Opening Pandora¿s Box
Picking up this book is like opening Pandora¿s Box. Reading it as a citizen of the world is painful enough, but reading it as an American citizen makes one cringe with despair and anger. Readers may experience trepidations or reservations about reading Griffin¿s book for reason that even Griffin expresses when he states that: ¿. . . most Americans will resist the idea that this ¿attack on America¿ could have been an inside job, staged by America¿s own leaders. The primary responsibility of the president and vice president, their cabinet . . . is to protect America and its citizens.¿ However, this is an important and worthwhile work a piece of investigative reporting of an event that shocked not just American citizens, but people all around the world. Griffin¿s aim in his book is to provoke and promote widespread dialogue among all people on the execrable attacks of September 11, 2001. Whereas conspiracy theories are abundant and usually associated with eccentric individuals and faulty reasoning and data, this is not the case with ¿The New Pearl Harbor¿. Griffin¿s book does read like a spy novel with no heroes in the horizon, but if Griffin¿s contentions have any foundation whatsoever, there are plenty of villains. The book is overflowing with disturbing and all too convincing theories concerning the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US attacks that demolished New York City¿s World Trade Center, damaged the Pentagon in Washington, and killed and injured thousands of innocent people. David Ray Griffin brings to light many inconsistencies from within the official report -- inconsistencies that have not been resolved by the American government to the satisfaction of the American people. Griffin assembles the works of various critics of the government¿s ¿official account¿ of the 9/11 attacks. He writes of the many theories proposed for the events, including the fire theory, controlled demolition theory, missile theory, and the two more convincing, complicity and incompetence theories. The individuals in Griffin¿s book that put forth these theories also argue that President Bush¿s administration, including, Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, the FAA, FBI, CIA, NSA, and a host of other agencies and government officials have intentionally interfered, coerced, and otherwise blocked efforts of those who wish to get answers to unanswered queries. Griffin contends that President George W. Bush has been unresponsive to the needs of ¿The 9/11 Independent Commission¿ which resulted in a faulty and incomplete report. What Griffin accomplishes in ¿The New Pearl Harbor¿ is to put forward, in simple terms, the doubts and unanswered questions concerning the events that transpired before, during, and after 9/11 that have yet to be confronted and/or resolved. The reader does not have to be a fanatic or a conspiracy bug to perceive the inconsistencies in the official account of 9/11. Griffin¿s logical arguments makes the above mentioned theories all the more credible. Griffin gives the reader an array of sample questions that have been asked, but not answered questions concerning the advance warnings that were ignored by the US government, the lack of reaction by the FAA, NORAD, NMCC and so on. Questions are put forth about the relationship between President George W. Bush and the Royal Saudi and Bin Laden families the relationship between the CIA and Pakistan¿s ISI and Afghanistan¿s Taliban. Griffin writes of the stonewalling and intimidation used by the FBI, CIA, NSA, and other federal agencies towards anyone trying to investigate the 9/11 case. Griffin looks at the statement made that 9/11 was a pretext to wage war against Afghanistan and Iraq for geopolitical purposes. Griffin also looks at President Bush¿s statement that the 9/11 attacks ¿opened vast, new opportunities¿ and many other statements made by government officials. What David Ray Grif
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
In the wake of the September 11th attacks, numerous individuals on the Internet and elsewhere began attacking the official accounts of how they occurred, raising questions over the actual physical evidence, the construction of the evidence, and the conduct of the government investigations. Although dubbed "conspiracy theorists" by many, former philosophy of religion professor Griffin prefers to call them "revisionists," arguing that they have made a strong prima facie case for some version of official complicity in the attacks. Collecting and collating the work of the conspiracy theorists/revisionists, Griffin admits that "although I have repeated only evidence that seemed credible to me, I have not independently verified ...