BN.com Gift Guide

Unusually Stupid Americans: A Compendium of All-American Stupidity

Overview

A hilarious collection of lists, statistics, news items, quotations, and facts detailing stupid acts of Americans from all walks of life—by the authors of the bestselling The 776 Stupidest Things Ever Said

Everyone knows that America is “the land of the free and the home of the brave,” but sometimes that means we’re free to be as bravely stupid as we want! In Unusually Stupid Americans, Kathryn Petras and Ross Petras assemble choice bits of stupidity, U.S.A.-style, including

...

See more details below
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (57) from $1.99   
  • New (4) from $9.19   
  • Used (53) from $1.99   
Unusually Stupid Americans: A Compendium of All-American Stupidity

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$8.99
BN.com price

Overview

A hilarious collection of lists, statistics, news items, quotations, and facts detailing stupid acts of Americans from all walks of life—by the authors of the bestselling The 776 Stupidest Things Ever Said

Everyone knows that America is “the land of the free and the home of the brave,” but sometimes that means we’re free to be as bravely stupid as we want! In Unusually Stupid Americans, Kathryn Petras and Ross Petras assemble choice bits of stupidity, U.S.A.-style, including

•the top seriously flawed American advertising moments, including Pacific Airlines’ brilliant “You’re scared of flying? So’s our pilot!” ad campaign, which led the airline to bankruptcy within two months of the campaign’s inception

•the Martin Luther King, Jr., celebration in Florida, where a plaque was un-veiled that was intended to honor the actor James Earl Jones but instead read, “Thank you James Earl Ray for keeping the dream alive” (an unfortunate slip-up, as James Earl Ray was King’s assassin)

•and much more!

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
What’s been said about their work:

“Exceedingly amusing.”—The Washington Post

“Cruel but funny.”—Playboy

“Brilliantly stupid.”—The Wall Street Journal

“Like eating popcorn. You can’t stop.”—The Dallas Morning News

“You want stupid? Check this book.”—The Houston Chronicle

“Sinfully delicious.”—Fort Worth Star-Telegram

“Wickedly funny.”—Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

“Enormously funny.”—The Star-Ledger

“Fabulous.”—Elle

“Perfect on-the-john entertainment.”—Stuff

Library Journal
The Petras siblings, authors of a number of "stupidest things" books (e.g., The Stupidest Things Ever Said by Politicians), now gleefully examine stupidity in our culture as a whole. The subtitle alludes to the contents more accurately than the title because the book is organized not by people but by subject (e.g., stupid food, stupid taxes, and stupid entertainment). Cited, for example, are the U.S. Air Force's 173 atomic-bomb-proof FAX machines, which cost more than half a million dollars per unit, and the Republican senatorial candidate who, asked by a McDonald's employee what he would like to drink, inquired about the house Chablis. Small inaccuracies and a lack of documentation make the title unsuitable for academic and school libraries, and the potentially objectionable subject matter might also keep school libraries away. Still, the book's entertainment value is unquestionable. This light and breezy title is meant simply in good fun and provides it. It is most suitable for large public libraries with sizable budgets, but smaller libraries may also wish to consider.-Audrey Snowden, Brewer, ME Copyright 2004 Reed Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780812970821
  • Publisher: Random House Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 10/21/2003
  • Edition description: 1ST
  • Pages: 304
  • Sales rank: 498,210
  • Product dimensions: 5.00 (w) x 7.30 (h) x 0.63 (d)

Meet the Author

Kathryn and Ross Petras are the authors of numerous humor books, including the bestselling The 776 Stupidest Things Ever Said and the annual bestselling calendar The 365 Stupidest Things Ever Said.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Stupid Education in the U.S.A.

Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach.” Thus goes the old saying. We take exception to this, as there are many fine teachers and other educators out there who are certainly doing a great deal—and a great deal of good.

Of course, there’s a flip side to this. . . .

Bad Moments in Innovative Education

We Americans are innovators; we don’t like doing stuff the old ways; we proudly invent new ways of doing everything. And today’s modern American teachers are innovators like everyone else—they boldly try to get kids interested in school by throwing away the textbooks and introducing new, fun, exciting, different ways of learning. But maybe, just maybe, there’s something to be said for just reading the dull old textbooks, as these innovative teaching disasters show.

Teacher innovatively uses banana prop in sex ed

Students learned one thing from this class: Mood music, bananas, and sex ed don’t mix. A teacher at Gulf Coast High School in Naples, Florida, decided to put on a demonstration of safe-sex practices. A laudable idea. He picked two volunteers, a boy and a girl, to come up in front of the class. Then he dimmed the lights and put on some “mood music”: Christmas carols. (It was the only music he had.) He gave the boy the banana and told him to hold it while the girl gently put a condom over it. Some of the kids in class weren’t amused; nor were parents when they found out about it; and nor, for that matter, were school administrators. As the teacher put it, “It wasn’t merely a demonstration of how to place a condom over a banana.” No, indeed. School officials decided to flunk the sex-ed teacher: They fired him.

Teacher innovatively feeds cute puppies to giant snakes in bio class

In retrospect, it was not one of the better ideas in biology pedagogy. A teacher at the Bluestem High School in Kansas who kept two boa constrictors wanted to show students how snakes eat. Three puppies were donated by a schoolboard member who operates a shelter where dogs are put to sleep. The problem was that the puppies were “soft” and “cuddly,” and people got very upset about the planned demonstration—the idea of cute puppies yelping in pain while being squeezed to death didn’t sit well with them. They began complaining loudly, and there were sugges- tions that the teacher be fired. The teacher defended his actions but realized he might have been a bit . . . insensitive. “I’m not sure I considered the sensitivity of some people when it involved what’s considered a pet.” But he also defended his choice of doomed puppies, saying, “I hate to see any life wasted.” But now he’s trying to find nonsnake- owning homes for the puppies.

Math worksheets innovatively ask the question: “How many bazookas does it take . . . ?”

The idea that learning must be fun has taken over the education industry, but there are limits—which were reached with math worksheets published by a Minnesota company called MindWare. In 2001, education officials complained that math worksheets for 12-year-olds contained jokes about unruly kids being shot. Another, called Five Foolish Rabbits, had a farmer using different kinds of weapons like bazookas to wipe out rabbits eating his crops. The company president said the worksheets were supposed to “liven up” math.

Teacher innovatively adds roadkill to curriculum

The fact that North Shore Technical High School of Middleton, Massachusetts, didn’t have a taxidermy course didn’t stop a bold, innovative carpentry teacher and amateur taxidermist from deciding to give the kids a little lesson in skinning animals for fun and profit. Finding a dead coyote on the side of the road on March 15, 2003, the intrepid teacher tossed it into his pickup and brought it to school—and skinned it outside, to show his pupils just how it was done. The aftermath of this school exercise was more painful: Although the brain of the coyote was too deteriorated to tell if it had rabies, two students opted for vaccinations, just in case. Superintendent Amy O’Malley said the entire incident was under investigation and added, “Of course, this was not a school-sanctioned activity.”

Science exhibit innovatively teaches “grossology”

It’s supposed to be the latest thing in “science” education: highlighting the gross aspects. In 2001, at a Chicago exhibition about the human body, children were treated to a vomit machine and a fart pinball game and a huge, sneezing nose. The exhibit organizers said, “There’s a lot of yelling and screaming.” And, supposedly, a lot of learning, although what kind of learning is perhaps more problematic. According to the organizer, “ ‘We smell the butt!’ becomes a 4th-grader’s Eureka! moment.”

College teacher innovatively teaches with rotting animals

Artist Ben Jennings wanted to capture the essence of decay for students in his art class at the University of Wisconsin–Marathon County. What better way than to put up an art display featuring a disemboweled raccoon and a dead crow? Unfortunately for the intrepid art teacher, school officials objected to the smell. Said Dean Jim Veninga, “I sort of like raccoons, but I don’t want them in the university’s gallery, dead or alive.” Jennings defended the project, insisting that “it wasn’t to be disgusting or grotesque.” Nevertheless, it ended up behind the college greenhouse—on a compost heap.

Roll the “probability cubes” and hope for a lucky seven! Probability cubes? That’s what math teachers in the U.S. are now encouraged to call dice, which are used in class to teach various probability concepts. Apparently, calling dice “dice” encourages gambling.

“Is Our Children Learning?”

As we know, President George W. Bush asked this rhetorical question during his first campaign for the presidency.

Unfortunately, perhaps they is not. . . .

•Number of correct answers out of 100 needed to get an A on the Palm Beach County final exam in history (for high school seniors): 50

Number of answers to get a B: 39

Number of correct answers to pass: 23

•Percentage of U.S. citizens ages 18–24 in 2002 (post-9/11) who couldn’t find Afghanistan on a map: 83% Percentage who couldn’t identify Israel: 85%

Percentage who could correctly place the 2001 Survivor TV series island in the South Pacific: 86%

Percentage who couldn’t find the U.K.: 69%

Percentage who couldn’t find France: 65%

Percentage who couldn’t find Japan: 58%

Percentage who couldn’t find the Pacific Ocean: 29%

Percentage who couldn’t find the U.S.: 11%

Rank of U.S. respondents compared with those of the other 8 countries polled: second to last

Rank of U.S. respondents in estimating the population of the U.S.: last

—National Geographic 2002 Global Geographic Literacy Survey

•Percentage of high school seniors who thought that Italy, Germany, or Japan was a U.S. ally in World War II: over 50%

Percentage of high school seniors who thought the Gulf of Tonkin agreement ended the Korean War: 43%

—2001 U.S. History National Assessment of Education Progress Survey

•Percentage of 17-year-olds who correctly placed the Civil War in the period 1850–1900: 33%

Percentage who thought the Civil War happened in the 18th century: more than 25%

Percentage who correctly identified Abraham Lin- coln as the author of the Emancipation Proclamation: 66%

Percentage who said Lincoln wrote the Bill of Rights: 14%

Percentage who said Lincoln wrote the Missouri Compromise: 10%

Percentage who said Lincoln wrote abolitionist novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin: 9%

—Wilson Quarterly 24, no. 2 (spring 2000), quoting a national assessment test given in the late 1980s

•Percentage of college seniors at the 55 top colleges in the country who knew that the phrase “Government of the people, by the people, for the people” comes from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address: 22%

Percentage who could identify James Madison as the “Father of the Constitution”: 23%

Percentage who could identify and correctly place in time the Reconstruction: 29%

Percentage who knew George Washington was the American general at the Battle of Yorktown: 33%

Percentage who were familiar with the name “Snoop Doggy Dogg” and could identify him as a rapper: 98%

Percentage who knew Beavis and Butt-head are cartoon characters: 99%

—2000 American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) survey (asking questions culled from high school textbooks)

•Percentage of Ivy League students who didn’t know the name of the U.S. Speaker of the House: 44%

Percentage who couldn’t identify the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board: 35%

Percentage who didn’t know how many U.S. Supreme Court justices there are: 23%

—Reader’s Digest, September 1993

Read More Show Less

First Chapter

Stupid Education in the U.S.A.

Those who can, do; those who can't, teach.” Thus goes the old saying. We take exception to this, as there are many fine teachers and other educators out there who are certainly doing a great deal—and a great deal of good.

Of course, there's a flip side to this. . . .

Bad Moments in Innovative Education

We Americans are innovators; we don't like doing stuff the old ways; we proudly invent new ways of doing everything. And today's modern American teachers are innovators like everyone else—they boldly try to get kids interested in school by throwing away the textbooks and introducing new, fun, exciting, different ways of learning. But maybe, just maybe, there's something to be said for just reading the dull old textbooks, as these innovative teaching disasters show.

Teacher innovatively uses banana prop in sex ed

Students learned one thing from this class: Mood music, bananas, and sex ed don't mix. A teacher at Gulf Coast High School in Naples, Florida, decided to put on a demonstration of safe-sex practices. A laudable idea. He picked two volunteers, a boy and a girl, to come up in front of the class. Then he dimmed the lights and put on some “mood music”: Christmas carols. (It was the only music he had.) He gave the boy the banana and told him to hold it while the girl gently put a condom over it. Some of the kids in class weren't amused; nor were parents when they found out about it; and nor, for that matter, were school administrators. As the teacher put it, “It wasn't merely a demonstration of how to place a condom over a banana.” No, indeed. School officialsdecided to flunk the sex-ed teacher: They fired him.

Teacher innovatively feeds cute puppies to giant snakes in bio class

In retrospect, it was not one of the better ideas in biology pedagogy. A teacher at the Bluestem High School in Kansas who kept two boa constrictors wanted to show students how snakes eat. Three puppies were donated by a schoolboard member who operates a shelter where dogs are put to sleep. The problem was that the puppies were “soft” and “cuddly,” and people got very upset about the planned demonstration—the idea of cute puppies yelping in pain while being squeezed to death didn't sit well with them. They began complaining loudly, and there were sugges- tions that the teacher be fired. The teacher defended his actions but realized he might have been a bit . . . insensitive. “I'm not sure I considered the sensitivity of some people when it involved what's considered a pet.” But he also defended his choice of doomed puppies, saying, “I hate to see any life wasted.” But now he's trying to find nonsnake- owning homes for the puppies.

Math worksheets innovatively ask the question: “How many bazookas does it take . . . ?”

The idea that learning must be fun has taken over the education industry, but there are limits—which were reached with math worksheets published by a Minnesota company called MindWare. In 2001, education officials complained that math worksheets for 12-year-olds contained jokes about unruly kids being shot. Another, called Five Foolish Rabbits, had a farmer using different kinds of weapons like bazookas to wipe out rabbits eating his crops. The company president said the worksheets were supposed to “liven up” math.

Teacher innovatively adds roadkill to curriculum

The fact that North Shore Technical High School of Middleton, Massachusetts, didn't have a taxidermy course didn't stop a bold, innovative carpentry teacher and amateur taxidermist from deciding to give the kids a little lesson in skinning animals for fun and profit. Finding a dead coyote on the side of the road on March 15, 2003, the intrepid teacher tossed it into his pickup and brought it to school—and skinned it outside, to show his pupils just how it was done. The aftermath of this school exercise was more painful: Although the brain of the coyote was too deteriorated to tell if it had rabies, two students opted for vaccinations, just in case. Superintendent Amy O'Malley said the entire incident was under investigation and added, “Of course, this was not a school-sanctioned activity.”

Science exhibit innovatively teaches “grossology”

It's supposed to be the latest thing in “science” education: highlighting the gross aspects. In 2001, at a Chicago exhibition about the human body, children were treated to a vomit machine and a fart pinball game and a huge, sneezing nose. The exhibit organizers said, “There's a lot of yelling and screaming.” And, supposedly, a lot of learning, although what kind of learning is perhaps more problematic. According to the organizer, “ ‘We smell the butt!' becomes a 4th-grader's Eureka! moment.”

College teacher innovatively teaches with rotting animals

Artist Ben Jennings wanted to capture the essence of decay for students in his art class at the University of Wisconsin–Marathon County. What better way than to put up an art display featuring a disemboweled raccoon and a dead crow? Unfortunately for the intrepid art teacher, school officials objected to the smell. Said Dean Jim Veninga, “I sort of like raccoons, but I don't want them in the university's gallery, dead or alive.” Jennings defended the project, insisting that “it wasn't to be disgusting or grotesque.” Nevertheless, it ended up behind the college greenhouse—on a compost heap.

Roll the “probability cubes” and hope for a lucky seven! Probability cubes? That's what math teachers in the U.S. are now encouraged to call dice, which are used in class to teach various probability concepts. Apparently, calling dice “dice” encourages gambling.

“Is Our Children Learning?”

As we know, President George W. Bush asked this rhetorical question during his first campaign for the presidency.

Unfortunately, perhaps they is not. . . .

•Number of correct answers out of 100 needed to get an A on the Palm Beach County final exam in history (for high school seniors): 50

Number of answers to get a B: 39

Number of correct answers to pass: 23

•Percentage of U.S. citizens ages 18–24 in 2002 (post-9/11) who couldn't find Afghanistan on a map: 83% Percentage who couldn't identify Israel: 85%

Percentage who could correctly place the 2001 Survivor TV series island in the South Pacific: 86%

Percentage who couldn't find the U.K.: 69%

Percentage who couldn't find France: 65%

Percentage who couldn't find Japan: 58%

Percentage who couldn't find the Pacific Ocean: 29%

Percentage who couldn't find the U.S.: 11%

Rank of U.S. respondents compared with those of the other 8 countries polled: second to last

Rank of U.S. respondents in estimating the population of the U.S.: last

—National Geographic 2002 Global Geographic Literacy Survey

•Percentage of high school seniors who thought that Italy, Germany, or Japan was a U.S. ally in World War II: over 50%

Percentage of high school seniors who thought the Gulf of Tonkin agreement ended the Korean War: 43%

—2001 U.S. History National Assessment of Education Progress Survey

•Percentage of 17-year-olds who correctly placed the Civil War in the period 1850–1900: 33%

Percentage who thought the Civil War happened in the 18th century: more than 25%

Percentage who correctly identified Abraham Lin- coln as the author of the Emancipation Proclamation: 66%

Percentage who said Lincoln wrote the Bill of Rights: 14%

Percentage who said Lincoln wrote the Missouri Compromise: 10%

Percentage who said Lincoln wrote abolitionist novel Uncle Tom's Cabin: 9%

—Wilson Quarterly 24, no. 2 (spring 2000), quoting a national assessment test given in the late 1980s

•Percentage of college seniors at the 55 top colleges in the country who knew that the phrase “Government of the people, by the people, for the people” comes from Lincoln's Gettysburg Address: 22%

Percentage who could identify James Madison as the “Father of the Constitution”: 23%

Percentage who could identify and correctly place in time the Reconstruction: 29%

Percentage who knew George Washington was the American general at the Battle of Yorktown: 33%

Percentage who were familiar with the name “Snoop Doggy Dogg” and could identify him as a rapper: 98%

Percentage who knew Beavis and Butt-head are cartoon characters: 99%

—2000 American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) survey (asking questions culled from high school textbooks)

•Percentage of Ivy League students who didn't know the name of the U.S. Speaker of the House: 44%

Percentage who couldn't identify the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board: 35%

Percentage who didn't know how many U.S. Supreme Court justices there are: 23%

—Reader's Digest, September 1993

Copyright© 2003 by Kathryn Petras and Ross Petras
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
  • Posted November 18, 2008

    more from this reviewer

    Jennifer Wardrip - Personal Read

    If you've ever wondered how stupid people really can be, all you have to do is pick up a copy of this book!<BR/><BR/>It's almost sad that it's so funny, but in the end the humor is well worth it.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 6, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 27, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)