Interesting and easy read but a work of total fiction!
Margolis is not just a writer but an actual combatant along with the Jihadis by his own admission! It is a clear case of a person who has taken his love for the people of the land too far and allowed it to cloud his judgement. I too have lived in Afghanistan, India, Yemen and have relatives in Pakistan. I am intimately familiar with the region and its politics especially since my father was a senior diplomat in India and my father¿s colleague was India¿s Foreign Secretary and Ambassador to Afghanistan. Being an Indian Muslim I can vouch for a fact that there never was and there is no pogrom against Muslims in India. Are Muslims discriminated against? Without a doubt. But one free breath in a secular country like India is worth a lifetime of spirit-sapping life in any of the Muslim countries with or without the beautiful mountains mentioned in the book. The book is repetitive and reads more like a bunch of essays collated together than a well-researched book. There are a number of factual errors for instance, the book claims in one place that Indian military casualties in 1999 in Kargil region numbered 5,000 and then 20 pages later changes the number to 1,200! I guess the author meant 1,200 fatalities and 5,000 total casualties but all this is up to the reader to decipher. He claims that Hindus who had recently moved into Kashmir were the Hindus targeted by the militants. While it may be true that recent immigrant Hindus were targeted (actually they were poor laborers who had gone there for work who were massacred by Margolis¿ henchmen) there is not an iota of doubt that his Jihadi colleagues also targeted Hindus who had been long time residents of Kashmir. I know this for a fact because I know personally many such Hindus who have been driven from their ancestral homes. He claims the recent uprising in Kashmir is spontaneous and the movement has been continual since 1947. He also mentions that India assumed after the 1971 conflict that Kashmir issue had been resolved but Kashmiris were not cowed down by Indian security forces and revolted in 1989! The discerning reader will notice this gap of 18 years and question why did the revolt not continue in the interim? Why the revolt coincided with the end of Punjab rebellion and the flight of Soviets from Afghanistan? He shouts through the pages about the cruelty of Indian forces in Kashmir but in 13 years, by his own count, 50,000 Kashmiris and 10,000 Indian soldiers have been killed. If Kashmiris were such peaceful people (according to him) and Indian army so professional (he himself says so) then how come in 13 years of barbarity heaped upon the Kahsmiris and the carte blanche given to the security forces Indians managed to kill only 50,000 to 70,000 people with 600,000 soldiers in Kashmir? In contrast China in Tibet against an even gentler people in opposition, managed to polish off 1 to 2 million! In contrast Pakistan in East Pakistan within a few months is reported to have killed 1 million! Are we Indians that inefficient at killing unarmed civilians and the Pakistanis that much more efficient? Then pray tell me how come the same army defeated the more efficient Pakistani army in 1971 in two weeks? If the glove does not fit you must acquit! It is amazing to hear a person who has lived in that part of the world fail to distinguish between the social problem of the caste system in India, indeed a reprehensible practice, that is legislated against by the government and the systematic discrimination against women and people of non-Islamic faiths in the Islamic world especially under the Taliban in Afghanistan and in Pakistan. Perhaps this bumbling, bombastic American will understand an example out of his own world. Is there any discrimination against African Americans in the US today? If there is how is it different from pre-Civil War and pre-Civil Rights days? That is the difference between caste system and discrimination against women in India and the discrimination ag
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
What will the post-Taliban government of Afghanistan look like? How will the war in Afghanistan affect the already unstable politics of Central Asia? In War at the Top of the World, veteran foreign correspondent Eric Margolis presents a revelatory history of the complicated and volatile conflicts that have entangled Afghanistan, Pakistan, the United States, the Soviet Union, and many others.By 1999, Pakistan had proven they have medium-range nuclear weapons, and now the threat that their government could be taken over by a radical Islamic fundamentalist faction is stronger than ever. In fact, Osama bin Laden has already claimed to have a nuclear ...