The Declaration of Independent Filmmaking: An Insider's Guide to Making Movies Outside of Hollywood


Less than a decade since they began working in the movies, Mark and Michael Polish have established themselves as critically acclaimed, award-winning independent filmmakers. Their innovative approach to art direction, use of digital photography, and ability to attract stellar talent to their modestly budgeted films sprang from necessity; now these aesthetics have become admired trademarks of their work.
Infused with this same balance of artistic integrity and popular appeal, The...

See more details below
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (36) from $1.99   
  • New (11) from $3.84   
  • Used (25) from $1.99   
Sending request ...


Less than a decade since they began working in the movies, Mark and Michael Polish have established themselves as critically acclaimed, award-winning independent filmmakers. Their innovative approach to art direction, use of digital photography, and ability to attract stellar talent to their modestly budgeted films sprang from necessity; now these aesthetics have become admired trademarks of their work.
Infused with this same balance of artistic integrity and popular appeal, The Declaration of Independent Filmmaking is a practical guide to writing, shooting, editing, scoring, promoting, and distributing short and feature films. Mark and Michael have packed this book with star-studded, often hilarious tales from their own experiences—as well as helpful insider photos. This is an indispensable resource for anyone interested in filmmaking, whether a high school student with a $500 budget or a serious filmmaker looking for a fresh approach.

A Harvest Original

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

"Another masterpiece . . . After Twin Falls, Idaho, here's more evidence that the Polish twins are the real thing."—Roger Ebert, Chicago Tribune


"Eerily effective . . . Twin Falls, Idaho has style, gravity, and originality to spare."—The New York Times

Library Journal
DIY film literature grows with these two additions to the genre. Drawing on many years of experience as a screenwriting professor and story analyst, Gilles (NYU Tisch Sch. of the Arts; The Screenwriter Within) now attempts to venture into a broader topic: the experience of going through film school. Readers hoping for a comprehensive encapsulation will be disappointed. Direction is only touched on and technical aspects are barely considered in favor of a focus on writing (not a bad strategy for film beginners to adopt). Included are essays on finding script ideas, writing exercises, writing short scripts, and rewriting, as well as extensive guidance on treatment writing and outlining and advice about working with agents. Filmmakers Mark and Michael Polish employ a drastically different style and method, culling their experience writing, producing, and directing three moderately successful feature films-Norfolk, Jackpot, and Twin Falls Idaho. Chronicled here is the entire filmmaking process, from conception and fund-raising to shooting and finishing to selling and marketing one's film. Overall, the Polish brothers, joined by Jonathan Sheldon, head of their company's development, write in a way that illuminates the details more clearly than most technical scribes. While this approach doesn't raise Declaration above some of the genre's standards, e.g., Lenny Lipton's Independent Filmmaking, the authors' narrative form will certainly appeal to aspiring filmmakers. Meanwhile, what Gilles really offers is explicit guidance on film writing; that isn't to say that his book doesn't have a place in the growing canon of filmmaking books for neophytes, just that the title is misleading. Both works are recommended for general collections and especially for film libraries and performing arts collections.-Michael Tierno, New York Copyright 2005 Reed Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780156029520
  • Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  • Publication date: 10/17/2005
  • Pages: 336
  • Product dimensions: 6.56 (w) x 7.96 (h) x 0.54 (d)

Meet the Author

Born in El Centro, California in the early 1970's, Mark and Michael Polish , identical twin brothers collectively known as the Polish Brothers, have made three critically lauded and award-winning independent feature films: Twin Falls Idaho, Jackpot, and Northfork. Their filmmaking awards and citations include the John Cassavetes Award at the 2002 Independent Spirit Awards and a 2001 Seattle International Film Festival New American Cinema Award. Their films have collectively been nominated for five Independent Spirit Awards. They both live in the Los Angeles area.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

What Makes a Film Independent?

It's hard to say exactly what is or isn't an independent film. Most people think of financial limitations as the hallmark of an indie, but a low budget is by no means a definitive marker. If that were the case, pornography and soft-core cable movies would have to be considered independent films. Perhaps the best way to approach a definition is to define what independent film is independent of. Certainly, part of this is being unattached to the major Hollywood studios, Hollywood micro-studios, or Hollywood production companies, which ordinarily prioritize financial gain before artistic endeavor.

This should be seen for what it is. It is entirely understandable that with tens of millions of dollars on the line, profitability has to be an imperative for a studio and its film executives. To them, movies are products. To ensure profitability, studios test-market and edit a film accordingly, control the casting, make mandatory script changes, and demand contractual control over fundamental creative decisions that will have an impact on the essence of the film. Historically, the independent filmmakers' gospel has been to shun decisive creative interference. The films they made were, thus, divorced from the Hollywood studio system. An independent film was the way for a director to show a studio what he or she was capable of without its involvement.

Creative independence in the film world is risky because the chance of success is so remote. Of the thousands of films made each year with private equity (money that comes from an outside source), only a small number are accepted into the Sundance Film Festival or another major festival, and of those, even fewer get picked up for distribution. The ability to secure private equity often has more to do with the state of the economy than the quality of a screenplay. But for a first-time independent filmmaker, private equity is usually the only option to pursue. The creative upside to this is that being removed from the "hit-making" devices of Hollywood allows a young filmmaker to find his or her own voice. This is the other part of what independent connotes. Whatever the story, an independent film attempts to tell it in an original, visionary way. Attempt is the key word here, because it doesn't mean the film is brilliant or even good, but it does imply that the filmmaker is trying to express his or her vision as an artist. Of course, this is a subjective evaluation. However, we contend it is quite like the obscenity definition given by the late Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart: "You know it when you see it."

Unfortunately, this interpretive nature of independent film's definition has allowed virtually any movie that is just slightly left of center to hide in the oeuvre of independent film. Savvy Hollywood marketers now regularly label low-budget films, regardless of their artistic ambitions, as "indies." Independent film as a catch moniker is so broadly used nowadays that it has been reduced to the equivalent of a "fat-free" label on cheese. These "independent" studio films are directly affiliated with the Hollywood studios and were born through their devices. Not that they are all bad films, but many of them do not embody the values or the struggle of independent film.

Independent film started to become more of a brand than a movement by the mid-1990s, after several independent films crossed over into the mainstream. When Hollywood smells money, it soon invades. And why not? Hollywood saw a cheap product grossing ten, twenty, or even a hundred times its cost- and recognized a chance to turn a huge profit. Would-be commercial filmmakers saw an opportunity to show Hollywood that they didn't need big budgets to have a commercial success. Thus was the birth of what we call cheap mainstream. The success of cheap mainstream created a lottery-ticket market for independents where suddenly the little independent film festivals became a marketplace for selling indies to Hollywood. Independent film was no longer a small niche movement; it had become a brand. And indie success by Hollywood standards was measured by a film's crossover potential: whether it could eventually move from the art-house crowd to the masses.

While this book isn't intended as a history lesson on independent film, some historical perspective is worth researching. If you're interested, there are many thoroughly researched tomes chronicling the rise of New Wave cinema from Europe, through the beginning of American independent cinema, to present-day indie filmmaking. Our goal in writing this book was to illustrate a point about the realities of getting indies made in today's marketplace.

By 1997, when we were making our first film, Twin Falls Idaho, the indie atmosphere had wafted into the backyard of Hollywood. Even with our budget of $500,000, there was pressure from the investor and producers to make our movie more accessible, to create a film that would appeal to the malls of America. But we knew the story we wanted to tell wasn't right for a committee process of test marketing and editing. While we wanted to protect the investment, we felt we shouldn't have the kind of burden Hollywood puts on filmmakers making $20 or $30 million movies. Our first concerns were to protect our voice and vision as filmmakers, and we believed that Twin Falls would be a worthwhile film only if it was made without dubious compromises.

As we started to edit Twin Falls, there was a disagreement between the producers and us on how the film should be cut. It had to do with length and chronology. One producer suggested we start the film with a flashback and voice-over, which would have dumbed the story down for a mainstream crowd. While the producers' points could be valid from a commercial standpoint (other than the serious suggestion that we trim the film down to ninety minutes so that it could play on airplanes, which even Hollywood movies don't undertake until an airline has licensed the film), we simply disagreed.

Things became more contentious when Twin Falls was subjected to a private test screening, where one of the producers gave out scorecards to an invited audience so they could rate the film. Suddenly, we were being subjected to the mainstream marketing machine when that wasn't part of our original deal. Moreover, this didn't make sense for the film; the subject matter wasn't mainstream. There was no way we were going to rework this film into the standard Hollywood criteria, and, besides, we didn't have the money or resources to reshoot even if every scorecard wanted the same unanimous change. We knew that even if 80 percent of the audience didn't want one of the twins to die, we couldn't please them even if we had wanted to. Ultimately, the only thing the test screening accomplished was to make everyone involved very insecure about the choices we had made as filmmakers.

These types of conflicts are more the norm than the exception in today's independent film marketplace. Many filmmakers, after the Sundance high of screening (and for some of them selling) their movie in Park City, wake up to a nightmare of recuts and test marketing. Protecting the independence of a film doesn't stop after production is wrapped. Many independent filmmakers think that once they have locked picture, the war is over, that the film is creatively protected. But in reality, an indie is still vulnerable after it is sold and while the distributor is focused on selling the film.

Copyright © 2005 by Mark Polish and Michael Polish

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to the following address: Permissions Department, Harcourt, Inc., 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, Florida 32887-6777.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Preface ix
Introduction: The Pipe Dream 1

What Makes a Film Independent? 7

Our First Day 15

Writing 27

Pricing Your Film 55

Financing Your Film 65

Preproduction 89

Casting 105

Production Design 123

Camera 143

Producing 161

Directing 175

Postproduction 193

Film Editing 203

Music 215

Sound 227

Independent Distribution 241

Welcome to Hollywood 259

Epilogue 267
Acknowledgments 271
Glossary 272
Movie Synopses 295
Index 298
Photo Credits 311

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 11, 2006


    Unable to afford an expensive film school and unsure where to begin, I found this book concise, hilarious and full of relevent information I can refer to over and over again. The Polish Brothers tenacity and sincerity is inspiring, and their story of how they became filmmakers has helped me to get to get closer to my dream of making movies one day.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)