The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal

( 15 )

Overview

We human beings share 98 percent of our genes with chimpanzees. Yet humans are the dominant species on the planet-having founded civilizations and religions, developed intricate and diverse forms of communication, learned science, built cities, and created breathtaking works of art-while chimps remain animals concerned primarily with the basic necessities of survival. What is it about that 2 percent difference in DNA that has created such a divergence between evolutionary cousins? In this fascinating, ...
See more details below
Available through our Marketplace sellers.
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (141) from $1.99   
  • New (3) from $5.99   
  • Used (138) from $1.99   
Close
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
$5.99
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:

(5)

Condition:

New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

New
PAPERBACK New 0060984031 New Book, may have some minor shelf wear. Fast Shipping, Excellent Customer Service, Satisfaction Guaranteed.

Ships from: Plantation, FL

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$45.00
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:

(164)

Condition: New
Brand new.

Ships from: acton, MA

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
$45.00
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:

(164)

Condition: New
Brand new.

Ships from: acton, MA

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Close
Sort by
Sending request ...

Overview

We human beings share 98 percent of our genes with chimpanzees. Yet humans are the dominant species on the planet-having founded civilizations and religions, developed intricate and diverse forms of communication, learned science, built cities, and created breathtaking works of art-while chimps remain animals concerned primarily with the basic necessities of survival. What is it about that 2 percent difference in DNA that has created such a divergence between evolutionary cousins? In this fascinating, provocative, passionate, funny, endlessly entertaining work, renowned Pulitzer Prize-winning author and scientist Jared Diamond explores how the extraordinary human animal, in a remarkably short time, developed the capacity to rule the world...and the means to irrevocably destroy it.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Booknews
Physiologist Diamond traces humankind's biological and social development from about 40,000 years ago, to the present, and into the future. For general readers. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780060984038
  • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
  • Publication date: 12/28/1992
  • Series: Harper Perennial
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 407
  • Product dimensions: 5.31 (w) x 8.01 (h) x 1.04 (d)

Meet the Author

Jared Diamond is the author of the bestselling Collapse and Guns, Germs, and Steel. A professor of geography at the University of California, Los Angeles, he has been elected to the National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the American Philosophical Society. He is a MacArthur Fellow and was awarded the National Medal of Science.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Part One

A Tale of
Three Chimps



The next time you visit a zoo, make a point of walking past the ape cages. Imagine that the apes had lost most of their hair, and imagine a cage nearby holding some unfortunate people who had no clothes and couldn't speak but were otherwise normal. Now try guessing how similar those apes are to us in their genes. For instance, would you guess that a chimpanzee shares 10 percent, 50 percent, or 99 percent of its genetic program with humans?

Then ask yourself why those apes are on exhibit in cages, and why other apes are being used for medical experiments, while it's not permissible to do either of those things to humans. Suppose it turned out that chimp genes were 99.9 percent identical to our genes, and that the important differences between humans and chimps were due to just a few genes. Would you still think it's okay to put chimps in cages and to experiment on them? Consider those unfortunate mentally defective people who have much less capacity to solve problems, to care for themselves, to communicate, to engage in social relationships, and to feel pain than do apes. What is the logic that forbids medical experiments on those people, but not on apes?

You might answer that apes are "animals," while humans are humans, and that's enough. An ethical code for treating humans shouldn't be extended to an "animal," no matter how similar its genes are to ours, and no matter what its capacity for social relationships or feeling pain. That's an arbitrary but at least self-consistent answer that can't be lightly dismissed. In that case, learning more about our ancestral relationships won't have any ethicalconsequences, but it will still satisfy our intellectual curiosity to understand where we come from. Every human society has felt a deep need to make sense of its origins, and has answered that need with its own story of the Creation. The Tale of Three Chimps is the Creation Story of our time.

For centuries it's been clear approximately where we fit into the animal kingdom. We are obviously mammals, the group of animals characterized by having hair, nursing their young, and other features. Among mammals we are obviously primates, the group of mammals including monkeys and apes. We share with other primates numerous traits lacking in most other mammals, such as flat fingernails and toenails rather than claws, hands for gripping, a thumb that can be opposed to the other four fingers, and a penis that hangs free rather than being attached to the abdomen. Already by the second century A.D., the Greek physician Galen deduced our approximate place in nature correctly when he dissected various animals and found that a monkey was "most similar to man in viscera, muscles, arteries, veins, nerves, and in the form of bones."

It's also easy to place us within the primates, among which we are obviously more similar to apes (the gibbons, orangutan, gorilla, and chimpanzees) than to monkeys. To name only one of the most visible signs, monkeys sport tails, which we lack along with apes. It's also clear that gibbons, with their small size and very long arms, are the most distinctive apes, and that orangutans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans are all more closely related to each other than any is to gibbons. But to go further with our relationships proves unexpectedly difficult. It has provoked an intense scientific debate, which revolves around three questions:

What is the detailed family tree of relationships among humans, the living apes, and extinct ancestral apes? For example, which of the living apes is our closest relative?

When did we and that closest living relative, whichever ape it is, last share a common ancestor?

What fraction of our genetic program do we share with that closest living relative?

At first, it would seem natural to assume that comparative anatomy had already solved the first of those three questions. We look especially like chimpanzees and gorillas, but differ from them in obvious features like our larger brains, upright posture, and much less body hair, as well as in many subtler points. However, on closer examination these anatomical facts aren't decisive. Depending on what anatomical characters one considers most important and how one interprets them, biologists differ as to whether we are most closely related to the orangutan (the minority view), with chimps and gorillas having branched off our family tree before we split off from orangutans, or whether we are instead closest to chimps and gorillas (the majority view), with the ancestors of orangutans having gone their separate way earlier.

Within the majority, most biologists have thought that gorillas and chimps are more like each other than either is like us, implying that we branched off before the gorillas and chimps diverged from each other. This conclusion reflects the commonsense view that chimps and gorillas can be lumped in a category termed "apes," while we're something different. However, it's also conceivable that we look distinct only because chimps and gorillas haven't changed much since we shared a common ancestor with them, while we were changing greatly in a few important and highly visible features like upright posture and brain size. In that case, humans might be most similar to gorillas, or humans might be most similar to chimps, or humans and gorillas and chimps might be roughly equidistant from each other in overall genetic makeup.

Thus, anatomists have continued to argue about the first question, the details of our family tree. Whichever tree one prefers, anatomical studies by themselves tell us nothing about the second and third questions, our time of divergence and genetic distance from apes. Perhaps, however, fossil evidence might in principle solve the questions of the correct ancestral tree and of dating, though not the question of genetic distance.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

1 A tale of three chimps 15
2 The great leap forward 32
3 The evolution of human sexuality 67
4 The science of adultery 85
5 How we pick our mates and sex partners 99
6 Sexual selection, and the origin of human races 110
7 Why do we grow old and die? 122
8 Bridges to human language 141
9 Animal origins of art 168
10 Agriculture's mixed blessings 180
11 Why do we smoke, drink, and use dangerous drugs? 192
12 Alone in a crowded universe 205
13 The last first contacts 223
14 Accidental conquerors 235
15 Horses, Hittites, and history 249
16 In black and white 276
17 The golden age that never was 317
18 Blitzkrieg and Thanksgiving in the New World 339
19 The second cloud 349
Epilogue : nothing learned, and everything forgotten? 363
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4.5
( 15 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(8)

4 Star

(6)

3 Star

(1)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 15 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 14, 2001

    Fun Facts City

    I decided to not put much stock anymore in the critics, who are often at odds with each other about you name it, and that includes the scholars and proffessors etc., too. In other words I say, read what you like, and I like this book, because regardless of the soundness of any theories, the book is loaded with some very interesting facts and I happen to like the authors style and temperment, occassioned also with a healthy sense of humor. He is also the author of the pulitzer winning 'Guns, Germs, and Steel' which, needless to say, I'm also enjoying.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 28, 2014

    Having read and become familiar with other writings by Diamond,

    Having read and become familiar with other writings by Diamond, I recommend that readers new to him start here. This is a brilliant book, written in the early 90's and still is every bit as valid as it ever was, which explains why it continues to remain on bookstore shelves, no doubt still selling well. Diamond is a top-notch historian, an original thinker/genius, and a damned good writer. This is not a quick read, but I can think of no other book that delivers more of a bang for every buck spent on it.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted July 4, 2009

    Good Perspective

    A earlier version of many themes in Guns, Germs, and Iron plus some biological perspectives. Good reasons why we should be more humble about our place in the world

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 4, 2008

    An eye opener.

    Mr. Diamond takes a datailed and provocative look at humanity. He sees exposes our animal origins and demonstrates how our primitive side is still active today. As a bird watcher observes birds, Diamond studies people. The human animal within us all will be delighted by this new source of insight.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 7, 2002

    Accessible and well-researched

    Overall a very interesting book indeed and an ideal supplement to Dawkins's classic 'The selfish gene.' While not containing the scientific rigour of the latter, it is nonetheless reccommended reading due to its breadth, lively style and ambition. Currently reading 'Guns,Germs and Steel' and am (so far) equally impressed.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 6, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 4, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 13, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted October 22, 2008

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 19, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 15, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 6, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 28, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 20, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted October 27, 2008

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 15 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)