The Nature of Natural History

Overview

This classic work is an exploration of what natural history is, and a sustained effort to see how it relates to other areas of biology. Marston Bates did not attempt to overwhelm his audience with facts or overinterpret those he did use, and, perhaps for this reason, The Nature of Natural History is a timeless work. The author's genuine interest in the tropics has a very current feeling, and the first ten or fifteen chapters of the work have a style that is parallel to that of David Attenborough's verbal ...
See more details below
Available through our Marketplace sellers.
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (19) from $1.99   
  • New (1) from $0.00   
  • Used (18) from $1.99   
Close
Sort by
Page 1 of 2
Showing 1 – 10 of 18 (2 pages)
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
$1.99
Seller since 2006

Feedback rating:

(60961)

Condition:

New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

Very Good
Great condition for a used book! Minimal wear. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Shipped to over one million happy customers. Your purchase benefits world literacy!

Ships from: Mishawaka, IN

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$1.99
Seller since 2009

Feedback rating:

(7754)

Condition: Good
Light shelving wear with minimal damage to cover and bindings. Pages show minor use. Help save a tree. Buy all your used books from Green Earth Books. Read. Recycle and Reuse.

Ships from: Portland, OR

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$1.99
Seller since 2010

Feedback rating:

(4057)

Condition: Very Good
Book shows a small amount of wear - very good condition. Selection as wide as the Mississippi.

Ships from: St Louis, MO

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$1.99
Seller since 2009

Feedback rating:

(25697)

Condition: Good
Giving great service since 2004: Buy from the Best! 4,000,000 items shipped to delighted customers. We have 1,000,000 unique items ready to ship! Find your Great Buy today!

Ships from: Toledo, OH

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$1.99
Seller since 2005

Feedback rating:

(21963)

Condition: Good
Princeton, NJ 1990-05-01 Trade Paperback Good Trade paperback (US). Glued binding.

Ships from: Sparks, NV

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$2.39
Seller since 2009

Feedback rating:

(3725)

Condition: Good
30/05/1990 Paperback Used-Good Book in good or better condition. Dispatched same day from US or UK warehouse.

Ships from: Valley Cottage, NY

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$4.00
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:

(1)

Condition: Good
1990 Paperback Good Connecting readers with great books since 1972. Used books may not include companion materials, some shelf wear, may contain highlighting/notes, and may not ... include cd-rom or access codes. Customer service is our top priority! Read more Show Less

Ships from: Cincinnati, OH

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$4.95
Seller since 2006

Feedback rating:

(386)

Condition: Very Good
PAPERBACK Very Good 0691024464 Princeton trade paperback, 1990, clean/tight and unmarked, light cover wear only...Near Fine...Bubble-wrapped and mailed in a Box w/delivery ... confirmation...NOT a remainder or ex-library. Read more Show Less

Ships from: New Hartford, CT

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$7.14
Seller since 2005

Feedback rating:

(60)

Condition: Like New
Ewing, New Jersey, U.S. A 1990 Soft cover 1st paper ed. Fine A fine, tight copy. Nice! // With a new preface by Henry S. Horn // Paperback original with this new preface. Also ... features a new bibliographical essay // First published in 1950 // Large-sized; Notes; Index 321 pp. Read more Show Less

Ships from: Penfield, NY

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$7.36
Seller since 2005

Feedback rating:

(72)

Condition: Very Good
1990 Trade paperback Very good. No dust jacket as issued. A Very Good Copy Trade paperback (US). Glued binding. Princeton Science Library (Paperback). Audience: General/trade.

Ships from: Delaware, OH

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 2
Showing 1 – 10 of 18 (2 pages)
Close
Sort by
Sending request ...

Overview

This classic work is an exploration of what natural history is, and a sustained effort to see how it relates to other areas of biology. Marston Bates did not attempt to overwhelm his audience with facts or overinterpret those he did use, and, perhaps for this reason, The Nature of Natural History is a timeless work. The author's genuine interest in the tropics has a very current feeling, and the first ten or fifteen chapters of the work have a style that is parallel to that of David Attenborough's verbal presentations of nature. From the book: "I have already made several remarks about the connection between parasitism and degeneracy. I suspect this is a matter of point of view. We are predatory animals ourselves, and consequently admire the characteristics of predationagility, speed, cunning, self-reliance. We feel a certain kinship with the lion, and regard the liver fluke with horror. If a sheep were given the choice, though, it might prefer to be debilitated by liver flukes rather than killed by a lion."
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Booknews
**** This 1950 (Scribners) work is cited in Books for College Librarians, 3d ed. It is here reprinted with a new preface and a bibliographical essay. Writing for the general reader as well as for biologists, Bates defined and defended natural history as an intellectual enterprise and set it in the broad context of traditional biology. It is a tribute to his style and judgment that nearly everything he said is still fresh and pertinent. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
From the Publisher
"It is a charming and well-written work by an American mandarin with an appreciation of history.... The book ... helps us to understand the scientific mind and the attraction of natural history."Archives of Natural History

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780691024462
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press
  • Publication date: 5/30/1990
  • Series: Princeton Science Library Series
  • Edition description: REPRINT
  • Pages: 336
  • Product dimensions: 5.52 (w) x 8.50 (h) x 0.80 (d)

Read an Excerpt

The Nature of Natural History


By Marston Bates

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS

Copyright © 1990 Princeton University Press
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-691-02446-2



CHAPTER 1

The Science of Natural History


THERE is a temptation to start a book with some grand phrase, some broad statement that will lead the reader on into the details of the text. The movie people often use such a device, starting with the camera aimed at an immensity of sky and clouds, lowering it to make a sweep across a wide landscape of forests and fields until one village is picked out, one street, one house. Within the house, the focus finally comes to rest on Dorothy, sitting quietly at her spinning wheel, her outward calm a cover for some seething turmoil of emotions. Only then does the story begin to develop.

If we used this same trick here, we could skip the incomprehensible universe of the astronomers and start by focussing on our planet, tiny by astronomical standards but big enough, in all conscience, to its inhabitants. Our first camera shot would be of this earth whirling endlessly on its axis, blindly following its elliptical course around the sun. We might stop to notice that its distance from the sun was just right to produce the temperatures that we find comfortable (as well as some uncomfortable ones), that its twistings and turnings gave us day and night and an annual succession of seasons and resulted in a curious zoning of the planetary surface from equatorial tropics to polar arctic.

Examining this surface more closely, we would see that most of it was covered with a thin film of water, that the dry parts were crinkled into corrugations of mountains in some places, spread out as broad plains in others. As we came down through the mats of cloud, we would make out details of lakes, rivers, bays, forests, savannahs—the endlessly variegated environmental conditions of the planetary surface.

If we carried the thing out in proper Hollywood style, we would land in the middle of a biological laboratory where there would be a man in a white jacket peering at a drop of water with a microscope. He would stand aside and allow us to look through the eyepiece at the world of subvisible creatures that he had been studying. There, certainly, we would see marvellous things: diatoms and desmids with their crystalline symmetry; bright green filaments of algae forming thickets through which jelly-like ciliates picked their leisurely way; bacterial rods trembling constantly from molecular bombardment, the ceaseless vibration called Brownian movement. Then, having settled our eye definitely on some particular bug, we could start to describe its life, its history, its relations with the other organisms surrounding it, and so gradually build up a picture of biological processes.

But such an approach would be misleading. My errand, in writing this book, is missionary; but it is not to impress with the facts of biology, or with the marvels of what we have learned about the processes of life. Rather, my errand is to arouse interest in an attitude, to explain a point of view, using facts only insofar as they may be necessary as illustrations for this attitude, this point of view.

The facts of the various sciences have been fairly well publicized; their impact has altered our material environment, affecting the course of our daily lives in all sorts of ways, many obvious, many subtle and indirect. The facts of biology have penetrated the nursery, the kitchen, the garden almost as much as they have the farm or the hospital. But the attitude of biology, the general method of science, seems to have made no corresponding contribution to our culture, to have resulted in no comparable alteration of our intellectual processes. Science remains a rather mysterious affair, cultivated by a special priesthood, guarded by an unintelligible jargon. We are all exposed to science in school: but the dissection of the frog or the smells of the chemical laboratory have about as much relation to the living discipline of science as do the rules for the ablative absolute to the living language in which Cicero played his games of politics.

It is a difficult assignment, to convey an attitude. I do not think it can be done by describing facts, or by arranging facts into narrative patterns. I do not think either that it can be done by abstract inquiry into the philosophy of science, or by a review of the history of science. Some combination of these methods, applied to one of the active growing points of knowledge, might be more helpful than any single type of exposition in itself.

I think natural history is well adapted to this purpose. It represents a growing point of science, an area in which our ignorance is more impressive than our knowledge, yet an area in which our knowledge is constantly, hopefully increasing. It is an area of science of immediate concern to all of us, since we are animals, subject to its laws and observations, though at the same time we seek to apply those laws for our very human purposes. It is also an area of science that has not yet progressed to a level that can only be reached by special training in its symbols of thought. Yet its methods, its attitudes, its goals, are the same as those of any other science.

There are many definitions of science, corresponding to an equal number of ideas about what should be included under the term. Most broadly, science is systematized or organized knowledge. But it has come, particularly during the last century or so, to be used more and more in a narrower sense, for a special type of knowledge, arrived at by special sorts of activities.

The characteristic stamp of our Western civilization comes from science in this narrower sense. Ours is the "scientific" age, an adjective that is supposed to distinguish it from any other, though we can lay no claim to the exclusive development of systematized or organized knowledge. By science in this special sense, we mean particular kinds of study, like physics and chemistry and biology. And we are apt also to think that we mean the experimental method —though we readily include things like geology and astronomy among our sciences, despite the fact that they have few traces of experiments in their make-up.

For science in this present, narrow sense, I like the definition of James Bryant Conant. Conant says that "science emerges from the other progressive activities of man to the extent that new concepts arise from experiments and observations, and that the new concepts in turn lead to further experiments and observations."

Science is a progressive activity. The outstanding peculiarity of man is that he stumbled onto the possibility of progressive activities. Such progress, the accumulation of experience from generation to generation, depended first on the development of language, then of writing and finally of printing. These allowed the accumulation of tradition and of knowledge, of the whole aura of cultural inheritance that surrounds us. This has so conditioned our existence that it is almost impossible for us to stop and examine the nature of our culture. We accept it as we accept the air we breathe; we are as unconscious of our culture as a fish, presumably, is of water.

The equipment with which we face the world is of two sorts: our biological inheritance and our cultural inheritance. Within the time span of history, our biological inheritance has not changed. The physiology of reproduction, for instance, is the same as with our cave man ancestors—though the antics that precede copulation may be different now, and may vary greatly from culture to culture. Our digestive system remains the same, despite its varying degrees of maltreatment. The shape of our noses has not changed since Caesar's day. And while lately we have been growing taller in the United States, this seems to be a result of better diet rather than of a shift in our biological potentialities.

Our cultural inheritance, when compared with our biological inheritance, seems to be subject to constant change. Though when we examine it carefully, we find that the rate of progress of its different parts is far from uniform. To realize this, we have only to compare our culture, our activities, with those of some other period in the line of historical antecedents. With Periclean Athens, for instance. Whether our activities in art, literature, philosophy, represent "progress" as compared with the Athenian is at least debatable. The amount of progress in politics or government might also be debated. We read the histories and wonder why the Greeks so stupidly clung to their petty city states, why their civilization was so persistently marred by internecine strife. But we seem still to be involved in the same sort of political jealousies, the same sort of armed strife, though we have changed the scale.

If we go back far enough, of course, we can detect all sorts of changes that have progressive aspects. If we compare ourselves with our cave man ancestors, we can see progress in art and philosophy as well as in mining and implements of war. But as we move along the time scale the progress in some things seems more regular than in others. The discovery of a technique makes possible the development of an art form, but the development proceeds in fits and starts. We might report progress in music, for instance, over Periclean Athens (though the evidence is pretty indirect), but this progress happened in a spurt after the discovery of harmony and the invention of a system of notation. The cumulative progress since Bach is at least not a matter of universal agreement. From this irregularity comes all of the discussion of the cycles of cultures and civilizations.

Along with these cycles of culture, we have the stream of progressive activities. Its first trickle is apparent in the discovery of fire, of ores, of agriculture, and its development can be measured by a constantly increasing power over the material universe. The stream has grown more rapidly in some periods than in others. But looking back over a large scale map of history, the stream seems surprisingly independent of the vicissitudes of cultures and civilizations. In Europe, even during the darkest part of the post-Roman Dark Ages, we find water mills developing, and the invention of things like stirrups and horse shoes. At that time, the main stream had left Europe in a curve that passed through the luxuriant periods of the Arabic and Indian civilizations, so that when it again turned towards Europe in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, it was much grander than when it left that continent with the collapse of the Graeco-Roman world.

Science can truly be said to emerge from this stream of progressive activities, but so imperceptibly that it is difficult to say exactly when, where or how. The history books trace its origins among the Egyptians, the Babylonians, the Greeks. It can be distinguished fairly clearly from philosophy at Alexandria, and it began to take definite shape during the bright period of Arabic culture. But as a strikingly distinct sort of activity, depending on the wide dissemination of individual discovery and thought, its development was hardly possible without the printing press. Its methods and attitudes are hard to define until we come to the first of the great modern scientists, Galileo, who lived in the sixteenth century.

Experiments, observations and conceptual schemes, if we accept Conant's definition, then form the basic components of science, of this progressive activity that first clearly emerges with Galileo. They must, in any particular science, act together as a self-maintaining system, an endless series in which new concepts are constantly formed or old ones modified through the factual accumulations resulting from the observations and experiments. The problem, in understanding any particular science, is to see how this modifying process works: how, in the present case, it applies to natural history.

One dictionary that I consulted remarks that "natural history" now commonly means the study of animals and plants "in a popular and superficial way," meaning popular and superficial to be equally damning adjectives. This is related to the current tendency in the biological sciences to label every subdivision of science with a name derived from the Greek. "Ecology" is erudite and profound; while "natural history" is popular and superficial. Though, as far as I can see, both labels apply to just about the same package of goods.

Natural history is not equivalent to biology. Biology is the study of life. Natural history is the study of animals and plants—of organisms. Biology thus includes natural history, and much else besides.

The world of organisms, of animals and plants, is built up of individuals. I like to think, then, of natural history as the study of life at the level of the individual—of what plants and animals do, how they react to each other and their environment, how they are organized into larger groupings like populations and communities. Other biological sciences take up the study at other levels of organization: dissecting the individual into organs and tissues and seeing how these work together, as in physiology; reaching down still further to the level of cells, as in cytology; and reaching the final biological level with the study of living molecules and their interactions, as in biochemistry.

No one of these levels can be considered as more important than any other. The phenomena at each level are different, and we must try to get an understanding of each. A cell is something more than an aggregate of molecules; an individual more than an aggregate of organs. A population or community, for that matter, is something more than an accumulation of individuals.

Studies at all of these levels can be fun; and can be important from the human point of view of trying to manipulate the universe for our own comfort, and of trying to understand it for our peace of mind. I happen to enjoy most the study at the level of the individual; and this level is also, I suspect, most easily understood. I am an individual; so are you; so is my dog and the oak tree on my lawn. What makes us act the way we do? How do we get along with each other—the oak tree, the dog and the man? How did we come to get this way?

The physiologists, cytologists and biochemists are very largely involved with the problems of explaining living systems in chemical and physical terms. This is surely one of the major objectives of biology, but it need concern us little in our pursuit of natural history. The explanation of the living process is one thing; the explanation of the diversity of living things is another; and the latter may well be taken as the major objective of natural history itself.

The diversity of life is extraordinary. There are said to be a million or so different kinds of living animals, and hundreds of thousands of kinds of plants. But we don't need to think of the world at large. It is amazing enough to stop and look at a forest or at a meadow—at the grass and trees and caterpillars and hawks and deer. How did all of these different kinds of things come about; what forces governed their evolution; what forces maintain their numbers and determine their survival or extinction; what are their relations to each other and to the physical environment in which they live? These are the problems of natural history, problems that concern us ourselves as animals and that concern us even more as originators of this thing we call civilization—which is, after all, merely a rather special sort of an animal community.

The explanation of these things furnishes us with an objective; one that at times seems hopelessly remote. But whether we ever get to the objective or not, we keep finding interesting things along the way so that the going, however difficult, never seems tedious.

CHAPTER 2

The Naming of Organisms


CHARLES ELTON has remarked that there is little use in making observations on an animal unless you know its name. The first step in a survey of natural history, then, should be the acquisition of some familiarity with the system of names and the system of classification, with the word equipment used by naturalists.

Many animals and plants have vernacular names that everyone learns in childhood, or that form parts of special vocabularies such as those of farmers, woodsmen or hunters. It is surprising, though, how quickly we exhaust this supply of names. It works well enough for large mammals such as bobcats, deer, foxes, raccoons. But if we start to make observations on field mice, we soon find that there are no common names for all of the kinds that we find; in the ordinary course of events, these different kinds of field mice simply don't come to our attention.


(Continues...)

Excerpted from The Nature of Natural History by Marston Bates. Copyright © 1990 Princeton University Press. Excerpted by permission of PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Contents

Preface to the Princeton Science Library Edition, ix,
I The Science of Natural History, 1,
II The Naming of Organisms, 9,
III The Catalogue of Nature, 23,
IV The History of Organisms, 42,
V Reproduction, 56,
VI The Development of the Individual, 72,
VII The Environment, 90,
VIII Biotic Communities, 106,
IX Partnership and Cooperation, 122,
X Parasitism, 137,
XI The Behavior of Individuals, 155,
XII The Behavior of Populations, 169,
XIII Biological Geography, 187,
XIV Adaptations, 204,
XV The Mechanism of Evolution, 222,
XVI Natural History and Human Economy, 238,
XVII The Natural History of Naturalists, 252,
XVIII Tactics, Strategy and the Goal, 263,
Appendix I: The Literature of Natural History, 285,
Appendix II: The Recent Literature of Natural History, 299,
Index, 311,

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)