When Sherman Marched North from the Sea: Resistance on the Confederate Home Front / Edition 1

Hardcover (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $5.01
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 88%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (11) from $5.01   
  • New (3) from $14.96   
  • Used (8) from $5.01   
Close
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
$14.96
Seller since 2008

Feedback rating:

(2229)

Condition:

New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

New
0807828092 New Condition. Ships immediately.

Ships from: Lindenhurst, NY

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$14.96
Seller since 2005

Feedback rating:

(1603)

Condition: New
2003-10-06 Hardcover 1 New 0807828092 New Condition. Ships immediately.

Ships from: Lindenhurst, NY

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$65.00
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:

(149)

Condition: New
Brand new.

Ships from: acton, MA

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Close
Sort by

Overview

Sherman's March was an invasion of both geographical and psychological space. The Union army viewed the Southern landscape as military terrain. But when they brought war into Southern households, Northern soldiers were frequently astounded by the fierceness with which white Southern women defended their homes. Campbell argues that in the household-centered South, Confederate women saw both ideological and material reasons to resist. While some Northern soldiers lauded this bravery, others regarded such behavior as inappropriate and unwomanly.

Campbell also investigates the complexities behind African Americans' decisions either to stay on the plantation or to flee with Union troops. Black Southerners' delight at the coming of the army of "emancipation" often turned to terror as Yankees plundered their homes and assaulted black women.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

KLIATT
The special vindictiveness many Southerners reserve for General William Tecumseh Sherman has always perplexed most Yankees. Sherman and his men left their supplies and marched boldly across Dixie, twice cutting the Confederacy in two. He and his men were guilty mostly of property crimes: destroying facilities, raiding farms, and systematically stripping the land of all foodstuffs. Grant, on the other hand, killed Southern fathers and sons wholesale. The difference, some maintain, was that Ulysses S. Grant was waging "honorable" warfare while Sherman behaved more like Attila the Hun. More likely, however, the bearded firebrand earned their enmity because he deliberately committed the unforgivable act: he humiliated the Confederacy. In truth, the Federals didn't have it all their own way, and for that reason alone, a book of this nature is long overdue. It has been left to historian Jacqueline Campbell to document the proof. The Northern soldiers were sometimes opposed by regular troops, but far more by guerilla fighters that ranged from well-led bands down to individual brigands. Snipers and irregulars were always ready to pick off careless Union scouts, and many Southern women defended their homes with fierceness and pride. Furtive bands of white criminals and black plunderers also complicated the situation. Professor Campbell tells of the special abhorrence Sherman's troops had for South Carolina, and also shows the dramatic improvement in their behavior once they crossed into North Carolina, a "thrifty" and definitely more "well behaved" state. The author writes easily and fluently, as much for the lay reader as for the professional historian. Secondary teachers will find this anexcellent choice for YA readers ready for their second Civil War book. KLIATT Codes: SA*—Exceptional book, recommended for senior high school students, advanced students, and adults. 2003, Univ. of North Carolina Press, 177p. notes. index., Ages 15 to adult.
—Raymond Puffer
Library Journal
Images of Southern women's untiring devotion to the Confederate cause emerged between 1861 and 1865 and were perpetuated in the postwar period but have been questioned by scholars such as George Rable and Drew Gilpin Faust in recent decades. In this blend of military and women's history, Campbell (history, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs) examines the interactions of white and black Southern men and women on the home front with the Union troops who waged the destructive march through Georgia and the Carolinas in the last months of the war. Campbell concludes that Southern women boldly defended their homes against the invaders, an experience that galvanized their dedication to the Confederacy and set the stage for institutionalized devotion to the Lost Cause, immense respect for Lee, and hatred for Sherman. This concise and readable study, based upon extensive manuscript sources, is recommended for larger academic libraries.-Theresa R. McDevitt, Indiana Univ. of Pennsylvania Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.
From the Publisher
"Anyone interested in a well-researched account of Confederate women's responses to Sherman's march will find this study rewarding."
American Historical Review

"A worthy addition to the burgeoning literature focusing on the social and cultural aspects of the Civil War. Concise yet thoroughly researched, it contributes fresh, thought-provoking insights into a long-neglected area of study: the interaction between General William T. Sherman's soldiers and southern civilians, black and white, male and female, during his march through the Carolinas."
The South Carolina Historical Magazine

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780807828090
  • Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press
  • Publication date: 10/6/2003
  • Series: Civil War America Series
  • Edition description: 1
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 192
  • Product dimensions: 5.60 (w) x 8.60 (h) x 0.80 (d)

Meet the Author

Jacqueline Glass Campbell is assistant professor of history at the University of Connecticut in Storrs.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

When Sherman Marched North from the Sea

Resistance on the Confederate Home Front
By Jacqueline Glass Campbell

The University of North Carolina Press

Copyright © 2003 The University of North Carolina Press
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-8078-2809-2


Chapter One

Savannah Has Gone Up the Spout

On December 22, 1864, William T. Sherman offered President Abraham Lincoln a special Christmas gift, namely the city of Savannah. When the Yankee press published the news, it made for a particularly joyous holiday in the North and earned Sherman the title of the "Military Santa Claus." The fact that Sherman offered such a gift to the Union president, neatly tied up and conveyable, suggests a tidy transfer of a city from Confederate to Union hands. This picture is underscored by the fact that Confederate troops under General William J. Hardee had evacuated during the night, and Mayor Richard Arnold had surrendered the city. The March to the Sea was over, and the Union soldiers felt a growing confidence in their ability to end the war. An officer from New Hampshire wrote to his sister of the "satisfaction in being with a victorious army." Unlike his experience in the Army of the Potomac, where it was "always defeat, except at Gettysburg," under Sherman's command, victory was the norm.

On the surface, the Georgia campaign had ended in an easy victory, and the orderly interaction between citizens and the Union army in Savannah tends to support this image of a "subjugated" people in Georgia. A closer examination of the month-long hiatus of Sherman's troops between their glorious march through Georgia and their ongoing campaign through the Carolinas reveals other aspects of the invasion-the complacent mood of the soldiers, the difficulties of families living on the outskirts of the city, who were subjected to repeated raids by foraging troops, and the resentments and acts of resistance of civilians who felt both anger and humiliation at the Federal occupation.

For many Union soldiers, the Georgia campaign had seemed "easy, comfortable and jolly." A Captain Divine described it as a "gay old campaign." In fact, his regiment had enjoyed "the best health they have since leaving the States." Little wonder that the troops felt so satisfied, for the countryside had provided them with a rich abundance of food. Sherman was well aware that his men "like[d] pigs, sheep, chickens, calves and Sweet potatoes better than Rations." He had thoroughly studied the Georgia census and correctly predicted that there was little chance his men would starve. An Iowan soldier told his cousin that he "had never lived better." He had fed on everything the general had promised, as well as "Geese, Turkeys, Honey, Molasses, Shugar [sic]." A New York private thought there had never been an army "that lived as well as Gen. Sherman's on his last campaign." Soldiers were quick to lay their hands on all the bounty of the Georgia countryside. They had little need of "Uncle Samuel's rations," which they regarded "with disdain." This greatly eased Chief Commissary Officer George Balloch's job. He had been "worn out" when he left Atlanta but had little to do on the march across Georgia. "The troops gathered from the country what supplies we did not bring with us and the novelties that presented themselves continually gave a healthy excitement to the journey so that the whole thing looked more like an old fashioned muster than the march of an invading army." His health was now excellent, he told his wife, "and I feel quite like a man again." So much food had been available that one soldier found the idea of starving the South utterly ridiculous.

Foraging for food and valuables had, in fact, become so easy that a sense of monotony was setting in. While main columns took everything by the roadside, others were looking for distractions and becoming expert at discovering hidden items. By early December one soldier noted a change in the behavior of Sherman's troops. "It is becoming apparent that unprincipled men are taking advantage of the license given to them to forage, and are pillaging," he wrote in his diary. "Almost an endless variety of articles have been exhumed. Some are bringing away clothing, others blankets, others fine dishes, silver spoons, etc. One man has just passed us dressed as a lady, only his toilet was rather crudely made."

For the white citizens of Georgia, of course, Sherman's March had seemed far from agreeable but was instead a "bitter quaff." Union soldiers who took pride in discovering hidden caches no doubt conveyed a sense that they were able to outsmart as well as overpower Southerners. Furthermore, when they engaged in the not uncommon ritual of parading around in clothes wrested from a Southern lady's wardrobe, they only intensified her humiliation and resentment. "Those of us who have suffered," wrote the editor of the Georgia Countryman, "can hardly be expected to love our tormentors, and persecutors, and we can hardly be expected to look with much favor upon anything that has the remotest resemblance to reunion with the Yankees." This resentment masked feelings of dishonor that Georgians had allowed Sherman to pass through "comparatively uninjured... . This should mantle with the blush of shame the cheek of every Georgian, and every Confederate.... We, for one, feel deeply mortified-humbled, chagrined-even degraded."

Georgia had, in fact, received far more of a psychological blow than material damage at the hands of Sherman. In the capital of Milledgeville, for example, only two plantation residences and two private city homes were destroyed. Soldiers did, however, ridicule Southerners by holding a mock session of the legislature in the abandoned statehouse and destroying books and papers. In the absence of any government officials, who had all fled before Sherman's forces, a young girl of the town felt her "cheeks glow with shame."

Just as Northern soldiers were prone to trivialize their transgressions, Southerners tended to exaggerate them. Recent scholarship suggests that the amount of destruction of private property in Georgia fell far short of what was popularly believed. Furthermore, in the countryside inhabitants also had to contend with Confederate cavalry under the command of Major General Joseph Wheeler. A resident of Griffin complained to Confederate president Jefferson Davis that Wheeler's cavalry were "burning up all the corn and fodder" and carrying off "mules and horses." Unless some speedy action was taken, he warned, citizens who had been loyal to the Confederacy "will not care one cent which army is victorious in Georgia." In a letter to the Countryman, a Georgia woman confirmed that the people were suffering from both the "depredations" of Yankees and the "shameful" behavior of Wheeler's men. "While the enemy were burning and destroying property on one side ... they [Wheeler's men] were stealing horses and mules on the other."

The limits of war depended to a great extent on geography. The apparent order in Savannah was in direct contrast to the confusion in the countryside. A correspondent from the New York Herald noted the difference in behavior. "While marching through the country, where military restraint cannot control all, excesses may be committed; but where military influence is concentrated, it is impossible for them to go unpunished." Civilians also understood this distinction. A refugee from the city told her sister that although she had heard property was respected in Savannah, the surrounding countryside was "devastated." A Savannah woman reported that although women in the city were not molested, "in the country of course it was different."

In Liberty County, surrounding the city of Savannah, residents were subjected to the repeated raids by soldiers stationed in the town. An Iowan soldier told his cousin that he had "a very pleasant time" on just such a five-day foraging excursion. The experiences of Georgians who lived in an area that one historian has described as "no-man's land" were an exception to the normal rule of foraging on Sherman's campaign. Yet they also represent what was typical in confrontations between Union soldiers and Southern civilians-namely, that Southern women frequently faced the enemy alone.

When white men of the South went off, eager to display their manhood on the battlefield, Confederate women celebrated their bravery, prayed for them, sewed for them, and wept for them. When the home front became a battlefront, however, it was primarily women and children who faced enemy troops. Even the men who remained at home frequently hid, leaving their families without a male protector. When Joseph LeConte, a doctor from Columbia, South Carolina, heard of Sherman's advance across Georgia, he traveled to Liberty County to bring some female members of his family out of harm's way. After a long and arduous journey, the doctor arrived to find his sister's house subjected to recurrent Union raids. Although the house was ransacked, the women suffered no bodily harm. It was, in fact, the doctor whose life was considered to be in jeopardy, and he hid in the surrounding woods for a week. A Union colonel detailed one of the few occasions on which his regiment came across Confederate soldiers who had taken shelter behind a house. After driving the enemy away, Colonel Oscar Jackson found the house filled with women and children. "This was chivalry indeed-to hide behind women and children," was his sarcastic comment. Why would Southern men hide from an approaching enemy, leaving their female kinfolk to face the onslaught alone? The explanation for this behavior rests in the culture of the Old South and its variance from gender ideologies accepted in the North.

One could well make the argument that both Yankees and Confederates shared a belief that privileges of race and class offered certain women a guarantee of protection. Nevertheless, there were also conflicting interpretations of gender ideology. One of the keys to understanding why Confederate men felt that their women were well prepared and equipped to serve as defenders of the home is that they interpreted female strength differently from their Northern counterparts.

The industrializing and urbanizing areas of the North encouraged the development of a separate sphere ideology molded around the model of burgeoning middle-class families. Women assumed the role of moral guardian to provide stability and shelter for men involved in the increasingly hostile world of business and politics. As gender became an especially salient political division in the North, women's economic roles were obscured and they were assigned a superior moral strength, based on the belief that they were inherently less passionate than men. This designation may well have eased the minds of middle-class men as their wives left the confines of the home to pursue acts of benevolence and reform.

Southern ladies did not enjoy the same liberties of movement as their Northern counterparts. Although this was the result of practicalities as much as ideological tenets, such limited mobility has been interpreted as undermining the development of feminist consciousness. This argument, however, is based on a flawed model of Southern society. The enduring significance of the Southern household as the center of both production and reproduction delayed the full flowering of the separate sphere ideology. In the mid-nineteenth century Northern industrialization and urbanization shifted the political focus from personal influence to public institutions, highlighting the exclusion of women. But in the South, where race was the primary determinant of social and political power, and deference remained central to its exercise, women could function as virtuous and active citizens so long as they supported the existing system.

Both North and South placed great importance on women's outward display of submission to male authority. In the South, however, this was not based on a belief that women were inherently delicate creatures, but that they chose to restrain their inner strength for the benefit of social harmony and family honor. Consequently, women were not merely vicarious beneficiaries of male honor but could share in this concept and see their own roles as vital in the shaping of Confederate nationalism. Furthermore, it was permissible for white women to display passion and proficiency provided it was in support of the family.

In the antebellum period it was not unusual for white women of the South to be left alone on plantations or farms. A series of letters from a young New York woman who married a North Carolina planter described to her family the major differences between the lives of Northern and Southern women. She explained that even privileged plantation women worked "harder than any Northern farmer's wife." With a workday that began at dawn, she found herself "tired enough to sleep like a rock" by dusk. During her husband's frequent absences she ran his business and suspected that she could be a farmer herself. Even though she felt lonely when left "quite alone in the midst of the pine woods with the Negroes," she did not feel fear. On the basis of this understanding, Southern women frequently managed farms and plantations alone and saw themselves as responsible for the material and cultural survival of the family. When threatened by an invading army, they were more than able to respond with a passion worthy of both mothers and warriors.

During an invasion, women often recognized the advantage of having no men present. A Jasper County, Georgia, woman who lived with her mother, her niece, and two female refugees from Tennessee expressed relief that there was "no gentleman at our house" when Sherman's men passed. "He would have been no protection," she continued, and may have "been badly treated." A Virginia woman hoped that her father in Georgia would not consider staying at home. "Here, in this raid-visited section, the men are wiser," she wrote. "They all leave home, as a matter of course on the approach of the enemy-for long experience has taught them that women are the best defenders of themselves and their property under such circumstances." Some men actually feared the passion that might be revealed by their female kin's overzealous defense of the hearth. The editor of the Georgia Countryman advised his mother, who waited alone for the Yankees, to be "polite." In his own home, even though he was present, he begged his wife to stay in her room "lest she should betray her indignation, and give vent to her feelings, in words which might cause the hyenas to insult her."

Northerners, for their part, used such examples of Confederate women's behavior as propaganda, particularly to encourage women's patriotism on the Union side. In 1863 a New York woman addressed accusations that "women of the North have not equaled those of the South in patriotic interest, labors, and sacrifices."

Continues...


Excerpted from When Sherman Marched North from the Sea by Jacqueline Glass Campbell Copyright © 2003 by The University of North Carolina Press. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments
Introduction 3
Ch. 1 Savannah Has Gone Up the Spout 8
Ch. 2 Rocking the Cradle of Secession 31
Ch. 3 The Most Diabolical Act of All the Barbarous War 58
Ch. 4 God Save Us from the Retreating Friend and Advancing Foe 75
Ch. 5 With Grief, but Not with Shame 93
Epilogue 105
Notes 111
Bibliography 145
Index 167
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)