Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Why There Are No Good Men Left

Why There Are No Good Men Left

5.0 1
by Barbara Dafoe Whitehead

See All Formats & Editions

A hard-hitting, groundbreaking exploration of the new mating conditions that are changing the face of love, commitment, and marriage as we know it.

A double revolution is at work in modern American love: A revolution in higher education has created the most professionally accomplished and independent generation of young women in history,


A hard-hitting, groundbreaking exploration of the new mating conditions that are changing the face of love, commitment, and marriage as we know it.

A double revolution is at work in modern American love: A revolution in higher education has created the most professionally accomplished and independent generation of young women in history, and a revolution in mating has created a prolonged and perplexing search for Mr. Right. Based on extensive research and interviews, Why There Are No Good Men Left explores the romantic plight of this high-status woman with findings that are sure to rouse debate.

Cultural historian, Barbara Dafoe Whitehead documents the new social climate in which the demands of work, the epidemic of cohabitation, the disappearance of courtship, and the exacting standards of educated women are leading them to stay single longer–and to find the search for a mate even harder when the time is right. From the frontlines of college, where dating is dead, to the trenches of corporate solitude, Whitehead reports on a wholesale shift that has stacked the marriage deck against the best and brightest women.

The thirty-something, perplexed single woman is today’s new cultural icon. Why There Are No Good Men Left is the first book to take a serious approach to analyzing where she came from and to ask how she can realize her dreams of lasting love.

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
"There are plenty of good men left, of course, but Whitehead deftly illustrates why women in my generation often believe otherwise. She has given women in their 20s and 30s a wise explanation as to why finding a lifelong mate has turned into a seemingly hopeless chore. Fascinating and reassuring, her portrayal of the single woman's plight leaves young women with more hope — and more strength — than they had before."
-Alexandra Robbins, co-author of Quarterlife Crisis and author of Secrets of the Tomb

Publishers Weekly
Despite its cliched title, this absorbing volume goes far beyond a superficial examination of the current dating scene for single women. It delves deeply into how dating and commitment differ from times past and the effects those changes are having on women and our culture. The author, whose previous book, The Divorce Culture, looked at a related social phenomenon, here makes a strong case for a phenomenon she calls the "Girl Project," a social "project" that has succeeded in preparing young women for adult lives of economic self-sufficiency, social independence, and sexual liberation, which began in 1972 when Title IX broke down major sex discrimination barriers and has had great success since then. Whitehead rightly argues that women today are operating in new social circumstances, in which they delay marriage until college-or, sometimes, graduate school-is finished and a career is established. This woman "embodies a new model of success based on educational and professional achievement," but, says Whitehead, the choices she makes in her 20s and 30s sometimes make finding a mate difficult. In exploring recent social changes that have made a strong and lasting impact, Whitehead highlights possible developments, such as online dating, that may replace traditional cultural systems. Her engaging cultural assessment, while not novel, sheds light on a current problem many women now face. Agents, Glen Hartley and Lynn Chu. (On sale Dec. 24) Forecast: Whitehead's three-city author tour could help get the word out about this book; however, its misleading title might stunt sales. Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
Whitehead (The Divorce Culture), a journalist currently serving as codirector of the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University, has written an intriguing study of the culture in which young, well-educated women find themselves today. Her interviewees are an elite group with whom many readers may not identify but who nonetheless make up a significant portion of the population. Whitehead compares baby boomers' marriage patterns with those of this new generation, concluding that for these young women, the territory is pretty much uncharted. She suggests that two significant social changes are at work. First, there is a new kind of young single woman who is in charge of her sexuality and career growth and does not "need" marriage. Second, new courtship systems have evolved that offer avenues not previously available, such as exclusive online dating services and private dating coaches. An interesting follow-up study would be to consider young women who do not have the advantage of a good education. With very current footnotes; recommended for public and large academic libraries.-Margaret Cardwell, Christian Brothers Univ., Memphis, TN

Product Details

Crown Publishing Group
Publication date:
Edition description:
Product dimensions:
5.50(w) x 8.50(h) x 0.54(d)

Read an Excerpt

Christina is 31, slim, pretty, a younger and darker-haired Annette Bening. The daughter of a professor and an artist, she grew up in a family where books, politics, and international sabbaticals filled her early life. After attending an elite boarding school in New England, she went off to college where she got interested in women’s political issues and began to work in campaigns. In the years following college, she moved into progressively more respon-sible jobs as a fund raiser for Democratic women candidates and causes. At the time we meet, she is working as the director of an international relations consulting group with an income in the high five figures. Yet there’s one nagging source of discontent in her otherwise contented and accomplished life. As we chat over plates of mushroom ragout in a trendy Washington restaurant, she says ruefully: “I’m always getting involved with Mr. Not Ready.”

Christina’s last Mr. Not Ready was someone she thought she might end up marrying. They were in a relationship for three years. She followed him from the West Coast to Washington so that they could be together, and soon after they moved in together. But only a short time later, she regretted the decision. It turned out that her boyfriend needed extensive house training. Their story was Pygmalion in reverse. Instead of My Fair Lady, it was My Fair Laddie. She had to teach him, improve him, get him up to speed. It was exhausting.

Plus, he wasn’t a very fast learner. When they first moved in together, they agreed to divide the housework equally. In the kitchen, they decided, she would cook and he would clean up. But he didn’t live up to his part of the deal. “He pretended to do dishes,” she says, bristling with fresh indignation. “I would come into the kitchen the next morning and find dishes still sitting there in cold, greasy water.” After three months, she had had enough of his helplessness, feigned or otherwise. She dumped him. He still called from time to time to ask for her advice. But she was sick of being his mother and mentor.

Then, to her annoyance and dismay, she found out that her Mr. Not Ready had turned into Mr. Ready. With someone else! He was ready to make commitments to his new girlfriend. Ready to follow her to another state where she had a job. Ready to give her an engagement ring. She had spent three years of her life in a relationship that she thought would lead to marriage or at least to a long-term relationship. She had trained the guy. And now her investment was paying off for someone else.

Even more depressingly, Christina’s women friends were vanishing into marriages. Her social life seemed to be dedicated to going to parties for soon-to-be-married girlfriends. Each year passed with another round of bridal showers, bachelor girl bashes, weddings, and receptions, until finally Christina realized that she was being seated at the cousins’ table at weddings. If that weren’t reminder enough of her lack of romantic success, her mother kept asking why she wasn’t married yet. Christina panicked. She decided to take a break from relationships to give herself time to de-stress, to get therapy, and to think about what she really wanted to do with her life. She gave up dating for a year.

All this happened just as Christina turned 30. By that age, she had expected to be married herself. Instead, she had already been in and out of relationships with seven different Mr. Not Readys. Her heart had been broken four times. It didn’t make sense. Here she was, a woman who set goals for herself, met deadlines, accomplished all the things on her professional “To Do” list, and yet she had missed a major “To Do” in her life.

What made Christina’s situation even more perplexing was that she seemed to have all the qualifications for romantic success. She was pretty, smart, and accomplished. She worked out and stayed in shape. She was independent. It wasn’t as if she were looking for someone to take care of her. Maybe she came across as a little intimidating, but the right kind of guy should be attracted to her confidence and competence, shouldn’t he? Yet, clearly, something was wrong. At 30, her job resumé looked a lot more impressive than her romantic resumé. Time after time, it seemed, she’d been promoted in work and pink-slipped in love.

Christina is one of those perfectionist, pulled-together, Type A young women who can make other women, even those like me who are nearly twice her age, feel slightly discombobulated and disarrayed, as if we might have lipstick on our teeth or sleep in our eyes. She exudes confidence and control. Yet despite her crisp look and executive manner, she becomes younger and softer as she talks about her romantic desires. She is a woman who can do practically anything she wants on her own, but she doesn’t want to be alone for her entire life. Though she’s dedicated herself to feminist causes, she isn’t hostile to men or marriage, like some professional feminists of the ’60s. She isn’t looking for a man to take care of her, but she wants to find a man who will care about her and share her life.

When Christina was in her early 20s, she didn’t think much about how to find someone to marry. She knew that she wanted to be married someday but she wasn’t ready to jump into such a big commitment at that point in her life. She needed to accomplish some things for herself and gain some life experience before settling down. Her parents had married at a young age, and their marriage didn’t last. So she wanted to be mature enough to make a wise choice.

At 31, after taking a year’s sabbatical from relationships, she decided to focus on the search for a husband. By now, she knows what she is looking for. Her standards are high but certainly not impossible: she wants to find a man who is physically attractive and takes good care of his body, enjoys his career but isn’t career-obsessed, pursues interests outside of his work life and isn’t boring, and dedicates himself to being faithful, loving, and kind. But finding such a man is turning out to be more difficult than she once imagined. For one thing, true love doesn’t happen as naturally or inevitably as she once thought. Up until the time she turned 30, Christina believed that finding someone to marry was the one thing in her life that she didn’t have to work at or plan for. She thought that Mr. Right would come along in the natural course of events. But that hasn’t happened, and she isn’t sure how to make it happen.

A New Life Stage

Women like Christina barely existed just a few decades ago. In 1960, a college-educated woman who was in her late 20s or early 30s, and “still single” as she would have been described back then, was a rarity. She represented a miniscule 1.6 percent of all women ages 25 to 34. In the entire country at the time, there were only 185,000 such women, a population roughly the size of the current population of Fort Wayne, Indiana. Today, however, she’s become a far more prominent figure on the social map. College-educated singles now make up 28 percent of all women ages 25 to 34. Their numbers have risen to 2.3 million, equal to the population of four Bostons. 1

This new single woman has emerged in greater numbers as the result of a confluence of two social trends. One is later age of entry into first marriage. Young women today are marrying at older ages than at any time in the past century. Moreover, the most dramatic changes in the age of first marriage have occurred in recent decades. Thus, over the past 30 years, the proportion of women who are single during the traditional “marrying years” has risen dramatically. Between 1970 and 2000, the proportion of unmarried women ages 20 to 24 has doubled, and among those 30 to 34, the proportion has tripled. 2

The second demographic trend is the dramatic increase in college attainment among young women. Historically, men have vastly outnumbered women in institutions of higher learning. (The sole exception, of course, is women’s colleges.) Even as recently as 1960, women made up a modest 35 percent of that year’s college graduating class. Today, however, women make up 56 percent of the most recent college graduating class. With these two trends, a growing population of young, college-educated women are spending a prolonged period of their early adult lives as working singles, out on their own.

It is a convention among social scientists to refer to this trend as a “postponement” of marriage. Their use of the term is accurate as a description of changes in the timing of entry into first marriage. But it can be misleading to the lay person. For it seems to suggest that the change is occurring wholly at the discretion of the young women themselves. To speak of the rise in the proportion of never-married young women as the “postponement” of marriage creates the impression that nothing has changed for them but the date of the wedding. It suggests that women are simply penciling in a later date for the cake and the caterer. If that were so, then the answer to the romantic frustrations of today’s young women would be for them simply to pencil in an earlier date—that is, to return to the earlier pattern of marrying at younger ages and to count on men to return to it as well. But this is not the conclusion to be drawn from reports of the “postponement” of marriage.

The changing timetable for first marriage reflects larger changes in the early life course of educated young women. New patterns of schooling and work, as well as the changes in sexual and living-together partnerships, have created a new stage of life that comes between school and marriage for this generation of young women. This new stage of life reorganizes the traditional sequence of love and work in early adulthood. Whereas the baby boom generation of college-educated women married and then tried to find satisfying work, this generation of college-educated women is seeking satisfying work before trying to find someone to marry.

Following college graduation, young women’s early adult life course follows a distinctive pattern. During their early 20s, they work very hard at getting established in careers. They vie for places with creative agencies, innovative companies, or prestige institutions, or they pursue a professional degree. They look for apartments in neighborhoods with a core cluster of upscale shops, including whole food markets, a Peet’s or Starbucks, an independent bookstore, ethnic restaurants, and a health club. The competition for such places in many cities is intense. Some women have to audition for slots in an established house of young singles, leaving their names and cell phone numbers on sign-up sheets and hoping to be called back for a final interview. They strive for the image of “pulled-together” professionals, throwing out their Old Navy stuff and adopting an Ann Taylor uniform. Dark pantsuit. Small gold earrings. Black pumps. They pursue physical perfection. They join a gym and treadmill after work. And somewhere along this strenuous path to success, in between work and working out, they hope to find someone to “be in a relationship with.”

In the years following college graduation, their first priority is individual financial independence. Both men and women seek to establish themselves as economically self-sufficient and stable at this stage in life. Eighty-six percent of never-married men and women ages 20 to 29 agree that it is extremely important to them to be “economically set” before they marry, according to the Gallup survey for the National Marriage Project. For many young adults, being “economically set” means paying off college loans, getting a professional job, and even buying a house. In addition, they have a strong desire for personal freedom and experience. As one woman told me, “I want to experience everything twice, once for myself and then again, with my future husband.”

And finally, among young adults, there is the pervasive fear of divorce. The generation that has come of age during the divorce revolution has now reached early adulthood, and its members are all too aware of the fragile stage of marriage. A large majority (82 percent) agree that it is unwise for a woman to trust marriage as a reliable economic partnership. The high divorce rate is another reason for women’s determination to invest in portable assets, like education and career, rather than to place their trust in the economic security of a long-lasting marriage. And young adults rightly believe that it is better to marry somewhat later if you want the marriage to last. One of the most reliable predictors of divorce is age at first marriage. People who marry in their teens have a dramatically higher risk of divorce than people who marry in their 20s. One recent study by a prominent demographer finds the single most important factor accounting for the recent leveling off of divorce rates is the rise in the median age of first marriage.3

In response to all these factors, women say that they are seeking “a life” before they look for a life partner. In the years immediately following college, they are no more ready than their male peers to make serious commitments. They have personal and career goals they want to accomplish before they begin to think about marriage. “If my knight in shining armor came along right now,” one 23-year-old engineer told me, “it would really screw up my life plan.” When I repeat her observation to a 30-something single woman, she gives it a slightly different spin: “For all I know, my knight in shining armor could have come along when I was in my early 20s. But if he had, I wouldn’t have recognized him.”

This does not mean that women are without sexual or romantic partners during these years, however. Some women continue to follow a “hook up” pattern that was established in college. They go out to clubs and bars and have casual sex “for fun.” Some of the 30-something women I interviewed describe the years right after college as their “wild” time. More commonly, however, they report two or three relationships of varying duration and seriousness in the immediate post-college years. Some form living-together partnerships. As noted previously, the majority of young women today will live with a boyfriend, either the man they eventually marry or another intimate partner, before they marry.

Cohabiting partnerships represent a distinctive new feature of the early adult life course. For many young adults, cohabitation provides a transitional kind of union, somewhere between casual dating relationships and marriage. Women enter cohabiting partnerships for a variety of reasons, including the economies of time and money, the desire for sex, intimacy, and partnership rolled into one, and the need to get to know more about the habits, character, and compatibility of a romantic partner. Indeed, cohabitation fulfills some of the same purposes as traditional courtship. Women often have sex with their boyfriend before they get to know him well as a human being. Consequently, for them, cohabitation provides a way to observe and learn about their partner by sharing a roof as well as a bed.

Meet the Author

Award-winning journalist BARBARA DAFOE WHITEHEAD writes about social issues for numerous national publications. She holds a Ph.D. in American social history from the University of Chicago and currently serves as the codirector of the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University. The author of The Divorce Culture, she lives in Amherst, Massachusetts.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews

4.5 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 2 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
So many brilliant, beautiful women I know seem to think that they must not be marriage material because they can't seem to find decent men. This book reminds us that all the social norms and rituals we were brought up to believe in don't necessarily apply to our career driven lives. This book provides hope to those women who put education and career first and now want a chance to complete the picture with marriage and children and home life.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
The title is misleading. This book isn't about bashing males. It's about social and dating systems. About views of marriage and relationships. About careers and female self image. It's about why so many women can't find "Mr Right". This tells much about what's called the "Relationship Cycle" The presumption is always that relationships will end/fail. Whether it's hook ups, friends with benefits, cohabitation, or marriage women presume it wont last. Women say they're postponing marriage. A more accurate description would be they either fear divorce or fear commitment. They place careers and personal freedom above intimacy and marriage. They've accepted casual relationships and live together relationships. They don't believe marriage is economically sound. This book shows that Women don't trust Men - financially or personally. Women demand independence, but expect loyalty. They can't stand to be taken care of, but still expect to be cared about. But despite all that they still take it for Granted that they can get married when they're ready. They take it for Granted that Mr Right will come along. They take Males for Granted! To sum up: Women see marriage as unsafe, unreliable, precarious, risky, a gamble, and they presume divorce. Despite all that, they still assume Men will want to get married.