The World Health Organization between North and South

Since 1948, the World Health Organization (WHO) has launched numerous programs aimed at improving health conditions around the globe, ranging from efforts to eradicate smallpox to education programs about the health risks of smoking. In setting global health priorities and carrying out initiatives, the WHO bureaucracy has faced the challenge of reconciling the preferences of a small minority of wealthy nations, who fund the organization, with the demands of poorer member countries, who hold the majority of votes. In The World Health Organization between North and South, Nitsan Chorev shows how the WHO bureaucracy has succeeded not only in avoiding having its agenda co-opted by either coalition of member states but also in reaching a consensus that fit the bureaucracy's own principles and interests.

Chorev assesses the response of the WHO bureaucracy to member-state pressure in two particularly contentious moments: when during the 1970s and early 1980s developing countries forcefully called for a more equal international economic order, and when in the 1990s the United States and other wealthy countries demanded international organizations adopt neoliberal economic reforms. In analyzing these two periods, Chorev demonstrates how strategic maneuvering made it possible for a vulnerable bureaucracy to preserve a relatively autonomous agenda, promote a consistent set of values, and protect its interests in the face of challenges from developing and developed countries alike.

1107971124
The World Health Organization between North and South

Since 1948, the World Health Organization (WHO) has launched numerous programs aimed at improving health conditions around the globe, ranging from efforts to eradicate smallpox to education programs about the health risks of smoking. In setting global health priorities and carrying out initiatives, the WHO bureaucracy has faced the challenge of reconciling the preferences of a small minority of wealthy nations, who fund the organization, with the demands of poorer member countries, who hold the majority of votes. In The World Health Organization between North and South, Nitsan Chorev shows how the WHO bureaucracy has succeeded not only in avoiding having its agenda co-opted by either coalition of member states but also in reaching a consensus that fit the bureaucracy's own principles and interests.

Chorev assesses the response of the WHO bureaucracy to member-state pressure in two particularly contentious moments: when during the 1970s and early 1980s developing countries forcefully called for a more equal international economic order, and when in the 1990s the United States and other wealthy countries demanded international organizations adopt neoliberal economic reforms. In analyzing these two periods, Chorev demonstrates how strategic maneuvering made it possible for a vulnerable bureaucracy to preserve a relatively autonomous agenda, promote a consistent set of values, and protect its interests in the face of challenges from developing and developed countries alike.

38.99 In Stock
The World Health Organization between North and South

The World Health Organization between North and South

by Nitsan Chorev
The World Health Organization between North and South

The World Health Organization between North and South

by Nitsan Chorev

eBook

$38.99 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

Since 1948, the World Health Organization (WHO) has launched numerous programs aimed at improving health conditions around the globe, ranging from efforts to eradicate smallpox to education programs about the health risks of smoking. In setting global health priorities and carrying out initiatives, the WHO bureaucracy has faced the challenge of reconciling the preferences of a small minority of wealthy nations, who fund the organization, with the demands of poorer member countries, who hold the majority of votes. In The World Health Organization between North and South, Nitsan Chorev shows how the WHO bureaucracy has succeeded not only in avoiding having its agenda co-opted by either coalition of member states but also in reaching a consensus that fit the bureaucracy's own principles and interests.

Chorev assesses the response of the WHO bureaucracy to member-state pressure in two particularly contentious moments: when during the 1970s and early 1980s developing countries forcefully called for a more equal international economic order, and when in the 1990s the United States and other wealthy countries demanded international organizations adopt neoliberal economic reforms. In analyzing these two periods, Chorev demonstrates how strategic maneuvering made it possible for a vulnerable bureaucracy to preserve a relatively autonomous agenda, promote a consistent set of values, and protect its interests in the face of challenges from developing and developed countries alike.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780801464393
Publisher: Cornell University Press
Publication date: 05/15/2012
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 288
File size: 2 MB
Age Range: 18 Years

About the Author

Nitsan Chorev is Associate Professor of Sociology at Brown University. She is the author of Remaking U.S. Trade Policy: From Protectionism to Globalization, also from Cornell.

Table of Contents

1. The World Health Organization
2. The Strategic Response of International Organizations
3. A New International Order in Health
4. Appropriate Technology, Inappropriate Marketing
5. The WHO in Crisis
6. Health in Economic Terms
7. How to Win Friends and Influence Enemies
Conclusion: Structural Transformations of the Global Health Regime

What People are Saying About This

Susan K. SellThe

This is a terrific book. The World Health Organization between North and South is an important contribution to our understanding of global governance. Nitsan Chorev traces the evolution of the World Health Organization as it has navigated vastly different external environments and interacted with new players, including private firms and foundations. The WHO is portrayed as a notably deft manager of changing strategic environments, constraints, and opportunities. In the process it has been able to stay true to its avowed mission.

Margaret P. Karns

This book fills a gap in works on the World Health Organization and its role in the global health regime. It fits well with other recent work on international organization bureaucracies by showing how the WHO's secretariat was able to deal with demands of member states in two critical periods and to protect the organization's own interests and core principles. Nitsan Chorev provides a particularly strong picture of the importance of the director general's leadership (or absence thereof). This very readable account will be valuable for political scientists, sociologists, and public health experts alike.

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews