The World's Newest Profession: Management Consulting in the Twentieth Century

Overview

In The World's Newest Profession, Christopher McKenna offers a history of management consulting in the twentieth century. While management consulting may not yet be a recognized profession, the leading consulting firms have been advising and reshaping the largest organizations in the world since the 1920s. This groundbreaking study details how the elite consulting firms, including McKinsey & Company and Booz Allen & Hamilton, expanded after U.S. regulatory changes during the 1930s, how they changed giant ...
See more details below
Hardcover
$38.74
BN.com price
(Save 9%)$43.00 List Price
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (18) from $5.40   
  • New (3) from $40.20   
  • Used (15) from $5.40   
The World's Newest Profession

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$12.49
BN.com price
(Save 43%)$22.00 List Price

Overview

In The World's Newest Profession, Christopher McKenna offers a history of management consulting in the twentieth century. While management consulting may not yet be a recognized profession, the leading consulting firms have been advising and reshaping the largest organizations in the world since the 1920s. This groundbreaking study details how the elite consulting firms, including McKinsey & Company and Booz Allen & Hamilton, expanded after U.S. regulatory changes during the 1930s, how they changed giant corporations, nonprofits, and the state during the 1950s, and why consultants became so influential in the global economy after 1960.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
"McKenna has unearthed the distinctly American origins of modern consulting in the evolution of financial market regulation — surprisingly and convincingly."
-John Clarkeson, Co-Chairman of the Board, The Boston Consulting Group

"This book should be required reading for everyone who teaches at a business school, as well as for all MBA students. I recommend it to anyone interested in the upheavals around corporate governance and professional ethics that marked the turn of the 21st century."
-JoAnne Yates, Sloan Distinguished Professor of Management, MIT Sloan School of Management

"If you use consultants, or claim to be a consultant, you should read this book."
-Charles Wilson, CEO, Booker Ltd.

"Witch doctors or miracle workers? Whatever your view of management consultants, it pays to understand how the world's leading consulting firms have become so influential. McKenna's superb history reveals how one crucial piece of US legislation — the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act — and one vibrant American city — Chicago — spawned an industry that has transformed the face of global business and national government in the 20th century."
-Martin Giles, Managing Director, The Economist Group, North America

"Fascinating, frightening, and perfectly timed — McKenna's sweeping survey shines a brilliant light on a profession that has always preferred to keep outsiders in the dark."
-Martin Kihn, author of House of Lies: How Management Consultants Steal Your Watch and then Tell You the Time

"McKenna opens the private world of management consulting to his keen analytical eye, providing a rich, absorbing accounting of the rise and expansion of this profession, and a sharp critique of consulting's role in shaping the strategies of the world's largest corporations. This is a fascinating, revealing book about a profession that has received little serious, sustained scholarly attention."
-Walter W. Powell, Professor of Education & Sociology, Stanford University

"This history of management consulting analyses an important stream of the history of modern business itself. Today's managers can put its insights to practical use when engaging — or deciding not to engage — consultants."
-Tony Tyler, Chief Operating Office, Cathay Pacific Airways

"McKenna's book does a superb job of exploring the role that this industry played in transforming (not always for the better) a variety of different types of organizations — from businesses to religious and charitable associations to government agencies — and through them much of the fabric of modern life."
-Naomi Lamoreaux, Professor of Economics & History, University of California, Los Angeles

"History is not bunk. With Glass-Steagall repealed and the aftershocks of the Enron scandal by no means over, the timing of The World's Newest Profession could hardly be more fortuitous. McKenna's breadth of scholarship and clarity of argument will undoubtedly sit, like Banquo's ghost, at the consulting banquet for years to come."
-Fiona Czerniawska, Consulting to Management

"McKenna offers a lively look at a profession that has often been shrouded in secrecy, and shows how it has become enormously lucrative — although not always as a result of the quality of advice being doled out. Interesting and provocative, McKenna's book offers a lens to understand the development of the modern corporation."
-Jon Housman, Managing Director, The Wall Street Journal Europe"It is an exhaustive account of the history of management consultancy that has been several years in the making. Although academic thoroughness is one of its chief merits, the book remains readable and entertaining throughout. McKenna's serious and not unsympathetic approach allows him to debunk certain myths about consultancy without falling into the trap of becoming an unthinking critic. It is a sober and truthful antidote to all the glossy consultancy marketing brochures that promise "strategic solutions" and "value-added" analysis."
-Stefan Stern, Financial Times

"Well-researched, thoughtful."
-Choice

"...this is a fascinating book whose accessible and clear writing style should ensure a wide readership. The footnotes provide a wonderful resource for any student of management consulting and knowledge-intensive firms. Its broad sweep and rich detail mean that it is destined to become a key text in this area."
-Timothy Clark, Durham University, Administrative Science Quarterly

"This groundbreaking study details how the leading consulting companies expanded after U.S. regulatory changes during the 1930s."
-Abstracts of Public Administration, Development, and Environment

'Christopher D. McKenna's masterful, impeccably researched, prize-winning study of management consulting exemplifies the best that business history has to offer to the larger historical profession, the business community, and to those who shape the public policy."
Albert Churella, Southern Polytechnic State University Journal of American History

Read More Show Less

Product Details

Meet the Author

Christopher D. McKenna is Reader in Business History and Strategy at the Said Business School, University of Oxford.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt


Cambridge University Press
0521810396 - The world's newest profession - management consulting in the twentieth century - by Christopher D. McKenna
Excerpt

INTRODUCTION

Making a Career of Consulting

Soon after I began teaching strategy at the University of Oxford’s Saïd Business School, one of the MBAs whom I supervised came to talk with me. The economic downturn in 2000 had left most of the business school students scrambling to find jobs when only a year before they would have been considering offers from several well-known employers. The student began by describing his work experience; he had served as a general manager both in his family business and also in another traditional company before he decided to pursue an MBA. The man, in his mid-twenties, explained that he was having a difficult time finding a job in either a management consulting firm or in an investment bank because neither group of professional service firms was hiring during the current recession. Did I have any suggestions or contacts that I could offer him?

   My initial response was simple and reasonable, or so I thought. Given his work experience and the fact that he was so clearly a superb general manager, why wasn’t he looking for a challenging job within an industrial company that would suit his newly acquired “Master of Business Administration” degree? The student smiled at me and indulged my naïveté by replying that if he had really wantedanother job in industry, why would he have spent all that time and money to acquire an MBA? The MBA, after all, was the de facto qualification for an elite position within a professional service firm and, therefore, a job in general management was obviously a waste of the potential value of his hard-earned degree.

   I soon recognized both how common this perspective is among business school students and how the faculties in business schools persist in deluding themselves that their central purpose is to train MBAs to enter large industrial corporations.1 By the late 1990s, at a time when the career placement services within the leading business schools were mostly helping students to enter either management consulting or investment banking firms (to be fair, some students also wanted to work in high-technology startups, venture capital firms, and hedge funds), traditional management theorists like Peter Drucker no longer had any illusion that the faculties in business schools still believed that they could make management a “true profession.”2 Instead, business school degrees had come to certify that these quasi-professionals were qualified to advise corporate executives on their strategy (management consultants), their financial structure (investment bankers), or both (venture capitalists). Although business school faculty may originally have hoped to create a new “profession of business,” by the end of the twentieth century, the leading professional service firms had first captured, and then redirected, the elite business schools to serve the specialized needs of their own quasi-professions.3 Where the American reformer Louis Brandeis had once argued that business would ultimately become its own profession, now the self-regulated, business professionals saw their MBA as the most effective way to distance themselves from direct competition with the nonprofessionals who actually managed the large corporations.4

   In 1999, just before the decade-long expansion in management consulting was about to crash, cultural critic Nicholas Lemann mused in The New Yorker about what he called an extraordinary “development” in the history of Western culture. As Lemann argued, the United States had decided, “in effect, to devote its top academic talent to the project of streamlining the operations of big business,” by directing its best and brightest students into management consulting.5 Just as perplexing, in Lemann’s words, was the fact that “if the old disrepute of business in elite universities is now suddenly gone, then why shouldn’t young graduates just go all the way, and work in actual companies instead of consulting firms and investment banks?”6 Lemann’s question cut to the heart of my exchange with the graduate student in Oxford: just how had it come to pass that nearly one-third of the top MBA graduates and one-sixth of all elite undergraduates (whether at Oxford or Yale) now began their working lives as management consultants?7 What explained the remarkable dominance of the world’s newest profession?

   Nicholas Lemann’s own answer to the question of why management consulting had come to assume such importance in American society was less theoretical than pragmatic. In Lemann’s view, the best students were drawn to jobs in the elite consulting firms because these firms offered students, “that odd upper-meritocratic combination of love of competition, herd mentality, and aversion to risk.”8 Where law (in America) or accounting (in Britain) had once been the means further to burnish the credentials of those graduates who were uncertain of what to do next, management consulting now fulfilled that role. In other words, for those students who couldn’t yet decide what to do with their lives, but did not want to appear directionless, management consulting promised the credentialed path to future glory.9

   To be fair, however, students were following the advice of career surveys that showed that management consulting offered a relatively secure way to achieve corporate success. In August 1999, only two months before Lemann’s critique appeared, Fortune magazine ran a feature comparing the relative success of General Electric and McKinsey & Company in training chief executive officers (CEOs) to lead other organizations. The “CEO Super Bowl,” as Fortune named their imaginary competition, resulted in a tie for the stock performance of the five companies led by the alumni of the two institutions but Fortune’s calculations also demonstrated that the partners at McKinsey & Company produced many more CEOs, and far more quickly, than the executives in General Electric, which was then the world’s largest corporation.10 The differences were even starker if one focused on the details of specific CEOs, for although General Electric had trained the future leaders of Allied Signal, Stanley Works, and Owens Corning, by 1999, former consultants from McKinsey ran IBM, Morgan Stanley, American Express, Delta Airlines, and Polaroid to name only the very best-known organizations.11 As Fortune’s charts illustrated, the total market capitalization of the five companies managed by CEOs who had started at General Electric was less than 15 percent of the value of the five companies controlled by former consultants from McKinsey & Company.12 Not coincidentally, by 1997, surveys showed that in both America and Europe, management consulting had become the top career choice for graduates and that a position within McKinsey was considered the dream job on both continents.13 By the end of the twentieth century, an entry-level position in a management consulting firm was not only a safe job to accept after completing a university degree, but a partnership within one of the elite management consulting firms had become the preferred path for promotion to the very highest executive positions throughout the world.14

   Of course, neither Nicholas Lemann nor the journalists at Fortune argued that management consulting had always been so powerful a force in Western societies. Indeed, either implicit or explicit in the journalists’ analysis was the question of just how this relatively new group of quasi-professionals – generally less well understood than other business professionals such as lawyers, accountants, and investment bankers – had come to command such prominence within such a short period of time. Less than forty years earlier, in 1962, the managing partners of the top management consulting firms had felt that it was necessary to explain to the MBAs at the Harvard Business School just why they would want to join one of the leading consulting firms and just what, more precisely, was actually involved in pursuing a career in management consulting.15 As Marvin Bower, then the Managing Director of McKinsey & Company, explained in the Harvard Business School’s Career Guide, “management consulting firms – which are rapidly emerging as members of one of the newer professions – help top management executives of businesses, governmental units, institutions, and other organizations solve their major management problems.”16 All of the other leading consultants who contributed to the 1962 Harvard Career Guide – Richard Paget, D. Ronald Daniel, Leonard Spacek, and Bruce Henderson – echoed Marvin Bower by declaring that this new profession would continue to grow rapidly in the years ahead.17 For those who became consultants, whether in the 1960s or the 1990s, the future seemed particularly bright even if no one knew just how this had happened quite so quickly.

   It was no coincidence that Marvin Bower of McKinsey & Company described management consulting as “one of the newer professions” when he addressed the MBAs at Harvard in 1962. In particular, Bower was a leading advocate of the ongoing professionalization of management consulting and professional status was a constant topic of concern as consultants gained economic and cultural status. Yet management consulting never achieved full professional status during the twentieth century. The double entendre in this book’s title, “The World’s Newest Profession,” plays off both the longstanding perception that consulting is an emerging profession and also the widespread public apprehension that the advice proffered by consultants constituted little more than corporate pandering. Both elements, as I argue throughout this book, were long-standing concerns in the evolution of management consulting firms and in consultants’ continuing quest for both autonomy and respect. In particular, as long as both insiders and outsiders to consulting accepted that the profession was still young, management consultants could dismiss any perceived ethical failings as symptomatic of the profession’s adolescent development.

   If immaturity shielded consultants from direct criticism, however, consulting’s “newness” could not assuage the public’s recurring concern over the particular role of consultants; a question of whether consultants primarily offered their clients legitimacy or some more tangible form of knowledge. The importance of legitimacy and knowledge varied from assignment to assignment and from decade to decade, with the two sometimes in harmony and sometimes in opposition. For example, in America during the 1930s and the 1990s, the legitimating function became consulting’s most important role, often exceeding the importance of knowledge transfer, while in Europe, during the 1960s, legitimacy and knowledge transfer generally went hand in hand as consultants carried new organizational structures to European corporations. The oscillation of these two functions, as they varied in importance over time, continually shaped the historical development of management consulting during the twentieth century.

   But before consultants could worry about their reputation or role, they first had to create markets for their services and to defend those new markets from rival professional groups. The historical explanation for the dominance of management consulting, as it turns out, was not to be found in the pragmatic choices of university graduates, but in a set of regulatory changes in America during the 1930s, the 1950s, and the 1980s that were bolstered by the strategic development of new markets by the leading management consulting firms. American antitrust regulation shielded early consultants from competition from rival professionals even as entrepreneurial firms created new lucrative practices by concentrating on particular market segments, like nonprofits or the state, or by installing specific organizational techniques, like the multidivisional form or information technology. This regulatory history helps to explain why most of the leading management consulting firms in the world are American in contrast to the other business professions, like law or accounting, where state regulation did not favor one geographic market over another. Remarkably, the regulatory history returned to haunt management consulting firms at the end of the twentieth century because corporate board members had come to rely so heavily on professionals to reduce their corporate liability. Throughout the twentieth century, state regulation, as much as institutional innovation, first shaped and then reshaped the evolutionary path of management consulting.

   The historical answer to Nicholas Lemann’s implicit question – “just how had the leading management consulting firms come to achieve such a dominant economic and cultural position?” – is the subject of this book. In the early twentieth century, before management consulting even existed, there was a need for management advice and a nascent professional setting in which that counsel was offered. The first chapter, then, is a “theory of management consulting” that is both consistent with modern economics and yet rooted in historical institutions. Before I can explain how consultants came to exert such enormous influence on the modern world, I must first answer the question of why management consulting firms even came to exist. We turn to that question now.





ONE

Economies of Knowledge

A Theory of Management Consulting

In 1930, Business Week introduced its readers to a new professional service: management consulting. As the writers at Business Week explained, the existing system of business professionals had become so complicated that, according to James McKinsey at the University of Chicago, a new type of professional was “increasing in numbers and influence...the advisor that tells business what other advisors to use and when.”1 Although Business Week would go on to chronicle the rise of management consulting over the next seventy years, consultants struggled to explain to the public what service they performed, particularly as the world’s newest profession kept expanding faster than the wider American economy.

   Since the 1930s, observers have repeatedly been surprised by the growth of management consulting.2 In 1965, Business Week commented with astonishment that there was one consultant for every hundred salaried managers. By 1995, the ratio stood at one for every thirteen.3 “Will the growth of consulting finally stop,” people were prone to ask, “when every manager employs their own personal consultant?” The sheer number of consultants nowadays may be striking, but their relative increase is particularly interesting when one wonders, following Peter Drucker’s lead: “Why management consultants” at all?4 In other words, why should executives routinely employ outsiders to advise them on administrative issues about which they, presumably, are themselves the experts? Or, following the language of economists, why do executives employ external advisors to span the boundaries of the firm?

   Analysts trying to explain the phenomenal growth of management consulting have traditionally tied the field’s expansion to the overall growth in the American economy, the impact of international competition, and the complexities of modern management. Their interpretation is not wrong – consultants have prospered during periods of economic expansion and suffered during economic recessions.5 But generalizations about increasing global competition and the complexity of management cannot fully explain the relative growth of consulting over other administrative roles. Consider, for example, a leading consultant’s explanation of the growth of consulting: “You have to be bullish about consulting. It thrives on change and this is an era where change is accelerating.”6 Many consultants would have agreed with this explanation of the growth of consulting in 1999, but the statement was also true in 1969, when the consultant uttered those words. And a similar description would also have been true thirty years before that when, in 1939, Marvin Bower refounded McKinsey & Company. How else could McKinsey & Co.’s phenomenal growth be explained (an average 47 percent increase in profits per year between 1939 and 1944), if not through the accelerating need for consultants to help executives in an increasingly complex world?7 As these examples suggest, any explanation of the growth in management consulting must be sensitive to exogenous changes in the economy and to the impact of global competition, but scholars cannot explain the remarkable run of management consulting solely through economic complexities and global change. Instead, in order to understand their growing influence on the national and international economy, we must first understand why consultants exist and how consultants outmaneuvered their professional rivals. Subsequent chapters in this book will build on this approach, charting the institutional impact of the rise of management consulting during the twentieth century. Before I describe the widespread influence of consultants, I must first set out why it is that outside advisors exist.

   Peter Drucker’s question, “Why management consultants?” echoes economist Ronald Coase’s famous question, “Why are there firms?”8 The two questions parallel one another because, at their heart, they challenge the traditional view of economists, “that firms might be envisaged as islands of planned coordination in a sea of market relations.”9 Because the two questions are so similar, it is not surprising that their explanations are also interconnected.10 Ronald Coase’s answer to his own question is that entrepreneurs create firms in order to reduce transaction costs (defined by economists as the cost of the administration of contracts and other relationships between separate firms). This partly helps to explain why executives are so willing to hire outside consultants.11 As Coase argued, long before the widespread acceptance of management consultants, not only do firms routinely face the decision of whether to “make or buy” their physical goods, but “we can [also] imagine a system where all advice or knowledge [is] bought as required.”12 Like the process that drives manufacturers to buy materials from lower cost vendors, suppliers of management information enjoy substantial “economies of knowledge” that are, in turn, passed along to their customers.13 Within the transaction cost framework, an executive decision on the margin to purchase advice from a consultant is no more outlandish than the decision to purchase machine tools rather than fabricate them internally.14 The nature of the firm, it turns out, defines the nature of the consultant.15

The Utility of Outside Advisors

Administrators have employed outside advisors for thousands of years, but their counsel has traditionally been political, not commercial. As Sir Francis Bacon wrote in 1597, there has been an “inseparable conjunction of counsel with kings.”16 Yet if political advisors, sanctified in the form of the king’s confessor, were commonplace, so too were warnings by political philosophers, from Aristotle to Erasmus, that it was dangerous to invest too much trust in outsiders.17 Writing in defense of political advisors, Thomas Hobbes argued that it was a mistake to punish the counselor for the actions of the king, but Machiavelli, always the realist, devoted a chapter of his Discourses to “the Danger of Being Prominent in Counseling any Enterprise.”18 Political theorists, including Francis Bacon in his essay “On Counsel” always conceded that despite the inherent danger in employing outsiders, external advisors offered a valuable sounding board for untested ideas.19 This pattern of pragmatic acceptance of the value of advisors, twinned with persistent concerns over their intensely political nature, has characterized the perception of professional and administrative expertise for more than 400 years.20 Most recently, in postwar America, state-sponsored experts proliferated as successive Presidents created national advisory councils like the Atomic Energy Commission, the National Security Council, and the Council of Economic Advisors, despite widespread misgivings that these experts served their own interests, and not those of the public.21 For better or for worse, government officials, nonprofit managers, and corporate executives came to depend on this new “mandarin” elite and, although suspicious of the advisors’ motives, grudgingly accepted the utility of these experts.22





© Cambridge University Press
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Introduction: Making a career of consulting;
1. Economies of knowledge: A theory of management consulting; 2. Accounting for a new profession: Consultants' struggle for jurisdictional power;
3. How have consultants mattered? The case of Lukens Steel;
4 Creating the contractor state: Consultants in the American Federal Government;
5. Finding profit in nonprofits: The influence of consultants on the third sector;
6. The gilded age of consulting: A snapshot of consultants circa 1960;
7. The American challenge: Exporting the American model;
8. Selling corporate culture: Codifying and commodifying professionalism;
9. Watchdogs, lapdogs, or retrievers? Liability and the rebirth of the management audit;
Conclusion: The world's newest profession?
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 11, 2007

    A reviewer

    No responsible business leader today would make a move before having a management consultant vet his or her plans. Doing it differently would be unwise. Not only would such a failure undermine corporate strategizing, but it could also result in a ruinous stockholders' due-diligence liability suit. Nonprofit directors are equally dependent on management consultants. They're increasingly ubiquitous and involved with everything. American to the core, with their 'can-do' attitudes and confident outlooks, management consulting firms have thoroughly remade both businesses and elements of society in their own sleek, corporate image. We highly recommend this comprehensively researched and annotated historical report. Read it to learn about a remarkable business phenomenon that has dramatically reshaped the world. You can't get sounder advice ¿ not even from a management consultant.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)