A very incomplete history
I have owned quite a few of the so-called 'automotive disasters' cited in this book and after reading the author's evaluations I have to say I'm not quite sure Mr. Cheetham has any idea what he's talking about. On one of the first pages there is a picture of an AMC Eagle with a caption that credits AMC for being among the first to offer a sport utility car but says it was 'a horror to drive'. A horror?! Obviously he has never gotten behind the wheel of one of these things because I have and am here to say it is far from horrible. Infact, it is one of the most comfortable and nicely drving vehicles I have ever owned. He goes on to criticize the car as being poorly built and not even half way decent though reviews in Popular Mechanics, Mechanix Illustrated, Four Wheeler and other automotive magazines will attest otherwise. The Eagle is actually a pretty remarkable car and there are plenty of credible automotive publishers who seem to agree. And this is just one car the author is totally wrong about. He goes on to include the Ford Maverick as being poorly designed and cheaply built but does this guy not realize that the Maverick was an entry level vehicle? Of course it was cheap. It certainly doesn't qualify as being one of the world's worst cars because of it. My Maverick was, as were countless others, totally solid, dependable and great looking on top of everything else. The Maverick is also enjoying a recent surge in popularity as more and more of them are being chosen as an alternative to the more typical cars of the era to be tricked out, restored or turned in to hot rods. I just sold a Maverick bumper on eBay for $250. A pretty steep price and high demand for a bumper off one of the world's worst cars wouldn't you say? The author also bags on the Mustang II for, among other things, having a lousy suspension. I knew a guy who owned a wrecking yard who always used to tell me when I owned my Mustang II that the first thing to get pulled off a Mustang II when it came to the wrecking yard was its suspension and rack and pinion system because the custom car guys and hot rodders loved to upgrade to the Mustang II setup. Again, having owned one myself I can say that it handled better than most of the cars I'd driven that were over 20 years newer. More inaccurate and unfair criticism? I'm starting to see a pattern. The author basically picks out all the easy automotive punching bags (Pacer, Edsel, Gremlin anyone?) and then tries to gloss over the car's history and reasons for failure in a mere paragraph or two. Hardly enlightening. A lot of the cars in this book, the American ones anyway, did infact have a lot more influence than the author gives them credit for. The AMC Pacer for instance has been given credit time and time again by many magazines and books for design innovations which later became popular on modern cars but didn't catch on in it's own time. A fatc that isn't mentioned in this book. A lot of interesting cars and their places in history are slighted by the author's careless treatment of the subject and I think that kind of sucks. Oh yeah, he put the Chevy Nova in there for many of the same reasons as the Ford Maverick. The Chevy Nova! Come on! If having an interior adorned with inexpensive plastics and average design qualifies a vehicle as being one of the world's worst cars then there is a serious lack of Hondas, Nissans and Toyotas in there that should certainly be included by those standards. How many boring, uninspired and just plain copy-cat cars have the Japanese produced to horn in on the American car market and why are they not as targetted in this book despite meeting so much of the same criteria? I'm sorry, a lot of this book is just lame and does a real disservice to some very good and interesting cars that have been produced over the years. If you do happen to read it at least do a little research for yourself before blindly agreeing with all this guy's choices. Otherwise you might miss out on owning som
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
Most manufacturers have made some great cars, but all manufacturers have made some unquestionable disasters. Cars that were either terrible designs, badly engineered, poorly manufactured, or misjudged the market. Or in some cases, all of the above. So what went wrong? How did these cars ever get off the drawing board, let alone into the showroom? And how many people bought them?
The World's Worst Cars takes a detailed look at 150 of these motoring mistakes, both old and new and from around the world. North America's embarrassments include the notorious Ford Edsel, the malfunctioning Chrysler TV Maserati collaboration and the grand folly of the Tucker ...