The Train Now Departing: Two Novellas


Featuring the two novellas:

The Train Now Departing and When “The Mousetrap” Closes

“Full of suspense and surprise. These carefully written little gems showcase Grimes at her best.”—Library Journal

“Grimes has created a work of value here, a book that expands her art, her reputation—and possibly her audience.”—The Richmond-Times Dispatch


See more details below
Paperback (Reissue)
$11.23 price
(Save 13%)$13.00 List Price
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (65) from $1.99   
  • New (6) from $3.99   
  • Used (59) from $1.99   
Sending request ...


Featuring the two novellas:

The Train Now Departing and When “The Mousetrap” Closes

“Full of suspense and surprise. These carefully written little gems showcase Grimes at her best.”—Library Journal

“Grimes has created a work of value here, a book that expands her art, her reputation—and possibly her audience.”—The Richmond-Times Dispatch

“Atmospheric and chilling…Grimes [exhibits] a complete mastery of emotional nuance and [a] virtuoso treatment of the grayest coloration.”—The Commercial Appeal (Memphis, TN)

“Intelligent…Merits applause.”—The Toronto Star

“As atmospherically evocative as [an] Edward Hopper painting.”—The Washington Post

“An a cappella novella, each note strong and noncompetitive.”—Los Angeles Times

“Grimes once again demonstrates her keen eye for character. Both of these languidly paced novellas focus on middle-aged women who long for respite from their narrow, disappointing lives and find it, at least temporarily, in the company of a man…Thoughtful, compelling, even dark stories—for readers more inclined toward investigating emotions than searching for armchair adventure.”—Booklist

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
Praising the title novella, the Los Angeles Times evoked a musical metaphor, calling it "an a cappella novella, each note strong and noncompetitive." The comparison is apt: Grimes's prose is smoothly textured and lyrical, a pleasure to imbibe. These two novellas are both studies in relationship; the author's renderings of these vexatious pairings are precise and engage us far more than a mere plot summary could suggest. Especially compelling is her portrait in the first novel of a travel writer who seems averse to travel.
Barnes & Noble Guide to New Fiction
Each of the two thematically linked novellas in this book centers on a single woman living a quiet, well-ordered, seemingly contented life. But both novellas harbor a man who imperceptibly embroils its heroine in something far darker. Readers found the first novella "lacking," poorly plotted, with "banal" characters, and "often tedious." The second, however, was filled with "interesting characters, charming detail, and a great twist at the end - a lovely read."
Richmond Times-Dispatch
A book that expands her art, her reputation-and her audience.
Boston Globe
Brilliantly told.
Atmospheric and chilling... Grimes [exhibits] a complete mastery of emotional nuance and [a] virtuoso treatment of the grayest coloration.
Toronto Star
Merits applause.
Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
As she did in Hotel Paradise, Grimes here eschews the mystery genre, venturing into Anita Brookner territory in two related novellas whose protagonists are lonely women in emotional limbo. The unnamed heroine of the title story is a colorless woman who lives on an inheritance in her comfortable family home in a small town, has given up her job as a teacher and spends her days in passive desperation. A chance meeting with a man who writes travel books leads to her only sustained human contact. The two have platonic late-afternoon lunches during which his attention to his food outweighs her need for conversation; when they do talk, they bicker. She only picks at the rich food, preferring cheese sandwiches at the railway cafe, where she feels more affinity for the waitress than she does for the writer, whom she inwardly assails as a man without depth. It is she herself, however, too timid to travel anywhere, or to do anything at all, who is depthless. The irony of the denouement, where the woman's fear proves more accurate than the writer's offhand denial of danger, proves touching. Though she too represents another narrow existence lived in solitude, Edith Parenger, the protagonist of "When The Mousetrap Closes," is a more appealing, nuanced character. "An ordinary maiden lady" of 52, she is mourning the recent death of her mother, with whom she lived in harmony. When renowned young actor Archie Marchbanks turns up at her neighborhood tearoom, Edith is moved to talk to him. To her amazement, he initiates a weekly tea date during which she quizzes him about his craft. Clues to Archie's motivation emerge when he describes his roles as "the trick of the confidence man," but Edith is slow to understand the implications of his behavior. As Grimes describes these women with restrained sympathy, one is moved by her ability to suggest the aching emotional chasm of apparently solid middle-aged lives. (May) Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.|
Library Journal
The latest offering from Grimes, the author of the popular Richard Jury mystery series, consists of a pair of atmospheric novellas. While both stories center on middle-aged, single women whose careful, well-ordered lives are gradually altered by meals they share with male acquaintances, these two novellas are quite distinct in their ambience and characterization. In "The Train Now Departing," Grimes eerily depicts a bright, analytical woman teetering into madness. "When the Mousetrap Closes" is the story of Edith Parenger, a woman whose desperate loneliness is pitted against her keen powers of observation in an unflinching exploration of the power of illusion. Although these stories are not mysteries, they are full of suspense and surprise. These carefully written little gems showcase Grimes at her best. Recommended for all fiction collections. [Previewed in Prepub Alert, LJ 1/00.]--Jane La Plante, Minot State Univ Lib., ND Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.\
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780451203755
  • Publisher: Penguin Group (USA) Incorporated
  • Publication date: 6/12/2001
  • Edition description: Reissue
  • Pages: 208
  • Sales rank: 745,047
  • Product dimensions: 5.38 (w) x 8.02 (h) x 0.59 (d)

Meet the Author

Martha Grimes is the bestselling author of eighteen Richard Jury mysteries and also the acclaimed fiction Foul Matter, Cold Flat Junction, Hotel Paradise, The End of the Pier, and The Train Now Departing.


"No, I'm not English, but nothing quickens my imagination more than a fog-bound moor, windy heath, river mist in an old fishing village, and the names of British pubs like The Stargazey," Martha Grimes has written, and it's this quirk of hers that has made her one of the best loved modern practitioners of the venerable whodunit.

All of the titles in Grimes's bestselling Richard Jury series are taken from actual pubs, and all of them feature said pub in some fashion. "I can imagine the end of British hope and glory, but not the end of the British pub," she explains. So, too, it is hard to imagine the end of these deft, witty mysteries, begun in 1981 with The Man with a Load of Mischief, featuring a lugubrious Scotland Yard superintendent (Jury) and his art-collecting sidekick (Melrose Plant).

Grimes has a particular talent for combining heavy gloom with an unmistakable humor that's as subtle and dry as a soda cracker – a good thing, since the Jury casebook tends to be dark, twisted, and rather gruesome. But she always infuses her characters with human motivations and is careful to set up a chain of clues that ultimately discloses them. In addition, she's been known to thread in an unlikely theme here and there – NFL football, poetry references, animal rights, even hormone replacement therapy.

It's clear that Grimes likes to stretch her legs a bit, bringing Jury and his eccentric friends Stateside for a few cases and occasionally foraying beyond the series with novellas, standalones, and some interconnected literary fiction featuring teenage heroines. No doubt these changes of pace help keep the author's skills sharp and honed and ensure for her a wider and more growing readership.

Good To Know

Unlike many mystery writers, Grimes does not outline her plots ahead of time or even profess to know where they are headed when she begins writing. "I am not overly concerned with plot as such," she explains on her web site. "Obviously, if you start with a chapter such as the one above and intend the story to proceed from it, you could write yourself into a corner. I always do. In The Case Has Altered, I didn't know until I was nearly finished with it who had killed these women or why."

Grimes's father was city solicitor of Pittsburgh, and her mother owned a hotel in western Maryland. As a girl, she spent half her time in Pittsburgh and the other half at her mother's hotel in a little town called Mountain Lake Park.

Although her western Maryland-set series that began with The End of the Pier has earned its own fans, there's no denying that for most Grimes readers, it's all about Jury. If she needed a reminder of this, she got one in the loads of hate mail she received for abandoning Richard Jury to write Pier.

Grimes has taught creative writing at various colleges, including the small Maryland community school Montgomery College and the more prestigious Johns Hopkins University. Comparing the two in a Washington Post interview, the mordant Grimes noted of JHU, "Not one pompous ass in the whole program ... The pompous asses are at Montgomery College."

Read More Show Less
    1. Hometown:
      Washington, DC and Santa Fe, NM
    1. Date of Birth:
      May 2, 1931
    2. Place of Birth:
      Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    1. Education:
      B.A., M.A., University of Maryland
    2. Website:

Read an Excerpt

Chapter One

She had been speaking of the railway station, and he, as usual, had abandoned any pretense of listening, his attention solidly fixed upon his food, his fork aimed as if he were waging war on his lamb chops. The concentration with which he attacked his plate left no room for "banter" (as he referred to most of her conversation). But were she to accuse him of not listening, he would claim he certainly had been, to every word, and would then go into one of his elaborately mocking displays by setting down his knife and fork and fixing her with a wide-eyed stare, as if to say, There, is that what you want? thus making her appear demanding and contentious.

    It was one of their long late-afternoon lunches, and she wondered why they continued to have them, since they annoyed each other so much. He was as usual eating something heavy, explaining that it would also serve as dinner. That way, he would not have to bother going out again later on. The main reason he liked late lunches, he told her, was because of his writing schedule; he liked to start around nine and continue on through the early afternoon. He could never write after a meal, he said, so he put off the meal until three or four.

    She had ordered a salad of mixed greens. The restaurant was French and so the menu didn't call it that; its description of the salad was complicated and euphemistic. She wondered how they managed to catch greens at the "baby" stage; did greens also have an adolescence, an adulthood? But however the menu tried to enrich it, the salad was still mixed greens.

    As an appetizer,he had ordered mussels to which a number of things had been done, including sautéing and saucing up. She didn't know one did such things to mussels. She had ordered tomato juice. Without looking up from his dish of mussels, he had asked her how her tomato juice was, as if anything really interesting could be done with tomato juice. The question How is this? or How was that?—repeated at every lunch—was one of his few ready contributions to the conversation. It was for him an obligatory question, one which demonstrated his interest in her enjoyment. He always asked it of one dish or another, often several times during the course of a meal, thereby discharging his conversational debt.

    The waiter came with the wine, and he and the waiter discussed the year and the vineyard, speaking in rapid-fire French. After the waiter poured a thimbleful for tasting, it was pronounced good or very good ("Bon, bon"). The label told her it was a Hermitage, one of the reds he was so fond of. He always chose well and, in choosing well, spent a great amount of money. This was his favorite restaurant because of its wine list. He had spent months in Burgundy, in Meursault, Chablis, and Puligny-Montrachet, but he did not talk about the trip as such: the customs, the people, the lie of the land. Or, to be more precise, he did speak of the lie of the land insofar as it involved the slopes of the vineyards, how a few feet might separate a good wine from a great.

    But he approached such subjects as if she knew all about them, yet she knew nothing at all about them. Why he assumed she was conversant with such topics as that particular vineyard which produced a grand cru, its exposure to sun and cold, its particular soil—this she simply couldn't imagine, since he so often accused her of bantering and foolishness. But there he had been, at a previous lunch and another table, going on about Puligny, the source of his beloved Montrachet, going on as if she'd lived in the village herself. He had talked about Chablis—"You know those vineyards that produce the best Chardonnay grapes?"—and she had interrupted to assure him she had never been anywhere near Chablis, never been to Burgundy, never to France; didn't he know that? She knew he knew it; still, he paid no attention. And when she thought surely she could lead him around to describing the villages and the countryside he would just shrug and say something about his rental car breaking down or the poor condition of the roads.

    It was not that he did not talk, it was that he went through bouts of talking, words like gusts of wind, blowing in, stirring up currents, and troubling the air around them for a few moments. The brief exchange with the waiter about the Crozes-Hermitage was like this. In the course of lunching with him at many different restaurants, she had discovered that he was fluent in French, Italian, Spanish, and probably German, as he'd spent a good deal of time in Cologne, too. But she would not find out until they went to a German restaurant. When she had expressed surprise at his astonishing fluency in these languages, he had shrugged and said, "Well, one picks them up."

    Their main course came and another swift exchange in French (the waiter happy he could "banter" in his own language). Now that their entrées had come, she could expect all conversation to be suspended while they ate. In place of conversation, after a certain amount of time and silence pressed upon them, he would ask her the obligatory question. Since she was having salad, he would ask about that.

    Her main course—the salad—did not charm her; the greens were greens, even if they had been plucked in their infancy, and the dressing was too sharp, too vinegary. It made no difference to her; she hadn't been hungry. She would have preferred to be in the station café, eating the grilled-cheese sandwich she usually ordered. The station was one of those handsome nineteenth-century railway stations, and unusual in that it had been one of those in which the agents and their families had lived at the turn of the century. It fascinated her to think that part of it had been occupied by a family once. It was near her own large house, of that same Victorian period. She had lived all her life in this house. Her family had been small, very small, and were now all dead; not only her father and her mother, all of them—the few aunts and uncles, the tiny sprinkling of cousins. She wondered how that could be. It was almost as if a passenger car on a train carrying everyone together had disappeared. Where be your gibes now? your gambols? your songs? your flashes of merriment? She caught her breath. Such fragments often overtook her, coming so swiftly they made her wince.

    "How's your salad?"

    She was not prepared for the question this time, and she felt tears well in the corners of her eyes. Tears of sadness and also of frustration. She wanted to slap him. At the very least, she would like to say, Awful, it's awful, but this would only have cued him to disregard her or contradict her: Looks perfectly all right to me. Something like that. "Fine" is what she said, and he continued eating his chops, probably without hearing the answer, certainly without caring about it.

    Over cocktails, she had been trying to get him to talk about Zimbabwe. But he had, as she knew he would, answered in monosyllables. She had realized soon after they met that to try and draw him out about his trips was bound to end in failure, for he would not be drawn. He would drop hints only of the exoticism of what he had seen. As today, between the end of his first course of mussels and the beginning of his lamb, he had slipped into the silence the information that there were fish in the Amazon capable of swallowing cows. She waited for him to explain this brilliant fact, perfectly aware that he wouldn't. He went on eating his lamb.

    He managed to travel to these places without affect (except, perhaps, for Burgundy), dropping astounding bits of information into the silences that made up the large part of their meals together, as if he were reporting on the weather outside. It was so peculiar. Had he been a charming person, this might have been the charmingly innocent act of a schoolboy. Only he wasn't charming. And he hadn't a sense of what they called "childlike wonder." He seemed to assume that everyone knew, for instance, about Quetzalcoatl, the plumed serpent; or Silbaco, the nightjar that haunts the forests of the Amazon. And he would speak of these things without enlarging upon them. That was what, above all, exasperated her beyond saying. Well, what good did it do to say? He merely grunted or shrugged or suggested she was being trying or overly literal.

    It was not that he was keeping these trips secret, quite the contrary: he talked like a man with no secrets to hide. When she really got irritated with him, she could question him quite mercilessly and take a perverse pleasure in his sidestepping, evading, and shooting down her questions, dropping them like dead birds on the table.

    They had had to build a raft to take them up the Yata River.

    "Of what? How did you build it?"

    "Balsa and vines." He shrugged. Anyone could do it.

    "Is—was—the river pretty?"

    "No. Where's the damned waiter?"

    So the river she would have to picture on her own. Brown and sinuous, islands of floating greenery, pink wading birds, luxuriant trees growing from the water. Eyes flashing through the dark vegetation .... She sighed. All she knew about jungles she supposed she'd got from Joseph Conrad.

    "What's wrong? Why are you glooming away?" he asked.

    "I'm not glooming. I'm merely trying to picture the river."

    "What river?"

    She dropped her head, sipped her coffee, recalling that he had taken a train, but from where to where she couldn't remember. He had said only that it was hot, crowded, dreadful. He would not expand upon that, though to her it sounded as if it must surely have been colorful, in spite of the discomfort. "Wasn't it colorful?"

    "Not particularly." He had found the waiter. More bread, more wine.

    It was his mention of the train that made her think of their own railway station—how uninhabited it always seemed, how deserted.

    As a child she remembered going to meet the train with her mother, standing on the platform in a cloud of steam, watching the conductor drop down the yellow step for passengers descending, and assisting the ladies with an old-world courtly manner. The steam settling like fog or ground mist, the snow a bright unbroken crust that lay around the station, reflecting back the gold light inside, and a frill of snow along each window ledge like the whipped-cream piping on a cake or a flourish of lace on a dress.

    She mentioned it to him—not the memory of her childhood but the train station itself, how deserted it had always seemed. "It's like a ghost station. Ghost trains steaming through a ghost station."

    "Diesel-ing through, you mean." He smiled slyly. He knew she liked the image of the ghost train and so decided to demolish it. Still smiling, he continued eating.

     "You accuse me of being literal, but it's you who are. I've never known a writer to be so literal." She flushed with both anger and embarrassment, as if caught out in the middle of a childish fantasy.

    "You've never known a writer at all, other than myself."

    "Me," she said. "Other than me." That was a weak refutation, merely correcting his grammar. She hurried on. "Didn't you have fun watching the steam trains when you were young? They seemed to have so much more ... authority than the ones we have now." There was no point in bringing up his childhood, she knew, for he never reminisced. Whereas, that was what she did mostly and well.

    "If you like them so much, you should go to Zimbabwe," he said.

    She blinked at this astonishing irrelevancy. "Why in heaven's name Zimbabwe?"

    "The trains all run on steam there. It's the coal, you see. Country's loaded with coal."

    Missing the point completely. He usually did. She wondered if missing it weren't deliberate.

    He had returned from Zimbabwe, and it was as if he'd taken a walk around the corner for a newspaper. He traveled a good six months out of the year, and though he avoided talking about his travels (that is, beyond the startling comment or two), he wrote about them, and that, he must have supposed, was enough. He was a travel writer. She had read bits and pieces of his books because of their lunches together and because she knew him. She felt she must. She did not dislike his books; she was quite astounded that events were so colorfully reported. But she'd rather not read about travel. Travel writing made her uncomfortable; she did not know why. Perhaps because she felt she should travel herself but grew anxious merely thinking about it. Still, she had to give him credit for not answering her questions with Read my book, it's all in my book. He did not refer to his books as sources. Indeed, he did not refer to his books at all. At first she thought this might stem from sheer indifference. He did not seem to care about the books, except by way of complaining about the publishing business, how inept "those people" were.

    She sipped her wine and thought it tasted flinty. It was extremely dry. "It's the anonymity of a train ride I like."

    "You never go anywhere, so how do you know?" He was separating the meat from the bone of his third chop, careful as a surgeon. They were quite small, the chops. But "baby lamb" was obviously redundant.

    She went on. "It's eerie. As if the self were in some kind of limbo."

    He was chewing and looking at her, but she doubted he was listening. Or, if listening, comprehending. Often, when he looked up from his food, he would fix her with the glazed look of a child confronted with an irritated parent, seeming to hear but not hearing. Tuning out. There but not there.

    The waiter came to replenish their water and wine. "Our station—why is it so empty nearly all of the time?" This was not what she meant. She meant, Why does it make me feel empty, as if I were as devoid of experience as one of the waiting-room benches or one of the loosened panes rattling in the wind? She would sit on one of these benches, against a wall painted a dull cream, woodwork a varnished brown, colors she would have liked to think were chosen because they wouldn't agitate one's mind. The station and the platform were always spotlessly clean. There was a dog, too, a Labrador mixed with other breeds, its coat brown and slightly shiny like the woodwork. She supposed it belonged to the stationmaster. The dog was well fed and friendly and sometimes came to sit beside her. And there was, of course, the lunchroom, the café. It was the area that once must have served as the living quarters for the family. The mother might even have cooked in the café's tiny kitchen. She was at a loss to understand how it took in enough business to keep going. Many times she had been the only customer. The station had the air of a place deserted, fled from. The vacant waiting room, the lost property counter with its double door shut and locked, the abandoned ticket window, its tan blind pulled down: CLOSED. All of this was a landscape of sorts that she could relate to.

    During these reflections, she had barely noticed the waiter had been and gone, removing the plates, taking her half-eaten salad away. She hadn't wanted it, had found it dull. Now the waiter had returned with the dessert: sorbet for her and, for him, a complicated confection of ivory-colored mousse in a sauce cassis, crowned with nuts and other adornments.

    "Well," he said, "you've certainly been sitting there glooming away." There was the sly smile again.

    Silence on his part was meant to indicate he was not interested in idle chatter; on her part, silence meant moodiness, an uneven, quixotic temperament. It made her smile to think this, for she considered her temperament to be quite bland, smooth and white like the mousse. "I was just picturing our station. Just wondering if anyone buys tickets anymore. The window's always closed, it seems."

    Having forced her into saying something, he now ignored what she said and spooned into a rather unappetizing puddle of purple sauce. What was the name of it in French? La mousse en cassis? Something involved, like the dessert itself.

    "La salle des pas perdus."

    She was startled. "What?" Occasionally he would produce a comment of eerie relevance, even though she had been so sure he hadn't been listening.

    "It's how the French used to refer to the hall of ticket windows. The booking hall, I suppose they called it. La salle des pas perdus. The place of lost footsteps."

    Her spoon hung in midair, frozen in time.

    "How's your sorbet?" he asked.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews
  • Posted December 9, 2008

    more from this reviewer

    Poignant novellas

    ¿The Train now Departing¿. They share lunch, but he never is really there. All she wants from the renowned travel writer is for him to relate some of his adventures that would allow her to precariously live life through him. However, he cannot sense her total loneliness as he is only into himself even as he tells her to have her own adventures. <P>¿When the Mousetrap Closes¿. Edith Parenger is excited about seeing actor Archie Marchbanks in her favorite tea shop. Behaving out of character for someone who debates with herself about leaving her bed, Edith goes to Archie¿s table to meet the rising star. Surprisingly, Archie is kind to his lonely admirer, who fawns over his every word. However, what will happen to her when he moves on as is expected of the handsome actor? <P>The poignant stories center on vulnerable, lonely women. The novellas are well written and dig deep into isolated individuals living in an urban environment. Fans of Martha Grimes¿ Jury books should realize that these two tales are a radical departure from the author¿s probing mysteries, but provide an insightful character study of being alone amidst a sea of humans. <P>Harriet Klausner

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 22, 2008

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)