- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Posted August 22, 2013
Posted March 1, 2013
A full eleven years before Cardinal,Karol Wolylta was elected as The next Vicar of Christ I saw a wonderful
film about the election of "a non Italian who was a political prisoner,from a Communist country"
In 1977,Cardinal,Karol Wolylta was elected Pope~and I knew I'd seen this somewhere before?
Then I thought back to "The Shoes of the Fisherman" and it's storyline.
It was like "Life had copied Art" not Art copying Life.
The names were similar,Karol Wolylta/Keril Lakota, him coming from a Communist country/Poland,
He being a political prisoner~ok,I'll give them a point for original idea?
The other thing that I've always loved about the film was the fact that it showed what the Election of a Pope
or a Conclave was like~somewhat?
Now I'm chosing to read the book,as I've seen the film countless numbers of time.
Marlene Ferraro Emmett,West Palm Beach,FL.
Posted December 8, 2006
This book is outstanding but so difficult to read! I started it thinking that it could be read for entertainment. I was so mistaken! The story is somewhat simple: a tormented man is elected Pope, and has to deal with his inner demon in the form of the premier of the former Soviet Union. As simple as the story may be, the plot soon takes a difficult path and makes the reader pay closer attention under penance of missing the whole picture. In short, not a beach read but very rewarding and worth the effort.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted April 4, 2005
This is the book on which the 1968 movie, The Shoes of the Fisherman, was based. It is a much drier read than the movie is a view, naturally. I saw the movie first, then read the book. While I found the book informative and interesting, because of my interest in the office of the Pope, it is not an easy read. It took focused concentration to absorb all it had to offer. It is the story of the election of a Russian to the Papacy, one Kiril Lakota, who had been imprisoned in Siberia for 20 years (17 in the book) and tormented by his jailer, Kamenev, who later becomes the head of the Soviet state. Lakota's ascent to the Papacy, and his actions as Pontiff, are related in this story. We learn about some of Lakota's brethren, Cardinal Leone and Cardinal Rinaldi, for example, who impart some of their own history and personality traits to one another and, hence, to the reader. Then, there is George Faber, the newsman, and others. We learn from each of them. There is also a desperate world situation with which the Pope must contend. He is in a unique position to do so. Another character worthy of mention is theologian Jean Télémond. In his intense internal struggle to justify God to man, he writes. His writings, often in conflict with his elders, offer his own passionate views of God, Jesus, and the Church--its leaders, tenets, practices, and views, as they relate to the people of the world, and to science. He was eventually put on trial for his theories. The movie, of course, takes many liberties, simplifies and leaves out much, but makes the whole of the story easier to digest. Like they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. The movie is a thousand pictures, pictures that help the reader understand the content and context of this excellent book. Carolyn Rowe HillWas this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted May 1, 2005
Rereading this book in 2005 reveals much that was fiction in 1963, yet now is history. Fascinating to see how much has changed, how much remains the same in world events. A timely look at the role of the Pope in the church and in the world.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 3, 2001
Posted October 20, 2009
No text was provided for this review.