Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

The Unity of the Bible: Unfolding God's Plan for Humanity

The Unity of the Bible: Unfolding God's Plan for Humanity

4.0 1
by Daniel Fuller

See All Formats & Editions

"Professor Daniel P. Fuller raises questions concerning the unity of the Bible which few are willing to ask. His interesting findings will provoke serious study of the Bible for all those who seek to edify the church and train men and women for positions of leadership." -Oscar Cullmann "No book besides the Bible has had a greater influence on my life than Daniel


"Professor Daniel P. Fuller raises questions concerning the unity of the Bible which few are willing to ask. His interesting findings will provoke serious study of the Bible for all those who seek to edify the church and train men and women for positions of leadership." -Oscar Cullmann "No book besides the Bible has had a greater influence on my life than Daniel Fuller's Unity of the Bible. When I first read it as a classroom syllabus over twenty years ago, everything began to change. . . . It changed my life because it is so honest. No hard questions are dodged. No troubling texts are swept under the rug. There is a passion for seeing all of Scripture with no reference to how one part fits with another. Too much academic labor passes for mature scholarship while dealing only piecemeal with the reality of God's work in redemptive history. Daniel Fuller has given his life to seeing the connections and pursuing the coherence of 'the whole counsel of God.'" -John Piper "A rich mine. . . .the meditation of a lifetime on key biblical passages that represent the biblical message and as such provide the 'Unity of the Bible.' If anyone has ever discovered the truth about the relation of Law to Gospel, Daniel Fuller has." -Ralph D. Winter "Reading Dr. Fuller's manuscript left me amazed that something like this had never been done before to my knowledge. Not only does this volume address a relevance." -Richard Halverson "This book could well become a theological classic. It is written in non-technical language and is thus within the grasp of serious laypersons. It provides deeply edifying devotional reading because it is saturated with Scripture. By reading this book you will not only enlighten your mind but will also treat yourself to a spiritual feast." -Ajith Fernando "The Unity of the Bible is an example of Daniel Fuller's devotion to Christ and God's holy inerrant Word. A 'must' reading! My own life was greatly enriched as I read the manuscript." -Bill Bright

Product Details

Publication date:
Product dimensions:
6.06(w) x 9.00(h) x 1.31(d)
Age Range:
18 Years

Read an Excerpt

The Unity of the Bible

Unfolding God's Plan for Humanity
By Daniel P. Fuller


Copyright © 2000 Zondervan
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-310-23404-2

Chapter One

Evidence for the Bible's Unity

The goal of this book is to discover and express the basic theme that gives coherence to the Bible's teachings. It seeks to put the Bible together so that people can make better sense out of it as a whole. This understanding is vital, for when Paul urged the Corinthian church to proclaim the biblical message in a way best suited to make people stronger Christians, he argued, "If the trumpet does not sound a clear call, who will get ready for battle? ... Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you are saying?" (1 Cor. 14:8-9).

It is obvious from this appeal for a clear presentation of biblical truth that the more coherent an understanding people receive, the more mature they will become as Christians. But just as soldiers in battle would become confused if, after sounding "Advance," the trumpet immediately sounded "Retreat," so Christians will be weakened if their successive exposures to the biblical message leave them contradictory notions about God and his purpose for humankind.

Indeed, searching for the Bible's coherent teaching appears as a formidable task when one considers its content: writings in different literary styles from thirty or more people living in diverse life-situations over a period of more than a thousand years in places extending from Rome to the Euphrates River. A cursory examination, however, soon provides one with several encouragements to carry out this search. First, the Bible proceeds according to a plan. Beginning with the creation of the world, it then relates and interprets a series of historical events that lead to the grand climax and goal of the world's history. One writer has compared the phenomenon of the Bible with the scriptures of other religions as follows:

The Koran, for instance, is a miscellany of disjointed pieces, out of which it is impossible to extract any order, progress, or arrangement. The 114 Suras or chapters of which it is composed are arranged chiefly according to length-the longer in general preceding the shorter. It is not otherwise with the Zoroastrian and Buddhist Scriptures. These are equally destitute of beginning, middle or end. They are, for the most part, collections of heterogeneous materials, loosely placed together. How different everyone must acknowledge it to be with the Bible! From Genesis to Revelation we feel that this book is in a real sense a unity. It is not a collection of fragments, but has, as we say, an organic character. It has one connected story to tell from beginning to end; we see something growing before our eyes; there is plan, purpose, progress; the end folds back on the beginning, and, when the whole is finished, we feel that here again, as in the primal creation, God has finished all his works, and behold, they are very good.

Even stronger encouragement to look for an organic unity in the Bible comes from statements made by its last spokespersons. These authors indicate their conviction that they were speaking in concert with every other biblical spokesperson. Two such statements are Luke's quotation of Paul in Acts and Paul's own testimony.

Acts 20:27

In Paul's farewell message to the elders of the Ephesian church (Acts 20:17-35) he said, "I have not hesitated to proclaim to you the whole [purpose] of God (v. 27)." The phrase "the whole purpose of God" represented the vast amount of teaching Paul had given at Ephesus during the three years he preached there day and night. Something of the magnitude and nature of this teaching is indicated by other statements: "I have not hesitated to preach anything that would be helpful to you but have taught you publicly and from house to house" (v. 20); "if only I may ... complete the task the Lord Jesus has given me-the task of testifying to the gospel of God's grace" (v. 24); "I declare to you today that I am innocent of the blood of all men [in preaching the kingdom of God]" (v. 26); "remember that for three years I never stopped warning each of you night and day with tears" (v. 31).

In such extended preaching Paul must have taught his entire message-summed up by the phrase "the whole purpose of God." Elements of it would naturally reappear in his farewell address: (1) the need to "turn to God in repentance" and to "have faith in our Lord Jesus" (Acts 20:21); (2) the responsibility for church elders to guard themselves from evil so they can keep a proper watch and protect God's people from the ravages of sin (vv. 28-31); (3) God's having purchased believers with his own blood (v. 28); (4) his holding in store an inheritance for all those who continue to build themselves up spiritually by heeding the word of God's grace (v. 32); (5) Paul's modeling Christian love in earning money to help the weak (v. 35); and (6) Jesus' teaching that "it is more blessed to give than to receive" (v. 35).

Additional elements of this whole purpose of God must also appear in Paul's other speeches recorded in Acts. The message in his sermon at Antioch of Pisidia (Acts 13:16-47) of how Jesus Christ had fulfilled God's Old Testament promises to Abraham and David, so that salvation was now available to Israelites as well as Gentiles who would believe in Jesus, was doubtless part of what was taught at Ephesus. Also the two basic points in Paul's message at Athens (17:22-31)-that God is not served by human hands, and that everyone must repent, since God had guaranteed a future judgment by raising Jesus from the dead-must have been part of the whole purpose of God. And the same would be true for his remaining speeches in Acts 24:10-24 and 25:24-26:29.

Since Paul summarized his message as the whole purpose of God, it is clear that he regarded it as a unity. The Greek word for "purpose" (boule, "will" in the NIV) in this phrase implies the deliberate choice to pursue a certain goal step-by-step, in a methodical way. A statement in Acts 2:23 uses the same Greek word to indicate a deliberate plan of action: "This man [Jesus] was handed over to you [Jews] by God's set purpose and foreknowledge." Since Jesus' crucifixion was not the goal of God's plan but an indispensable step for realizing it, we understand that God's boule implies taking successive steps toward realizing his goal. This same point is also made in Acts 13:36, where Paul spoke about how "David had served God's purpose [boule] in his own generation." There were steps in God's purpose for the world that had to be taken during David's lifetime, and David served God in the way he helped carry out those steps. So the phrase "the whole purpose of God" implies the steps God takes in creation and afterward in bringing world history to his intended goal.

This plan includes not only the many elements of Paul's teaching but also all that was taught in the Old Testament. In making his defense before King Agrippa, Paul declared, "I am saying nothing beyond what the prophets and Moses said would happen" (Acts 26:22). In Paul's thinking, then, all that the Old Testament taught was included in the phrase "the whole purpose of God." This conviction is found also in his epistles. In 2 Timothy 3:16-17 Paul said, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work." In the next I argue that the Old Testament canon with its thirty-nine books was closed about 150 years before the Christian era. So in making this statement Paul was saying that the whole Old Testament was verbally inspired by God. In chapters 3 and 4, then, I conclude that the twenty-seven books composing the New Testament canon are also inerrantly and verbally inspired by God.


Excerpted from The Unity of the Bible by Daniel P. Fuller Copyright © 2000 by Zondervan. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Meet the Author

Dr. Daniel P. Fuller is Emeritus Professor of Hermeneutics, Fuller Theological Seminary, 1993 to present.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews

The Unity of the Bible: Unfolding God's Plan for Humanity 4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 1 reviews.
Bret_James_Stewart More than 1 year ago
This is the third or fourth book I have read about biblical theology. I think Fuller has handled the subject well and provided a great overview of the subject. Biblical theology deals with the overall characteristics of God and the Bible and the divine plan for creation. Fuller provides a view of progressive revelation.. There are notes and review questions at the end of each segment and a bibliography, general index, and scripture index at the end. In Part I, Fuller does what one would expect for a textbook as he sets out to explain terms and reasons in order to explain why he has written and one should read the book. He lays out the canonical legitimacy of the Bible, which is important to accept as all of his material is going to be based upon and supported by scripture. He includes a couple of apologetic segments herein about Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, though I am not sure why. I agree with his arguments, but I do not understand what these have to do with a biblical theology. In Part II, the foundations of redemptive history are laid out. Fuller uses both testaments as evidence. He promotes and uses an inductive approach, trying to view scripture in light of the author’s intent, which I think is the proper starting point. He grapples with the concepts of the Trinity, the Fall, Hell, the Cross, Heaven, and other fundamental (this word in its original meaning) issues of the Christian faith. In Part III, Fuller examines Israel’s role as the “lesson book,” as he terms it, or the example, as I would term it, to the world. Major themes herein are forgiveness of sins, the ceremonial Law, and the concepts related to the kingdom of God in an Old Testament context. The idea of national/ethnic Israel as the “light to the gentiles” is an important concept many Christians have missed out on, and it can be a fairly difficult concept to understand. It is, however, important, and the Christian does not want to remain ignorant about this characteristic of God’s chosen people. In Part IV, the focus is upon the New Testament purpose and presence of Jesus. As we currently live within the modern world, Fuller addresses contemporary life within the biblical context. Further, he deals with the (predominantly future) conversion of Israel. Overall, I think Fuller has done a great job to deal with such a large subject in such a short text. He makes the error of confusing the Roman Catholic religion as Christian—falling for or assuming the “branches of Christianity” concept we are fed by the “establishment”. I do not know why he does this. He has the sense to recognize Hinduism, etc. are distinct religions, and he has the biblical training to understand that the Roman Catholic religion does not qualify as a biblical religion. Perhaps the error lies in an ignorance not of the Bible, but of the faith in question. In any case, I took away one star for this as I feel this is a tragic error as it encourages Christians to mistakenly think the very large R. Catholic Church consists of saved people, which is not at all the case. This results in them not being considered for missionary activities, which puts souls at risk. Fuller is very qualified to write about the subject. Further, the far more popular systematic theology of writers and pastors has resulted (coincidentally, I think) in many Christians being unfamiliar with the overall biblical theology of Our Lord, which is not a good thing. We should be familiar with the big picture and the details.