Unfinished Revolution CD: Making Computers Human-Centric


Using a computer ought to be as easy and productive as driving your car. But today's systems are oblivious to our needs and demand ever more attention and work from us, as they swell in numbers, complexity and features. now Michael Dertouzos argues that we must shift the focus of information technology away from machines and back to people. In The Unfinished Revolution, he not only outlines five key technologies that will help us do this, he also offers and exciting vision of how human-centric computers could ...
See more details below
Available through our Marketplace sellers.
Other sellers (Audiobook)
  • All (4) from $1.99   
  • New (2) from $58.97   
  • Used (2) from $1.99   
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing 1 – 1 of 2
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
Seller since 2015

Feedback rating:



New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

Brand New Item.

Ships from: Chatham, NJ

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing 1 – 1 of 2
Sort by
Sending request ...


Using a computer ought to be as easy and productive as driving your car. But today's systems are oblivious to our needs and demand ever more attention and work from us, as they swell in numbers, complexity and features. now Michael Dertouzos argues that we must shift the focus of information technology away from machines and back to people. In The Unfinished Revolution, he not only outlines five key technologies that will help us do this, he also offers and exciting vision of how human-centric computers could dramatically alter the way we live and work in the Information Century.

About the Author:
For more than a quarter century, Michael Dertouzos has headed up the MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, which has been associated with many of the most important developments in computing. Dertouzos is the author of the 1997 best-seller What Will Be: How the New World of Information Will Change Our Lives. He lives in Weston, MA.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
Our Review
A few hours before I started reading Michael Dertouzos's The Unfinished Revolution, I was furious, angry -- you might even say downright spitting mad. You see, my boyfriend and I, both with limited money and free time to spare, had decided to use our computer to create our Christmas cards. It seemed like an easy enough task until we attempted to print the address labels. The ZIP codes, although properly in place on our computer screen, refused to show up on the printouts. After running through about $50 worth of Avery sheets, I started plotting ways to throw the printer out the window, while my boyfriend cursed at the screen and repeatedly pressed the Control-Alt-Delete keys.

If you've ever had a similarly frustrating experience with your PC, not only will you love Dertouzos's latest work, you'll want to email passages of text to engineers and executives at every major computer, software, and networking technology company. You see, even Dertouzos -- who is more high-tech than most high-tech moguls and has pioneered countless technological developments as director of MIT's prestigious Laboratory for Computer Science -- can't figure out those automated voice mail systems that make you press 1 if you have a touch-tone phone and 7 to hear the instructions in Spanish. That's why his new book resonates for everyone. He shares all of our high-tech frustrations and argues that we must accept nothing short of human-centered computers.

"Once we change our mind-set in earnest," he writes, "we will no longer put up with the maddening computer faults we now suffer.... No longer will we be seduced by fancy buzzwords like 'multi-media,' 'intelligent agents,' 'push-versus-pull technologies,'...and a few hundred others already with us and yet to come."

The most refreshing thing about Dertouzos's new work is the fact that it never abandon's his "keep it simple" philosophy. He uses simple metaphors to help readers envision the creation of truly human-centric systems. (One of my favorites is an "e-bulldozer" that helps us with the overwhelming amount of "information shoveling" that we face every day.) The book's different sections present five human-centric forces -- speech understanding, automation, individualized information access, collaboration, and customization -- and clearly explain why the existence of all five is entirely plausible in the near future. Unlike so many business and technology books of the past five years, this is not a collection of pie-in-the-sky futurist hype. Instead, it's a common sense refashioning of our collective focus when it comes to technology.

If Dertouzos is at all guilty of futuristic fantasizing, it's in his argument for breaking down economic barriers and making computers available to individuals in the world's developing nations. "Imagine a new breed of useful counseling exchanges between the rich people of the West, who are often troubled by depression, divorce, and family problems, and the poor people of the East, who seem to counterbalance lack of money with strong family ties and inner peace." Although this reviewer is all for equal access to technology, it's hard to imagine, as Dertouzos suggests, that leveling the technology playing field will eliminate our need for psychotherapy and family counseling.

Despite such minor faults, The Unfinished Revolution will be a great start to your new year's reading. It will help you begin 2001 on an optimistic note. Instead of throwing that printer out the window or forcefully pressing Control-Alt-Delete, you'll want to join Dertouzos in finishing what is sure to be one of this century's most important revolutions.

--Amy Lambo is a freelance writer and editor living in New York City.

New York Times
In eight books, Dr. Michael L. Dertouzos—engineer, inventor, theoretician, and director of the Laboratory for Computer Science at MIT—predicted the many ways the information revolution would affect human lives.
Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
With wry humor and searing wit, the man Time magazine calls "MIT's #1 computer guru" disparages the high-tech devices (PCs, laptops, Web-friendly cell phones, hand-held digital organizersDwhat the author dismissively calls "weird animals") we've come to rely on so heavily but that often take forever to boot up, then crash and frustrate us to no end. (In a few years, he warns, there will be 10 times as many of these "creatures biting at" us.) Enough is enough, says Dertouzos (What Will Be). Instead, he envisions a time when we alternate ample leisure with intellectually stimulating work, seamlessly integrated by technology that spares us the inconveniences of modern life. The key, says Dertouzos, is "human-centric computing," technological devices that "talk with us, do things for us, get the information we want, help us work with other people, and adapt to our individual needs... [that] truly serve us, instead of the other way around." These are not generic recommendations; the book discusses both the existing technology and what is needed to bring it up to human-centric standards. It then offers a five-pronged approach that takes into account "both the human and computer sides of the relationship." A weakness in Dertouzo's argument, however, is the lack of discussion of competing design views or past failures in implementing these ideas. Human speech interaction, in particular, has been controversial since the 1960s and has occasioned many expensive flops; there is also a school of thought that early adopters have consistently preferred cutting-edge features to user-friendly ones. Still, the book is a readable and sensible application of design principles to computer technology, written at a level accessible to nonprofessionals. Agent, Ike Williams. (Jan. 31) Forecast: A well-known futurist and technology expert, Dertouzos will command significant attention on his 15-city tour to East and West Coast technology hot spots. Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780694525041
  • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
  • Publication date: 1/1/2001
  • Format: CD
  • Edition description: Abridged, 5 CDs
  • Pages: 240
  • Product dimensions: 4.91 (w) x 5.61 (h) x 0.99 (d)

First Chapter

Chapter One

Why Change

Weird animals surround me in my home, at work, everywhere I go. Every day I must spend hours feeding them, healing them, waiting for them. And the fighting! They hold each other hostage in asphyxiating headlocks. I scream at them, but they just grunt or stare back stupidly. When we do get along, and I'm feeling affection for them, they suddenly turn around and bite a chunk off my hide.

You are surrounded by these creatures, too -- the personal computers, laptops, handheld assistants, printers, Internet-savvy phones, music storage drives, and other digital wonders. They are everywhere and multiplying fast. Yet instead of serving us, we are serving them. We wait endlessly for our computers to boot up, and for bulky Web pages to paint themselves on our screens. We stand perplexed in front of incomprehensible system messages, and wait in frustration on the phone for computerized assistance. We constantly add software upgrades, enter odd instructions, fix glitches, only to sit in maddening silence when our machines crash, forcing us to start all over again, hoping against hope that they didn't take a piece of our intellectual hide with them. We'd never live in a house, work in an office, or ride in a car where we had to put up with a menagerie of such beasts. Yet we do it every day with our computer menagerie.

We shouldn't have to.

We have already gone so far down the road of serving computers that we've come to accept our servitude as necessary. It isn't. It is time for us to rise up with a profound demand: "Make our computers simpler to use!" Make them talk with us, do things for us, get the information we want, help us work with other people, and adapt to our individual needs. Only then will computers make us productive and truly serve us, instead of the other way around.

Is this possible? Certainly.

Before I reveal an entirely new approach to computer systems and their uses -- a new plan for human-centric computing -- let me assure you that in our new century, we have every right to expect fundamental reform. For 40 years computers have been shrines to which we pay dutiful homage. When something goes wrong, the "user"you and I -- feel that if we somehow had behaved better the trouble would not have arisen. But we are not at fault. The trouble lies in the current approach to computing.

If computers are to live up to the promise of serving us, they will have to change drastically and never again subject us to the frustrating experiences we have all shared.

Several colleagues from the MIT Laboratory for Computer Science and I are flying to Taiwan. I have been trying for three hours to make my new laptop work with one of these "smart cards" that plug into the machine and download my personal calendar. When the card software is happy, the operating system complains, and vice versa. Irritated, I turn to Tim Berners-Lee, sitting next to me, who graciously offers to assist. After an hour the inventor of the Web admits that the task is beyond his capabilities. I turn to Ron Rivest, inventor of RSA public key cryptography, and ask him to help. He declines, exhibiting his wisdom. A young faculty member behind us speaks up: "You guys are too old. Let me do it." He gives up after an hour and a half. So Igo back to my "expert" approach of typing random entries into the various wizards and lizards that keep popping up on the screen. After two more hours, and two batteries, I make it work, by sheer accident and without remembering how.

My friends on this flight were hardly incompetent. The problem was what I call the "unintegrated systems fault." Technologists design today's hardware and software systems without worrying enough about how these different pieces will work together. If the slightest conflict arises among an operating system, a communications network, a digital camera, a printer, or any other device, the modules become deadlocked, as do their makers, who point to one another, leaving you to resolve their differences. After I published this Taiwan anecdote in an August 1999 article in Scientific American, I received scores of letters from people who said, "I know exactly what you are talking about. Please fix it." The problem is not simply a "bug" to be worked out in existing systems, but rather an endemic mind-set that has characterized computer design for decades. Only a radical change can fix it.

It's 11 P.M. and I check my e-mail. Ninety-eight new messages have arrived since yesterday. At 2 to 3 minutes per message, my average response time, I'll need 4 hours to handle them. I'd like to grant them my highest security classfication, DBR -- "destroy before reading."

How do we handle this "overload fault?" We don't. Mostly, we feel guilty if we cannot respond to all the messages that come our way. Better e-mail software can relieve a lot of this burden. Better human behavior can go further. Human-centric computing means more than changing the hardware and software of computer systems. We must also improve the ways we use technology.

My son is searching the Web for information on Vespas, the Italian scooters that conquered Europe in the 1950s, which he loves to restore. The search engine has given him 2,545 hits and he is busy checking them out. His eyes squint and his brain labors to minimize the time he needs to decide whether he should keep or toss each entry. I imagine him in an ancient badlands, furiously shoveling through 2,545 mountains of dirt, looking for one nugget of hidden treasure. His shovel is diamond studded and it is stamped "high tech," so he is duly modern. Yet he is still shoveling!

Read More Show Less

Interviews & Essays

Author Essay

The automatic answering system greets you with its murderous "You have reached the Tough Luck Corporation. If you want Marketing, press 1. If you want Engineering, press 2...." The image this ritual forms in my head is of a human being, on whose head a price cannot be set, obediently executing instructions dispensed by a $100 computer. You are serving the inhuman machine and its inhuman owners, who got away with saving a few dollars of operator time by squandering valuable pieces of your life and that of millions of other people. What glory: The highest technology artifacts in the world have become our masters, reintroducing us to human slavery more than a century after its abolition.

This "human servitude fault" is but one of the many ways in which machines cause us to serve them, instead of the other way around. Here are some more: In the "manual labor fault" you do all the work, squinting your eyes and taxing your brain, as when you sift through thousands of search-engine results to find the one you want. In the "excessive learning fault," your handheld digital assistant demands that you go back to first grade and relearn how to write, so it can understand your scribbling on its tiny screen. Software, overloaded with features that you don't need, overwhelms you. You wait forever as web pages load up on your screen. And when two pieces of software come in conflict with each another, so do their makers, leaving you alone to sort out the mess.

The Web, which we think has reached its pinnacle, is more like a meeting ground for "exhibitionists" displaying their wares or tooting their horns and "voyeurs" browsing frantically to catch these exhibitions. And as for the Web being "worldwide," it interconnects fewer than 5 percent of the world's people.

Two factors are responsible for this situation: an overwhelming complexity of computer systems that force us to deal with them at their low, mechanistic levels and the yet-to-be realized potential of the Information Revolution to help us do more with less effort. And we should keep in mind that technology is not standing still: Millions of new wireless devices and physical appliances that we use in our everyday lives will increasingly join the interconnected information marketplace, making our systems even more complex. By all these counts, we are nowhere near where we could be. In comparison to the industrial age, the information era is at the steam-engine stage. By the time information systems reach jet-plane status, we will focus on utility over fads, triple our productivity, use our computers as naturally and easily as we now use our cars and refrigerators, and hear the voices of hundreds of millions more people -- if we abandon our self-defeating path toward unbridled and growing machine complexity.

Until we undertake this challenge, people will stay confused, and justifiably so. Does all this new and exciting technology make us "better off"? Or are we headed toward greater complexity, increased frustration, and a human burden that will grow in proportion to the gadgets and programs that surround us? We certainly can be better off with information technology. But not the way we are headed. Without a fundamentally new approach the confusion will get worse, and the Information Revolution will remain unfinished. It's high time for a radical change.

I have called the approach that will induce this change "human-centric computing," to emphasize that, from now on, computer systems should be centered around our needs and capabilities. Here is what human-centered systems should be able to do:

1. They should let us communicate with them naturally, the way we communicate with other people, using the spoken word. This way, we won't need to learn new and complex ways for telling our machines what we want them to do. Fortunately, the speech understanding technology is up to meeting this challenge.

2. They should automate routine human actions: You should be able to say to your machine, "If Joe calls or sends me email, alert me, wherever I may be." And the machine should obediently and tirelessly check every incoming caller ID and email sender, carrying out its master's instructions.

3. Human-centered systems should help us work with other people, across space and time. You should be able to sell your office work not only to local organizations but to distant ones as well, even to ones that are in faraway time zones. Hardly any office work flows over the Net today. Yet, it will be the bulk of tomorrow's economic activity over the world's network, because at 50 percent of the industrial world economy, it involves some $10 trillion a year.

4. The new systems must help people locate the information they need, the people they want to reach, and the physical appliances they desire to control, whenever and wherever they wish to do so, without having to search forever through mounting piles of info-junk.

5. Finally, human-centered systems should be able to adapt easily to the highly varying needs of different human beings and organizations. Ultimately, everyone will start with similar information systems. What will distinguish the winners from the losers will be the way they dovetail the new systems with their most precious resource -- their human capabilities.

Human-centered systems will make available these new technologies to tomorrow's computer application programs. This way, a human-centered system for doctors and hospitals would come equipped with the ability to understand spoken medical commands and queries; with built-in programs that would automate routine medical procedures, communicating, as necessary, with medical appliances; with collaboration software that would enable doctors to hold consultations with one another; and with built-in information access capabilities that would let doctors easily access patient records and the medical literature. With such increased capabilities in hand, doctors would be able to devote much more of their precious time to valuable eyeball-to-eyeball doctor-patient sessions, instead of doing all the routine office work by themselves.

The human-centric approach also calls for changes in our attitude: As we complain about the email that overloads us, we should keep in mind the fact that just because we have become interconnected, we have not earned the automatic right to reach anyone we want, nor the automatic obligation to respond to every message that reaches us. Human-centered systems will also give rise to a new breed of "nomadic" software that flows among the networks to our machines, where it is needed. If you drop your handheld unit in the lake, you should be able to pick up another one, maybe from a friend, and download your "information personality" into it from your home and office units, without missing a beat.

Human-centered systems will have a profound impact upon our personal and professional lives. Take the information work that will be made possible with the collaboration technology: Imagine now the 50 million Indians in Asia who can read and write in English and who are skilled in some kind of office work -- transcribing medical instructions to text, reviewing mortgage applications, selling products or services, and so on. These people will be able to offer their work, at a distance, to the wealthy English-speaking nations of the world, perhaps at one quarter of the cost charged by local office workers. The result will be a global redistribution of labor with the attendant pain for those who lose their work and the corresponding gain for those who replace them. At the same time, speech technology will open the door of the information marketplace to billions of people who today cannot read and write but are perfectly capable of speaking.

Most office work over the Net will flow within the industrial world, transforming the way we do business and eventually tripling our productivity. Much like the Industrial Revolution gave rise to the middle class, human-centered systems will give rise to a new info-royalty class. Kings and rich folk have always had servants. With human-centered automation, we, too, will end up surrounded by automated servants. Rich people have always had products and services customized to their wishes. So will we through customization. Rich people don't need to work, because their wealth breeds more wealth. The expected threefold increase in human productivity made possible by human-centered systems could free up two-thirds of the time we now spend working...if we elect to realize the savings in this way. Many more benefits will accrue to our health care, our education, our business and professional lives, simply because human-centered systems aim to serve our needs.

We will know that the Information Revolution is finished when human-centered systems become invisible, as they quietly serve our needs, letting us do a great deal more of what we want, with a lot less effort on our part.

--Michael Dertouzos

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)