The Supreme Court in the Early Republic: The Chief Justiceships of John Jay and Oliver Ellsworth


William R. Casto sheds a new light on America's federal judiciary and the changing legal landscape with his detailed examination of the Supreme Court's formative years. In a study that spans the period from the Court's tentative beginnings through the appointment of its third chief justice, Casto reveals a judicial body quite different in orientation and philosophy from the current Supreme Court and one with a legacy of enduring significance for the U.S. legal system.
Casto ...
See more details below
Available through our Marketplace sellers.
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (8) from $34.21   
  • New (2) from $108.16   
  • Used (6) from $34.21   
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any coupons and promotions
Seller since 2008

Feedback rating:



New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.


Ships from: Chicago, IL

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
Seller since 2010

Feedback rating:


Condition: New
Hardcover New 1570030332 New Condition *** Right Off the Shelf | Ships within 2 Business Days ~~~ Customer Service Is Our Top Priority! -Thank you for LOOKING: -)

Ships from: Geneva, IL

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Sort by
The Supreme Court in the Early Republic: The Chief Justiceships of John Jay and Oliver Ellsworth

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$13.99 price
(Save 43%)$24.95 List Price


William R. Casto sheds a new light on America's federal judiciary and the changing legal landscape with his detailed examination of the Supreme Court's formative years. In a study that spans the period from the Court's tentative beginnings through the appointment of its third chief justice, Casto reveals a judicial body quite different in orientation and philosophy from the current Supreme Court and one with a legacy of enduring significance for the U.S. legal system.
Casto portrays the founding of the Supreme Court as a conscious effort to help the newly established government deal more effectively with national security and foreign policy concerns, and he credits the Court with assisting the Washington and Adams administrations establish stable relationships with Great Britain and France. The initial debate over the Supreme Court's jurisdiction as well as over the method of selecting its justices is recalled here.
Casto also reveals the philosophical mindset of the first Supreme Court, contrasting the eighteenth-century concept of natural law with the legal positivism on which the Supreme Court now relies. Using this historical context, he addresses the political controversy over federal common-law crimes, the drafting of the Judiciary Act of 1789, and the adoption of judicial review.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Casto (law, Texas Tech U.) sheds new light on America's federal judiciary in this examination of the Supreme Court's formative years, from the Court's beginnings through the appointment of its third chief justice. He reveals the philosophical mindset of the first Supreme Court, contrasting the 18th-century concept of natural law with the legal positivism on which the Court now relies, and addresses the political controversy over federal common law crimes, the drafting of the Judiciary Act of 1789, and the adoption of judicial review. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (
Barry Friedman
No one will gainsay that the Supreme Court's very early history often is neglected by historians. Ask anyone about the "early" Supreme Court and they are likely to tell you about John Marshall and MARBURY V. MADISON, as though it all began there and never mind the first roughly fifteen years. William Casto s interesting book on the very early years of the Supreme Court takes us back before familiar beginnings, and in doing so provides insight into not only many issues of that day, but of our day as well. This book is, chronologically, the first in a series that covers the Supreme Court s history, organized with reference to the presiding Chief Justice. It is common to study or discuss the Supreme Court in periodic blocks defined by the sitting Chief Justice. Witness our familiarity with the Warren Court (which gave us BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION) and the Rehnquist Court (which cut back on the civil liberties advances of the Warren Court). Common as the convention is, it is a misleading one, for what the Supreme Court is doing at any given time may have little to do with the proclivities or leadership of the Chief Justice. Casto's book makes the point perfectly. It may be easiest to begin with what Casto does not do. Take the title, and the Chief Justice convention. While the book is indeed about the early years of the Supreme Court, it has surprisingly little to say about Ellsworth and Jay's relationships with the courts they led. There is somewhat more about Ellsworth in the book (Casto is an Ellsworth biographer), but the focus is on Ellsworth's prominent role as one of the architects of the Judiciary Act of 1789. The point of the observation is not to highlight a gaping omission by Casto, but recognition of a point he makes repeatedly and well. The Supreme Court in its early years was not a cohesive collegial body. The reasons for this were many, but among them were a slow-building docket and the fact that court members spent most of their time cast to the winds riding circuit. In addition, and though there is little significance to this, it seems from the literature of the period that some court members spent a fair amount of their time sick and unable to attend. Whatever the reasons, today's picture of a court ensconced in one building and meeting regularly to hear arguments and discuss cases, or even to exchange memoranda among chambers, could hardly be further from the late 18th Century reality. Dispersed as the Court was, and with most of the work done on circuit, neither Ellsworth nor Jay seems to have exerted a great deal of influence administratively or ideologically; much of this story -- despite the book s title and the series organization -- is not theirs. A tad more disappointing is that the book did not turn out to be exactly what it promised (a description of a court whose work was mostly in the area of national security and foreign affairs) nor even what one might have expected. Given the battle between the Supreme Court and the political branches in Page 220 follows: Marshall's time, and the fight between nationalizing Federalists and state-centered anti-Federalists that preceded Marshall, one would have thought a book about the early years would address these themes. Instead, Casto tells us "most (58%) of the cases from the Supreme Court's first decade had significant national security and foreign affairs implications." (p.3) Casto thus tempts the reader with an unexpected thesis, but does not carry through in a fulfilling way. The national security and foreign affairs topics are discussed, primarily in one long chapter on "A National Security Court," and one on "National Security and Federal Criminal Law," but Casto s unique focus does not really work. For example, Casto seems to include among national security issues revenue and sedition cases. Sedition cases were as much about partisan wrangling as they were truly about national security, however, and revenue is a national security issue in a sense, but in that sense almost everything is. While trying hard to make his descriptive thesis work, Casto unfortunately neglected the antecedents of the great battles that loomed on the horizon following Jefferson's selection as President and Marshall's taking his seat on the Supreme Bench. Yet, despite these shortcomings, Casto's work is a fascinating and illuminating one. It captures precisely what the first part of the title suggests, the early years of the Supreme Court. While the book lacks a certain coherence, it nonetheless touches on many subjects of deep interest, among them the Philadelphia Convention's struggle over a federal judiciary, Ellsworth's framing of the first judiciary act, the national security cases, federal criminal common law, a bit on state's rights, and extrajudicial activities of the Justices. In essence Casto offers a potpourri of the issues arising from creation of a new judiciary. One of the highlights of the book is the extended discussion of the Madisonian Compromise as it played out through the drafting of the Judiciary Act of 1789. It is familiar history that the delegates to the constitutional convention, unable to agree on the need or good sense of a system of lower federal courts, punted the question to successive Congresses. The battle, as was common, was between those who hoped lower courts would exert a nationalizing influence, and those who were jealous of state prerogatives and feared such an influence. Casto picks up the thread, showing how Ellsworth, and Congress, resolved matters in a way that granted federal jurisdiction to lower courts where it was most needed, while always solicitous of state judicial prerogatives. In this sense, federal jurisdiction was utilized in a highly instrumental way. Indeed, the book s most important message may be with regard to the proper uses of federal courts. While there seems today to be a mad scramble to federalize as many criminal law cases as possible, often with higher penalties that entice prosecutors to federal court, Casto tells us the original district courts had punishment ceilings so low that they "almost never tried criminal cases." Of course, the federal circuit courts were available, and in the face of congressional non-action these courts even fell back on common law to prosecute crimes against the nation, but here too one is left with the distinct impression such prosecutions only occurred when a national interest truly existed that required circumventing the state courts. Similarly, in order to avoid pulling all debt cases out of state court, Ellsworth's judiciary act contained an amount-in-controversy requirement, setting the precedent for a practice utilized yet today in diversity cases. Casto makes the important point that in a pre-17th Amendment world Senators truly were Page 221 follows: representative of state interests, and thus solicitude for the states was a key factor in fashioning the work of the federal courts. The only place Casto seems to go astray is in the odd conclusion that although federal jurisdiction was shaped in the 18th Century instrumentally to further national goals, today there is "a shared assumption that the scope of federal jurisdiction should be determined by general principles more or less unrelated to the outcome of particular cases." (p.52) Perhaps Casto sees federalization of crimes, the Violence Against Women Act, proposed limits on the use of federal courts in tort cases while federalizing tort law, proposed limits on habeas corpus jurisdiction and the like differently than I do, but I suspect Congress throughout history generally has followed Ellsworth's lead in using federal courts to serve national ends. The enduring thread of Casto's book, however, and one that could have provided an entire thesis, is the extraordinarily pragmatic approach the Supreme Court Justices took to their work in the early years. Constitutional government is so familiar to us we easily forget these folks were making it up as they went along. While this was true of all three branches, Casto repeatedly demonstrates how pragmatic creativity more than anything else carried the Court through its work. When the Justices were assigned to hear invalid war pensioner's claims subject to reversal by the Secretary of War, they all -- riding circuit -- declined on separation of powers grounds: Article III courts could only render final judgments. Yet, several of the Justices then fudged matters serving as "commissioners" to see that this vital work was done. When George Washington formally asked for advisory opinions in the Correspondence of the Justices, the Court declined on separation of powers and justiciability grounds, but individual Justices continued to render such opinions informally and the Court hastened to decide a case that would provide answers. The great decision in HYLTON V. U.S. resolving the authority of the national government to impose a carriage tax was transparently trumped up. Hylton's sixteen dollars at issue hardly met the amount-in-controversy requirement, so he stipulated that he had "125 chariots for the conveyance of persons . . ." and owed $2,000. (p. 102-03). Even in the face of a jurisdictional requirement that the amount in controversy EXCEED $2,000, the Court resolved the case on the merits. Repeatedly Casto shows us how addressing national interests motivated the Court far more than principle or existing rules. Oddly enough, Casto overlooks his own point when trying too hard to explain the rules that governed constitutional judicial review in pre-Marbury days. Casto tells us that the Court almost unanimously was of the view that it had the power to strike acts of Congress, and then Casto tries to explain how interpretation worked. Repeatedly, however, he seems forced to deal with conflicting evidence he himself presents. The Court would not rely on the framers' intent (p.230), except Paterson and Chase seemed to do so (p.231) and in any event the ratifier s' intent was important (p.234). Casto seeks to explain away the notion that the Justices relied upon supraconstitutional principles (p.236) in the face of evidence he identifies to the contrary (p.238) and after frequently telling us how natural law principles frequently governed the Justices' action. While Casto's attempt to make sense of the somewhat-conflicting evidence is admirable, what stands out is how in the area of constitutional interpretation, as in so much else, the Justices essentially were making it up as they went along. Consistency was far too much to expect under the circumstances. Too many would-be constitutional interpreters of today are sanctimonious about the One True Way to Page 222 follows: bring life to that document, yet those charged with doing so in the early years acted far more out of a sense of the necessary and possible than out of any formalistic interpretive method. Although not precisely what one might have expected, Casto's chronicle of the early court is an interesting and informative read. While much here is familiar, much else is not. And while Casto gets lost too much at times in the cases, the broader story, of creating a nation out of whole parchment, is a telling one. REFERENCES: HYLTON V. U.S. 3 U.S. 171 (1796)
Read More Show Less

Product Details

Meet the Author

William R. Casto is the Paul Whitfield Horn Professor of Law at Texas Tech University. He is the author of Oliver Ellsworth and the Creation of the Federal Republic and Foreign Affairs and the Constitution in the Age of Fighting Sail.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Editor's Preface
Preface and Acknowledgments
Repository Symbols
Short Titles and Abbreviations
Introduction 1
1 Creating the Court 4
The Federal Courts' Subject-Matter Jurisdiction 5
Judicial Appointments 16
Good Behavior and Compensation 18
Judicial Review 19
Nonjudicial Duties 23
Looking to the Future 25
2 The Judiciary Act of 1789 27
Drafting the Judiciary Act 27
Opposition to the Federal Courts 29
The Seeds of a Compromiss 31
Limiting the Supreme Court's Jurisdiction 33
Federal Trial Courts: Admiralty Jurisdiction 38
Shaping the Compromise on Federal Trial Courts 41
The Congress Accepts Ellsworth's Compromise 47
Congressional Instrumentalism 51
3 Selecting the Justices and Initial Operations 54
The First Nominees 56
Assessing Washington's Nomination Criteria 65
4 A National Security Court 71
The Nootka Sound Crisis 71
Relations with France and Great Britain 72
The Neutrality Proclamation 74
The Treaty of Alliance and the Correspondence of the Justices 75
Admiralty Jurisdiction I: Glass v. The Sloop Betsy 82
The Jay Treaty I: Extrajudicial Service 87
The Jay Treaty II: The Rutledge Fiasco 90
Oliver Ellsworth and Samuel Chase 95
The Jay Treaty III: Advisory Opinions 97
The British Debt Cases 98
The Power to Tax 101
Admiralty Jurisdiction II: La Vengeance 105
La Vengeance: Majority Opinions and Chiefly Leadership 110
Admiralty Jurisdiction III: Restitution of Prizes 112
The Jay Treaty IV: Sale of Prizes 115
Bushrod Washington 117
The Quasi-War I: The Ellsworth Mission 118
Alfred Moore 120
The Quasi-War II: Bas v. Tingy 120
The Quasi-War III: Chief Justice Ellsworth Resigns 124
5 National Security and Federal Criminal Law 126
Political Grand Jury Charges 126
Common-Law Crimes 129
Enforcing the Law of Nations 130
Beyond the Law of Nations: The Worrall Case 141
The Problem of Seditious Libel 147
Federal Common Law and the Williams Case 152
The Williams Case and Interstitial Federal Common Law 154
Common-Law Crimes and Common-Law Thinking 155
Statutory Crimes: The Whiskey Rebellion 163
Statutory Crimes: Justice Chase on Circuit 165
6 Nonjudicial Activities 173
Ex-Officio Duties 174
The Invalid Pensioners Act 175
Advisory Opinions 178
A Pragmatic Approach to Nonjudicial Activities 180
7 The Constitution and State Sovereignty 184
Chisholm v. Georgia 188
The Eleventh Amendment 197
The Scope of the Eleventh Amendment 202
Suits by Foreign States 203
Suits in Admiralty 204
Enforcement of Federal Rights 205
The Federalists and the Eleventh Amendment 211
8 The Court and the Constitution 213
Judicial Review of Federal Actions 214
The Sovereignty of the People 215
Justice Chase's Doubts 220
Interpreting the Constitution 222
Congressional Power to Restrict Jurisdiction 239
9 An Assessment 247
Table of Cases 255
Index 259
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)