The Trouble with Medical Journals / Edition 1

Paperback (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from BN.com
$39.95
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $37.90
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 5%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (13) from $37.90   
  • New (7) from $37.90   
  • Used (6) from $39.49   

Overview

It is a turbulent time for STM publishing. With moves towards open access to scientific literature, the future of medical journals is uncertain and unpredictable. This is the only book of its kind to address this problematic issue.

Richard Smith, a previous editor of the British Medical Journal for twenty five years and one of the most influential people within medical journals and medicine depicts a compelling picture of medical publishing. Drawn from the author's own extensive and unrivalled experience in medical publishing, Smith provides a refreshingly honest analysis of current and future trends in journal publishing including peer review, ethics in medical publishing, the influence of the pharmaceutical industry as well as that of the mass media, and the risk that money can cloud objectivity in publishing.

Full of personal anecdotes and amusing tales, this is a book for everyone, from researcher to patient, author to publisher and editor to reader. The controversial and highly topical nature of this book, will make uncomfortable reading for publishers, researchers, funding bodies and pharmaceutical companies alike making this useful resource for anyone with an interest in medicine or medical journals.

Topic covered include: Libel and medical journals; Patients and medical journals; Medical journals and the mass media; Medical journals and pharmaceutical companies: uneasy bedfellows; Editorial independence; misconduct; and accountability; Ethical support and accountability for journals; Peer review: a flawed process and Conflicts of interest: how money clouds objectivity.

This is a unique offering by the former BMJ editor- challenging, comprehensive and controversial. This must be the most controversial medical book of the 21st Century
John Illman, MJA News

Lively, full of anecdote and he [Smith] is brutally honest
British Journal of Hospital Medicine

*************************************************************************************************
Please note that the reference to Arup Banerjee on page 100 of this book should be to Anjan Banerjee. We apologise to Professor Arup Banerjee for this oversight.

*************************************************************************************************

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
5 Stars: This book is important to the general reader
I enjoyed the book - a real page turner!
Amazon customer review, Oct 2006

5 Stars: Editors unaccoutable as kings!
A stonking good read ... Wonderful stuff!
Amazon customer review, Oct 2006

5 Stars: A new classic
This book is a must read for anyone who practices medicine or conducts, peer reviews or publishes research. While the subject matter is extremely serious, with profound and unavoidable lessons for doctors, researchers, editors, reviewers and publishers, it is also highly entertaining thanks to Smith's story telling which makes each chapter a joy to read. The book has a broader remit than its title would suggest. It is as much about the state of medical research as a whole and its consequences for medicine, as it is about publishing. A new classic - highly recommended- 5 stars
Amazon customer review, Oct 2006

Lively, full of anecdote and he [Smith] is scrupulously honest
British Journal of Hospital Medicine

A punchy book that deserves to be read...All human life is in this book, which makes plenty of pertinent points...It is a real page-turner, and I recommend it.
Oldie

Richard Smith, a former editor of the British Medical Journal, has written a witty, readable and provocative account of the current and future role of scholarly medical journals...I suggest you drop heavy hints for this book to be added to your birthday present list.
Learned Publishing

I read Smith's book with interest and was concerned greatly by some of the accusations he made within its pages.
Pharmaceutical Marketing

Amusing ...
The Times

This is an absolute must read book. It is beautifully written, but the content is quite devastating. I read it from end to end in one sitting and was riveted throughout. Any illusions one might have had about the integrity of scientific research, the veracity of papers, and the altruism of journals are shattered forever. But the demolition is done with such a lovely blend of logic, humour, anecdote, and evidence that it really does make a cracking good read. It should be a standard text for all courses in scientific subjects, never mind medicine, as it would open students' eyes to the dangers of taking published work for granted. If you buy no other book this year, buy this one, and then reflect on which of your colleagues most need a copy too, and either a) give them your copy or b) buy some more.
Evidence-Based Medicine: Primary Care and Internal Medicine, BMJ, August 2008

The Trouble with Medical Journals is truly an eye opening book. Smith is able to lend instant credibility to his claims as a former insider of that world. This book is highly recommended for all medical libraries. With its clear conversational tone and broad coverage of research and publishing, it will be useful for doctors, researchers, and librarians, as well as consumers and patients.
Medical Reference Services Quarterly, Vol 26, 4, 2007

This must be the most controversial medical book of the 21st century, with the same kind of explosive impact as Ivan Illich's critique of the limits of medicine, Medical Nemesis (1976).
Medical Journalists' Association News, Feb/Mar 2007

A valuable educational resource for editors and reviewers, and a gold mine of data for journalologists.
The Journal of the European Medical Writers Association, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2007

Doody's Review Service
Reviewer: Griffin Trotter, MD, PhD (Saint Louis University)
Description: The book examines ethical and social problems arising in the publication of medical journals. Rich in interesting and pertinent cases drawn from the author's immense experience as editor of one of the world's top medical journals, the book addresses a full gamut of topics, ranging from high-profile issues such as authors' conflicts of interest to less publicized problems such as the failure of medical journals to serve the developing world.
Purpose: The book questions the values that animate and sometimes corrupt medical journals as well as the professional and social roles that medical journals do and should fulfill, and critically assesses problems that arise in fulfilling these roles. It succeeds at each level, exhibiting a degree of comprehensiveness and a depth of insight that are unprecedented in the current literature on these topics.
Audience: The author, who is immensely and almost uniquely qualified to undertake this project, seeks to reach the general public as well as physicians and other medical professionals. Hence, the book is written in non-technical style, accessible to well educated persons who lack medical training.
Features: The book begins with a detailed discussion of issues related to the mission and purpose of medical journals, then proceeds to a detailed discussion of the actual procedures employed by medical journals in peer review, editing, content selection, reporting, and, perhaps most importantly, securing profits. It concludes with thoughtful chapters addressing the social significance and ethical accountability of medical journals. There is a multitude of immensely engaging stories, such that any reader who finishes the book will be up to date on relevant news events. Despite the book's impressive scope, it would be improved if the author devoted a chapter to the manner in which science is skewed — regardless of financial conflicts of interest — when researchers are the primary interpreters of their own data.
Assessment: This is an extremely valuable and uniquely comprehensive account of ethical problems in medical publishing, and is one of the most readable and entertaining books in the field. It is essential reading for anyone who desires to cultivate an understanding of pitfalls pertaining to the generation and marketing of medical knowledge and, thus, seeks to become a more sophisticated consumer of the medical literature.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781853156731
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis
  • Publication date: 2/29/2000
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 304
  • Product dimensions: 6.10 (w) x 9.20 (h) x 0.70 (d)

Meet the Author

Richard Smith, Chief Executive, United Healthcare Europe. Former Editor of BMJ and Chief Executive of BMJ Publishing Group

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

SECTION 1: Introduction
1. Introduction: medical journals are probably a force for good but need considerable reform
SECTION 2: The nature of medical journals
2. Why bother with medical journals and whether they are honest?
3. What and who are medical journals for?
4. Can medical journals lead or must they follow?
5. What are and what should be the values of medical journals?
SECTION 3: The processes of pubishing medical research
6. The complexities and confusions of medical science
7. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
SECTION 4: Problems in publishing medical research
8. Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well
9. The death of the author and the birth of the contributor?
10. Publishing too much and nothing: serious problems not just nuisances
11. Conflicts of interest: how money clouds objectivity
12. Editorial misconduct, freedom and accountability: amateurs at work
SECTION 5: Important relationships of medical journals
13. Patients and medical journals: from objects to partners
14. Medical journals and the mass media: moving from love and hate to love
15. Trying to stop failing the developing world
16. Medical journals and pharmaceutical companies: uneasy bedfellows
17. The highly profitable but perhaps unethical business of publishing medical research
SECTION 6: Ethical accountability of researchers and journals
18. Relations between research ethics committees and medical journals: guarding the probity of research
19. Ethical support and accountability for journals: an ombudsman, an ethics committee, and next?
20. Libel and medical journals: proper constraint or against the public interest?
21. The case that concern with ethical issues in publishing medical research is overdone
SECTION 7: The future
22. Ethical manifestos for four different futures for medical publishing
References

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)