×

Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Theory of CMOS Digital Circuits and Circuit Failures
     

Theory of CMOS Digital Circuits and Circuit Failures

by Masakazu Shoji
 

See All Formats & Editions

CMOS chips are becoming increasingly important in computer circuitry. They have been widely used during the past decade, and they will continue to grow in popularity in those application areas that demand high performance. Challenging the prevailing opinion that circuit simulation can reveal all problems in CMOS circuits, Masakazu Shoji maintains that simulation

Overview

CMOS chips are becoming increasingly important in computer circuitry. They have been widely used during the past decade, and they will continue to grow in popularity in those application areas that demand high performance. Challenging the prevailing opinion that circuit simulation can reveal all problems in CMOS circuits, Masakazu Shoji maintains that simulation cannot completely remove the often costly errors that occur in circuit design. To address the failure modes of these circuits more fully, he presents a new approach to CMOS circuit design based on his systematizing of circuit design error and his unique theory of CMOS digital circuit operation. In analyzing CMOS digital circuits, the author focuses not on effects originating from the characteristics of the device (MOSFET) but on those arising from their connection. This emphasis allows him to formulate a powerful but ultimately simple theory explaining the effects of connectivity by using a concept of the states of the circuits, called microstates. Shoji introduces microstate sequence diagrams that describe the state changes (or the circuit connectivity changes), and he uses his microstate theory to analyze many of the conventional CMOS digital circuits. These analyses are practically all in closed-form, and they provide easy physical interpretation of the circuit's working mechanisms, the parametric dependence of performance, and the circuit's failure modes.

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780691087634
Publisher:
Princeton University Press
Publication date:
10/19/1992
Series:
Princeton Legacy Library Series
Pages:
596
Product dimensions:
7.90(w) x 10.37(h) x 1.76(d)

Related Subjects

Read an Excerpt

Theory of CMOS Digital Circuits and Circuit Failures


By Masakazu Shoji

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS

Copyright © 1992 Princeton University Press
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-691-08763-4



CHAPTER 1

Physics of CMOS Integrated Circuits


1.1 Introduction

In this chapter we prepare the background materials for this book—concepts and methods necessary for detailed studies of CMOS digital circuit failures that will be carried out in the later chapters. Electrical properties of basic components such as field-effect transistors (FETs), resistors, capacitors, inductors, and interconnects in CMOS integrated circuits are reviewed, and characteristics of elementary circuits built by interconnecting these components, such as CMOS static and dynamic gates and linear and nonlinear amplifiers, are summarized. The study of circuit failure requires closed-form theoretical analyses of rather complex circuits. Therefore, two methods of closed-form analysis of CMOS circuits containing FETs and other passive components are discussed. These techniques of closed-form analysis become the basic tools in later chapters. The first method is to represent all active devices, components and interconnects by equivalent linear resistors and capacitors, whose values are determined from each component's physical model. Electrical properties of the equivalent resistance-capacitance circuit are analyzed using many useful analytical methods of conventional linear circuit theory (summarized in the later part of this chapter), and the results are translated back into the properties of digital CMOS circuits. In the second method, FETs are represented by gate voltage controlled collapsible current generators (devices that generate constant current if terminal voltages are not zero). As we study the second method of analysis in detail, we find that a digital circuit may be represented by an analog circuit, whose circuit configuration (connectivity of devices and components) changes with time. In this representation we recognize that information about how this change of circuit configuration takes place is more useful in understanding the circuit than the detailed numerical information or an algebraic formula of time-dependent voltages of the nodes. To make the best use of the information about the changes of the circuit configuration, we introduce the concept of circuit states, called microstates. Both of the methods (linear resistor model and the collapsible current generator model) are mathematically simple: Using one method or the other, most CMOS digital circuits can be analyzed in closed form.

To study CMOS digital circuits we require a good FET model, as well as a reasonable method of representing an integrated circuit by a lumped constant equivalent circuit. This chapter examines how to determine the best possible equivalent circuit and the approximations imposed by the equivalent circuits.


1.2 Field-Effect Transistors

MOSFET characteristics have been studied in great detail during thirty years of research. Sophisticated FET models are used in numerical simulation of MOS circuits. For application to studies of circuit failure, however, very high numerical precision is usually unnecessary. For research into circuit failure, simple device models that allow closed-form analysis are more desirable than better numerical accuracy attained by precise but complex models. This is because fundamental circuit characteristics are determined more from interconnection of devices than from the details of device characteristics. When the conclusions of theoretical circuit research are applied to practical IC design, the results obtained using the simple device model are calibrated using more accurate simulation results (this can be done by reinterpreting device model parameters). This two-step approach is more straightforward, more useful and often more accurate than brute-force circuit simulation.

Figure 1(a) shows a cross-section of N-channel MOSFET (NFET) in CMOS integrated circuit. The processing technology required to fabricate this structure is not discussed in detail. Interested readers are referred to standard references on IC processing [06]. The substrate of a conventional CMOS IC is N-type silicon, on the surface of which a P-type diffused area called a P-tub is formed. Thin oxide (gate oxide) of thickness TOX is grown on the P-tub surface, and polysilicon gate material is deposited on the top of the thin oxide layer. Polysilicon gate area (cross-hatched) is patterned using photolithography. Using the polysilicon gate features as mask, N+ drain and source impurities are implanted and diffused. Channel length L (often called electrical channel length) is approximately the same, but it is less than the gate polysilicon width (called designed channel length). Following further deposition of oxide insulation (intermediate oxide) source, gate, drain, and substrate are contacted by metallic (usually aluminum) conductors by cutting holes (windows) through the intermediate oxide. The finished NFETs have channel length L, width (often called FET size) W, and source-drain island width X, as defined in Fig. 1(a). The process of fabricating PFETs is interwoven with the NFET process. The only essential difference is that a PFET is fabricated on N-substrate (doped to make N-tub). An FET is a four-terminal device (Source, Drain, Gate, and Substrate). A PFET substrate terminal is common for all the PFETs on the same chip. We described the traditional N-substrate CMOS technology. Recently, P-type substrates are often used as starting material. In this case NFETs are fabricated on a globally connected P-tub, and PFETs are fabricated on isolated N-tubs. If the substrate is P-type, the NFET is a device having three independent terminals and a common substrate terminal, and a PFET has four independent terminals.

Suppose that the substrate and the source terminals are grounded, the gate is biased to positive voltage VG, and the drain to positive voltage VD, both relative to the grounded source. According to the theory by Weimer, the drain current ID of the NFET is given by [07]

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1a)

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1b)

where εOX is the dielectric constant of silicon dioxide (0.345 × 10-12F/cm) and µN is the mobility of electrons in the surface channel. VTH is called the threshold voltage. If VTH > 0 as in conventional enhancement mode CMOS FETs, a FET carries no drain current if the gate voltage is zero. Equations (1a) and (1b) are plotted in Fig. 1(b). Equations (1a) and (1b) are valid, subject to the following conditions:

1) The electric field parallel to the length of FET channel is low, so that the surface electron drift velocity is proportional to the local field within the channel, directed from drain to source (low-field condition).

2) The source/drain diffused island is shallow. The gate field (that induces channel charge) is approximately perpendicular to the channel, and the drain-source field (within the channel) is approximately parallel to the silicon surface. The channel is quite shallow (long-channel condition).

3) The substrate is lightly doped, so that the charge that exists between the conducting surface channel and the neutral bulk substrate is negligible.


In Eq. (1), the BG parameter that specifies FET current has special suffix G, which stands for the gradual channel, low-field FET model. For NFETs we use BGN, and for PFETs we use BGP.

Characteristics of PFETs have the same form as Eqs. (la) and (lb) except that VD is replaced by Vs - VD and VG by VS - VG, where Vs is the source voltage (the highest voltage relative to ground). In Eq. (1b), µP becomes the mobility of the surface holes. Enhancement PFET threshold voltage VTHN is defined as a positive number. This choice of sign is convenient in writing the circuit equations. Equations (la) and (lb) give idealized FET characteristics. To explain characteristics of real MOSFETs in scaled-down CMOS ICs the assumptions used to derive Eqs. (1a) and (1b), and the parameters contained in them, must be qualified and reinterpreted. We must consider the effects of substrate doping, shape of the channel, identification of source and drain, and the high-field carrier transport effects.


1.3 FET Threshold Voltage

The simple FET characteristics of Eqs. (1a) and (1b) are derived assuming a lightly doped substrate. If the substrate is doped P-type [diffused P-tub shown in Fig. 1(a)], FET current-voltage characteristics deviate from Eqs. (1a) and (1b) because of the space-charge that exists between the channel and the doped substrate (or tub). The mechanism is as follows: Since (1) the surface channel is N-type (because it consists of thin surface layer heavily populated with electrons); (2) the substrate is P-type (that contains free holes); and (3) the electrons and the holes do not mix, there must be a layer depleted of holes immediately below the surface channel. Since the layer depleted of majority (positive) holes has negative ionic charge, the depletion layer carries negative charge. The surface conducting channel also carries negative electronic charge. The negative charge of the depletion layer must be induced in addition to the electron charge in the surface channel by the applied gate voltage. The most remarkable effects are positive shift (increase) in the threshold voltage VTH of a FET (increases if substrate doping is increased), and dependence of VTH on the substrate bias voltage (sourcesubstrate potential difference). This second effect is called the back-bias effect.

With reference to Fig. 2(a), NFET MN1 is fabricated on a grounded P-tub, and the source is biased to VS volts relative to the grounded P-tub (where Vs > 0). A small drain voltage relative to the source, VDS (where VDS > 0) is applied, and channel current ID is measured. As gate to source voltage, VGS, is increased from zero, ID begins to flow when VGS equals threshold voltage VTH. According to the theory of the back-bias effect, VTH is an increasing function of source voltage VS, and the dependence is written as

VTH = VTH(VS) (2)

Since the back-bias effect has significant impact on circuit design, we determine the function of Eq. (2) using simple physical reasoning. Let the threshold voltage of a reference NFET fabricated on a lightly doped substrate, but otherwise same as the first NFET, be VTH0. Suppose that VTH0 is given. Suppose that the substrate of the NFET under consideration is doped to NA (acceptors/cm3). Then the Fermi level of the P-type substrate is shifted down by [05]

φF= kT/q log (NA/n1)

from the center of the forbidden band, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is the absolute temperature, q is the charge of an electron and n1 is the intrinsic carrier density of silicon. We note that the Fermi level of the reference NFET substrate is at the center of the forbidden band. To create a conducting surface channel, the P-tub silicon surface must be converted to N-type inverted surface having comparable surface electron concentration (≈ NA). The potential of the silicon surface must be pulled up by 2φF, and this potential must be supplied from the gate. Therefore a term (2φF) must be added to VTH0. As we see from this term, doping Ptub increases the NFET threshold voltage, or the NFET becomes less conductive. Intuitively an NFET fabricated on more heavily doped P-type substrate is harder to turn on. This explains the mechanism of positive shift of the threshold voltage, VTH, if substrate doping is increased.

Let us consider the effects of source-substrate voltage. When the substrate and the source are held at the same potential [inset in Fig. 2(a)], the negative space-charge layer beneath the conducting channel sustains potential 2φF. Charge density per unit area of the space-charge layer is given by electrostatics as (P-tub is assumed uniformly doped)

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (3a)

If source to substrate voltage VS (VS > 0)is applied Q0, increases to Q. Q is found by replacing 2φF in Eq. (3a) by 2φF + VS as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (3b)

and therefore the incremental charge in the space-charge layer, ΔQ, is given by

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

Since this extra charge ΔQ must be induced by the positively biased gate, threshold voltage increases by

ΔVHT = ΔQ/COX

where COX = εOX/TOX> is the gate oxide capacitance per unit gate area. Therefore, the real threshold voltage is given by adding the two corrections to VTH0(threshold voltage of the reference FET fabricated on lightly doped substrate) as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (4a)

If dependence is separated out for convenience

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (4b)

where VTH(0) = VTH0 + 2φF and V0 = (2εSqNA · 2φF) 1/2/COX. Figure 2(b) shows function ΔvTH(VS/2φF) defined in Eq. (4b) versus normalized source voltage VS/2φF.

If we assume NA = 2 × 1016acceptors/cm3, the Fermi level at room temperature is

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

below the center of the forbidden band, where thermal voltage kT/q = 25 mV and ni = 2 × 1010cm-3 at room temperature. We have

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

Therefore if VS/2φF = 5, threshold voltage VTH increases by about 0.75 volt.

Substrate doping is the standard technique for FET threshold voltage control. Enhancement mode NFETs in digital CMOS ICs are now fabricated exclusively by doping P-tubs. If a lightly doped substrate is used, the threshold voltage of NFETs becomes negative, or NFETs conduct even at zero gate voltage (such NFETs are called depletion mode NFETs). There is immobile positive charge in the gate oxide immediately above the channel (conventionally called QSS) that induces a conducting surface channel in NFETs, even at zero gate voltage. We understand that enhancement mode NFETs in CMOS are inevitably associated with the back-bias effect.

The back-bias effect creates significant difficulties in setting the DC bias point of CMOS circuits that have series-connected FETs and that carry DC currents. Such a circuit structure is often seen if analog circuits are integrated into digital CMOS circuits. The differential amplifier shown in Fig. 3(a) is used to convert a small-amplitude differential signal into a single-ended CMOS level signal. Since this circuit is complex, full analysis will be given later (Section 2.11). Here we consider the most relevant points only. If both input FETs MN+ and MN– are to split current generated by MNO equally at the balanced operating point and are to operate as a linear differential amplifier at the bias point, the range of input voltage allowed is limited by the increased threshold voltage of NFET MN+ and MN- due to the back-bias effect. The range of input voltages allowed for linear operation is schematically shown in Fig. 3(b). If VIN+ and VIN-are reduced below the limit, common source voltage VC is reduced too much. A minimum VC voltage must be maintained at the common source node of the differential NFET pair to guarantee that the current generator, MNO, is well into the saturation region and the current is independent of VC. If this condition is not satisfied, the differential amplifier has poor CMRR (common mode rejection ratio-change of the two input voltages in the same polarity). The problem is aggravated if the power supply voltage is low.


(Continues...)

Excerpted from Theory of CMOS Digital Circuits and Circuit Failures by Masakazu Shoji. Copyright © 1992 Princeton University Press. Excerpted by permission of PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews