The Unexpurgated Beaton: The Cecil Beaton Diaries as He Wrote Them, 1970-1980

( 1 )

Overview

Cecil Beaton was one of the great twentieth-century tastemakers. A photographer, artist, writer and designer for more than fifty years, he was at the center of the worlds of fashion, society, theater and film. The Unexpurgated Beaton brings together for the first time the never-before-published diaries from 1970 to 1980 and, unlike the six slim volumes of diaries published during his lifetime, these have been left uniquely unedited.

Hugo Vickers, the executor of Beaton’s estate ...

See more details below
Hardcover (1 AMER ED)
$26.71
BN.com price
(Save 23%)$35.00 List Price
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (26) from $4.23   
  • New (6) from $12.48   
  • Used (20) from $4.23   
Unexpurgated Beaton: The Cecil Beaton Diaries as He Wrote Them, 1970-1980

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$21.99
BN.com price

Overview

Cecil Beaton was one of the great twentieth-century tastemakers. A photographer, artist, writer and designer for more than fifty years, he was at the center of the worlds of fashion, society, theater and film. The Unexpurgated Beaton brings together for the first time the never-before-published diaries from 1970 to 1980 and, unlike the six slim volumes of diaries published during his lifetime, these have been left uniquely unedited.

Hugo Vickers, the executor of Beaton’s estate and the author of his acclaimed biography, has added extensive and fascinating notes that are as lively as the diary entries themselves. As one London reviewer wrote, “Vickers’ waspish footnotes are the salt on the side of the dish.” Beaton treated his other published diaries like his photographs, endlessly retouching them, but, for this volume, Vickers went back to the original manuscripts to find the unedited diaries.

Here is the photographer for British and American Vogue, designer of the sets and costumes for the play and film My Fair Lady and the film Gigi, with a cast of characters from many worlds: Bianca Jagger, Greta Garbo, David Hockney, Truman Capote, the Queen Mother and Princess Margaret, Mae West, Elizabeth Taylor, Marlene Dietrich, Rose Kennedy and assorted Rothschilds, Phippses and Wrightsmans; in New York, San Francisco, Palm Beach, Rio and Greece, on the Amalfi coast; at shooting parties in the English countryside, on yachts, at garden parties at Buckingham Palace, at costume balls in Venice, Paris or London.

Beaton had started as an outsider and “developed the power to observe, first with his nose pressed up against the glass,” and then later from within inner circles. Vickers has said, “his eagle eye missed nothing,” and his diaries are intuitive, malicious (he took a “relish in hating certain figures”), praising and awestruck. Truman Capote once said “the camera will never be invented that could capture or encompass all that he actually sees.”

The Unexpurgated Beaton is a book that is not only a great read and wicked fun but a timeless chronicle of our age.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

The New York Times
… Cecil Beaton, the photographer known for exquisitely glamorous (and artfully retouched), genteel portraiture, joins the ranks of Andy Warhol and Truman Capote when it comes to curtsy-and-tell writing about his friends. When his biographer and co-literary executor, Hugo Vickers, says that Beaton "gave pleasure to the world, and he did no harm," he is understating the obvious. Beaton also scratched, clawed, flattered and gave great dish. — Janet Maslin
The Washington Post
At times these diaries by the man described by Hugo Vickers as "photographer, artist, writer, designer for screen and theatre, and arbiter of style" are great fun to read. Bitchiness is not without its attractions, and Beaton had it in spades. He was a gifted storyteller with a keen eye for the outre and the egregious, perhaps because he had so much of both himself, and when he casts an appraising eye on others thus afflicted the results can be hilarious. — Jonathan Yardley
Kirkus Reviews
The late photographer’s diaries from the 1970s, in which he assails the rich and famous he dislikes, composes paeans to the ones he favors, and, ultimately, bores with the bulk of his quotidian detail. Most people will likely give short shrift to this heavily footnoted volume cover-to-cover (the identities of Jacqueline Onassis and Rose Kennedy are spelled out) and will instead skip to the passages of celebrity-trashing. And there are plenty of them. Katharine Hepburn is a "dried-up boot"; Mae West’s "muzzle" resembled an ape’s; Virginia Woolf was a "swine"; Dorothy Parker was "never funny"; Leonard Bernstein was "disgusting and repellent"; Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor were vulgar (her breasts were too big); Peggy Guggenheim was "ugly and gauche"; and so on. Perhaps not surprisingly for a visual artist, he placed special emphasis on appearances—especially the ravages of aging—that he most often condemned: sagging breasts, lined faces, too-thick makeup. Ugly furniture and clothing put him off. Words like "horrid" and "appalling" and "hideous" he wielded like weapons. He detested his own physical decline as well, commenting on the unpleasantness delivered by mirrors, and in one truly touching excerpt, he writes of his own prostate surgery and its attendant terrors. He admired Queen Elizabeth II (he was one of the official Royal photographers), found the young Princess Anne ugly, loved his friend named Kin (who managed to have no flaws, in Beaton’s considerable estimation, other than his failure to write letters to Beaton frequently enough), was impressed with Rebecca West and charmed by Coco Chanel. Beaton published sanitized volumes of his diary during hislifetime—and greatly feared the negative criticism that he gleefully heaped on others. Nasty and vain, pathetic and dull. (40 b&w photos throughout)
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781400041121
  • Publisher: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 10/28/2003
  • Edition description: 1 AMER ED
  • Pages: 528
  • Sales rank: 1,007,492
  • Product dimensions: 6.44 (w) x 9.52 (h) x 1.71 (d)

Meet the Author

Hugo Vickers is the author of Gladys, Duchess of Marlborough; Cecil Beaton; Vivien Leigh; Loving Garbo; and Alice, Princess Andrew of Greece, among other books. He lives in London and Hampshire with his wife and his three children.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Chapter 1
1970

Cecil Beaton entered the new decade at Reddish House, the country home at Broadchalke, not far from Salisbury, to which he had retreated regularly since he bought it in 1948. Here he was able to lay aside the studied image he wore in London and the United States, and relish all aspects of country life. His friend Michael Pitt-Rivers once asked him, "Cecil, why is it that you are so loathsome in London and yet so delightful in the country?" Cecil mused a moment and confessed, "It's true!" A sterner note was added by another Wiltshire neighbour, Mary, Countess of Pembroke, who stated simply, "We wouldn't let him get away with it."

Cecil was fortunate to live in a beautiful and historical part of the country, not far from Stonehenge and Old Sarum, near the great stately home of Wilton, seat of the Earl and Countess of Pembroke, and with sympathetic neighbours in and around the area of the Chalke Valley, the Earl and Countess of Avon at Alvediston, Michael and Anne Tree in Donhead, Lord and Lady David Cecil, Viscount and Viscountess Head, Richard Buckle at Semley, Billy Henderson and Frank Tait in Tisbury

This country life afforded him welcome respite from the more synthetic worlds in which he made his living, the magazine world of London, Paris and New York, and none more remunerative, yet more irksome to him, than the world of show business on Broadway and in Hollywood.

When in London, he lived at 8 Pelham Place, a late-Georgian house in South Kensington, which he had bought in 1940. He was there during the week, though at every opportunity he escaped to the country.

Cecil had indeed lately returned to Britain from a disagreeable stint in New York, designing Coco, a musical based on the life of the celebrated monstre sacré icon of twentieth-century fashion, "Coco" Chanel. She was a peasant-born seamstress, who became a legendary figure in the world of haute couture, creating nimble and stylish suits and freeing women of the encumbrances of formal clothing. Her empire has thrived since her death.

The musical starred the legendary American film star Katharine Hepburn as Chanel. She was one of the few great stars of stage and early screen to survive into the twenty-first century. Her "apple-a-day" smile and her long, discreet affair with Spencer Tracy assured her a place in many hearts, if not Cecil's. She had mistrusted Cecil since he had written of her "rocking-horse nostrils" and her "tousled beetroot-coloured hair" in Cecil Beaton's Scrapbook in 1937, not to mention his concluding that she was "in close proximity very like any exceedingly animated and delightful hockey mistress at a Physical Training College." Hepburn insured that, in his Coco contract, he was forbidden to publish a single word about her.

The musical was written by Alan Jay Lerner, the brilliant, nervous, highly strung playwright, with music by André Previn. Lerner was normally partnered by Fritz Loewe, who wrote the music. Lerner and Loewe were the team which had created Gigi and My Fair Lady. Lerner once vexed himself over the line: "Those little eyes so helpless and appealing, one day will flash and send you crashing through the ceiling." Loewe reassured him: "It's your lyric and if you want to crash through the ceiling, crash through the ceiling!" Lerner wrote the words for Coco, but unfortunately he and Cecil fell out badly during this show, because Cecil always needed a hate figure and this time it was Alan. Cecil blamed him for causing Rosalind Russell (the American leading lady in films who favoured roles as a career woman and starred in Gypsy) to be dropped in favour of Katharine Hepburn.

This was the more strange, since the show was produced by Frederick Brisson, businessman producer, who had been trying to get the musical into production since 1954. He was a man of limited charm, who was married to Rosalind Russell. Elaine Stritch called him "The Wizard of Ros." He was the son of Carl Brisson, the Danish director, an international favourite of stage and screen, who made many films in Britain.

Katharine Hepburn and Cecil were not soulmates.

Coco and Katharine Hepburn in retrospect[December 1969]

No cause for regrets. I knew the show would be no good with such a rotten book. I never fooled myself into thinking the book could be sufficiently improved. It's no good wondering if Alan Lerner had not made a great mistake by throwing out Rosalind Russell (done in such a dishonest, beastly way) in favour of Katharine Hepburn. In fact R. R. would have given a better performance, would have projected the songs better, but the show would not have succeeded in becoming a smash hit, though it might have lasted longer than it will if K. H. is still determined to leave at the end of April.

It may, however, suit her to stay on to receive the applause of the multitudes. She is the egomaniac of all time and her whole life is devised to receive the standing ovation that she has had at the end of her great personality performance. As the play nears its end and she is sure of her success, she becomes raged, the years roll off her, and she becomes a young schoolmistress. Up till then she has, to my way of thinking, been as unlike Chanel as anyone could be. With the manners of an old sea salt, spreading her ugly piano-calved legs in the most indecent positions, even kicking her protégée with her foot in the "London" scene, standing with her huge legs wide apart and being in every gesture as unfeminine and unlike the fascinating Chanel as anyone could be. Her performance is just one long series of personal mannerisms.

I would not have thought audiences could react so admiringly, yet the first time I saw a run-through rehearsal, I was impressed and even touched. But ever since I've found her performance mechanical, inept (her timing is erratic), she stops and laughs, she falters over words, she is maladroit, and she is ugly. That beautiful bone structure of cheekbone, nose and chin goes for nothing in the surrounding flesh of the New England shopkeeper. Her skin is revolting and since she does not apply enough make-up even from the front she appears pockmarked. In life her appearance is appalling, a raddled, rash-ridden, freckled, burnt, mottled, bleached and wizened piece of decaying matter. It is unbelievable, incredible that she can still be exhibited in public.

Fred Brisson tells me that one day he will repeat the vile things she has said about me. As it is I have heard that she has complained about my being difficult, stubborn. She obviously does not trust me or have confidence in my talent. She pretends to be fairly friendly and direct, but she has never given me any friendship, never spoken to me of anything that has not direct bearing on the part that she is playing.

I have determined not to have a row with her, have put up with a great deal of double-crossing, chicanery and even deceit. She has behaved unethically in altering her clothes without telling me, asserting her "own" taste instead of mine. (On the first night she appeared in her own hat instead of the one that went with the blue on her costume. Instead of the Chanel jewellery she wears a little paste brooch chosen by her friend . . . in quiet good taste.) She is suspicious and untrustworthy.

Never has anyone been so one-tracked in their determination to succeed. She knows fundamentally that she has no great talent as an actress. This gives her great insecurity so she must expend enormous effort in overcoming this by asserting herself in as strident a manner as only she knows how. She must always be proved right, only she knows, no matter what the subject. It is extraordinary that she has not been paid out for her lack of taking advice. But even if this is her last job, and it won't be, she will have had an incredible run for incredible money. She owns $20 million. She is getting $13,000 a week. But in spite of her success, her aura of freshness and natural directness, she is a rotten, ingrained viper. She has no generosity, no heart, no grace. She is a dried-up boot. Completely lacking in feminine grace, in manners, she cannot smile except to bare her teeth to give an effect of utter youthfulness and charm. (This, one of her most valuable stage assets, is completely without feeling.) She is ungenerous, never gives a present, and miserly. She lives like a miser, bullies Phyllis [Willbourn] and thinks only of herself day and night. Garbo has magic. Garbo is a miracle with many of the same faults, but Hepburn is synthetic, lacking in the qualities that would make such an unbearable human being into a real artist.

I hope I never have to see her again.

Cecil was fond of his Wiltshire neighbours. He was devoted to Michael and Anne Tree, and relished having them as nearish neighbours at Donhead. Michael was the son of Ronald Tree and his wife, Nancy Lancaster. Lady Anne was a daughter of the tenth Duke of Devonshire. They were rich and deployed their riches with style, commissioning Sir Geoffrey Jellicoe to create their garden at Shute House.

Cecil was reading Enid Bagnold's autobiography. Enid was best known for National Velvet and The Chalk Garden. She lived at Rottingdean, an addict of vast doses of morphine. Cecil had fallen out with her over his sets for The Chalk Garden, which he designed in New York. To his rage, the sets were not used in the London production. Over twenty years of non-speaks ensued. Enid's autobiography (Heinemann, 1969) was a remarkable book. She had been scared to write it for fear of upsetting her children with an account of her affair, as a young girl, with the literary lothario, Frank Harris. This she covered with eloquence: " 'Sex,' said Frank Harris, 'is the gateway to life.' So I went through the gateway in an upper room in the Café Royal."

Cecil was expecting the arrival of Eileen Hose, his secretary. She joined him in 1953 and stayed with him until the end, becoming housekeeper, nurse, amanuensis, accountant and best friend. After his death she served as Literary Executor and settled his affairs, donating his papers to St. John's College, Cambridge, organising a sale of his drawings and paintings, and giving his Royal photographs to the Victoria and Albert Museum.

Boxing Day26 December 1969

Such a wonderful illuminating view from the top of the Downs, looking over the distances of Fonthill as I drove out to my Christmas Day lunch with the Trees. It was a sunny day and the winter scene was strangely soft and welcoming in a haze of sweet-pea colours, pale buff, pale mauves, pale blues and rose, the sight was eternal. It was of simple basic shapes, the distant woods were bare and just like patches of colour, no trimming, a living sculpture. Something breathing and alive, but unmoving. It was the best I'd seen since I left and I only now realised what solace to the spirit I have been missing. I was pleased with Anne's highly civilised conversation, so basic and honest and funny. She is one of the best that England produces, and I came away deeply satisfied with my happy outing to read Enid Bagnold's remarkably excellent autobiography. This is a great lesson in depth and all her qualities are apparent (also her dislikeable-ness-she is not a nice person). But her honesty and strength of character are amazing and I feel sorry that she should have spent so much time writing plays at which she is no good.

Her description of past events reminded me of the Japanese film Rashomon where so many people tell their varying versions of the truth. I knew so much that Enid believed in was not the same as I feel to be the truth. But the book kept me riveted for 2 days and it is a remarkable legacy for her to leave, an important and profound reportage in-depth of a strange, remarkable, original and warped life.

By degrees, the cotton wool gives place to sinew and muscle, and I am able to keep awake for a few hours. There are no pressing engagements and this gives me a wonderful feeling of luxury. The house is warm and scented with Smallpeice's pot plants and the neighbours I visit seem lively and bright, and when Eileen arrives with Alan and Charles, there is much laughter and the memories of 51st Street are fading quietly as my brain is filled with other music played on the record player.

5 January 1970

I kept this bloody diary every day while I was busy with idiotic events in New York. Now that I am quietly ensconced in the country, in my own adorable surroundings, I find I have not one moment of energy to even find where I have left this book. Ten happy days have passed. The first 5 were spent almost exclusively in sleep. I could not keep awake after I had had my late breakfast. I slept all afternoon and 12 hours at night. Then I started to read-Enid Bagnold-her autobiography-her plays. Then I started to write (the Sam Green piece) and every day was filled. Social life at a maximum, dinners or visits of succour to recent widows-Essex, Pembroke, Radnor, David, Dot and Anthony come to dine (spent from a pro-Communist on-thrust from Dot, which angers Anthony). The evening was a marvel of intelligence and delight and I was so pleased, when, as a result of the flowers Smallpeice has produced all over the house, Dot examining the dining table said "You have banished winter."

A recurring feature of Cecil's life was to be entertained by the super-rich. On the one hand, he loved the luxury and the chance to observe them. On the other hand, he was jealous of their riches and disapproving of their way of life. His hosts in Palm Beach in January 1970 were the Guinnesses.4

Group Captain Loel Guinness and his third wife Gloria were supremely rich members of the Guinness clan. Loel was the father of Lindy, Marchioness of Dufferin and Ava. Gloria's past was less clear. She was the daughter of Raphael Rubio, of Mexico, and had been married to Count Egon von Fürstenberg and Prince Ahmed Fakri. She was popular with young aristocratic men, whom she initiated into the ways of the world. In later life, when people like Cecil complained that their private parts were getting smaller, she would mutter, "I wish mine were."

Read More Show Less

First Chapter

Chapter 1
1970

Cecil Beaton entered the new decade at Reddish House, the country home at Broadchalke, not far from Salisbury, to which he had retreated regularly since he bought it in 1948. Here he was able to lay aside the studied image he wore in London and the United States, and relish all aspects of country life. His friend Michael Pitt-Rivers once asked him, "Cecil, why is it that you are so loathsome in London and yet so delightful in the country?" Cecil mused a moment and confessed, "It's true!" A sterner note was added by another Wiltshire neighbour, Mary, Countess of Pembroke, who stated simply, "We wouldn't let him get away with it."

Cecil was fortunate to live in a beautiful and historical part of the country, not far from Stonehenge and Old Sarum, near the great stately home of Wilton, seat of the Earl and Countess of Pembroke, and with sympathetic neighbours in and around the area of the Chalke Valley, the Earl and Countess of Avon at Alvediston, Michael and Anne Tree in Donhead, Lord and Lady David Cecil, Viscount and Viscountess Head, Richard Buckle at Semley, Billy Henderson and Frank Tait in Tisbury

This country life afforded him welcome respite from the more synthetic worlds in which he made his living, the magazine world of London, Paris and New York, and none more remunerative, yet more irksome to him, than the world of show business on Broadway and in Hollywood.

When in London, he lived at 8 Pelham Place, a late-Georgian house in South Kensington, which he had bought in 1940. He was there during the week, though at every opportunity he escaped to the country.

Cecil had indeed lately returned to Britain from a disagreeablestint in New York, designing Coco, a musical based on the life of the celebrated monstre sacré icon of twentieth-century fashion, "Coco" Chanel. She was a peasant-born seamstress, who became a legendary figure in the world of haute couture, creating nimble and stylish suits and freeing women of the encumbrances of formal clothing. Her empire has thrived since her death.

The musical starred the legendary American film star Katharine Hepburn as Chanel. She was one of the few great stars of stage and early screen to survive into the twenty-first century. Her "apple-a-day" smile and her long, discreet affair with Spencer Tracy assured her a place in many hearts, if not Cecil's. She had mistrusted Cecil since he had written of her "rocking-horse nostrils" and her "tousled beetroot-coloured hair" in Cecil Beaton's Scrapbook in 1937, not to mention his concluding that she was "in close proximity very like any exceedingly animated and delightful hockey mistress at a Physical Training College." Hepburn insured that, in his Coco contract, he was forbidden to publish a single word about her.

The musical was written by Alan Jay Lerner, the brilliant, nervous, highly strung playwright, with music by André Previn. Lerner was normally partnered by Fritz Loewe, who wrote the music. Lerner and Loewe were the team which had created Gigi and My Fair Lady. Lerner once vexed himself over the line: "Those little eyes so helpless and appealing, one day will flash and send you crashing through the ceiling." Loewe reassured him: "It's your lyric and if you want to crash through the ceiling, crash through the ceiling!" Lerner wrote the words for Coco, but unfortunately he and Cecil fell out badly during this show, because Cecil always needed a hate figure and this time it was Alan. Cecil blamed him for causing Rosalind Russell (the American leading lady in films who favoured roles as a career woman and starred in Gypsy) to be dropped in favour of Katharine Hepburn.

This was the more strange, since the show was produced by Frederick Brisson, businessman producer, who had been trying to get the musical into production since 1954. He was a man of limited charm, who was married to Rosalind Russell. Elaine Stritch called him "The Wizard of Ros." He was the son of Carl Brisson, the Danish director, an international favourite of stage and screen, who made many films in Britain.

Katharine Hepburn and Cecil were not soulmates.

Coco and Katharine Hepburn in retrospect[December 1969]

No cause for regrets. I knew the show would be no good with such a rotten book. I never fooled myself into thinking the book could be sufficiently improved. It's no good wondering if Alan Lerner had not made a great mistake by throwing out Rosalind Russell (done in such a dishonest, beastly way) in favour of Katharine Hepburn. In fact R. R. would have given a better performance, would have projected the songs better, but the show would not have succeeded in becoming a smash hit, though it might have lasted longer than it will if K. H. is still determined to leave at the end of April.

It may, however, suit her to stay on to receive the applause of the multitudes. She is the egomaniac of all time and her whole life is devised to receive the standing ovation that she has had at the end of her great personality performance. As the play nears its end and she is sure of her success, she becomes raged, the years roll off her, and she becomes a young schoolmistress. Up till then she has, to my way of thinking, been as unlike Chanel as anyone could be. With the manners of an old sea salt, spreading her ugly piano-calved legs in the most indecent positions, even kicking her protégée with her foot in the "London" scene, standing with her huge legs wide apart and being in every gesture as unfeminine and unlike the fascinating Chanel as anyone could be. Her performance is just one long series of personal mannerisms.

I would not have thought audiences could react so admiringly, yet the first time I saw a run-through rehearsal, I was impressed and even touched. But ever since I've found her performance mechanical, inept (her timing is erratic), she stops and laughs, she falters over words, she is maladroit, and she is ugly. That beautiful bone structure of cheekbone, nose and chin goes for nothing in the surrounding flesh of the New England shopkeeper. Her skin is revolting and since she does not apply enough make-up even from the front she appears pockmarked. In life her appearance is appalling, a raddled, rash-ridden, freckled, burnt, mottled, bleached and wizened piece of decaying matter. It is unbelievable, incredible that she can still be exhibited in public.

Fred Brisson tells me that one day he will repeat the vile things she has said about me. As it is I have heard that she has complained about my being difficult, stubborn. She obviously does not trust me or have confidence in my talent. She pretends to be fairly friendly and direct, but she has never given me any friendship, never spoken to me of anything that has not direct bearing on the part that she is playing.

I have determined not to have a row with her, have put up with a great deal of double-crossing, chicanery and even deceit. She has behaved unethically in altering her clothes without telling me, asserting her "own" taste instead of mine. (On the first night she appeared in her own hat instead of the one that went with the blue on her costume. Instead of the Chanel jewellery she wears a little paste brooch chosen by her friend . . . in quiet good taste.) She is suspicious and untrustworthy.

Never has anyone been so one-tracked in their determination to succeed. She knows fundamentally that she has no great talent as an actress. This gives her great insecurity so she must expend enormous effort in overcoming this by asserting herself in as strident a manner as only she knows how. She must always be proved right, only she knows, no matter what the subject. It is extraordinary that she has not been paid out for her lack of taking advice. But even if this is her last job, and it won't be, she will have had an incredible run for incredible money. She owns $20 million. She is getting $13,000 a week. But in spite of her success, her aura of freshness and natural directness, she is a rotten, ingrained viper. She has no generosity, no heart, no grace. She is a dried-up boot. Completely lacking in feminine grace, in manners, she cannot smile except to bare her teeth to give an effect of utter youthfulness and charm. (This, one of her most valuable stage assets, is completely without feeling.) She is ungenerous, never gives a present, and miserly. She lives like a miser, bullies Phyllis [Willbourn] and thinks only of herself day and night. Garbo has magic. Garbo is a miracle with many of the same faults, but Hepburn is synthetic, lacking in the qualities that would make such an unbearable human being into a real artist.

I hope I never have to see her again.

Cecil was fond of his Wiltshire neighbours. He was devoted to Michael and Anne Tree, and relished having them as nearish neighbours at Donhead. Michael was the son of Ronald Tree and his wife, Nancy Lancaster. Lady Anne was a daughter of the tenth Duke of Devonshire. They were rich and deployed their riches with style, commissioning Sir Geoffrey Jellicoe to create their garden at Shute House.

Cecil was reading Enid Bagnold's autobiography. Enid was best known for National Velvet and The Chalk Garden. She lived at Rottingdean, an addict of vast doses of morphine. Cecil had fallen out with her over his sets for The Chalk Garden, which he designed in New York. To his rage, the sets were not used in the London production. Over twenty years of non-speaks ensued. Enid's autobiography (Heinemann, 1969) was a remarkable book. She had been scared to write it for fear of upsetting her children with an account of her affair, as a young girl, with the literary lothario, Frank Harris. This she covered with eloquence: " 'Sex,' said Frank Harris, 'is the gateway to life.' So I went through the gateway in an upper room in the Café Royal."

Cecil was expecting the arrival of Eileen Hose, his secretary. She joined him in 1953 and stayed with him until the end, becoming housekeeper, nurse, amanuensis, accountant and best friend. After his death she served as Literary Executor and settled his affairs, donating his papers to St. John's College, Cambridge, organising a sale of his drawings and paintings, and giving his Royal photographs to the Victoria and Albert Museum.

Boxing Day26 December 1969

Such a wonderful illuminating view from the top of the Downs, looking over the distances of Fonthill as I drove out to my Christmas Day lunch with the Trees. It was a sunny day and the winter scene was strangely soft and welcoming in a haze of sweet-pea colours, pale buff, pale mauves, pale blues and rose, the sight was eternal. It was of simple basic shapes, the distant woods were bare and just like patches of colour, no trimming, a living sculpture. Something breathing and alive, but unmoving. It was the best I'd seen since I left and I only now realised what solace to the spirit I have been missing. I was pleased with Anne's highly civilised conversation, so basic and honest and funny. She is one of the best that England produces, and I came away deeply satisfied with my happy outing to read Enid Bagnold's remarkably excellent autobiography. This is a great lesson in depth and all her qualities are apparent (also her dislikeable-ness-she is not a nice person). But her honesty and strength of character are amazing and I feel sorry that she should have spent so much time writing plays at which she is no good.

Her description of past events reminded me of the Japanese film Rashomon where so many people tell their varying versions of the truth. I knew so much that Enid believed in was not the same as I feel to be the truth. But the book kept me riveted for 2 days and it is a remarkable legacy for her to leave, an important and profound reportage in-depth of a strange, remarkable, original and warped life.

By degrees, the cotton wool gives place to sinew and muscle, and I am able to keep awake for a few hours. There are no pressing engagements and this gives me a wonderful feeling of luxury. The house is warm and scented with Smallpeice's pot plants and the neighbours I visit seem lively and bright, and when Eileen arrives with Alan and Charles, there is much laughter and the memories of 51st Street are fading quietly as my brain is filled with other music played on the record player.

5 January 1970

I kept this bloody diary every day while I was busy with idiotic events in New York. Now that I am quietly ensconced in the country, in my own adorable surroundings, I find I have not one moment of energy to even find where I have left this book. Ten happy days have passed. The first 5 were spent almost exclusively in sleep. I could not keep awake after I had had my late breakfast. I slept all afternoon and 12 hours at night. Then I started to read-Enid Bagnold-her autobiography-her plays. Then I started to write (the Sam Green piece) and every day was filled. Social life at a maximum, dinners or visits of succour to recent widows-Essex, Pembroke, Radnor, David, Dot and Anthony come to dine (spent from a pro-Communist on-thrust from Dot, which angers Anthony). The evening was a marvel of intelligence and delight and I was so pleased, when, as a result of the flowers Smallpeice has produced all over the house, Dot examining the dining table said "You have banished winter."

A recurring feature of Cecil's life was to be entertained by the super-rich. On the one hand, he loved the luxury and the chance to observe them. On the other hand, he was jealous of their riches and disapproving of their way of life. His hosts in Palm Beach in January 1970 were the Guinnesses.4

Group Captain Loel Guinness and his third wife Gloria were supremely rich members of the Guinness clan. Loel was the father of Lindy, Marchioness of Dufferin and Ava. Gloria's past was less clear. She was the daughter of Raphael Rubio, of Mexico, and had been married to Count Egon von Fürstenberg and Prince Ahmed Fakri. She was popular with young aristocratic men, whom she initiated into the ways of the world. In later life, when people like Cecil complained that their private parts were getting smaller, she would mutter, "I wish mine were."

Copyright© 2003 by Cecil Beaton
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 5
( 1 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(1)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 22, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)