The Magus of Freemasonry: The Mysterious Life of Elias Ashmole--Scientist, Alchemist, and Founder of the Royal Societyby Tobias Churton
Tobias Churton's portrait of Elias Ashmole (1617-1692) offers a perfect illustration of the true Renaissance figure--the magus. Ashmole was a key figure in the birth of modern science, a missing link between operative and symbolic Freemasonry, and a vital transmitter of esoteric thought when the laws of science were first taking hold.See more details below
Tobias Churton's portrait of Elias Ashmole (1617-1692) offers a perfect illustration of the true Renaissance figure--the magus. Ashmole was a key figure in the birth of modern science, a missing link between operative and symbolic Freemasonry, and a vital transmitter of esoteric thought when the laws of science were first taking hold.
"This book is not only an excellent reference on the life of Elias Ashmole but also a most needed, in-depth study into the early transition from Operative to Speculative Freemasonry. It is highly recommended reading for the Masonic scholar."
- Inner Traditions/Bear & Company
- Publication date:
- Edition description:
- Sales rank:
- Product dimensions:
- 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.80(d)
Meet the Author
Tobias Churton is an Honorary Fellow of Exeter University where he is a course lecturer on Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism and teaches in England’s first master’s program in Western Esotericism. He studied theology at Oxford University and created the award-winning documentary series and accompanying book The Gnostics as well as several other films on Christian doctrine, mysticism, and magical folklore. He is the founding editor of Freemasonry Today magazine and author of Gnostic Philosophy. He lives in England.
More from this Author
Read an Excerpt
from the INTRODUCTION
Ex Uno Omnia
Lichfield has been considered by some to be the true spiritual center of England. And, as freemasons should know, “at the centre of the circle, a master mason cannot err.” Right at the center of that circle was Elias Ashmole, the privileged blend that is Renaissance Man, the British Hermetic philosopher par excellence, the self-styled Mercuriophilus Anglicus, and “Mighty Good Man.” And if Elias, the “expected one,” the harbinger of new arts and revealed knowledge, was indeed at the center, then Elias Ashmole was everything and everywhere. For 20th century English mage Edward Alexander Crowley, Ashmole was a saint of the Gnostic Church.
Ashmole was a magus. He inhabited a world where science and magick were still handmaidens to religion and philosophy. He was one of the last men of learning to enjoy that world before the family broke up. All too soon, science would leave home to plough her own furrow independently and, at times, in contempt of her troubled parents. Nevertheless, Ashmole was a founding member of the Royal Society--a harbinger of that fateful parting--and was himself unconcerned with theological disputes. The philosophy he espoused stood above them; and so did he. . . .
Elias Ashmole began calling himself the Mercuriophilus Anglicus (the English Mercury Lover) during the 1650s, after the illegal execution of King Charles I and the beginning of Oliver Cromwell’s decade of power. Mercurius was the Latin form of the Greek Hermes. As the divine Mercurius, Hermes, the pater philosophorum (father of philosophy), was crowned as the lord of the ancient art of alchemy.
Alchemy was the subject of Ashmole’s first three books. Mercurius is also a staple element of alchemical processes. In simple words, there could be no alchemical transformations without the implicit principle of transformation, mercurius. Hermes was the psychic lord (psychopomp) of the Art.
Alchemical mercury is not to be understood as the chemical element alone. According to the alchemist physician Paracelsus, “There are as many mercuries as there are things.” Alchemical mercury suffuses all things. It was thought to be the secret or hidden principle that is the creative essence of the cosmic All (Pan) in all things. While mercurius is the principle manifest in the strange properties of chemical mercury, the word nonetheless represents a deeper reality: the principle of change itself. . . .
from Chapter 4
Ashmole saw himself as “human mercury,” an agent for transformation, moving swiftly twixt earth and heaven, almost invisible: a presence. In the frontispiece to his translation of Fasciculus Chemicus (1650), he hides his face behind his astrological birth chart. The essential Elias was a kind of incarnation of the Hermetic principle; the real man could be found in the stars, albeit with his feet on the ground.
Men such as Ashmole are few in number, and vitally necessary. Like the Englishman of George Santayana’s observation, “It will be a black day for the human race when scientific blackguards, churls, and fanatics manage to supplant him.” Men of Ashmole’s cast stimulate the conditions that enable the genius of an Einstein, Newton, or Mozart to flourish.
He was a master’s master, most recognized by the few, not subject to that democratic assessment whose choices lie invariably between mediocre and superficial options. Democracy has always been a means chosen by the sick to control the healthy.
If these gifts of Ashmole’s were obvious to discerning scholars in his antiquarian works, they were no less intrinsic to Ashmole’s continuous engagement with drawing up astrological “figures” or “schemes” (as he called them) for himself and others. What appeared first as advice to ladies seeking husbands would eventually serve the deliberations of the monarch and his senior ministers.
Ashmole’s “figures” showed the positions of the sun and the moon as well as the seven known planets within the familiar twelve signs of the zodiac. The zodiac was divided into twelve “houses,” six above and six below the horizon; six east and six west of the meridian. The “cusp” or beginning of the first house (the “ascendant”) always coincides with the eastern point of the horizon; the seventh house cusp, with its western point. The cusps of the tenth house (“mid heaven”) and the fourth are determined by the meridian.
It should be emphasized that while there was science in astrology (astro-nomy, the law of the stars), interpretation (astro-logy, the logos or “word” of the stars) was an art and like all art requires experience and individual human sensitivity. Horary judgements were based on “favorable” or “unfavorable” positions (or “conjunctions”) of planets in the zodiac and in the twelve houses. Harmonious and disharmonious characteristics of certain angles (“aspects”) at which the sun, moon, and planets “beheld one another” were also taken into consideration. Plotting the angles or “aspects” required some knowledge of geometry. The when and the how of constructing a significant building involved both an astrological and a geometrical aspect. A significant building contained a “sign,” a celestial signal.
Different aspects of the celestial pattern touched planet Earth in different ways at different times, as did the rays of the sun and the moonlight that had such a demonstrable effect on planetary existence. These aspects might condition any significant detail of life. For example, a horoscope of the time in which a letter arrived could inform the astrologer of the writer’s sincerity or of hidden intentions. Horoscopes could be used to decide on the advisability of a projected meeting or “scheme,” or even the laying of a foundation stone. Furthermore, one might plan one’s future activities around propitious times. A number of projected scenarios could be set up as “figures.” The resulting figures were called “elections.” According to Ashmole’s Theatrum Chemicum Britannicum (1652, p. 451): “by Elections we may Governe, Order and Produce things as we please: Faber quisque Fortunae propriae.”
and post it to your social network
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
See all customer reviews >