Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning

Paperback (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $13.34
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 33%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (14) from $13.34   
  • New (8) from $18.83   
  • Used (6) from $13.34   

Overview


This primer on legal reasoning is aimed at law students and upper-level undergraduates. But it is also an original exposition of basic legal concepts that scholars and lawyers will find stimulating. It covers such topics as rules, precedent, authority, analogical reasoning, the common law, statutory interpretation, legal realism, judicial opinions, legal facts, and burden of proof. In addressing the question whether legal reasoning is distinctive, Frederick Schauer emphasizes the formality and rule-dependence of law. When taking the words of a statute seriously, when following a rule even when it does not produce the best result, when treating the fact of a past decision as a reason for making the same decision again, or when relying on authoritative sources, the law embodies values other than simply that of making the best decision for the particular occasion or dispute. In thus pursuing goals of stability, predictability, and constraint on the idiosyncrasies of individual decision-makers, the law employs forms of reasoning that may not be unique to it but are far more dominant in legal decision-making than elsewhere. Schauer’s analysis of what makes legal reasoning special will be a valuable guide for students while also presenting a challenge to a wide range of current academic theories.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Lawrence A. Alexander
This book will belong on every law professor's and law student's bookshelf--and on many others' bookshelves as well.
Richard A. Posner
Schauer is a leading scholar of jurisprudence and legal process, and his new book is as comprehensive, thorough, and sophisticated an introduction to legal reasoning as it is a lucid one. All of the bases are covered, and law students, teachers, practicing lawyers, and judges alike will gain perspective and insight from seeing the entire range of legal reasoning techniques laid out before them.
Sanford V. Levinson
Thinking Like a Lawyer is by far the best available introduction to legal reasoning, of interest to law students and their teachers alike. It should be enlightening to the general reader as well, who will learn what, for better and perhaps for worse, distinguishes 'thinking like a lawyer' from other approaches to analyzing social problems.
Brian H. Bix
Thinking Like a Lawyer is well-designed to work for first-year law school classes. It covers the most important themes relating to law and legal reasoning, and manages to do so in ways that are accessible and thought-provoking.
Times Literary Supplement - Brian Leiter
A welcome complement to [Edward] Levi's approach, as well as being easier for the legal novice to understand. Yet Schauer's book also offers the lawyer and scholar useful perspective on what he or she does.
Times Literary Supplement

A welcome complement to [Edward] Levi's approach, as well as being easier for the legal novice to understand. Yet Schauer's book also offers the lawyer and scholar useful perspective on what he or she does.
— Brian Leiter

Law Library Journal
Thinking Like a Lawyer is excellent reading material for anyone wishing a deeper and more nuanced--even a more magnanimous--understanding of the motivations behind law's often convoluted pronouncements.
— John Azzolini
Times Literary Supplement
A welcome complement to [Edward] Levi's approach, as well as being easier for the legal novice to understand. Yet Schauer's book also offers the lawyer and scholar useful perspective on what he or she does.
— Brian Leiter
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780674062481
  • Publisher: Harvard
  • Publication date: 4/16/2012
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Pages: 256
  • Sales rank: 261,877
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 9.20 (h) x 0.70 (d)

Meet the Author

Frederick Schauer is David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

  • Preface

  1. Is There Legal Reasoning?
  2. Rules—in Law and Elsewhere

    2.1 Of Rules in General

    2.2 The Core and the Fringe

    2.3 The Generality of Rules

    2.4 The Formality of Law

  3. The Practice and Problems of Precedent

    3.1 Precedent in Two Directions

    3.2 Precedent—The Basic Idea

    3.3 A Strange Idea

    3.4 On Identifying a Precedent

    3.5 On the Force of Precedent—Overruling, Distinguishing, and Other Types of Avoidance

  4. Authority and Authorities

    4.1 The Idea of Authority

    4.2 On Binding and So-Called Persuasive Authority

    4.3 Why Real Authority Need Not be “Binding”

    4.4 Can There Be Prohibited Authorities?

    4.5 How Authorities Become Authoritative

  5. The Use and Abuse of Analogies

    5.1 On Distinguishing Precedent from Analogy

    5.2 On the Determination of Similarity

    5.3 The Skeptical Challenge

    5.4 Analogy and the Speed of Legal Change

  6. The Idea of the Common Law

    6.1 Some History and a Comparison

    6.2 On the Nature of the Common Law

    6.3 How Does the Common Law Change?

    6.4 Is the Common Law Law?

    6.5 A Short Tour of the Realm of Equity

  7. The Challenge of Legal Realism

    7.1 Do Rules and Precedents Decide cases?

    7.2 Does Doctrine Constrain Even if It Does Not Direct?

    7.3 An Empirical Claim

    7.4 Realism and the Role of the Lawyer

    7.5 Critical Legal Studies and Realism in Modern Dress

  8. The Interpretation of Statutes

    8.1 Statutory Interpretation in the Regulatory State

    8.2 The Role of the Text

    8.3 When the Text Provides No Answer

    8.4 When the Text Provides a Bad Answer

    8.5 The Canons of Statutory Construction

  9. The Judicial Opinion

    9.1 The Causes and Consequences of Judicial Opinions

    9.2 Giving Reasons

    9.3 On Holding and Dicta

    9.4 The Declining Frequency of Opinions

  10. Making Law with Rules and Standards

    10.1 The Basic Distinction

    10.2 Rules, Standards, and the Question of Discretion

    10.3 Stability and Flexibility

    10.4 Rules and Standards in Judicial Opinions

  11. Law and Fact

    11.1 On the Idea of a Fact

    11.2 Determining Facts at Trial—The Law of Evidence and Its Critics

    11.3 Facts and the Appellate Process

  12. The Burden of Proof and Its Cousins

    12.1 The Burden of Proof

    12.2 Presumptions

    12.3 Deference and the Allocation of Decision-Making Responsibility


  • Index

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)