This report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction. Examining the political and social consequences of coercive border enforcement, this thesis hypothesizes that unilateral border hardening erodes institutional legitimacy and undermines regional stability. Relying on a case study of the Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan border in Central Asia's Ferghana Valley, the thesis finds that border hardening is likely to change local perceptions of the border, diminish its overall institutional legitimacy, and weaken regional stability. Border institutions depend on a mixture of willing obedience and coercion by the state to obtain social compliance. Coercive and illegitimate means of border enforcement may have unintended consequences, undermining perceptions of legitimacy and leading to a logic of escalation of border hardening measures. This may in turn necessitate increasing levels of coercive border enforcement in order to achieve social compliance. Perceptions of border legitimacy influence the extent to which individuals voluntarily comply with border rules. Methods of border hardening are nearly always regarded as illegitimate and coercive when they adversely affect the local population. Policy-makers and military leaders must move beyond simple assumptions about borders as barriers in order to balance short- and long-term factors of security, strengthen a border's institutional legitimacy, and promote regional stability.
Do hardened borders enhance or undermine regional stability? While economic or security concerns may drive unilateral hardening of borders, little is known about the long-term impact of this policy in light of popular support and local perceptions of the border. An underlying theme of this thesis is the role of unintended consequences on the legitimacy of the border institution. The opening question considers whether the policy of hardening— while intended to improve security—undermines regional stability by weakening the institutional legitimacy of the border. Under specific circumstances and in a particular historical context, the hardening of a border may drive local perceptions of illegitimacy because it contradicts local expectations for the meaning and purpose of the political border. The border is not only perceived as illegitimate but also complicates the everyday life of borderland people. This perception of illegitimacy—which is often associated with feelings or beliefs that include annoyance, unfairness, suspicion, corruption, and fear—may also shape local behavior and influence whether people willingly obey the border rules or comply merely owing to the state's coercive use of force.
As a concept, the political, social, economic, and cultural dynamics of a region affect stability both internally and among states. "Defined as the orderly and peaceful operation of the balance-of-power system," according to American political theorist G. John Ikenberry, stability "requires the ability of states to recognize and respond to shifting power distributions." Consistent with most rationalist, realist, and pragmatist approaches to international politics, the pursuit of stability involves the balance of legitimacy with security and prosperity. Without denying the importance of economic and military stability, the focus of this thesis is decidedly on elements of political and social stability. Border hardening is usually aimed at immediate security concerns, and policy-makers and scholars lack consensus on whether it is constructive for future prosperity and stability. As a result of its complex borders as well as its geopolitical importance to Russia, China, the United States, and the European Union, Central Asia's Ferghana Valley is a particularly useful case for examining the connection between border hardening and regional stability.
This report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction. Examining the political and social consequences of coercive border enforcement, this thesis hypothesizes that unilateral border hardening erodes institutional legitimacy and undermines regional stability. Relying on a case study of the Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan border in Central Asia's Ferghana Valley, the thesis finds that border hardening is likely to change local perceptions of the border, diminish its overall institutional legitimacy, and weaken regional stability. Border institutions depend on a mixture of willing obedience and coercion by the state to obtain social compliance. Coercive and illegitimate means of border enforcement may have unintended consequences, undermining perceptions of legitimacy and leading to a logic of escalation of border hardening measures. This may in turn necessitate increasing levels of coercive border enforcement in order to achieve social compliance. Perceptions of border legitimacy influence the extent to which individuals voluntarily comply with border rules. Methods of border hardening are nearly always regarded as illegitimate and coercive when they adversely affect the local population. Policy-makers and military leaders must move beyond simple assumptions about borders as barriers in order to balance short- and long-term factors of security, strengthen a border's institutional legitimacy, and promote regional stability.
Do hardened borders enhance or undermine regional stability? While economic or security concerns may drive unilateral hardening of borders, little is known about the long-term impact of this policy in light of popular support and local perceptions of the border. An underlying theme of this thesis is the role of unintended consequences on the legitimacy of the border institution. The opening question considers whether the policy of hardening— while intended to improve security—undermines regional stability by weakening the institutional legitimacy of the border. Under specific circumstances and in a particular historical context, the hardening of a border may drive local perceptions of illegitimacy because it contradicts local expectations for the meaning and purpose of the political border. The border is not only perceived as illegitimate but also complicates the everyday life of borderland people. This perception of illegitimacy—which is often associated with feelings or beliefs that include annoyance, unfairness, suspicion, corruption, and fear—may also shape local behavior and influence whether people willingly obey the border rules or comply merely owing to the state's coercive use of force.
As a concept, the political, social, economic, and cultural dynamics of a region affect stability both internally and among states. "Defined as the orderly and peaceful operation of the balance-of-power system," according to American political theorist G. John Ikenberry, stability "requires the ability of states to recognize and respond to shifting power distributions." Consistent with most rationalist, realist, and pragmatist approaches to international politics, the pursuit of stability involves the balance of legitimacy with security and prosperity. Without denying the importance of economic and military stability, the focus of this thesis is decidedly on elements of political and social stability. Border hardening is usually aimed at immediate security concerns, and policy-makers and scholars lack consensus on whether it is constructive for future prosperity and stability. As a result of its complex borders as well as its geopolitical importance to Russia, China, the United States, and the European Union, Central Asia's Ferghana Valley is a particularly useful case for examining the connection between border hardening and regional stability.
The Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan Border: Institutional Legitimacy and Regional Stability - Case Study of Central Asia's Ferghana Valley, Border Enforcement, Walls and Fences for Hardening, Security
The Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan Border: Institutional Legitimacy and Regional Stability - Case Study of Central Asia's Ferghana Valley, Border Enforcement, Walls and Fences for Hardening, Security
Product Details
| BN ID: | 2940155780045 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | Progressive Management |
| Publication date: | 08/17/2018 |
| Sold by: | Smashwords |
| Format: | eBook |
| File size: | 799 KB |