- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
The historic long-term economic interconnections of the world are now universally accepted. The idea of the 'world'system' advanced by Immanuel Wallerstein has set the period of linkage in the early modern period. But some academics think this date is much too late and denies a much longer interconnection going back as much as five thousand years.
Reframing the chronology of the world'system exercises powerful influences on the writing of history. It integrates the areas of Asia and the East which were marginalized by Wallerstein into the heart of the debate and provides a much more convincing account of developments which cannot otherwise be explained. It undermines the primacy claimed for Europe as the major agent of economic change, an issue with implications far beyond the realm of history.
|List of Contributors|
|1||The 5,000-Year World System: an Interdisciplinary Introduction||3|
|2||"Capital" Imperialism and Exploitation in Ancient World Systems||59|
|3||The Cumulation of Accumulation||81|
|4||Hegemonic Transitions in the World System||115|
|5||World System Cycles, Crises, and Hegemonic Shifts, 1700 BC to 1700 AD||143|
|6||Transitional Ideological Modes: Feudalism, Capitalism, Socialism||200|
|7||Civilizations, Cores, World Economies, and Oikumenes||221|
|8||The Ancient World-Systems Versus the Modern Capitalist World-System||247|
|9||Discontinuities and Persistence: One World System Or a Succession of Systems?||278|
|10||World System Versus World-Systems: A Critique||292|
|11||Rejoinder and Conclusions||297|