The Plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham and the Remaking of the American City [NOOK Book]

Overview

Arguably the most influential document in the history of urban planning, Daniel Burnham’s 1909 Plan of Chicago, coauthored by Edward Bennett and produced in collaboration with the Commercial Club of Chicago, proposed many of the city’s most distinctive features, including its lakefront parks and roadways, the Magnificent Mile, and Navy Pier. Carl Smith’s fascinating history reveals the Plan’s central role in shaping the ways people envision the...

See more details below
The Plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham and the Remaking of the American City

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$10.49
BN.com price
(Save 12%)$12.00 List Price

Overview

Arguably the most influential document in the history of urban planning, Daniel Burnham’s 1909 Plan of Chicago, coauthored by Edward Bennett and produced in collaboration with the Commercial Club of Chicago, proposed many of the city’s most distinctive features, including its lakefront parks and roadways, the Magnificent Mile, and Navy Pier. Carl Smith’s fascinating history reveals the Plan’s central role in shaping the ways people envision the cityscape and urban life itself. 

Smith’s concise and accessible narrative begins with a survey of Chicago’s stunning rise from a tiny frontier settlement to the nation’s second-largest city. He then offers an illuminating exploration of the Plan’s creation and reveals how it embodies the renowned architect’s belief that cities can and must be remade for the better. The Plan defined the City Beautiful movement and was the first comprehensive attempt to reimagine a major American city. Smith points out the ways the Plan continues to influence debates, even a century after its publication, about how to create a vibrant and habitable urban environment. 

Richly illustrated and incisively written, his insightful book will be indispensable to our understanding of Chicago, Daniel Burnham, and the emergence of the modern city.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
"Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men's blood and probably will themselves not be realized." Architectural historians still debate if Daniel Hudson Burnham (1846-1912) ever really spoke these words, but nobody can deny that the quotation fits the scope of his life mission. Nothing embodies that better than his 1906-9 Plan of Chicago, arguably the most influential document in the history of American city planning. Northwestern University history professor Carl Smith places this visionary urban strategy within its historical context. After reading this book, no Windy City resident or visitor will ever regard the city's lakefront parks and Magnificent Mile in the same way again.
Chicago Tribune
The story of Burnham’s plan has been told many times but never in a more appealing or succinct style than in Carl Smith’s modest little book, The Plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham and the Remaking of the American City. . . . What sets this book apart from other Burnham histories is Smith’s attention to the filthy, miserable, nineteenth-century city that repelled and motivated Burnham, and the extraordinary promotional effort led by the Commercial Club of Chicago that sold his plan to the public. . . . A clear-eyed assessment of Burnham.”

— Lois Wille

CHOICE

“This well-written book on the 1909 Plan of Chicago, ‘The Burnham Plan,’ excellently summarizes numerous publications about the plan and its influence on Chicago’s development.”–J.W. Stamper, CHOICE

Enterprise and Society
Smith has produced a compelling and informative story of a time when the civic realm was still robust. By focusing on the individuals behind the Plan, placing the Plan in the context of Chicago's history, and offering a wealth of detailed knowledge, Smith has written an important book. One cannot fully understand either city planning or the role of business in urban development without knowing what happened in Chicago in 1909.

— Robert A, Beauregard

Make
Smith's storytelling, saturated in engaging fact, gives sharp yet sweeping coverage of how the plan came to be and how certain parts were laboriously implemented. . . . Smith's addition to the history and architecture of the city gives fresh perspective on where we've been and where we're going.

— Robert Duffer

Michigan Historical Review
Fascinating. . . . One comes away from this finely written book with the conviction that Burnham is arguably not only the most influential person in Chicago’s history—but also America’s most successful architect and visionary urban planner. . . . The Plan of Chicago tells one of the great American urban stories.”

— James Schmiechen

Urban History
Smith takes up where [Pierce's History of Chicago] left off, and his work may stand alongside hers as the starting point for numerous inquiries into the fascinating city of Chicago.

— Elaine Lewinnek

Robert Bruegmann

“Carl Smith’s The Plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham and the Remaking of the American City is a triumph of meticulous research, clear organization, and accessible writing.  In his hands the story of the Plan, the campaign to promote it, and its influence on generations of Chicagoans come alive.” —Robert Bruegmann, University of Illinois at Chicago, author of Sprawl: A Compact History

 

William Bryk

“An imaginative, beautifully produced, and visually appealing masterpiece of stirring prose and stunning illustration. . . . Carl Smith’s book is a concise, splendidly accessible, and beautifully constructed introduction to a seminal work of American urban planning and its enduring influence on Chicago and other American cities. He writes particularly well, without padding or academic jargon, and admirable self-restraint: He tells us just enough about the men and the times that created The Plan of Chicago to make us want to learn more on our own. One can offer no higher praise for a writer.”

— New York Sun

Kevin Nance

“A concise and reader-friendly introduction to the visionary and ambitious plan that helped shape much of the Windy City as we know it today.”

— Chicago Sun-Times

Chicago Tribune - Lois Wille

“The story of Burnham’s plan has been told many times but never in a more appealing or succinct style than in Carl Smith’s modest little book, The Plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham and the Remaking of the American City. . . . What sets this book apart from other Burnham histories is Smith’s attention to the filthy, miserable, nineteenth-century city that repelled and motivated Burnham, and the extraordinary promotional effort led by the Commercial Club of Chicago that sold his plan to the public. . . . A clear-eyed assessment of Burnham.”
Ann Durkin Keating

“Carl Smith breathes inspired new life into Daniel Burnham, the major figure behind the 1909 Plan of Chicago. Smith vividly describes both the thoughtful conceptualization and the masterful showmanship of Burnham and his many collaborators in the Plan development. Smith shows that this is a plan that reshaped American notions of the modern city.”
William Cronon

"Daniel Burnham’s 1909 Plan of Chicago has long been regarded as one of the benchmark documents of American urban and regional planning in the twentieth century.  Carl Smith has now provided the first book-length study of this signal moment in the history of American city, exploring its larger context and helping modern readers understand the role it played in shaping the subsequent history not just of Chicago but of metropolitan America."

William Bryk - New York Sun

“An imaginative, beautifully produced, and visually appealing masterpiece of stirring prose and stunning illustration. . . . Carl Smith’s book is a concise, splendidly accessible, and beautifully constructed introduction to a seminal work of American urban planning and its enduring influence on Chicago and other American cities. He writes particularly well, without padding or academic jargon, and admirable self-restraint: He tells us just enough about the men and the times that created The Plan of Chicago to make us want to learn more on our own. One can offer no higher praise for a writer.”

Kevin Nance - Chicago Sun-Times

“A concise and reader-friendly introduction to the visionary and ambitious plan that helped shape much of the Windy City as we know it today.”

Make - Robert Duffer

"Smith's storytelling, saturated in engaging fact, gives sharp yet sweeping coverage of how the plan came to be and how certain parts were laboriously implemented. . . . Smith's addition to the history and architecture of the city gives fresh perspective on where we've been and where we're going."
Urban History - Elaine Lewinnek

"Smith takes up where [Pierce's History of Chicago] left off, and his work may stand alongside hers as the starting point for numerous inquiries into the fascinating city of Chicago."
Enterprise and Society - Robert A

"Smith has produced a compelling and informative story of a time when the civic realm was still robust. By focusing on the individuals behind the Plan, placing the Plan in the context of Chicago's history, and offering a wealth of detailed knowledge, Smith has written an important book. One cannot fully understand either city planning or the role of business in urban development without knowing what happened in Chicago in 1909."
Michigan Historical Review - James Schmiechen

“Fascinating. . . . One comes away from this finely written book with the conviction that Burnham is arguably not only the most influential person in Chicago’s history—but also America’s most successful architect and visionary urban planner. . . . The Plan of Chicago tells one of the great American urban stories.”
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780226764733
  • Publisher: University of Chicago Press
  • Publication date: 8/1/2009
  • Series: Chicago Visions and Revisions
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 202
  • Sales rank: 1,107,930
  • File size: 6 MB

Meet the Author

Carl Smith is the Franklyn Bliss Snyder Professor of English and American Studies and professor of history at Northwestern University. He is the author of Chicago and the American Literary Imagination, 1880–1920, and Urban Disorder and the Shape of Belief, both published by the University of Chicago Press.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

The Plan of Chicago Daniel Burnham and the Remaking of the American City
By CARL SMITH
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS Copyright © 2006 Carl Smith
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-0-226-76471-9



Chapter One PLANNING BEFORE THE PLAN

* * *

The Plan of Chicago establishes its authoritative tone and announces its ruling assumptions in its opening pages. Urbanization, the Plan declares, is a defining condition of modernity. The current growth of cities was unprecedented, as was the increase in wealth and the advance of democracy. But "the formless growth of the city," which had produced overcrowding and congestion, was "neither economical nor satisfactory." As a result, the Plan explains, "practical men of affairs are turning their attention to working out the means whereby the city may be made an efficient instrument for providing all its people with the best possible conditions of living." As for Chicago, its sudden emergence as a major metropolis was merely a prelude to its seizing its rightful place as the preeminent city of America and the world. It could only attain that position, however, if it exercised the vision and will required to discipline and direct the powerful but disparate physical and social energies that, having created this prodigious city, now threatened its undoing. Chicago's spectacular development had resulted in "the chaos incident to rapid growth, and especially to the influx of people of many nationalities without common traditions or habits of life."

Chicago emerged so abruptly, the Plan explains two chapters later, that events outran its citizens' capacity to comprehend and control them. Over the seventy-five years-a single human lifetime-in which this outpost with only a smattering of settlers exploded into a great metropolis encompassing close to two hundred square miles and more than 2 million residents, the city's expansion was "so rapid that it has been impossible to plan for the economical disposition of the great influx of people, surging like a human tide to spread itself wherever opportunity for profitable labor offered place." The public interest now demanded that Chicagoans lift their eyes from their limited personal concerns to those of the fundamental structure and organization of the built urban environment in which they all lived. A coherent and compelling strategy for creating a "well-ordered and convenient city" was now nothing short of "indispensable." These words, like many other passages in the Plan of Chicago, have inspired readers since they were published on July 4, 1909. The choice of date was noteworthy, for the Plan was a declaration of independence from what its framers saw as a self-imposed tyranny of unregulated development that threatened the fortunes, and perhaps even the lives and sacred honor, of the city's citizens.

But was it true that Chicago had evolved without any plan? In fact, by 1909 it had been the site of many plans. While the city always attracted opportunists focused only on immediate gain, as early as the 1830s it was being fashioned by people who consistently looked ahead. This hardly means that they did not often pursue very short-term-and shortsighted-goals. But they consistently and actively attempted to create what was by their lights a better city, in the belief, shared by the authors of the Plan, that improving Chicago as a whole would benefit everyone who lived within it.

The place and the times rewarded Chicagoans' efforts to grow their own and their city's fortunes. Modern Chicago owes its origins to its location at the southwestern edge of the Great Lakes near a convenient portage to the Mississippi Valley and the heart of the continent. The most distinctive feature of the setting was, paradoxically, its lack of distinctive features. The level prairie that stretched in all directions away from the lake invited the most ambitious conceptions by offering few obvious natural obstacles to their realization. The prairie and the lake, the Plan observes, "each immeasurable by the senses," dictated the scale of possibility in Chicago. "Whatever man undertakes here," it continues, "should be either actually or seemingly without limit." While European explorers recognized the area's promise as early as the 1670s, the fulfillment of its potential had to wait for the right historical moment. This arrived in the antebellum decades with the onset of the industrial, transportation, and communications revolutions in the United States.

These developments animated an increasingly networked national and international free-market economy, a jump in both immigration from abroad and population mobility within the nation, and an ethos of hyperbolic boosterism, the local form of the national rhetoric of manifest destiny. Chicago was home to nearly thirty thousand people by 1850 and to ten times that number only twenty years later. After the Great Fire of 1871 incinerated close to a third of the city, including the commercial downtown and most of the North Side, Chicago was speedily rebuilt, thanks to the irrepressible spirit of local residents and an infusion of capital from investors elsewhere who knew the country needed this great central marketplace. None of this happened smoothly. Considerable tumult, whether in the form of financial busts that alternated unpredictably with the booms or social and economic tensions that all too often erupted into violence, marked the city's growth through the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

Where was planning in all of this, or did the invisible hand of market forces take care of everything? In a noted address delivered in 1923 at the Field Museum to the Geographical Society of Chicago and appropriately titled "Chicago: A City of Destiny," J. Paul Goode, professor of geography at the University of Chicago, argued that the advantages of the city's location, and the local population's ability to understand and exploit these advantages, made Chicago's eminence inevitable. Thirty-two years later, Harold M. Mayer, another University of Chicago geography professor speaking under the same auspices, complicated Goode's argument. Mayer began his lecture, "Chicago: City of Decisions," by citing five deliberate actions that "have carried [Chicago] toward its destiny as the Metropolis of the Midwest." These included the provision of the federal Land Ordinance of 1785 that dictated Chicago's (and many other towns') rectangular street grid, the building of Fort Dearborn near the mouth of the Chicago River in 1803, and the choice by railroads to make Chicago what historian William Cronon has called the "gateway city" between the industrializing East and the agricultural hinterland. Of interest here is that Mayer's other two examples were the creation of the Plan of Chicago and "the decision to set up planning as a continuous operation in Chicago."

Mayer stated that he picked these five decisions "more or less arbitrarily." He claimed that he could have chosen any of a number of other examples. Among them were many of the developments he and his coauthor Richard C. Wade later described in Chicago: Growth of a Metropolis (1969). These included the cut in the sandbar that had impeded entrance to the Chicago River and the construction of a harbor at that entrance, both accomplished by 1833; the expulsion of the Native American population shortly after; the greatly anticipated and much-delayed completion of the Illinois and Michigan Canal, which was finally in operation by 1848; the raising of the city's grade and the construction of a comprehensive waterworks, both of which began in the 1850s; the establishment of the South, West, and Lincoln parks and the boulevard system that connected them, starting in the late 1860s; and the successful reversal of the flow of the Chicago River, after several earlier attempts, during the 1890s. All of these entailed planning in that they were long-term coordinated efforts usually involving direct or indirect public participation, approval, and financing. Chicago was also the site of several large-scale privately funded planning initiatives, among them the opening of the Union Stock Yard in 1865, the building of the model town of Pullman in the 1880s, and the creation of the Central Manufacturing District in 1905. As the Plan said of its own purpose, the aim of all of these was "to anticipate the needs of the future as well as to provide for the necessities of the present."

In ways that transcend any individual example, the planning idea is deeply ingrained in the nature and character of Chicago. The city's lack of a long history, at least from the point of view of those not of Native American ancestry, both invited and demanded planning. One of the things that distinguished Chicago from the other leading American cities that, with the exception of New York, it surpassed in population by 1890 was the comparative brevity of its past. What history Chicago did possess its residents commonly ignored because they felt little connection to it. Through the nineteenth century, Chicago's population consisted overwhelmingly of those who, if not from somewhere else themselves, were children of parents born and raised in other places. Commonly this elsewhere was a different and distant country. And if members of the city's commercial and social elite were largely native born, they, too, had mostly come to Chicago from other parts of the United States.

Even in the early twentieth century, when the Plan of Chicago appeared, self-made men constituted the bulk of this elite, though more and more the sons of such economic pioneers were taking positions of leadership. For much of the city's population, moving to Chicago and allying oneself with its future had been central to their own personal plans for success. Indeed, few places were so speculatively oriented. It is no coincidence that Chicagoans created the modern commodities market, in the form of the Chicago Board of Trade, where the future itself is bought and sold. Nor was it out of the city's character that real estate developers purchased property in sparsely settled areas in anticipation of the growth that was sure to make the investment pay.

Nowhere else in the United States did booster rhetoric rise to such brassy grandiloquence. Of the countless speeches and tracts that boomed Chicago's prospects, few outstripped the hyperbolic optimism of the thick volume Chicago: Past, Present, Future, subtitled Relations to the Great Interior, and to the Continent, first published in 1868 by John S. Wright. Wright arrived from western Massachusetts in 1832 at the age of seventeen. Before he was twenty-one, he made a fortune in real estate speculation. Wright prepared a census and one of the earliest maps of Chicago, and he constructed at his own expense the town's first public school. Wright's real estate profits evaporated in the Panic of 1837 (he lost another fortune twenty years later investing in a new kind of reaper), but his faith in the city's prospects never wavered. Well before J. Paul Goode's address to the Geographical Society, Wright contended that the natural creation had been planned with Chicago's greatness in mind. "It is clear as sunlight," he proclaims, "that for Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, North Missouri, and part of Indiana and Michigan, this city must be the emporium." Of all America's new western cities, Wright likewise declares, Chicago "is most certain to grow." Speaking of the city's nondescript topography, Wright adds, "There never was a site more perfectly adapted by nature for a great commercial and manufacturing city, than this."

One could dismiss all of this as bombast, except for the fact that it was true. In 1861 Wright reportedly predicted that within a quarter of a century the city's population would reach 1 million. He was off by only four years. Wright's main point was that, whatever the momentary setbacks, Chicago's progress was irresistible. The future, the most valuable commodity in Chicago, would be bigger and better, and it would belong to those who most fully understood the potential that lay in the factors that Goode listed and who then knew how to command Chicago's promise with the kind of decisions that Mayer described. In Chicago, Mark Twain writes in Life on the Mississippi (1883), "they are always rubbing the lamp, and fetching up the genii, and contriving and achieving new impossibilities." For the occasional visitor, Twain explains, Chicago was always a "novelty," since "she is never the Chicago you saw when you passed through the last time."

Well before the Plan of Chicago was published, there were also those who anticipated its assertion that in their haste Chicagoans had built all too carelessly and with insufficient planning. Legendary landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted, reflecting on the Great Chicago Fire in the Nation shortly after the conflagration occurred, was only one of several observers who attributed the extent of the damage to hurried and sloppy building. Olmsted-who had recently designed the South Side's Jackson Park and Washington Park, as well as the elegant suburb of Riverside-would twenty years later be one of Plan author Daniel Burnham's chief collaborators on the World's Columbian Exposition of 1893. Chicago's "weakness for 'big things,'" its desire "to think that it was outbuilding New York," Olmsted wrote, did not directly cause but certainly invited the disaster. The editors of the Chicago Inter-Ocean at the time agreed, stating that the fire revealed that the city's "paramount need was harness, self-restraint, the temperance which comes from experience." None of these qualities thrived in Chicago.

At the turn of the twentieth century, numerous observers criticized the apparent governing spirit of Chicago and other cities for thinking of planning, if at all, merely as a matter of expanding the urban infrastructure in ways that would attract and support yet more private commercial investment. It was bad policy, these critics maintained, to entrust the future to real estate developers, project engineers, and most public officials, who rarely lifted their eyes from the matter right at hand. In too many instances, the highest concern of such people was how quickly and cheaply they could get a particular project done, not how long it would last or how it related to the city as a whole. Though by the 1880s Chicago was becoming famous for its architecture, the most skilled designers were responsible only for a limited number of buildings and did not pay a great deal of attention to the larger context as they worked on individual structures.

Some thoughtful Chicagoans complained that their fellow citizens measured civic achievement only in quantitative rather than qualitative terms, and rarely with anything but their own personal welfare in mind. As a result, Chicago suffered from being a place where all too many people came to work and invest rather than to live, and this showed in the city they had built. One of the city's most thoughtful and perceptive social observers was journalist and novelist Henry Blake Fuller, who was actually born and raised in the city but who never made peace with its booster ethos and imperious entrepreneurial spirit. Commenting on the built environment of Chicago in an article on the city in the Atlantic Monthly in 1897, Fuller noted with regret, "Possessed of a single sheet of paper, we have set down our crude, hasty, mistaken sketch upon it, and we shall have the odds decidedly against us in any attempt to work over this sketch, made on the one surface at our disposal, into the tasteful and finished picture that we may be hoping finally to produce." In Fuller's novel With the Procession (1895), a civic-minded group aptly named the Consolation Club meets to consider the affairs of their "vast and sudden municipality." One of its members remarks sadly, "This town of ours labors under one peculiar disadvantage: it is the only great city in the world to which all its citizens have come for the one common, avowed object of making money."

The Plan of Chicago combines familiar booster rhetoric with the reservations expressed by Olmsted, Fuller, and others. On the one hand, it contains passages that John S. Wright could have written, as when it flatly states, "Chicago is now facing the momentous fact that fifty years hence, when the children of to-day are at the height of their power and influence, this city will be larger than London: that is, larger than any existing city." On the other hand, it rejects the idea that the city's success could or should be evaluated in terms of numbers alone, or that the future would take care of itself. While Chicago's growth had exceeded the most optimistic projections, it was time to rethink some basic conceptions of civic success. Fortunately, the Plan states, "the people of Chicago have ceased to be impressed by rapid growth or the great size of the city. What they insist [on] asking now is, How are we living?" The answer to that question was not reassuring, and the only proper course of action, the Plan asserts, was to prove Fuller's pessimism wrong and triumphantly remake the city.



Excerpted from The Plan of Chicago by CARL SMITH Copyright © 2006 by Carl Smith. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Contents

List of Illustrations
Acknowledgements
Introduction

1. Planning Before the Plan
2. Antecedents and Inspirations
3. The City the Planners Saw
4. The Plan Comes Together
5. Creating the Plan
6. Reading the Plan
7. Promotion
8. Implementation
9. Heritage

Bibliographical Essay
Index
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 28, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)