Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty / Edition 2


Brilliant and engagingly written, Why Nations Fail answers the question that has stumped the experts for centuries: Why are some nations rich and others poor, divided by wealth and poverty, health and sickness, food and famine?

Is it culture, the weather, geography? Perhaps ignorance of what the right policies are?

Simply, no. None of these factors is either definitive or destiny. Otherwise, how to explain why Botswana has become one of the fastest growing countries in the world, while other African nations, such as Zimbabwe, the Congo, and Sierra Leone, are mired in poverty and violence?

Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson conclusively show that it is man-made political and economic institutions that underlie economic success (or lack of it). Korea, to take just one of their fascinating examples, is a remarkably homogeneous nation, yet the people of North Korea are among the poorest on earth while their brothers and sisters in South Korea are among the richest. The south forged a society that created incentives, rewarded innovation, and allowed everyone to participate in economic opportunities. The economic success thus spurred was sustained because the government became accountable and responsive to citizens and the great mass of people. Sadly, the people of the north have endured decades of famine, political repression, and very different economic institutions—with no end in sight. The differences between the Koreas is due to the politics that created these completely different institutional trajectories.

Based on fifteen years of original research Acemoglu and Robinson marshall extraordinary historical evidence from the Roman Empire, the Mayan city-states, medieval Venice, the Soviet Union, Latin America, England, Europe, the United States, and Africa to build a new theory of political economy with great relevance for the big questions of today, including:

   - China has built an authoritarian growth machine. Will it continue to grow at such high speed and overwhelm the West?
   - Are America’s best days behind it? Are we moving from a virtuous circle in which efforts by elites to aggrandize power are resisted to a vicious one that enriches and empowers a small minority?
   - What is the most effective way to help move billions of people from the rut of poverty to prosperity? More philanthropy from the wealthy nations of the West? Or learning the hard-won lessons of Acemoglu and Robinson’s breakthrough ideas on the interplay between inclusive political and economic institutions?

Why Nations Fail will change the way you look at—and understand—the world.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Warren Bass
Why Nations Fail is a sweeping attempt to explain the gut-wrenching poverty that leaves 1.29 billion people in the developing world struggling to live on less than $1.25 a day. You might expect it to be a bleak, numbing read. It's not. It's bracing, garrulous, wildly ambitious and ultimately hopeful. It may, in fact, be a bit of a masterpiece.
—The Washington Post
From the Publisher
"Should be required reading for politicians and anyone concerned with economic development." —Jared Diamond, New York Review of Books

"...bracing, garrulous, wildly ambitious and ultimately hopeful. It may, in fact, be a bit of a masterpiece."Washington Post

“For economics and political-science students, surely, but also for the general reader who will appreciate how gracefully the authors wear their erudition.”Kirkus Reviews
“Provocative stuff; backed by lots of brain power.”Library Journal

“This is an intellectually rich book that develops an important thesis with verve. It should be widely read.” Financial Times

“A probing . . . look at the roots of political and economic success . . . large and ambitious new book.” The Daily

Why Nations Fail is a splendid piece of scholarship and a showcase of economic rigor.” —The Wall Street Journal

"Ranging from imperial Rome to modern Botswana, this book will change the way people think about the wealth and poverty of nations...as ambitious as Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel."
Bloomberg BusinessWeek

“The main strength of this book is beyond the power of summary: it is packed, from beginning to end, with historical vignettes that are both erudite and fascinating. As Jared Diamond says on the cover: 'It will make you a spellbinder at parties.' But it will also make you think.” —The  Observer (UK)

"A brilliant book.” Bloomberg (Jonathan Alter)

Why Nations Fail is a wildly ambitious work that hopscotches through history and around the world to answer the very big question of why some countries get rich and others don’t.” The New York Times (Chrystia Freeland)

"Why Nations Failis a truly awesome book. Acemoglu and Robinson tackle one of the most important problems in the social sciences—a question that has bedeviled leading thinkers for centuries—and offer an answer that is brilliant in its simplicity and power. A wonderfully readable mix of history, political science, and economics, this book will change the way we think about economic development. Why Nations Fail is a must-read book." —Steven Levitt, coauthor of Freakonomics

"You will have three reasons to love this book. It’s about national income differences within the modern world, perhaps the biggest problem facing the world today. It’s peppered with fascinating stories that will make you a spellbinder at cocktail parties—such as why Botswana is prospering and Sierra Leone isn’t. And it’s a great read. Like me, you may succumb to reading it in one go, and then you may come back to it again and again." —Jared Diamond, Pulitzer Prize–winning author of the bestsellers Guns, Germs, and Steel and Collapse

"A compelling and highly readable book. And [the] conclusion is a cheering one: the authoritarian ‘extractive’ institutions like the ones that drive growth in China today are bound to run out of steam. Without the inclusive institutions that first evolved in the West, sustainable growth is impossible, because only a truly free society can foster genuine innovation and the creative destruction that is its corollary." —Niall Ferguson, author of The Ascent of Money

"Some time ago a little-known Scottish philosopher wrote a book on what makes nations succeed and what makes them fail. The Wealth of Nations is still being read today. With the same perspicacity and with the same broad historical perspective, Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson have retackled this same question for our own times. Two centuries from now our great-great- . . . -great grandchildren will be, similarly, reading Why Nations Fail." —George Akerlof, Nobel laureate in economics, 2001

"Why Nations Fail is so good in so many ways that I despair of listing them all. It explains huge swathes of human history. It is equally at home in Asia, Africa and the Americas. It is fair to left and right and every flavor in between. It doesn’t pull punches but doesn’t insult just to gain attention. It illuminates the past as it gives us a new way to think about the present. It is that rare book in economics that convinces the reader that the authors want the best for ordinary people. It will provide scholars with years of argument and ordinary readers with years of did-you-know-that dinner conversation. It has some jokes, which are always welcome. It is an excellent book and should be purchased forthwith, so to encourage the authors to keep working." —Charles C. Mann, author of 1491 and 1493

“Imagine sitting around a table listening to Jared Diamond, Joseph Schumpeter, and James Madison reflect on over two thousand years of political and economic history.  Imagine that they weave their ideas into a coherent theoretical framework based on limiting extraction, promoting creative destruction, and creating strong political institutions that share power and you begin to see the contribution of this brilliant and engagingly written book.” —Scott E. Page, University of Michigan and Santa Fre Institute

“This fascinating and readable book centers on the complex joint evolution of political and economic institutions, in good directions and bad. It strikes a delicate balance between the logic of political and economic behavior and the shifts in direction created by contingent historical events, large and small at ‘critical junctures.' Acemoglu and Robinson provide an enormous range of historical examples to show how such shifts can tilt toward favorable institutions, progressive innovation and economic success or toward repressive institutions and eventual decay or stagnation. Somehow they can generate both excitement and reflection.” —Robert Solow, Nobel Laureate in Economics, 1987

“It’s the politics, stupid! That is Acemoglu and Robinson’s simple yet compelling explanation for why so many countries fail to develop. From the absolutism of the Stuarts to the antebellum South, from Sierra Leone to Colombia, this magisterial work shows how powerful elites rig the rules to benefit themselves at the expense of the many.  Charting a careful course between the pessimists and optimists, the authors demonstrate history and geography need not be destiny. But they also document how sensible economic ideas and policies often achieve little in the absence of fundamental political change.”—Dani Rodrik, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

“Two of the world’s best and most erudite economists turn to the hardest  issue of all: why are some nations poor and others rich? Written with a deep knowledge of economics and political history, this is perhaps the most powerful statement made to date that ‘institutions matter.’  A provocative, instructive, yet thoroughly enthralling book.” —Joel Mokyr, Robert H. Strotz Professor of Arts and Sciences and Professor of Economics and History, Northwestern University

“A brilliant and uplifting book—yet also a deeply disturbing wake-up call. Acemoglu and Robinson lay out a convincing theory of almost everything to do with economic development. Countries rise when they put in place the right pro-growth political institutions and they fail—often spectacularly—when those institutions ossify or fail to adapt.  Powerful people always and everywhere seek to grab complete control over government, undermining broader social progress for their own greed. Keep those people in check with effective democracy or watch your nation fail.” —Simon Johnson, co-author of 13 Bankers and professor at MIT Sloan

“This important and insightful book, packed with historical examples, makes the case that inclusive political institutions in support of inclusive economic institutions is key to sustained prosperity. The book reviews how some good regimes got launched and then had a virtuous spiral, while bad regimes remain in a vicious spiral.  This is important analysis not to be missed.” —Peter Diamond, Nobel Laureate in Economics
“Acemoglu and Robinson have made an important contribution to the debate as to why similar-looking nations differ so greatly in their economic and political development. Through a broad multiplicity of historical examples, they show how institutional developments, sometimes based on very accidental circumstances, have had enormous consequences. The openness of a society, its willingness to permit creative destruction, and the rule of  appear to be decisive for economic development.” —Kenneth Arrow, Professor Emeritus, Stanford University, Nobel Laureate in Economics, 1972
“Acemoglu and Robinson—two of the world's leading experts on development—reveal why it is not geography, disease, or culture which explains why some nations are rich and some poor, but rather a matter of institutions and politics. This highly accessible book provides welcome insight to specialists and general readers alike.” —Francis Fukuyama, author of The End of History and the Last Man and The Origins of Political Order

“Some time ago a little known Scottish philosopher wrote a book on what makes nations succeed and what makes them fail.  The Wealth of Nations is still being read today.  With the same perspicacity and with the same broad historical perspective, Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson have re-tackled this same question for our own times.  Two centuries from now our great-great-…-great grandchildren will be, similarly, reading Why Nations Fail.” —George Akerlof, Nobel Laureate in Economics, 2001
“In this stunningly wide ranging book Acemoglu and Robinson ask a simple but vital question, why do some nations become rich and others remain poor?  Their answer is also simplebecause some polities develop more inclusive political institutions.  What is remarkable about the book is the crispness and clarity of the writing, the elegance of the argument, and the remarkable richness of historical detail.  This book is a must read at a moment where governments right across the western world must come up with the political will to deal with a debt crisis of unusual proportions.”—Steve Pincus, Bradford Durfee Professor of History and International and Area Studies, Yale University
“The authors convincingly show that countries escape poverty only when they have appropriate economic institutions, especially private property and competition. More originally, they argue countries are more likely to develop the right institutions when they have an open pluralistic political system with competition for political office, a widespread electorate, and openness to new political leaders. This intimate connection between political and economic institutions is the heart of their major contribution, and has resulted in a study of great vitality on one of the crucial questions in economics and political economy.”— Gary S. Becker, Nobel Laureate in Economics, 1992
“This not only a fascinating and interesting book: it is a really important one.  The highly original research that Professors Acemoglu and Robinson have done, and continue to do,  on how economic forces, politics and policy choices evolve together and constrain each other, and how institutions affect that evolution, is essential to understanding the successes and failures of societies and nations.  And here, in this book, these insights come in a highly accessible, indeed riveting form.  Those who pick this book up and start reading will have trouble putting it down.” ¯Michael Spence, Nobel Laureate in Economics, 2001

"In this delightfully readable romp through 400 years of  history, two of the giants of contemporary social science bring us an inspiring and important message: it is freedom that makes the world rich. Let tyrants everywhere tremble!" —Ian Morris, Stanford University, author of Why the West Rules – For Now

“Acemoglu and Robinson pose the fundamental question concerning the development of the bottom billion. Their answers are profound, lucid, and convincing.” ―Paul Collier, Professor of Economics, Oxford University, and author of The Bottom Billion

Library Journal
Coauthors Acemoglu (economics, MIT) and Robinson (David Florence Professor of Government, Harvard Univ.) won high praise for their previous collaboration, Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, an examination of what influences democracy to take root, persist, or collapse. They have tackled an equally important and difficult topic in their latest effort in seeking to explain what causes countries to be rich or poor. In their opinion, neither climate, geography, nor culture paves or blocks the way to prosperity—institutions do. To illustrate their point, the authors use diverse examples from world history, e.g., the Mayan city-states of 250–900 C.E., the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and the Egyptian uprising that brought down Hosni Mubarak in 2011. VERDICT The authors make what could be a weighty topic both engaging and accessible. It will appeal not only to students of economics and political science but also to anyone looking to gain insight into the current state of our global economy, its origins, and the kind of transformations that might level the playing field. [See Prepub Alert, 10/23/11.]—Sara Holder, McGill Univ. Lib., Montreal
Kirkus Reviews
Following up on their earlier collaboration (Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, 2005), two scholars examine why some nations thrive and others don't. Neither geography, nor culture, nor mistaken policies explain the vast differences in prosperity among nations. The reasons for world inequality, write Acemoglu (Economics/MIT) and Robinson (Government/Harvard Univ.), are rooted in politics, in whether nations have developed inclusive political institutions and a sufficiently centralized state to lay the groundwork for economic institutions critical for growth. In turn, these economic institutions give citizens liberty to pursue work that suits their talents, a fairly enforced set of rules and incentives to pursue education and technological innovation. When these conditions are not met, write the authors, when the political and economic institutions are "extractive," failure surely follows. It matters not if the Tsars or the Bolsheviks governed Russia, if the Qing dynasty or Mao ruled China, if Ferdinand and Isabella or General Franco reigned in Spain--all absolutism is the same, erecting historically predictable barriers to prosperity. The critical distinction between, say, North and South Korea, lies in the vastly different institutional legacies on either side, one open and responsive to the needs and aspirations of society, the other closed with power narrowly distributed for the benefit of a few. In their wide-ranging discussion, Acemoglu and Robinson address big-picture concepts like "critical junctures" in history--the Black Death, the discovery of the Americas, the Glorious Revolution--which disrupt the existing political and economic balance and can abruptly change the trajectory of nations for better or worse. They also offer a series of small but telling stories in support of their thesis: how the wealth of Bill Gates differs from the riches of Carlos Slim, why Queen Elizabeth I rejected a patent for a knitting machine, how the inmates took over the asylum in colonies like Jamestown and New South Wales and why the Ottoman Empire suppressed the printing press. For economics and political-science students, surely, but also for the general reader who will appreciate how gracefully the authors wear their erudition.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • BN ID: 2580307719211
  • Manufacturer: Crown Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 3/20/2012
  • Edition description: Second Edition
  • Edition number: 2
  • Pages: 544
  • Product dimensions: 6.10 (w) x 9.40 (h) x 2.00 (d)
  • These items ship to U.S. address only. No APO/FPO.

Meet the Author

DARON ACEMOGLU is the Killian Professor of Economics at MIT. In 2005 he received the John Bates Clark Medal awarded to economists under forty judged to have made the most significant contribution to economic thought and knowledge.

JAMES A. ROBINSON, a political scientist and an economist, is the David Florence Professor of Government at Harvard University. A world-renowned expert on Latin America and Africa, he has worked in Botswana, Mauritius, Sierra Leone, and South Africa.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

C o n t e n t s
Why Egyptians fi lled Tahrir Square to bring down Hosni Mubarak
and what it means for our understanding of the causes of
prosperity and poverty
So Close and Yet So Different
Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora, have the same people,
culture, and geography. Why is one rich and one poor?
Theories That Don’t Work
Poor countries are poor not because of their geographies or cultures,
or because their leaders do not know which policies will enrich
their citizens
The Making of Prosperity and Poverty
How prosperity and poverty are determined by the incentives
created by institutions, and how politics determines what
institutions a nation has
Small Differences and Critical Junctures:
The Weight of History
How institutions change through political confl ict and how
the past shapes the present
“I’ve Seen the Future, and It Works”:
Growth Under Extractive Institutions
What Stalin, King Shyaam, the Neolithic Revolution, and the
Maya city-states all had in common and how this explains why
China’s current economic growth cannot last
Drifting Apart
How institutions evolve over time, often slowly drifting apart
The Turning Point
How a political revolution in 1688 changed institutions in
England and led to the Industrial Revolution
Not on Our Turf: Barriers to Development
Why the politically powerful in many nations opposed the
Industrial Revolution
Reversing Development
How European colonialism impoverished large parts of the world
The Diffusion of Prosperity
How some parts of the world took different paths to prosperity
from that of Britain
The Virtuous Circle
How institutions that encourage prosperity create positive feedback
loops that prevent the efforts by elites to undermine them


The Vicious Circle
How institutions that create poverty generate negative
feedback loops and endure
Why Nations Fail Today
Institutions, institutions, institutions
Breaking the Mold
How a few countries changed their economic trajectory by
changing their institutions
Understanding Prosperity and Poverty
How the world could have been different and how understanding
this can explain why most attempts to combat poverty have failed
Bibliographical Essay and Sources

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 34 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 34 Customer Reviews
  • Posted May 29, 2012

    This is up there with Guns, Germs, and Steel as a macro theory o

    This is up there with Guns, Germs, and Steel as a macro theory on why the world (and history) is as it is. The author actually rebuff's Dimond's thesis in Gun, Germs.. that geography is destiny (albeit gently). Instead, institutions matter. Countries with extractive political and economic systems (which most of the world have) will underperform against those with open, pluralistic systems (which only a few have). It's a great read with the authors backing up their thesis with enough examples to give it credit (and you'll have no trouble coming up with your own), but not so many as to make the book unwieldily.

    6 out of 7 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 4, 2012

    Very much on target, missing only details

    Obviously a pair of former leftists, these guys have got the free market message, even if clinging to their former prejudices in small ways (don't we all). Through numerous examples they focus on the vital phenomena which they've convinced me are crucial to understanding the reality here.

    Other reviewers will describe their identification of institutions as key, though the authors demand that it be seen that the institutions must be understood in their respective historical terms, whether those of rich countries or poor. Their analysis of Latin America's encomienda system is fine.

    But though I'm not yet finished with the book, so far they have not provided enough detail regarding how the actual institutions presently fail their citizens in particular countries. There are instead too many generalities involving "extractive economies" and "extractive political systems", to the point of almost exact repetition.

    I eagerly await "Why Nations Fail, Vol. II -- The Details".

    5 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted July 4, 2012

    Thought-provoking, but flawed

    If you're interested in international relations and economics, this is a must-read, as it's definitely thought-provoking. However:

    1. It's repetitive; it repeats its theme of "extractive institutions do not lead to long-term growth" over and over, and it even summarizes what the book just stated a few pages before, over and over.

    2. It doesn't show any data to back up its arguments. Extractive systems don't produce growth over the long run? Show me tables, graphs, etc., please. Not just the conclusion that extractive systems don't produce growth over the long run.

    3. It gets its history wrong in an effort to back up its key arguments. For example, it claims that Austria-Hungary was an "absolutist" monarchy until World War I. It wasn't the most free country in the world, but by the 1900s, it was an emerging democracy, with elected legislatures, limits on the monarch's power, etc.

    Also, it states that the Civil Rights movement in the US succeeded in part because Southern "planters" were less resistant to it due to economic changes. Right...those planters (They were long gone by the 1950s).

    4. Finally, it just summarily dismisses alternative theories about economic growth. Yes, Country X was wealthier than North America in 1500- and this book shows that as a reason why geography, climate and other reasons don't really matter in economic growth. In the rudimentary economy of 1500, perhaps Country X's geography and climate weren't a problem. But just maybe in 2012, its climate and geography and other factors don't work to produce success in today's economy.

    3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 11, 2012

    Very repetative

    I found this book very boring, repetative and difficult to read. They fold all societies into Inclusive and Extrative. Every time they see a society decline they attribute it to being extractive. The decline of the Roman Empire was attributed to being extractive and quote gibbon. Like Gibbon they use the things they don't like in their society to make this point. Latin America's poverty is attributed to Extractve insttutions(ie large estates) yet it was the US which frequently prevented remediating this. They predict that China's growth will soon end because of it's political system. (Having been to both the old Soviet Union and China there is enormous difference between them.) China is building high speed rail we can't get anything done in the US. Their ideas could have been expressed in a much shorter book.

    2 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 1, 2012

    Interesting Theory

    This book lays out an interesting theory that suggests the requirement for a new approach towards global politics and economics. On the face of it, the theory certainly makes sense and the authors provide plenty of examples that support their theory. The narrative was easy to follow, but the book was a slow read. Likely because the same point was made repeatedly, only with different examples.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 28, 2012

    Highly Recommended

    Very interesting and insightful theory of development. Plausibly explains why Iraq and Afghanistan are turning out as they are and why the persistent poverty in certain parts of the world. Great read

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 13, 2012

    A book that needs to be read slowly because it is filled with de

    A book that needs to be read slowly because it is filled with detailed studies -- and that's a good thing. The authors do a great job of illustrating their thesis. It's the most substantive book of its kind that I've seen. This book is a big step forward. You should read it.

    However, the authors do omit some relevant considerations. For example, when discussing the Republic of Venice they don't mention externals such as the Ottomans gaining control of the Mediterranean or de Gama's discovery of a shorter route to the Orient.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 7, 2012

    Wow, Amazing and thorough book.

    This was an interesting book with some parts that were dry and textbook like. After reading the history of the nations of the world I can't help but think that the US is in trouble. The odds are against this nation making it. There is too many destructive societies around us to keep us on the right path. The youth of the world need to read this book so they can steer their nations to stay on a prosperous path.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted March 6, 2014

    In Why Nations Fail, Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson presen

    In Why Nations Fail, Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson present a strong argument for the significant role of economic and political institutions in determining the success or failure of a nation. According to the authors, inclusive institutions provide citizens with the incentives (law and order, [intellectual] property rights, and so forth) that encourage people to become economically productive members of society. On the other hand, extractive (exploitative) political economic and political institutions leave citizens with little motivation to contribute to the commonwealth of a nation as the fruits of their labor are funneled into the pockets of an elite minority. Acemoglu and Robinson provide a lot of details, but the details often cross into redundancy territory; to be fair to the writers, it's not easy to avoid some repetitiveness with a book of this scope. However, my biggest concern with the work is how they cover successful nations. Early on, the institutional arguments for failing/failed nations are presented in a political vacuum, as if more powerful nations don't exert influence on developing states. This concern is later addressed in a chapter on the influence of the slave trade on the political/economic development in certain African nations. Unfortunately, there is little more than a brief acknowledgement of the fact that successful nations with inclusive political/economic institutions support and benefit from extractive institutions overseas. So I couldn't help but wonder if extractive institutions are indeed a necessity for a nations success as long as they manage to capitalize on the extractive, exploitative institutions beyond their borders? I know the titular question is "why nations fail," but I feel that the book would have been more complete if they provided a more nuanced picture of "why nations succeed." 

    Ultimately, Why Nations Fail is a solid book with a great deal of research, but treating institutions as the answer to a nations' woes cannot fully account for the complexities that every nation must deal with. In short, the book shouldn't stand alone, but should be placed in conversation with Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel and Naomi Klein's The Shock Doctrine. 

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 6, 2013


    The best explanation I have seen as to why the vast sums of monies provided to the impoverished nations of the world do so little good. It is time for the U.S.A. and other donor nations to rethink the entire process of selecting the recipients of, managing, and delivering foreign aid. The observations and ideas presented in this book should enter into that process.

    The authors make their case in a thorough and methodical way, but I found the book to be a slow read. I also found it to be more than worth the effort and recommend it to those who have an interest in why nations fail.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 12, 2013


    Stop tHis disgusting if you dont im repirting you to b and n and theyll track down youre account. STOP IT NOW! IM LEAVING!!!!!

    0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 11, 2013


    *Bends down and sucks his pe.n.is* while she rubs her boo.obs

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 8, 2013

    Here! In the morning! Gtg see iron man 3 buh bye lol

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 8, 2013

    Okay. Sticks his cok in her vagin a before she leaves

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 16, 2013

    P A persuasive thesis

    The authors thesis, that political and economic control by elites, is well researched and persuasive. The grassroots success story of Brazil is encouraginng. I do wonder why the Chinese molde of African development is not discussed?
    Overall an excellent look at the underpinnings of prosperity.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted January 23, 2013

    Excellent explanations of why some nations succeed and others fa

    Excellent explanations of why some nations succeed and others fail. The authors' basic framework is pretty simple, and they offer many historical examples as anecdotal evidence to support it. There are also many nuances to the framework, too, which many other reviewers seem to have missed.

    The authors' framework is more like an "operating system" a person can use to analyze past and current systems of government and economics, rather than a plain explanation. (It's not the only operating system a person could use, of course.) I find it fascinating to match up current events in the US with the writers' framework.

    The book also is non-partisan; conservatives will find things to like in it, such as the insistence on property rights for a nation to succeed. Liberals will like the insistence of including all members of society in the political and economic spheres of the nation.

    The book is written by economists, but given that, I still found the historical examples and analyses engaging. Takes some work on the reader's part, though, and can be repetitive at times. Still, I have a feeling people will be reading this one far into the future.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 2, 2013

    Intersting book I would not recommend to the general public.

    This long book is filled with interesting historical examples, which the authors try to fit into their theory. It discounts the theories of other economists and repeatedly states its own theory. For example, the first chapter is about American colonization by Spain and Great Britain. There are immediate attempts to make these events fit the theory without a look at other possible causes such as the markets these countries provided fot their colonies. This is repeated with other historical examples.

    I would recommend this book to anyone interested in economics and history. I believe most of the history is well researched, even if it may be twisted to fit the book's theme.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 15, 2012

    This book is excellent in explaining the relationship between a

    This book is excellent in explaining the relationship between a nations wealth, its institutions and its political makeup. .

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 8, 2012

    where is my book?

    i ordered how nations fail on the 10th oct, you were paid on that day, buy i have no book

    order no is 00417090112933348810 whats going on.?

    regards robert.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 15, 2012




    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 34 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)