Working Longer: The Solution to the Retirement Income Challenge


Daily headlines warn American workers that their retirement years may be far from golden. The main components of the retirement income system ?Social Security and employer-provided pensions and health insurance ?are in decline while the amount of income needed for a comfortable retirement continues to rise.

In Working Longer, Alicia Munnell and Steven Sass suggest a simple solution to this problem: postponing retirement by two to four years. By following their advice, the ...

See more details below
$35.50 price
(Save 3%)$36.95 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (12) from $1.99   
  • New (1) from $35.25   
  • Used (11) from $1.99   
Working Longer: The Solution to the Retirement Income Challenge

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$12.49 price
(Save 40%)$20.95 List Price


Daily headlines warn American workers that their retirement years may be far from golden. The main components of the retirement income system —Social Security and employer-provided pensions and health insurance —are in decline while the amount of income needed for a comfortable retirement continues to rise.

In Working Longer, Alicia Munnell and Steven Sass suggest a simple solution to this problem: postponing retirement by two to four years. By following their advice, the average worker retiring in 2030 can be as well off as today's retirees. Implementing this solution on a national scale, however, may not be simple.

Working Longer investigates the prospects for moving the average retirement age from 63, the current figure, to 66. Munnell and Sass ask whether future generations will be healthy enough to work beyond the current retirement age and whether older men and women want to work. They examine companies' incentives to employ older works and ask what government can do to promote continued participation in the workforce. Finally, they consider the challenge of ensuring a secure retirement for low-wage workers and those who are unable to continue to work.

The retirement system faces very real challenges. But together, workers, employers, and the government can keep this vital piece of the American dream alive.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

"This book is a badly needed wake-up call. With lifetime pension plans dwindling and employer health benefits to retirees shrinking drastically, Americans--especially the Boomer generation--need to face the reality that Munnell and Sass describe: longer lives, higher costs, and inadequate savings in their 401k plans and elsewhere. This means that average Americans are going to have to work longer or face poverty in their so-called golden years." —Hedrick Smith, correspondent, PBS Frontline: "Can You Afford to Retire?"

"The United States has a retirement income problem. This remarkable book examines one potential solution to the problem: increased work by older Americans. Munnell and Sass provide thoughtful answers to the key questions. This is a lucid, thorough, and thought-provoking contribution to a very important debate." —Robert Hutchens, Cornell University

"We have made remarkable progress in improving health and longevity. Now we need to figure out how to finance the substantially longer retirements these gains have produced. In Working Longer, Munnell and Sass make a strong case for moving the average age at retirement from 62 to 65 or 66& #151;and thereby safeguarding the future of most retirees. Anyone who is interested in preparing our country for a better retirement future should read this elegant essay." —John H. Biggs, former chairman and CEO, TIAA-CREF

"The retirement landscape is different from the one you might have imagined just a few years ago. The good news is that you're living longer. The bad news is that health care will cost more, pensions are shrinking, and your investments might not have grown as fast as you'd hoped. Munnell and Sass show you how& #151;by working a little longer& #151;you can overcome these challenges and live the retirement you'd planned." —Jane Bryant Quinn, financial columnist and author of Smart and Simple Financial Strategies for Busy People

"As Americans live longer and healthier lives, many seniors will need to generate additional income to remain financially secure. The skills, experience, and expertise of these seasoned workers can only stand to benefit our economy. This book is a timely and comprehensive look at the challenges and opportunities of recruiting and retaining older workers." —U.S. Senator Herb Kohl (D-Wisc.), Chairman of the Senate Special Committee on Aging

"The books provides a concise summary of a wealth of evidence about retirement decisions and a handy guide for middle-aged Americans on how to stay well-off when they hang up their shoes." — The Economist

"A well-researched, thoughtful explanation of a critical national issue and a well-reasoned proposal to cope with this challenge. Highly recommended." — CHOICE

" Working Longer tackles the issues of surviving one's so-called golden years." —Harry Hurt III, New York Times

" Working Longer offers a prescription that readers may find a bitter pill: keep working.... [The authors] have studded their brief, well-organized book with tables, charts, and graphs." — Wall Street Journal

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780815758983
  • Publisher: Brookings Institution Press
  • Publication date: 5/28/2008
  • Pages: 206
  • Product dimensions: 6.20 (w) x 9.10 (h) x 1.00 (d)

Meet the Author

Alicia H. Munnell is the Peter F. Drucker Professor of Management Sciences, Carroll School of Management, and director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. She has served as assistant secretary of the Treasury for economic policy (1993—1995) and as a member of the President's Council of Economic Advisers (1995—97). She was also cofounder and first president of the National Academy of Social Insurance. Munnell has written or edited numerous books, including Coming up Short: The Challenge of 401(k) Plans, with Annika Sundén (Brookings, 2004).

Steven A. Sass is associate director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. He was previously an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and taught at Rutgers and Brandeis. His books include The Promise of Private Pensions: The First Hundred Years (Harvard, 1997), Social Security and the Stock Market: How the Pursuit of Market Magic Shapes the System, with Alicia H. Munnell (Upjohn Institute, 2006), and The Social Security Fix-It Book, with Alicia H. Munnell and Andrew Eschtruth (Center for Retirement Research, 2007).

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 1

2 Will Older People Be Healthy Enough to Work Longer? 16

3 Will Older Men Want to Work Longer? 35

4 Will Older Women Want to Work Longer? 61

5 Will Employers Want to Employ Older Workers? 92

6 What Can Be Done? 117

7 Rounding Out the Picture 142

Notes 149

References 179

Index 201

Read More Show Less

First Chapter

Working Longer

The Solution to the Retirement Income Challenge
By Alicia H. Munnell Steven A. Sass

Brookings Institution Press

Copyright © 2008 Brookings Institution Press
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-0-8157-5898-3

Chapter One


Every morning more than 100 million Americans wake up and head out to work. They grab a bite, get the news, then turn their attention to the issues they'll face that day. At times, however, it becomes necessary to look beyond this workaday routine and deal with issues that could disrupt one's life if not addressed. This is one of those times, and the issue is retirement.

A wake-up call regarding one's retirement should come as no surprise. The press is filled with calls to fix Social Security, shore up employer pensions, and make 401(k) plans work better. Indeed, Social Security benefits-relative to earnings-are declining. Employer pensions have become increasingly scarce. And 401(k) balances are generally inadequate. At the same time, longevity is steadily rising. The retirement challenge is typically framed as a financial problem, requiring more saving and better asset management or cuts in promised benefits. The challenge, however, is in many ways better framed as an employment problem.

According to the standard life-cycle model, rational actors respond to a rise in longevity and decline in Social Security and employer pensions in three ways. They spread the burden across the life cycle by consuming less and setting aside more of their income while working; they remain in the labor force longer; and they live on less in retirement. But the baby boom generation has not set aside more of its income while working. Nor do subsequent cohorts seem to be saving much more. This lack of saving puts more weight on the other two responses: working longer and consuming less in retirement. A failure to work longer shifts the entire burden to lower retirement consumption, implying a steep reduction in living standards upon exiting the labor force. Alternatively, the most effective lever for securing a comfortable retirement, especially for the baby boom generation now at the cusp with little opportunity to save, is to remain in the work force longer.

At first blush, it may seem strange to say: "You need to reduce your retirement to ensure your retirement." But it's not nearly as bad as it sounds. Because life expectancy has increased dramatically over the past several decades while the average age of retirement has fallen, working longer does not mean having fewer years in retirement than workers earlier in the postwar era. The working-longer prescription is not about no retirement at all; it's about beginning your retirement somewhat later.

Spending a few additional years in the labor force can make a big difference. It directly increases current income; it avoids the actuarial reduction in Social Security benefits; it allows people to contribute more to their 401(k) plans; it allows those plans to accumulate more investment income; and it shortens the period of retirement. By and large, those who continue to work until their mid-60s or beyond should have a reasonably comfortable retirement.

Working longer, however, will not be simple. It requires thought and planning on the part of individuals. It also requires employers to retain, train, and even hire older workers. Government also has a role to play. And the sooner everybody realizes that staying in the labor force is the best way to ensure a secure retirement, the better.

The Retirement Income Challenge

The major reason that people have to work longer is that the retirement income system is contracting. This system-Social Security and publicly subsidized and regulated employer-sponsored plans-is the major source of support for people as they withdraw from the labor force and as earnings decline. But Social Security and employer-sponsored retirement income plans will provide relatively less in the future than they do today. Employers have also backed away from offering retiree health insurance, leaving households exposed to rapidly rising health care costs. In addition, life expectancy is rising: for men, life expectancy at age 65 was less than fifteen years in 1980 but in 2020 is projected to be nearly eighteen years. Workers in the future will thus need more resources, not fewer, if they continue to retire at the same ages as they do today.

The Outlook for Social Security

At any given retirement age, Social Security benefits will replace a smaller fraction of preretirement earnings than in the past. Today, the hypothetical average earner retiring at age 65 receives benefits equal to about 41 percent of previous earnings. After payment of the Medicare part B premium, which is automatically deducted from Social Security benefits, the replacement rate is 39 percent. But under current law Social Security replacement rates are scheduled to decline for three reasons. First, the full retirement age is currently in the process of moving from 65 to 67, which is equivalent to an across-the-board cut. Second, Medicare part B premiums are slated to increase sharply due to rising health care costs. Finally, Social Security benefits will be taxed more under the personal income tax, as the exemption amounts are not indexed to inflation. These three factors alone will reduce the net replacement rate for the average worker who claims at age 65 from 39 percent in 2002 to 30 percent in 2030 (figure 1-1). This percentage does not include premiums for the part D drug benefit, which will also claim an increasing share of the Social Security check. Nor does it include any additional benefit cuts enacted to shore up the solvency of the Social Security program.

The Outlook for Private Sector, Employer-Sponsored Pensions

With a diminished role for Social Security, retirees will be increasingly dependent on employer-sponsored pensions. At any moment in time, however, less than half of the private sector workforce ages 25-64 participates in an employer-sponsored plan of any type. This fraction has remained virtually unchanged since the late 1970s and is unlikely to improve. Since pension participation tends to increase with earnings, only middle- and upper-income individuals can count on receiving meaningful benefits from employer-sponsored pension plans.

While the level of pension coverage has remained flat, the nature of coverage has changed dramatically. Twenty-five years ago, most people with pension coverage had a traditional defined benefit plan that pays a lifetime annuity at retirement. Today the world looks very different (figure 1-2). Most people with a pension have a defined contribution plan, typically a 401(k) plan, which is like a savings account. In theory workers could accumulate substantial wealth in a 401(k) and offset the decline in both Social Security and employer-provided pensions. Simulations suggest that the worker in the middle of the earnings distribution, who contributes regularly throughout his work life, should end up at retirement with about $300,000 in his 401(k) or individual retirement account (IRA). (Most IRA assets are rolled-over balances from 401(k) plans.) This amount, when combined with Social Security, could easily provide an adequate retirement income. But reality looks quite different. The Federal Reserve's 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances reports that the typical household head approaching retirement (ages 55-64) had combined 401(k) and IRA balances of only $60,000. Nor do younger cohorts seem to be on track to accumulate sufficient wealth to support themselves in retirement (figure 1-3).

The Outlook for Individual Saving

Given the decline in Social Security and employer-provided pensions and the rise in longevity, the standard life-cycle model would expect the working-age population to decrease the share of income it consumes and increase the share it saves. This saving does not have to be in a 401(k). Workers could set aside more of their income for retirement in bank deposits or investments in businesses, securities held outside a retirement account, home equity, or investment real estate. But a study estimating saving by the working-age population, based on the U.S. National Income and Product Accounts, shows that this has not occurred. Both the personal saving rate of the working-age population, which includes 401(k) saving and employer contributions to defined benefit pension plans, and a broader private saving measure, which includes business saving (retained earnings) by businesses owned directly or through equities, have declined. The study also finds that virtually all personal saving occurred in pension plans and that saving outside such plans, in recent years, has actually been negative (figure 1-4).

This disconcerting finding is corroborated by a study based on the Survey of Consumer Finances. It finds that median household wealth, excluding Social Security and employer-defined benefit pensions, has remained remarkably constant relative to household income (figure 1-5). Households have not increased their accumulation of wealth to offset the demise of employer-defined benefit plans or the scheduled reduction in Social Security replacement rates.

Retiree Health Insurance

The preceding discussion focuses on the decline in cash benefits. Employers have also cut back on postretirement health care benefits. Between 1989 and 2006 the percentage of large firms offering such benefits dropped from 66 percent to 35 percent. The decline in participating firms actually understates the extent of the cutback, because the generosity of the benefits has also been reduced. In response to the rising costs of health care, employers have increased retiree premium contributions, copayments, deductibles, and out-of-pocket limits. Moreover, many of those providing postretirement health benefits today have terminated such benefits for new retirees. Thus workers will need more income than they did in the past to cover health care costs that were previously borne by the employer.

In summary, the outlook for retirement income for future retirees is dismal. People are not going to be able to continue to retire at age 63-the average retirement age for men today-and maintain their preretirement living standards over an increasingly long period of retirement. Moreover, dramatically rising health care costs are going to erode already diminished pension income. Working longer is the obvious solution for the baby boom generation, which has little time to accumulate more retirement savings. Even if saving rates in subsequent generations increase, working longer will continue to be an effective lever for securing a comfortable retirement.

Will We Have to Work Forever?

Future retirees need not panic. Although the replacement rate reductions are significant, a few years of work can make retirees in 2030 as well off as those in the current generation. In other words, working longer does not mean working forever.

Each additional year in the workforce increases income directly through earnings from work and investments. It also actuarially increases Social Security benefits by 7-8 percent a year and produces a similar increase, on a risk-adjusted basis, on income from balances in 401(k) plans. The implications on the need for retirement savings are striking. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that in 2004 a married couple earning in the middle of the income distribution could reduce the assets needed to achieve their target replacement rate from $550,000 if they retire at age 62 to $325,000 if they retire at age 66 and to $130,000 if they retire at age 70.

So, how much longer do most people need to work? The easiest calculation is the required response to the increase in the full retirement age. By definition, a worker in 2030 will have to work until age 67 to receive the same replacement rate as a worker retiring at 65 today. Similarly, those who would have chosen actuarially reduced benefits at age 63 in 2002 will have to delay claiming benefits to age 65 in 2030 to receive the same replacement rate.

With a simple model, it is possible to calculate the increase in required work life to offset the projected increase in the Medicare premium and taxation of Social Security benefits. In 2030 the reduction from the Medicare part B premium can be reversed in about six months, and that from taxes can be reversed in about thirteen months. To compensate for all the foreseeable changes to the Social Security replacement rate, workers will need to extend their work lives by about four years.

Workers who reach retirement with significant assets in their 401(k) plans or other accounts will have to work less than four years to offset the projected reductions in Social Security replacement rates. The reason is that additional years of work, assuming financial assets are left untouched, increase the ultimate annual income that can be derived from 401(k) accumulations. Part of the increase comes from the additional investment income. The other part of the story is that by working longer, expected years in retirement decrease, raising the income available for each retirement year. To make income from 401(k)s comparable with Social Security benefits, which are indexed for inflation, 401(k) proceeds would be used to purchase an inflation-indexed annuity. Thus a medium earner who reaches age 63 with 401(k) assets that could buy a real annuity that would produce a replacement rate of 20 percent will only need to work for about twenty-eight months to offset reductions in Social Security. This increase is significantly less than that for workers without financial assets, because the additional income from the 401(k) assets makes up for some of the loss.

The important message is that continued employment means two to four more years of work to maintain today's level of income replacement. This prescription is equivalent to moving the current average retirement age-the age at which half the cohort is out of the labor market-from 63 to about 66. Interestingly, 66 was the average retirement age for men in 1960. This book explores the potential for making such a change.

Organization of the Book

This book is organized around the notion that working longer requires older workers to be healthy enough to work and willing to work. But the decision is not one sided. Employers also have to be willing to hire them. Since both sides of this equation appear uncertain, the question is what individuals, employers, and the government can do to make continued employment more likely.

To set the stage for labor supply decisions, chapter 2 explores whether future generations of workers will be healthy enough to work beyond the current retirement age of 63. Intuitively, people's health affects their ability and desire to work, an intuition that is confirmed by a substantial body of research. People's health can also affect their attractiveness to employers. This chapter explores the extent to which health today compares to health in 1960, when the retirement age for men was 66.

Certainly life expectancy for both men and women has increased since the 1960s. But the relationship between increases in longevity and improvements in health is complicated. If medical advancements keep frail people alive, the overall health of a population can look like it has deteriorated. Indeed in the 1970s, when health trends appeared to be worsening, experts accepted the outcome as the "failure of success." Therefore, it is important to look closely at health trends for both older people (those 65 and over) and for older workers (those 55-64). The trends for these age groups are likely related because presumably if those 65 and over are healthier, those 55-64 should also be healthier.

The evidence suggests that the health of older people, as opposed to older workers, showed little improvement in the 1970s, mixed results in the 1980s, and marked improvement since the 1990s. The improvement for older workers most likely began earlier, in the 1980s. Today, the health of older workers appears to be at least as good as it was forty years ago. And today's jobs are less physically demanding. Thus if half of the male population was healthy enough to work until age 66 in 1960, the same percentage should be able to do so today. Two notes of caution are needed. First, 15-20 percent of the older population will not be able to work that long. Second, some studies suggest that the improvements seen to date may not continue and might even reverse.

Given that improved health should enable most people to work longer, chapters 3 and 4 turn to the question of whether older men and older women are likely to want to work. It is necessary to deal with men and women separately, because women's work patterns reflect the increasing participation of cohorts over time as well as the factors that affect retirement behavior. Putting the two together muddies the waters.


Excerpted from Working Longer by Alicia H. Munnell Steven A. Sass Copyright © 2008 by Brookings Institution Press. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)