The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice

( 36 )

Overview


"A religious fundamentalist, a political operative, a primitive sermonizer, and an accomplice of worldly secular powers. Her mission has always been of this kind. The irony is that she has never been able to induce anybody to believe her. It is past time that she was duly honored and taken at her word."

Among his many books, perhaps none have sparked more outrage than THE MISSIONARY POSITION, Christopher Hitchens's meticulous study of the life and deeds of Mother Teresa.

A ...

See more details below
Paperback
$11.99
BN.com price
(Save 20%)$14.99 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (18) from $6.64   
  • New (13) from $6.64   
  • Used (5) from $9.59   
The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$9.99
BN.com price

Overview


"A religious fundamentalist, a political operative, a primitive sermonizer, and an accomplice of worldly secular powers. Her mission has always been of this kind. The irony is that she has never been able to induce anybody to believe her. It is past time that she was duly honored and taken at her word."

Among his many books, perhaps none have sparked more outrage than THE MISSIONARY POSITION, Christopher Hitchens's meticulous study of the life and deeds of Mother Teresa.

A Nobel Peace Prize recipient beatified by the Catholic Church in 2003, Mother Teresa of Calcutta was celebrated by heads of state and adored by millions for her work on behalf of the poor. In his measured critique, Hitchens asks only that Mother Teresa's reputation be judged by her actions-not the other way around.

With characteristic élan and rhetorical dexterity, Hitchens eviscerates the fawning cult of Teresa, recasting the Albanian missionary as a spurious, despotic, and megalomaniacal operative of the wealthy who long opposed measures to end poverty, and fraternized, for financial gain, with tyrants and white-collar criminals throughout the world.

In a searching examination of the Teresa cult, the author of International Territory: The United Nations 1945-95 passes his final caustic judgement on Mother Teresa, reviewing her surrogate role as propagandist for the most extreme views, and concluding that she is not heaven's agent on Earth. "Hitchens argues his case with consummate style."--New York Times. 20 illustrations. 98 pp.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
An extended, nun-busting polemic from the The Nation columnist. (Apr.)
Library Journal
Hitchens (For the Sake of Argument, LJ 6/1/93), a columnist for the Nation, debunks missionary Mother Teresa's saintly, humane persona. He characterizes this 1979 Nobel Peace Prize winner as a political opportunistic promoter of a cult of submission among the poor, who suffer under her substandard medical care. Hitchens claims she is an ideological accomplice and moral legitimizer for the political right, including Charles Keating of the Savings and Loan scandal, Ronald Reagan, and the Haitian Duvaliers. This readable, caustic polemic is very short on biographical data and cited sources and lacks scholarly development. Given its provocative nature, it is recommended for libraries owning several titles about Mother Teresa despite its weaknesses.-Charles L. Lumpkins, Bloomsburg Univ. Lib., Pa.
New York Times Book Review
"Convincing . . . Hitchens argues his case with consummate style."
San Francisco Bay Guardian
"Anyone with ambivalent feelings about the influence of Catholic dogma (especially concerning sex and procreation); about the media's manufacture of images; or about what one can, should, or shouldn't do for someone less fortunate, should read this book."
Sunday Times (London)
"A dirty job but someone had to do it. By the end of this elegantly written, brilliantly argued piece of polemic, it is not looking good for Mother Teresa."
New York Press
"If there is a hell, Hitchens is going there for this book."
John Waters
"Hilariously mean."
From the Publisher
"Hilariously mean."—John Waters

"Convincing . . . Hitchens argues his case with consummate style."—New York Times Book Review

"Anyone with ambivalent feelings about the influence of Catholic dogma (especially concerning sex and procreation); about the media's manufacture of images; or about what one can, should, or shouldn't do for someone less fortunate, should read this book."—San Francisco Bay Guardian

"A dirty job but someone had to do it. By the end of this elegantly written, brilliantly argued piece of polemic, it is not looking good for Mother Teresa."—Sunday Times (London)

"If there is a hell, Hitchens is going there for this book."—New York Press

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781455523009
  • Publisher: Grand Central Publishing
  • Publication date: 4/10/2012
  • Pages: 128
  • Sales rank: 237,442
  • Product dimensions: 5.20 (w) x 7.90 (h) x 0.50 (d)

Meet the Author

Christopher Hitchens
Christopher Hitchens was a contributing editor to Vanity Fair, Slate, and The Atlantic, and the author of numerous books, including works on Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, and George Orwell. He also wrote the international bestsellers god Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, Hitch-22: A Memoir, and Arguably. He died in December 2011.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

The Missionary Position

Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice
By Hitchens, Christopher

Twelve

Copyright © 2012 Hitchens, Christopher
All right reserved.

ISBN: 9781455523009

A Miracle

Convulsions in nature, disorders, prodigies, miracles, though the most opposite to the plan of a wise superintendent, impress mankind with the strongest sentiments of religion.

David Hume, The Natural History of Religion

Upon the whole, mystery, miracle and prophecy are appendages that belong to fabulous and not to true religion. They are the means by which so many Lo heres! and Lo theres! have been spread about the world, and religion been made into a trade. The success of one impostor gave encouragement to another, and the quieting salvo of doing some good by keeping up a pious fraud, protected them from remorse.

Tom Paine, The Age of Reason

Thus we call a belief an illusion when a wish-fulfillment is a prominent factor in its motivation, and in doing so we disregard its relations to reality just as the illusion itself sets no store by verification.

Sigmund Freud, The Future of an Illusion

Intercession, the hallmark of sainthood, requires the certification of a miracle. Mother Teresa is already worshipped as something more than human, but she has not transcended our common lot to the extent of being cited as a wonder-worker by Mother Church. The printout of the titles provided me by the Library of Congress showed that almost all were published in the 1980s and 1990s, and it wasn’t until I had been through the list that I noticed what was not there: a 1971 book by Malcolm Muggeridge which argued, inter alia, that Mother Teresa’s miracle had already taken place.

Muggeridge’s book, Something Beautiful for God, was the outcome of a BBC documentary of the same name, screened in 1969. Muggeridge, who made something of a career out of ridiculing TV and showbiz values, claims that he began the project with no idea of the impression it would help to create. “Mother Teresa’s way of looking at life is barren soil for copy-writers,” he says, “and the poorest of the poor she cherishes offer little in the way of ratings.” If that disingenuous disclaimer was true when filming began, it ceased to be true very shortly after transmission had occurred, for it is from this film and this book that we can date the arrival of Mother Teresa’s “image” on the international retina.

Essential to Muggeridge’s project, essential indeed to the whole Mother Teresa cult, is the impression that Calcutta is a hellhole:

As it happened, I lived in Calcutta for eighteen months in the middle Thirties when I was working with the Statesman newspaper there, and found the place, even with all the comforts of a European’s life—the refrigerator, the servants, the morning canter round the Maidan or out at the Jodhpur Club, and so on—barely tolerable.

Since Muggeridge’s time, the city has not only had its own enormous difficulties to contend with but it has also been the scene of three major migrations of misery. Having been itself partitioned by a stupid British colonial decision before independence, Bengal took the brunt of the partitioning of all India into India and Pakistan in 1947. The Bangladesh war in 1971 and, later, the sectarian brushfires in Assam have swollen Calcutta’s population to a number far greater than it can hope to accommodate. Photographs of people living on pavements have become internationally recognized emblems of destitution. Mother Teresa’s emphasis on “the poorest of the poor and the lowest of the low” has served to reinforce the impression of Calcutta as a city of dreadful night, an impression which justly irritates many Bengalis.

The pleasant surprise that awaits the visitor to Calcutta is this: it is poor and crowded and dirty, in ways which are hard to exaggerate, but it is anything but abject. Its people are neither inert nor cringing. They work and they struggle, and as a general rule (especially as compared with ostensibly richer cities such as Bombay) they do not beg. This is the city of Tagore, of Ray and Bose and Mrinal Sen, and of a great flowering of culture and nationalism. There are films, theaters, university departments and magazines, all of a high quality. The photographs of Raghubir Singh are a testament to the vitality of the people, as well as to the beauty and variety of the architecture. Secular-leftist politics predominate, with a very strong internationalist temper: hardly unwelcome in a region so poisoned by brute religion.

When I paid my own visit to the city some years ago, I immediately felt rather cheated by the anti-Calcutta propaganda put out by the Muggeridges of the world. And when I made my way to the offices of the Missionaries of Charity on Bose Road, I received something of a shock. First was the inscription over the door, which read “He that loveth correction loveth knowledge.” I don’t know the provenance of the quotation, but it had something of the ring of the workhouse about it. Mother Teresa herself gave me a guided tour. I did not particularly care for the way that she took kisses bestowed on her sandaled feet as no more than her due, but I decided to suspend judgment on this—perhaps it was a local custom that I understood imperfectly. The orphanage, anyway, was moving and affecting. Very small (no shame in that) and very clean, it had an encouraging air and seemed to be run by charming and devoted people. One tiny cot stood empty, its occupant not having survived the night, and there was earnest discussion about a vacancy to be filled. I had begun to fumble for a contribution when Mother Teresa turned to me and said, with a gesture that seemed to take in the whole scene, “See, this is how we fight abortion and contraception.”

If not for this, it would have been trifling to point out the drop-in-a-bucket contribution that such a small establishment makes to such a gigantic problem. But it is difficult to spend any time at all in Calcutta and conclude that what it most needs is a campaign against population control. Nor, of course, does Mother Teresa make this judgment based on local conditions. She was opposed on principle to abortion and birth control long before she got there. For her, Calcutta is simply a front in a much larger war.

Muggeridge’s fatalistic revulsion from the actual Calcutta made him all the more receptive to Mother Teresa’s mystical prescription for the place, which is that it suffers from being too distant from Jesus. In consequence, his gullibility led him to write the following, which is worth quoting at length. (I should preface the quotation by saying that Muggeridge’s BBC crew included a very distinguished cameraman named Ken Macmillan, who had earned a great reputation for his work on Lord Clark’s art-history series Civilisation.)

This Home for the Dying is dimly lit by small windows high up in the walls, and Ken was adamant that filming was quite impossible there. We had only one small light with us, and to get the place adequately lighted in the time at our disposal was quite impossible. It was decided that, nonetheless, Ken should have a go, but by way of insurance he took, as well, some film in an outside courtyard where some of the inmates were sitting in the sun. In the processed film, the part taken inside was bathed in a particularly beautiful soft light, whereas the part taken outside was rather dim and confused…. I myself am absolutely convinced that the technically unaccountable light is, in fact, the Kindly Light [Cardinal] Newman refers to in his well-known exquisite hymn.

Nor was Muggeridge attempting to speak metaphorically. Of the love he observed in the home, he wrote that it was

luminous, like the haloes artists have seen and made visible round the heads of the saints. I find it not at all surprising that the luminosity should register on a photographic film. The supernatural is only an infinite projection of the natural, as the furthest horizon is an image of eternity. Jesus put mud on a blind man’s eyes and made him see.

Having gone on in this vein for some time, Muggeridge concluded:

This is precisely what miracles are for—to reveal the inner reality of God’s outward creation. I am personally persuaded that Ken recorded the first authentic photographic miracle. [Emphasis added.]



Continues...

Excerpted from The Missionary Position by Hitchens, Christopher Copyright © 2012 by Hitchens, Christopher. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Foreword and Acknowledgments

Introduction
A Miracle
Good Works andHeroic Virtues
Ubiquity
Afterword

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3
( 36 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(15)

4 Star

(5)

3 Star

(2)

2 Star

(1)

1 Star

(13)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 36 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 6, 2006

    Not a single point has been refuted.

    The negative reviews posted here are typical of the reaction to this book. Outrage is expressed toward the heretic, without any specific refutation of any point. The book presents a clear and concise case that MT was a hypocrite and a fraud. The addition of further details of the woman's life and career would have improved the book, however.

    12 out of 16 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 30, 2009

    Mean spirited and miss-represents the truth about Mother Teresa and the Church

    The person who wrote this book has more of an issue with the beliefs and religious practices of the Catholic Church and he is using Mother Teresa as a ploy to get his point across. I suggest that he actually seek why the Church teaches what it does instead of basing his assumptions on silly notions that the church wants everyone to be unhappy wretches.

    If you seek the truth you may actually discover it.

    What I find ironic is that the author calls a woman who lived her life helping the sick and poor of India a fraud while he sits in a nice office with all the comforts of life writing books.

    Is the author giving all his money he made on this book to the poor of India whom he claims was wronged by Mother Teresa?

    8 out of 24 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 4, 2007

    It had to be written

    And Hitchens is the man fto say it. I was always in agreement with this view and wondered when the world would catch on. As someone who raised money for impoverished third world hospitals 'the ones that actually like to see poor people stop suffering and live healthy lives', I was enraged by the money this little con artist drained from legitimately charitable enterprises. Saintly? no! but she and her minions were very slick and resorted to sabotage to attract the big donors. I was grateful for this book and bravo again to Hitchens, a hero of mine from the days he taught at Pitt.

    8 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 12, 2003

    Try reading a review from someone who has read the book

    As a former Catholic, I understand how Mother Teresa was canonized even before she died, because that was the powerful marketing message we were fed for years. But one thing Hitchens does, that the Church conditions you not to do, was ask for hard facts. The hard facts show Teresa to be an ultra-orthodox hypocrite who harkens back to 19th century attitudes about rich and poor, holy and holier than thou. One thing is true of the people who can't wait to pray to Teresa: they are icon-seekers who can't tolerate challenges, because they mistake blind acceptance for faith. So if you can't stomach the thought that the media image of a bent old woman reaching her hand out the a starving, sick child actually believed that that child's suffering somehow redeems the world, remember that she was friends with Doc Duvalier and Charles Keating, two of the biggest thieves of the 20th century. It's not much of a stretch.

    6 out of 8 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 26, 2007

    A reviewer

    One of Hitchen's finest! The religious fanatics are out in swarms attempting to discredit and hide the truth of one of the foremost swindlers and frauds in modern history. Independaent thinkers, moral and ethical individuals owe Hitchens a vast debt of gratitude for providing a brilliant example of the repudiation of received opinion and its replacement with an exercise in critical inquiry that results in the smashing of illusion and unmasking its beneficiary, in this instance Mother Teresa, and exposing her to the piercing light of reality, especially when the beneficiary has been protected from exposure by ensconcement behind the massive propaganda stronghold of religion.

    5 out of 7 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 24, 2007

    no end to religious hypocrisy

    Great book, tough topic, outstandingly written. Of course, mass deluded people and bigots would give the book only a 'poor' rating. In fact, they would give it to their lives and intellect.

    5 out of 9 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 21, 2003

    GIVE ENOUGH MONKEYS....

    This ironically named author sorely tempts the Christian notion that God's love for humankind is unconditional as he spins his antipapist vitriol. It stops just short of the old bromides about tunnels between the convent and rectory. His writing suggests that he is on the Saul side of his journey to become St. Paul (like). Just one well placed lightning bolt and I think he could make it all the way over. His writing evokes the hopelessness of Himmler's Treblinka or Camus' The Fall. If you don't think there is enough pain, hate and anger in the world, this is your kind of read. For the rest of us, it is a reminder that the legacy of Mother Teresa-faith, hope and charity, is in all too short supply. Mother Teresa's actions honored the dignity of all God's people, including those with spiritual, moral and physical diseases. She was a true witness to Christ's journey and she personifies a life of faith and meaning. This book shines more light on its spiritually desolate author than his subject. Then again, that, and making a few bucks off trashing a decent human being, was likely the point of its publication. Amen

    5 out of 20 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 21, 2007

    Certainly angry but well-researched

    The negative reviews are presumably written by those who never read the book. They might have an example of his poor writing or bad research otherwise. Perhaps Hitchens has a bit too little sympathy for a sincere woman who was willing to sacrifice much, exploit many and overlook the failings of her sponsors to build her conservative religious legacy, but he illuminates hypocracies unbecoming to a supposed saint.

    4 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 9, 2006

    Excellent and shocking

    Society shouldn't venerate people unless they deserve it. After reading this, I think Christopher Hitchens deserves veneration more than Mother Theresa for trying to open people's eyes.

    4 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 26, 2006

    Poorly researched

    I was disappointed by this book, as it proports to be an in-depth exposé. However, it seems more opinion than sources and the author is at times almost juvenile in its approach.

    4 out of 14 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 6, 2004

    Thank you, Christopher Hitchens

    At last, someone who is not afraid to speak out and shake a lulled and willingly-duped world. I see this blind acceptance of 'Mother' Teresa's carefully cultivated public image even inside india. A 'must-read' for those who want to understand how history is made: by propoagandists, publicists and an uncritical media.

    4 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 9, 2013

    It amuses me ever so much that the outrage (often by Christian t

    It amuses me ever so much that the outrage (often by Christian theologians and religious fundamentalists) is directed at the supposed belief that Teresa, because of her presumably religious disposition, is above scrutiny and above criticism, just as as religion is apparently claimed to be so. Hitchens tears down the curtain of rhetoric and nonsense and shows the truth behind the matter, shows the reality of who Teresa was and how she came to do what she did. Those who give this book low scores and write their scathing reviews are best to be ignored; they don't read this to learn, they read in the hopes that it will help bolster their faith and give them further fodder in their attempts to belittle those who seek to be free from religious thinking, and are upset that they didn't find the ammunition they were hoping to acquire and so they resort to ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and rhetological fallacies all the while refusing to accept, or in fact RESPOND to the facts presented before them, regardless if the evidence produced. For them, religion should never be questioned, and their saints never thought ill of. Though not the greatest literary work of the 21st century, it is still an essential read for those willing to tear themselves away from the propaganda of the church and expand their knowledge beyond an outdated religious manuscript that was cobbled together by dozens of religious copyists with hidden agendas.

    3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 3, 2008

    A reviewer

    On page 11, Christopher Hitchens claims the following: Mother Teresa was ¿a religious fundamentalist,¿ ¿a political operative,¿ ¿a primitive sermonizer,¿ and ¿an accomplice of worldly, secular powers.¿ Four points, if Mr. Hitchens proves and communicates these points there should be no objection to giving him a star for each of the points validated. An extra star will be added if he proves all four. Christopher Eric Hitchens (1949-) is a well known atheist. He is well known not for the sole reason he is an atheist but because he is a missionary for atheism (see the quotes before the Foreward and Hitchens books). When authors write they communicate almost as much about themselves as they do the subject they are writing about (see his anti-Catholicism, pp. 28, 29, 32, 48, 51, 56, 60, 78, 84, 98). For that reason, Mr. Hitchens cannot divorce himself from his atheism when he writes anymore than this Catholic reviewer can in writing this review. For example, Hitchens claims that Mother Teresa¿s view on abortion and contraception was the first red flag for him (p. 24). Another example is his judgment of Mother Teresa with pejorative words, such as, ¿fundamentalist,¿ ¿operative,¿ ¿primitive,¿ and ¿accomplice.¿ Mr. Hitchens¿s atheism does not invalidate his critiques of Mother Teresa but it does beg the question ¿by what standard¿ does he use to determine the good, the true, and the beautiful outside the social conventions of the soceity for which he lives. It would be a lie to say most authors who write about Mother Teresa hold Mr. Hitchens¿s thesis. There are dozens of books promoting Mother Teresa in a positive light and only a couple that offer critiques of her person and mission. Even so, the impact of his book is vast. It is still a best seller 13 years after its publication and received a spike in sales since the release of Mother Teresa¿s private writings. It is the bible for anti-Mother Teresa crusaders and it is a popular work in the anti-theist movement. The first fifteen pages of the book is the Introduction (15% of the book). After indicting Mother Teresa for the company see keep (pp. 3ff), Mr. Hitchens critiques Malcolm Muggeridge for his, in Hitchens¿s opinion, misrepresentation of Calcutta (p. 21ff.). He questions the motives of Mother Teresa (p. 37). But he also claims she is an ¿instinctive genius¿ (p. 86). He believes her social work was not helping people but hurting them, he uses a doctor, among others, to make his claim (p. 38ff.). On pages 64-71, the Charles Keating Savings and Loan scandal is argued with photocopies of the letters of the court and Mother Teresa. Readers looking for a book bleeding with data and precise notes as to Mr. Hitchens¿s sources must seek elsewhere. There is a list of books Hitchens claimed to use as sources for the book (p. 12). He gives the criteria for his sources (p. 42). Most of his arguments are from circumstantial evidence or from those who claimed to have worked with or known Mother Teresa. Names are given but there are few written sources listed. One of his most important sources is an ex-Missionary of Charity, Susan Shields (p.43ff.). Hitchens¿s prime source is his claim that he met Mother Teresa in Calcutta (p. 23ff.). Many of the attacks on Mother Teresa are linked with the Church¿s doctrines which Mr. Hitchens is rather ignorant of, or distorting (p. 52ff, 77, 88n). Though, there is one time when he praises the Catholic Church for its defense of ¿potential life¿ (p. 52). Mr. Hitchens is well know for his dexterity in the use of the English language, and in this he does not disappoint in his use of high but non-technical English. However, his language is loose on understanding the facts of his subject and the sensitivity of the issue (pp. 21, 56-57). Unfortunately for Hitchens, his words are a two-edge sword cutting him every time he swings a sharp word at Mother Teresa. On page 56, Hitchens speaks of the ¿myth of Christ¿s conception.¿ He seems to be constantly drawn to th

    3 out of 13 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 13, 2003

    A controversial read from Britain's greatest living essayist

    Christopher Hitchens' latest is guaranteed to spark controversy, as he takes aim at one of the icons of Catholicism. The irascible Hitchens -- one of the few committed socialists to support the Iraq war -- reaffirms his status as iconoclast and, from his point of view, truth teller. While The Missionary Position is short on facts, and demonstrates the usual socialist bias against organized religion, Hitchens does raise disturbing questions about Mother Teresa, who routinely flew to the US for medical treatment using donated money, professed divorce as a mortal sin, yet supported her friend Lady Diana's decision to divorce Charles, and spent a goodly portion of her later years traveling the world using other people's money. Hitchens is always unpredictable. He celebrates George Orwell for his willingess to admit his early support of Stalin was misplaced; voted for G. W. Bush; excoriated the Clintons, whom he calls cynical liars; believes Henry Kissinger belongs in prison; and quit his job at the left leaning The Nation rather than change his position favoring the Saddam's overthrow. If you're looking for conventional wisdom, watch Larry King. If you're looking for provocative commentary, check out Hitchens.

    3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 21, 2003

    Extremely distasteful

    He writes with extreme bitterness and cynicism. I don't know much about Mother Theresa, but I do know that he attacks her with a ferocity that is unbecoming of anyone -- religious or not.

    3 out of 14 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 29, 2010

    How very interesting

    How nice for Mr. Hitchens that he has basically been vindicated by mother teresa herself! She has recently confirmed his notions that she in FACT has no faith. See just some of her own writing and remarks below:
    Shortly after beginning her work in the slums of Calcutta, she wrote "Where is my faith? Even deep down there is nothing but emptiness and darkness. If there be a God - please forgive me."

    In letters eight years later she was still expressing "such deep longing for God", adding that she felt "repulsed, empty, no faith, no love, no zeal".
    This is just a tidbit. So for all who bashed Mr. Hitchens for his brave revalations about this wicked person, do some real investigating before you pass judgement. Read her very own book!

    2 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 8, 2003

    Not worth it, even if it were free.

    The title tells us that the author will present a good theological missionary position -- It does not, an in no way is CH at theologian. It seems as if the book is completely his (negative) opinion. He writes books like Stephen King does (a lot of them), but at least Stephen King realizes he is dealing in non-reality and actually does put out good books (Unlike CH).

    2 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 21, 2003

    Pathetic, Pathetic, Pathetic!

    I had to choose one star, because there wasn't a '0' star option. How dare Mr. Hutchins write such an obviously devious book. With no proof of any of his claims, he ironically becomes what he's claiming Mother Teresa to be--a fraud. Please Mr. Hutchins, you are not any authority to speak on matters which you obviously know nothing about. Mr. Hutchins' transparent thirst for attacking anything Catholic is obvious in this book. And I am not amused by your choice of title.

    2 out of 14 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 6, 2003

    An Acrid Attack on an Icon of Hope

    How dare this man attack Mother Theresa! A Nobel Peace prize winner and a true advocate against poverty, she never was a propagandist; I also agree that the author should get his head out of his butt and maybe realize the accomplishments of MT.

    1 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 20, 2003

    I WOULDNT LOOSE MY TIME READING IT

    Please tell this author that his book will not take away for a minute what millions think of Mother Therese. I hope he can do more research about her , do a little of what she did. I like american writers but this is flooding with bitterness.

    1 out of 13 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 36 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)