The One Force of Nature

by David Simmons

Overview

Current theory claims that there are 4 fundamental forces of nature which existed as a superforce at t=0. Carl Anderson experimentally proved that gamma ray photons split into electron-positron pairs. Physicists at Imperial College London built a photon-photon collider where low energy photons collide, coalesce and split into electron-positron pairs. This means that the primeval energy split into electrons and positrons from which protons and neutrons were made. Protons and neutrons would have positrons as a nucleus orbited by electrons just like atoms.

The protons will have one excess positron and neutrons will have equal numbers of electrons and positrons. When they bond to form nuclei, they do so electromagnetically. So, the strong and weak nuclear forces are manifestations of the electromagnetic force which implies that gravity is a manifestation of the electromagnetic force i.e there's only one force of nature. So unification was the wrong method to come up with a Theory of Everything. In fact, I believe that electricity and magnetism shouldn't have been unified in the first place as they seem to act independently.

I will go on to explain a lot of the natural phenomena in terms of the electric and magnetic forces like radioactivity, Pauli's Exclusion Principle and how pigeons use the earth's magnetic field to navigate. I believe that much of the 20th Century was wasted so I'll be using 19th Century physics as well. My theory and explanations will be non-mathematical and doesn't require higher knowledge than high school physics.

Product Details

BN ID:	2940153858661
Publisher:	David Simmons
Publication date:	11/16/2016
Sold by:	Smashwords
Format:	eBook
File size:	252 KB

About the Author

I'm a retired IT professional with interest in Science. When I was at school, I always challenged the facts I was taught e.g. I disagreed with the inverse square law in that you can't get an infinity force. I proved that with two weak magnets by putting a south pole to another south pole and told my colleagues that, according to the inverse square law, it's impossible to make these poles touch. I then proceeded to make them touch thus disproving the law. From that time on, I never believed in infinities although I keep an open mind on the universe being infinite.

I also challenge the theories of relativity particularly the special theory because Einstein used length contraction and time dilation to compensate for the errors introduced by holding the speed of light constant. I also have an alternative of the Big Bang, which is what my first book - The One Force of Nature - is about, but after the energy was created. No one can explain the creation of the first energy without violating the conservation laws. So, Lawrence Krauss is wrong about his "universe from nothing". They merely classify that as philosophy so that they don't have to explain them.