- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Ships from: Secaucus, NJ
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
We have come to assume that governing our social activities by advance planning—by creating abstract descriptions of what ought to happen and adjusting these descriptions as situations change—is not as efficient and responsive as dealing directly with the real substance of the situation at hand. Stinchcombe argues the opposite. When a plan is designed to correct itself and keep up with the reality it is meant to govern, it can be remarkably successful. He points out a wide range of examples where this is the case, including architectural blueprints, immigration law, the construction of common law by appeals courts, Fannie Mae's secondary mortgage market, and scientific paradigms and programs.
Arguing that formality has been misconceived as consisting mainly of its defects, Stinchcombe shows how formality, at its best, can serve us much better than ritual obedience to poorly laid plans or a romantic appeal to "real life."
Excerpted from When Formality Works: Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations by Arthur L. Stinchcombe Copyright © 2001 by Arthur L. Stinchcombe. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
|1||Introduction: Why is Formality so Unpopular?||1|
|2||A Redefinition of the Concept of Formality||18|
|3||Legal Formality and Graphical Planning Languages||55|
|4||Certainty of the Law: Reasons, Situation-Types, Analogy, and Equilibrium||76|
|5||The Social Structure of Liquidity: Flexibility in Markets, States, and Organizations||100|
|6||Formalizing Rightlessness in Immigration Law and Administration||140|
|7||Formalizing Epistemological Stratification of Knowledge||158|
|8||Conclusion: The Varieties of Formality||179|