The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You've Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson

The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You've Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson

3.4 44
by David Barton

View All Available Formats & Editions

Thomas Jefferson stands falsely accused of several crimes, among them infidelity and disbelief. Noted historian David Barton now sets the record straight. Having borne the brunt of a smear campaign that started more than two centuries ago, the reputation and character of American president Thomas Jefferson shows considerable tarnish, as lies and misunderstandings have


Thomas Jefferson stands falsely accused of several crimes, among them infidelity and disbelief. Noted historian David Barton now sets the record straight. Having borne the brunt of a smear campaign that started more than two centuries ago, the reputation and character of American president Thomas Jefferson shows considerable tarnish, as lies and misunderstandings have gathered on his legacy. Noted early-America historian David Barton scours out the truth. -Jefferson and Sally: Did he really have children by his slave, Sally Hemings? -Jefferson and Jesus: Did he really abandon the faith of ...

Editorial Reviews

Professor Emeritus of Economics at Bellevue Univer Dr. Judd W. Patton

“In his new edition of The Jefferson Lies, David Barton decisively---with his characteristic impeccable scholarship and comprehensive historical research---makes his case for re-discovering the “real Jefferson” by exposing significant myths put forth by liberal scholars about our third President. . . . David Barton righty identifies and destroys each of these myths about our beloved President in just one chapter alone!

Dr. John Eidsmoe

“David Barton has devoted his life to researching American history and educating us about the Christian foundations of this nation. His most recent book, The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Lies We’ve All Been told about Thomas Jefferson is possibly his best, because it provides convincing evidence that Jefferson was not a Deist as many have assumed. . . . The Jefferson Lies makes a worthwhile contribution by presenting a side of Jefferson that has been largely neglected.

Dr. White McKenzie Wellborn

“The Jefferson Lies” is a well-written, accurately and profusely referenced book. Thomas Jefferson, one of the greatest of our founders and surely the most visionary of all of our Presidents, has in recent years come under misleading and at times vicious attacks upon his legacy. David Barton has risen to Jefferson’s defense with an excellent publication. Americans who are proud of their country and its founders will enjoy this book.

Steve Fitschen

“The revised Paperback Edition of David Barton’s The Jefferson Lies is an important book. In the wake of the firestorm over the original version, David has completely reviewed his original work on his seven major myths about Jefferson. Seriously examining both praise and criticism, David has done whatever needed doing: revising, deleting, or—in most cases—sticking to his guns or making his case even more strongly. While showing the humility to adjust when necessary, he also has the courage to not back down in the face of controversy.”

Product Details

WallBuilder Press
Publication date:
Sold by:
Barnes & Noble
Sales rank:
File size:
278 KB

Read an Excerpt


Exposing the Myths You've Always Believed about Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Nelson

Copyright © 2012 David Barton
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-1-59555-459-8

Chapter One

Lie #1

Thomas Jefferson Fathered Sally Hemings' Children

In 1998 the journal Science released the results of a DNA inquiry into whether Jefferson had fathered any children through his slave Sally Hemings, specifically her first child, Thomas, or her fifth child, Eston. In conjunction with the announcement, Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Professor Joseph Ellis wrote an accompanying article in the journal Nature declaring that the question was now settled—that DNA testing had conclusively proved that Thomas Jefferson had indeed fathered a Hemings child, thus scientifically affirming a two-centuries-old rumor.

That 1998 announcement concerning early American history was actually relevant to events occurring at the time, for it came at the commencement of President Bill Clinton's impeachment proceedings for lying under oath to a grand jury about his sexual activities with a young intern inside the Oval Office. News reports immediately pounced on the fortuitous DNA announcement, arguing that if a man as great as Thomas Jefferson had engaged in sexual trysts, then President Clinton should not face questions about his sexual misbehavior. After all, such conduct had not diminished the stature of Jefferson, they argued, so it should not be allowed to weaken that of Clinton.

Professor Ellis agreed, candidly admitting, "President William Jefferson Clinton also has a vested interest in this [DNA] revelation." Significantly, just weeks before Ellis' bombshell announcement about Jefferson, he had added his signature as a cosigner of an October 1998 ad in the New York Times opposing the impeachment of Clinton. Henry Gee, a staff writer for Nature who also wrote a piece as part of the initial revelation, acknowledged that the DNA report provided much-needed cover for President Clinton:

The parallels between the story of Jefferson's sexual indiscretions and the travails of the current President are close. Thomas Jefferson came close to impeachment—but the scandal did not affect his popularity and he won the 1804 Presidential election by a landslide. And if President William Jefferson Clinton has cause to curse the invention of DNA fingerprinting, the latest report shows that it has a long reach indeed—back to the birth of the United States itself.

Dr. David Mayer, professor of law and history, was a member of an independent "Scholars Commission" later convened over the Jefferson-Hemings issue. He agreed that the timing of the DNA article had not been by accident:

Professor Ellis' accompanying article also noted, quite frankly, "Politically, the Thomas Jefferson verdict is likely to figure in upcoming impeachment hearings on William Jefferson Clinton's sexual indiscretions, in which DNA testing has also played a role." In television interviews following release of the article, Professor Ellis elaborated on this theme; and Clinton's apologists made part of their defense the notion that every President—even Jefferson—had his "sexual indiscretions."

As far as Clinton defenders were concerned (especially his supporters in the media), the announcement of Jefferson's alleged moral failings was a gift from heaven. The entire nation was bombarded with the Jefferson paternity story for weeks; and the news of his moral failings was burned deeply into the consciousness of Americans. But many groups beyond Clinton supporters also welcomed the test results as useful to their particular agendas.

For example, the Jefferson-Hemings affair became the perfect platform for the feminist movement to discuss the nature of sexual relations. Many in that movement had already asserted that any type of sexual relations between a male and a female constituted rape, but this development seemed especially to prove their point. It was questioned whether any sex could be consensual if it was between individuals from different stations in life—such as Hemings and Jefferson. Many feminist writers, including Fawn Brodie, Barbara Chase-Riboud, and Annette Gordon-Reed, had even authored books about the older Jefferson and the younger Hemings.

Another movement that benefited from the Jefferson-Hemings story included those who wished to keep open the racial wounds of previous generations. They pointed to Jefferson and his sexual exploitation of the slave Hemings as proof of how all African Americans were treated by all white Americans, not only in Jefferson's day, but also throughout much of the rest of American history. The Jefferson announcement rekindled demands for restitutionary policies that would provide preferential treatment and elevation of status and opportunity as repayment for past wrongs committed.

However, only eight weeks after the initial blockbuster DNA story was issued, it was retracted quietly and without fanfare, with the scientific researcher who had conducted the DNA test announcing that it actually had not proven that Jefferson fathered any children with Hemings. But this news exonerating Jefferson did not make the same splash in the national headlines, for it aided no agenda being advanced at that time. Since doing justice to Jefferson's reputation was not deemed to be a worthy national consideration in and of itself, the retraction story was simply buried or ignored.

Consider the damage done by this false reporting. Ask any adult today whether it has been scientifically proven that Jefferson fathered illegitimate children with Hemings, and they will likely answer with a resounding "Yes!" The nation certainly heard and still remembers the news barrage following the initial report, but the silence surrounding its retraction was deafening.

Yet notwithstanding the 1998 DNA testing results, the fact remains that charges of a Jefferson moral failure with Hemings had circulated for almost two centuries before the DNA testing was undertaken. Even without the DNA testing results, it is still appropriate to ask why such charges were originally leveled against Jefferson. Did he actually commit the sexual misbehavior with which he has long been charged? After all, we're often told that where there's smoke, there's surely fire; and if it had not been for the charges raised long ago, no one today would have even considered undertaking DNA testing.

Here is some background to this situation. Sally Hemings was a young slave girl who served Jefferson's daughters at the family home, Monticello. Jefferson had five daughters: Martha (nicknamed "Patsy"), Mary (nicknamed "Maria" but also called "Polly"), Jane (who died very young), Lucy Elizabeth I (who also died very young), and Lucy Elizabeth II. During the American Revolution Jefferson was frequently away from his beloved family, serving in the Virginia legislature, the Continental Congress, and as state governor.

In 1784, following the Revolution, Jefferson was sent by Congress as an ambassador to Paris. His wife had recently died, so he took Patsy, the oldest of his three remaining daughters, with him to France. The other two daughters, Mary and Lucy Elizabeth II, stayed behind with their aunt. But after Jefferson departed Monticello with Patsy, the toddler Lucy Elizabeth II unexpectedly died, so Jefferson sent for his only remaining daughter, Mary, to join him in France. Accompanying the eight-year-old Mary on the voyage as her companion was the fourteen-year-old Sally Hemings, whom Jefferson described as "Maria's maid."

Critics charge that after the girls arrived in Paris, Jefferson began a sexual relationship with Hemings, who was nearly thirty years his junior and the same age as his oldest daughter, fourteen-year-old Patsy—a relationship that produced some or all of Sally's children. (Most scholars believe that Hemings had five children.)

Following the initial DNA testing announcement that Jefferson was the father of Hemings' fifth child, Eston, some historians, including many who had previously believed Jefferson to be innocent of the paternity charges, declared Jefferson guilty, and the two-century-old debate finally closed. But the subsequent retraction certainly changed matters. Yet, regardless of the on-and-then-off DNA testing results about Eston, was there a sexual moral failure between Jefferson and Hemings?

The evidence against Jefferson may be divided into three categories:

1. The original 1998 DNA report. While this category of evidence is now discredited, it is important to understand the reason behind the retraction.

2. Oral tradition from two of Sally's children, the strongest of which involved Thomas Woodson, her first child. Two centuries ago, he claimed (and others repeated) that Sally Hemings was his mother and Thomas Jefferson his father. The fact that Sally had named the boy Thomas was used as evidence to confirm that he had indeed been fathered by Jefferson. Sally's fourth child, Madison, also made similar claims.

3. Published newspaper reports from Jefferson's day specifically charging him with fathering Hemings' children.

Consider the evidence.

Category 1: The DNA Evidence

To delve further into the story behind the retraction of the 1998 DNA testing results, begin with Professor Ellis' original announcement in Nature, which had declared:

Almost two hundred years ago Thomas Jefferson was alleged to have fathered children by his slave Sally Hemings. The charges have remained controversial. Now, DNA analysis confirms that Jefferson was indeed the father of at least one of Hemings' children [Eston].

In the two weeks following that announcement, 221 printed news articles repeated the claim, embedding it deeply in the minds of Americans. Typical articles declared:

Did the author of the Declaration of Independence take a slave for his mistress? DNA tests say yes.... The evidence here, in other words, removes any shadow of a doubt that Thomas Jefferson sired at least one son by Sally Hemings. —U.S. News Online

DNA Test Finds Evidence of Jefferson Child by Slave. —New York Times on the Web

Jefferson affair no longer rumor.... The DNA tests end nearly two centuries of speculation.... The evidence has shifted so startlingly that it now appears likely that Jefferson fathered four or five children by Hemings. —USA Today

[G]enetic testing almost certainly proves that our third president fathered at least one child by Sally Hemings. —Washington Post

The opportunity to announce these results afforded many Deconstructionists in the media a welcome occasion to denigrate Jefferson. One national columnist gloated, "What a relief. Now Jefferson can be brought down off the god-like pedestal on which some have tried to elevate him." He continued, "How are we to view Jefferson now? How about 'deadbeat dad'? That's what you call fathers who run away from their responsibilities to their children."

Another described him as a "slave-owning, serial flogger, sex maniac." Others portrayed him as a child molester, using an innocent adolescent girl for sex:

We have recently learned through DNA testing that Jefferson was probably the father of Sally Hemings' youngest child, a boy, and maybe the father of the other four children as well.... He took her to Paris when she was 13, and when she returned two years later, she was pregnant. —Washington Post

What type of relationship could this have been, considering the profound power differences between master and slave? ... [S]he was 13 or 14 and he was 43. —Chicago Tribune

In 1789, Sally Hemings returned with the Jefferson family to Virginia. By then, Sally was 16 or 17 and pregnant. —New York Times on the Web

The hysterics against Jefferson became so great that some questioned why his image appeared on our coins; others clamored for "the dismantling of the Jefferson Memorial" in Washington, DC, and "the removal of his face from Mount Rushmore."

The DNA evidence as originally presented by Professor Ellis and reported by the media had seemed both unassailable and irrefutable, but there were several critical facts in the report that most Americans never heard.

For example, the original 1998 report contained a significant finding about which scholars and the media remained conspicuously silent:

President Thomas Jefferson was accused of having fathered a child, Tom, by Sally Hemings. Tom was said to have been born in 1790, soon after Jefferson and Sally Hemings returned from France, where he had been minister. Present-day members of the African-American Woodson family believe that Thomas Jefferson was the father of Thomas Woodson, whose name comes from his later owner.... [But DNA testing shows] Thomas Woodson was not Thomas Jefferson's son. (emphasis added)

So, the longest rumored charge against Jefferson, originally printed two centuries ago in publications of the day, was now proven wrong. Jefferson had been completely exonerated of that longstanding claim.

Additionally, when Nature issued its embarrassing retraction, it sheepishly confessed, "The title assigned to our study was misleading." 31 Why? Because no DNA sample from the Thomas Jefferson family line had been used in the testing—and the public was never told of this significant omission. It does seem that if someone wanted to test Jefferson's paternity that his DNA should be used.

Genetic DNA paternity testing requires the testing of a Y chromosome from a male descendant of the subject because the Y chromosome in males remains virtually unchanged from generation to generation. But Thomas Jefferson had no male descendants from which to take a DNA sample. His only son had died at birth. Since Jefferson had no surviving male descendants, the researchers therefore chose to test the Y chromosomes from the descendants of Field Jefferson, Thomas's uncle.

The researchers found that the configuration of the Y chromosomes in the descendants of Field Jefferson—a general configuration common to the entire Jefferson family—was indeed present in the descendants of Sally Hemings' youngest child, Eston. Therefore, on the basis of DNA testing, the most that researchers could conclusively say was that some Jefferson male—and there were twenty-six Jefferson males living in the area at the time—had a relationship with Sally Hemings that resulted in the birth of Eston. But which Jefferson was it?

A distinguished commission of noted authorities was convened to examine the matter, and it concluded:

There are at least ten possible fathers for Sally Hemings' children who could have passed down genetic material that might produce children physically resembling Thomas Jefferson and who are thought to have visited Monticello regularly during the years Sally Hemings was having children.

After investigating the ten possible fathers, the group concluded that the "case against some of Thomas Jefferson's relatives appears significantly stronger than the case against him." It was these other nine unaddressed paternity alternatives that made the DNA testing announcement suspect. Thomas Jefferson's own DNA was not checked, and with the exception of Field Jefferson, the DNA was not checked for the rest of the Jefferson males living in the area. World therefore correctly reported:

According to the genetic evidence, the father could have been Jefferson. Or it could have been his brother Randolph. Or one of Randolph's sons. Or, presumably, his uncle Field, or his son George or one of his sons.... Any of these men had access to Monticello and could have been culpable. (emphasis added)

National columnist Mona Charen accurately summarized the scope of the testing results:

The DNA data did rule Jefferson out as the father of Thomas Woodson, the eldest of Sally's sons, and shed no light on the rest. That leaves a scenario in which Jefferson's sexual liaison with his slave [that produced Eston] is estimated to have begun when he was 65 years old. Possible certainly, but likely? While the DNA data adds to our knowledge—it is clear that there was mixing of Hemings and Jefferson genes sometime in the past 200 years—they do not provide names or dates. They most definitely do not "prove" anything about Thomas Jefferson himself.

Herbert Barger, the Jefferson family historian and genealogist who assisted in the DNA testing, explained:

My study indicates to me that Thomas Jefferson was NOT the father of Eston or any other Hemings child. The DNA study ... indicates that Randolph [Thomas' younger brother] is possibly the father of Eston and maybe the others.... [T]hree of Sally Hemings' children, Harriet, Beverly, and Eston (the latter two not common names), were given names of the Randolph family. (emphasis added)


Excerpted from The JEFFERSON LIES by DAVID BARTON Copyright © 2012 by David Barton. Excerpted by permission of Thomas Nelson. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Meet the Author

David Barton is the founder and president of WallBuilders, a national pro-family organization that presents America’s forgotten history and heroes, with an emphasis on our moral, religious, and constitutional heritage. He is the author of many best-selling books, including Original Intent, The Bulletproof George Washington, American History in Black and White, and The Question of Freemasonry and the Founding Fathers. He addresses more than four hundred groups each year. Barton was named by Time magazine as one of America s twenty-five most influential evangelicals, and he has received numerous national and international awards, including Who’s Who in Education and Daughters of the American Revolution's highest award, the Medal of Honor. David and his wife, Cheryl, have three grown children.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >

The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You've Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson 3.4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 44 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
It's interesting to see how those that preach tolerance like it is some kind of holy doctrine are so completely intolerant of Christianty, God, or anything that doesn't align with their worldview. David Barton has the largest collection of original historical documents and letters from the founding of America of both private and public collections. This alone makes him uniquely qualified to write as an authority on the subject. Especially considering many historians and indoctrinators (educators) get their research 2nd or 3rd hand or simply make assumptions. In an age when historical revisionism is rampant it's nice to read the truth about our history backed by the irrefutable documents written by the founders themselves. Speculation and assumptions based on someones modern political persuasions is not history as some would like you to believe, it is propaganda. And as much as it pains some to admit it, this country was founded by Christian men and women and our founding documents were based on Biblical teachings. As evidenced by the many original historical documents, letters, journals and writings in David Barton's collections as well as the many other public and private collections across the country.
Zor-El More than 1 year ago
Take the low reviews with a grain of salt. Barton does a tremendous job in this book of taking each Jefferson myth to task. If one is objective and fair to him they have to admit that far from taking a few lines here and there to make his point he documents heavily from original source material every single point he makes and gives numerous examples to support his thesis. His work is enlightening to say the least on a man that in many ways America has forgotten. Does Barton hold a view? Of course, and he is very open and up front about that. So does every single historical writer out there whether they admit it or not. I have noted that the bad reviews (including the one from the alleged Ph.d) are dripping with vitriol but absent of actual notations of errors that they believe Barton has made. Of course a review isn't a place for a major rebutal but if his work was so shallow an example with a source would be interesting. When all is said and done I simply would suggest that anyone who is interested simply read this tremendously interesting work and check out his sources. Even if one were to disagree with some of his conclusions I believe they will come away with a fresh interest in this iconic American.
GoldenEagleCW More than 1 year ago
I just finished reading the book. I've read a great deal of the history of the Revolutionary period, including several Jefferson biographies. I've always been confused about so many contradictions I've found in most of these books, primarily the apparent contradiction between Jefferson's personality and his relationship with Sally Hemmings and Christianity. I believe Barton has resolved those for me. The alleged relationship with Sally Hemmings never made any sense, based on Jefferson's character. His alleged atheism too never made any sense based on his well-known writings. Barton apparently has answered my doubts, though I will continue my research into Jefferson and the Revolutionary era, with an eye to proving or disproving what Barton has said. The Jefferson Lies is a great read. I recommend it highly for any student of history with the caveat that those who are anti-Christian will not likely change their views and will simply not accept what is written here or in the book.
katiekatPD More than 1 year ago
This book should be mandatory for every school child in America and every former and current 'sitting' member of Congress, Supreme Court and the White House. It is obvious that we today have been deliberately and successfully 'separated' from our historical roots; and therefore we are 'dying on the vine' as a nation. I'm 72 years old and this is the 1st time that actual history has been taught since the author has extensively quoted and written from the original documents of that time. I dare you to read it; I double-dare you!
Mktony More than 1 year ago
Well constructed debunking of the historical myths surronding Jefferson, with a note section to help you research the topic yourself.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
This is a factual and well documented & well written book that debunks the Progressive spiel/cover-up of this Founder. The one star raters are obviously Atheists who either can't handle, nor abide the truth because it doesn't fit their respective agenda. The truth has no agenda.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Barton cares nothing for history. "Citing a loss of confidence in the book's details, Christian publisher Thomas Nelson is ending the publication and distribution of the bestseller, The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You've Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson." If you wish to learn about Jefferson's true views on religion, there are several editions of the Jefferson-Adams letters in which the two ex-presidents discuss their ideas; reading Jefferson's actual words, not distorted selection, will reveal his (and Adams' ) dissatisfaction with the notion of biblical inerrancy. Facts matter, whether or not you agree with Jefferson.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I was fortunate enough to have 16 years of catholic education. For those of you who are rabid fundamentalists, Catholicism IS Christianity. The nuns who taught used textbooks which explicitly stated that Jefferson was a Deist. What Barton doesn't tell you is that TJ actually cut up his bible, removing all the references to miracles, which makes it pretty obvious that he did not see Scripture as inerrant, and probably did not view Jesus as the son of YHWH. As for Sally Hemings, it is definite that her descenants are related to TJ. DNA tests have proved it conclusively. So either Thomas or his brother sired those children. Do recall that Sally was the hal sister of his late wife, so it is possible she resembled his wife. Neither his Deist beliefs or fathering illegitimate children detract from his brilliance. I cannot.say the same for Barton, who doesn't even dare to hode his bias.
Kerry_Nietz More than 1 year ago
Prior to reading this book, I had only surface-level knowledge of Thomas Jefferson. I knew he was an important and central figure in the founding of America, and I also suspected he was an intellectual genius. There were many things I’d heard about him that troubled me, though, too. I knew he owned slaves. I’d heard the rumors about illegitimate children. Vaguely remembered there was a movie with that premise. (Never saw it.) I also was used to hearing that he was a deist, or possibly an atheist. “The Jefferson Lies” really informed and improved my opinion of Jefferson. It is skillfully written and divided into logical chapters—one for each of the apparent lies told about the famous founder. Each chapter then refutes, or at the very least, draws into serious question, the commonly held belief about him. Unlike many books that deal with history or historical figures, this book isn’t a slog to get through. It is a brisk read, yet it is filled with vital history—and much of it through the words of Jefferson himself. I appreciated the fact that the author gives context for what Jefferson said and did. Often this is left out of the discussion. But in a brief manner, Barton manages to paint Jefferson into the tapestry of the times he lived in. I also liked the breadth of Jefferson’s life being mentioned and explored. It is true that most people’s opinions and beliefs change over time, and it is easy for sloppy historians to characterize an individual by a particular instance in their life, or a particular comment. To fit their own preconceived notions. (This book is HEAVILY footnoted, BTW. It has nearly fifty pages of footnotes, printed in a tiny, tiny font.) All in all, I think “The Jefferson Lies” is a great primer on the life of a great man. As mentioned, my attitude toward Jefferson has changed. What started as an important, yet intellectually troublesome, individual for me has become one of the founders I’d most like to meet, second only to Washington. I recommend this book to everyone.
Anonymous 11 months ago
Seeing some of Jefferson's words in context makes a world of difference. He has certainly been mischaracterized, from the evidence presented in this book. The author's dismissal of Jefferson's religious beliefs later in life isn't great, but a relatively minor flaw to an otherwise great, scholarly work.
ACE62 12 months ago
My first question is, how does DNA lie with the Hemmings? It is well documented that Jefferson DNA and Hemmings are related. It is actually noted at Montcello. Second, Jefferson wrote clearly to Adams (a Unitarian) that he did not wish to share his beliefs with others because of the trouble it would cause him (since he did not believe in miracles or the trinity). I would recommend everyone to read the "Jefferson Bible" that he cut and pasted his way of seeing his religion. I would also encourage people to read the letters that are easily available of Jefferson and Adams. Revision of history to enforce your beliefs can be convenient.
drglennking More than 1 year ago
As an academic I learned from a number of liberal and centrist colleagues that much of the Jefferson legend is incorrect. These tidbits included his right-wing positions on topics such as state's rights. Consequently, I'm amused by the attempts here to portray the book as a brave 'conservative' stand against the godless liberals. Looks to me like this is right-wing political correctness, which is just as egregious as the same thing on the left.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Barton is an ideologue on a mission. "Popular History" is not historical scholarship. The disgruntlement of some that their "versions" of history are attacked as "versions" is predictable. They hate any criticism. Barton has no reputation as a serious historian. No good one. It's no accident his book is listed here with a similar one by Brian Kilmeade, for God's sake.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I loved this book! All arguments are meticulously researched and approved, and are well expressed and very convincing. I wish all text books were this thorough! All in all, it is one of the best books I have ever read (and I have read a lot of good books), and anyone who opposes it has clearly either not read it or has not thought critically about it, being biased against something he does not know.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
It is amazing how many people would say this man is a right wing idiot and look at it from a dim point of view. I for example try to look at all the facts and find the truth before judging and also see their point. I think David has many valid points and some of the writings he mentions are available to many if you just take time to look it up.  
A-Freeman More than 1 year ago
A welcome narative which tackles historical issues and resets history to reflect an image previously tainted by controversy now restored to the reputation appropriate for a founder of such note. We'd reccommend this book for all students of American history.
TKM5073 More than 1 year ago
Excellent read and very educational. Barton used references, which can be researched and verified. It is nice to find an author who takes the time to document and verify information, and who cares to correct the hear-say that many individuals have been taught. Thanks Barton for teaching readers to take the time to verify information themselves, vs. believing what they are told. Most of all thank you for re-educating the 21st century about our founding fathers and the wisdom they each attributed to the making of our great country.
TruthbetoldJB More than 1 year ago
One only needs to read the original sources to see for themselves that Barton is 100% correct. Many modern historians have done their best to slander Jefferson by cherry-picking self serving quotes. You have to read Jefferson works and put them in the context the times. When you actually spend the time to do that you will see how accurate Barton is, period.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
ellid More than 1 year ago
Horrible, distorted, blatantly untruthful work by a Christian whose avowed intent is to turn our republic into a theocracy. Shame on the author for his lies.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Loved it! I wish every kid in America had to read it! So good to read a book with footnotes to original documents and not just others opinions. Hope every reads this a truly great book!!
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I loved this book, very informative. Magnificently done! David Barton uses Jefferson's own writings not what someone else picked out of Jefferson's writtings to make solid arguments about what Jefferson actually believed and did. If you read it cover to cover like I did, it gets a little monotonous because some of the same points are made regarding Jefferson's character. However, if you just want to read one or two of the chapters for that particular point or information, all information is included so each chapter can stand on it's own, you don't have to refer back to a previous chapter for information or references. Detailed reference list incase you want to read Jefferson's writings on your own.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I finally got the true story. I had always felt Jefferson was a good man, now I know he was.