The Liberal Consensus Reconsidered: American Politics and Society in the Postwar Era
When first published in 1976, Godfrey Hodgson’s America in Our Time won immediate recognition as a major interpretive study of the postwar era. Although the term liberal consensus, or its approximation, had received some previous expression, Hodgson was responsible for its entry into the lexicon of American history. Yet what he considered a substantive phenomenon would inevitably become a controversial paradigm as a massive outpouring of literature cited evidence of a significant conservative presence at the grassroots level from the 1930s to the 1960s. Here, leading scholars—including Hodgson himself—confront the longstanding theory that a liberal consensus shaped the United States after World War II. The essays draw on fresh research to examine how the consensus related to key policy areas, how it was viewed by different factions and groups, what its limitations were, and why it fell apart in the late 1960s. They find that although elite politicians from both parties did share certain principles that gave direction to postwar America, the nation still experienced major political, cultural, and ideological conflict. Identifying the forces at work that gave rise to a newly confident conservatism promoted by corporate leaders, Sunbelt boosters, and religious activists, the contributors offer new insights into the era and diverging opinions on one of the most influential interpretations of mid-twentieth-century U.S. history.
1124657500
The Liberal Consensus Reconsidered: American Politics and Society in the Postwar Era
When first published in 1976, Godfrey Hodgson’s America in Our Time won immediate recognition as a major interpretive study of the postwar era. Although the term liberal consensus, or its approximation, had received some previous expression, Hodgson was responsible for its entry into the lexicon of American history. Yet what he considered a substantive phenomenon would inevitably become a controversial paradigm as a massive outpouring of literature cited evidence of a significant conservative presence at the grassroots level from the 1930s to the 1960s. Here, leading scholars—including Hodgson himself—confront the longstanding theory that a liberal consensus shaped the United States after World War II. The essays draw on fresh research to examine how the consensus related to key policy areas, how it was viewed by different factions and groups, what its limitations were, and why it fell apart in the late 1960s. They find that although elite politicians from both parties did share certain principles that gave direction to postwar America, the nation still experienced major political, cultural, and ideological conflict. Identifying the forces at work that gave rise to a newly confident conservatism promoted by corporate leaders, Sunbelt boosters, and religious activists, the contributors offer new insights into the era and diverging opinions on one of the most influential interpretations of mid-twentieth-century U.S. history.
89.95 In Stock
The Liberal Consensus Reconsidered: American Politics and Society in the Postwar Era

The Liberal Consensus Reconsidered: American Politics and Society in the Postwar Era

The Liberal Consensus Reconsidered: American Politics and Society in the Postwar Era

The Liberal Consensus Reconsidered: American Politics and Society in the Postwar Era

Hardcover

$89.95 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    In stock. Ships in 1-2 days.
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

When first published in 1976, Godfrey Hodgson’s America in Our Time won immediate recognition as a major interpretive study of the postwar era. Although the term liberal consensus, or its approximation, had received some previous expression, Hodgson was responsible for its entry into the lexicon of American history. Yet what he considered a substantive phenomenon would inevitably become a controversial paradigm as a massive outpouring of literature cited evidence of a significant conservative presence at the grassroots level from the 1930s to the 1960s. Here, leading scholars—including Hodgson himself—confront the longstanding theory that a liberal consensus shaped the United States after World War II. The essays draw on fresh research to examine how the consensus related to key policy areas, how it was viewed by different factions and groups, what its limitations were, and why it fell apart in the late 1960s. They find that although elite politicians from both parties did share certain principles that gave direction to postwar America, the nation still experienced major political, cultural, and ideological conflict. Identifying the forces at work that gave rise to a newly confident conservatism promoted by corporate leaders, Sunbelt boosters, and religious activists, the contributors offer new insights into the era and diverging opinions on one of the most influential interpretations of mid-twentieth-century U.S. history.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780813054261
Publisher: University Press of Florida
Publication date: 04/11/2017
Pages: 304
Product dimensions: 6.20(w) x 9.30(h) x 1.00(d)

About the Author

Robert Mason, professor of history at the University of Edinburgh, is the author of The Republican Party and American Politics from Hoover to Reagan. Iwan Morgan, professor of United States studies at University College London, is the author of Reagan: American Icon and coeditor of From Sit-Ins to SNCC: The Student Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.

Table of Contents

Content Introduction: Reconsidering the Liberal Consensus 1 Robert Mason and Iwan Morgan 1. Revisiting the Liberal Consensus 12 Godfrey Hodgson 2. Historians and the Postwar Liberal Consensus 29 Michael Heale 3. The Reach and Limits of the Liberal Consensus 52 Gary Gerstle 4. The 1930s Roots of the Postwar “Consensus” 67 Wendy L. Wall 5. The Keynesian Consensus and Its Limits 86 Iwan Morgan 6. Social Welfare in the United States, 1945–1960 108 David Stebenne 7. Red-Hunting and Internal Security: Conflict in the Age of Consensus 127 Alex Goodall 8. Containment: A Consensual or Contested Foreign Policy? 148 Andrew Preston 9. Sunbelt Patriarchs: Lyndon B. Johnson, Barry Goldwater, and the New Deal Dissensus 167 Elizabeth Tandy Shermer 10. “Down the Middle of the Road”: Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Republican Party, and the Politics of Consensus and Conflict, 1949–1961 186 Robert Mason 11. “We Have Run Out of Poor People”: The Democratic Party’s Crisis of Identity in the 1950s 208 Jonathan Bell 12. Billy Graham’s Neo-evangelical Triumph and the Limits of the Liberal Consensus 227 Uta A. Balbier 13. Gender in an Era of Liberal Consensus 245 Helen Laville 14. Memories of the Movement: Civil Rights, the Liberal Consensus, and the March on Washington Twenty Years Later 262 George Lewis Contributors 283 Index 287

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

“An exceptionally fine collection that distills the very latest writing on midtwentieth-century U.S. politics and society.”—Gareth Davies, author of From Opportunity to Entitlement: The Transformation and Decline of Great Society Liberalism “Offers a diverse mix of interpretations that demonstrate how this era was often marked by intense political and cultural conflict. Rightly cautions against drawing too sharp a contrast between this period and the polarization of our time.”—Timothy N. Thurber, author of Republicans and Race: The GOP’s Frayed Relationship with African Americans, 1945–1974

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews