Worth's Greatest Stock Picks of All Time: Lessons on Buying the Right Stock at the Right Time [NOOK Book]

Overview

Learn How to Pick the Right Stock at the Right Time

The momentum of the bull market spoiled us all—buying stock, any stock, was an almost surefire way to make a mint. Now, in a time of turbulent markets, stock picking has become a mixture of science and high art. With thousands of stocks to choose from, how can investors determine which ones will be future winners?

We all ...
See more details below
Worth's Greatest Stock Picks of All Time: Lessons on Buying the Right Stock at the Right Time

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$12.99
BN.com price

Overview

Learn How to Pick the Right Stock at the Right Time

The momentum of the bull market spoiled us all—buying stock, any stock, was an almost surefire way to make a mint. Now, in a time of turbulent markets, stock picking has become a mixture of science and high art. With thousands of stocks to choose from, how can investors determine which ones will be future winners?

We all know there’s a time to buy and a time to sell every stock, but when is the right time? Timing stock buys so that you catch upward momentum is not luck, and Randy Jones shows you how to hone your buying and selling skills by striving to analyze the factors that made winners of the great stocks in the past. Why was AT&T a great stock pick in the 1920s, Polaroid a winner in the ’40s, Xerox in the ’50s, Teledyne in the ’70s, and Intel in the ’90s? The potential of these stocks was in plain sight—for those who knew how to read the signs. And perhaps as important is understanding the signs of decline and knowing when to sell.

Randy Jones analyzes twenty-five of the greatest stocks of all time, providing a framework for evaluating their strengths that can be used for future selections, including:

• Linking great management and bottom-line profits: Who were the faces behind AIG, GE, and IBM that led to profitability, and what was it about these people’s management skills that made their companies so great?
• Pathbreaking products: Polaroid, Xerox, and Amgen show that products that often seem to be overnight sensations were instead developed over many years, giving investors plenty of lead time to discover their potential as great investments.
• The innovative business model: Avon, McDonald’s, and Dell reveal that understanding how a company makes money helps you to understand its strengths and vulnerabilities.
• Investing during bad times: For some companies, such as Coca-Cola, Schlumberger, and Chrysler, nationwide economic downturns can actually be advantageous.

Worth’s Greatest Stock Picks of All Time has invaluable lessons for anyone in the market today.


From the Hardcover edition.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
Defying the conventional wisdom that no mortal can outsmart the market, this study of fabulous stock run-ups of the last century argues that ordinary investors can learn to spot winners. Jones, CEO of Worth Magazine, examines past and present Wall Street darlings like Coca-Cola, Avon and Intel to illuminate why some stocks take off and others stagnate. His corporate histories are stylish and informative, and they engagingly introduce novices to price/earnings ratios, book value, return on equity and other measures of a stock's potential. Some telltale signs emerge: firms with patents on hot technologies, like Polaroid, are sure bets, as are those that maintain monopoly pricing power by continually innovating ahead of the competition, like Intel. Other signs, however, are less clear-cut. A company reorganization, a new CEO or an inspired ad campaign can all unpredictably affect a stock, and one pointer drawn from the General Electric saga is to "have faith...if you like the management and believe in them, stick with the company." Such "lessons" make the notion that average investors can pick the right stock at the right time seem shaky indeed. The problem, as Jones makes clear, is that there are many methods of evaluating stocks that don't always tell the same story, and many competing corporate strategies that may or may not pan out depending on a host of imponderables. Investors without the benefit of hindsight or time to pore over annual reports should beware. (Dec.) Copyright 2003 Cahners Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781400048809
  • Publisher: Crown Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 12/17/2002
  • Sold by: Random House
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 288
  • File size: 444 KB

Meet the Author

W. Randall Jones (editor in chief of Worth® magazine) is the founder, chairman, and CEO of Worth Media LLC, the parent company for Worth®, the financial lifestyle publication for wealthy, active investors. Randy is also the voice of the ABC News Radio program A Minute’s Worth, syndicated daily to 4,600 ABC radio affiliates, as well as a frequent commentator on numerous television shows, including The Today Show, CNBC’s Power Lunch and Business Center, CNN’s Business Unusual, and Fox News programs. He resides in Manhattan and Bronxville, New York. Julie M. Fenster has written several books on personal finance and business history.


From the Hardcover edition.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

From Chapter One, The Link Between Great Management and Bottom-line Profits


ETERNALLY YOUNG
American International Group
1988–2000

AIG was that actuarial’s complaint—the statistical anomaly. It was a big insurance company that was still growing at a gallop, making money in good times and bad. Not many insurance companies could say the same over the last quarter of the twentieth century, which is what made AIG so cool and consistent. In other words, it was an investor’s dream.

When analyzing the quality of a company’s management, it’s natural to start at the top. Not every CEO gets to be a national media star, so it can take a bit of legwork to learn how a company is run. The process is certainly easier when there’s continuity in the executive suite.

Investors who prize continuity hit the jackpot with American International Group. What has set it apart over the years has been management’s insistence that growth take place away from the commodity segment of the business. Every single CEO of AIG felt the same way: both of them, that is.

Two Strong Leaders = One Great Company

From 1919 to the present day American International Group (AIG) has had only two CEOs, Cornelius “Neil” Starr and Maurice Greenberg, and it’s been the better company for it. The latter is bombastic and the former was reticent, but outward personalities aside, their philosophies have reflected the same values, and given AIG a distinct corporate culture. Most of all, the romance of the insurance giant, incongruous as that phrase may be, is a deep involvement in business all over the world. Since the day AIG opened its first two-room office in Shanghai in 1919, overseas revenues have been central to the business, and accounted for about 50 percent of operating income from 1988 to 2000. The company stock was not only an insurance play, but for an individual portfolio, it also offered one-step global diversification.

Both Starr and Greenberg were alike in believing that every center in the business is a profit center, or should be. One arm could not be expected to make up for another. Greenberg in particular has long believed that innovation is essential to AIG’s growth. The company, therefore, cast a wide net, including the more mundane property-and-casualty, marine, life, and auto insurance, of course, but it also would offer the more exotic, such as insuring children in day care against kidnapping and Internet websites from hackers. With so many types of policies and different entities to sell them, “innovation” has translated into a corporate structure so complicated that AIG could be called a corporate spiderweb, woven of as many as 300 subsidiaries.

To say that Greenberg wanted AIG to grow would be an understatement; by his own confession, he has thought nothing else ever since he took over in 1968. One year into his tenure, he oversaw AIG’s first public offering of shares. The stock thrived on Greenberg’s dictum for the company—earnings growth of nearly 20 percent per year. It was easier to say than to do, but from 1968 to 1998 AIG found ways, ridding the books of lagging businesses and starting or acquiring ones with glowing potential. By the mid-1980s, the company easily hit Greenberg’s target, as assets grew by an average of 34 percent from 1984 to 1988, while in each of the four preceding years growth in earnings followed at an average clip of 27 percent. During that time, the stock price languished, due to the pessimistic perception of the whole property/casualty sector. Smart investors may have been accumulating AIG stock, but the price didn’t really start to move until 1988. That year, with Asian markets booming, Wall Street looked for companies poised to benefit. AIG was belle of the ball.

Americans were hearing a great deal about the accelerating overseas economies of the Pacific Rim and AIG offered a ride along with those “tiger” economies. The stock, which had made precious little progress between 1985 and 1988, burst out, showing that insurance could still be a high-growth industry when it encompassed practically the whole world.

From 1988 to 2000, AIG stock increased from a price (adjusted for splits) of $4.85 to $110. A $10,000 investment would have been worth $226,804 after a dozen years. Even more intriguing for investors, AIG was surefooted. The stock moved upward without a noticeable downturn or even a plateau. In that sense, it only reflected the company, which turned a profit even in years when the earnings reports of other property-and-casualty companies were laid waste by hurricanes or other natural disasters. While AIG stock easily outstripped the S&P 500 (average of large companies), as well as its own brethren in the insurance sector, it also stayed ahead of the NASDAQ average. AIG was one of the anomalies of the 1990s bull market, which was largely propelled by nascent high-tech companies: it was old company, old economy, but decidedly high-growth nonetheless.

Blatant Opportunist

One of the things that helps distinguish AIG is its origins. In 1919, fresh from service in World War I, twenty-seven-year-old Berkeley grad and lawyer Neil Starr went to Shanghai looking for opportunity. He found it, all right, in a nation of millions unable to buy their own life insurance.

The Chinese people were going uninsured because the British companies that dominated the business in China wouldn’t consider selling life insurance policies to native Chinese. The only logical reason for the English position was that actuarial tables (which predict average life spans) did not yet exist for the Chinese population. These tables are key, because normally the people who issue policies depend on tables in order to set rates. So, Starr saw quite a business. He founded American Asiatic Underwriters (AIG’s predecessor) and established a pattern when he extended his company to include life insurance for Chinese nationals, estimating longevity and setting rates that ensured a profit.

Another hallmark of Starr’s young company was that its staff was exclusively Chinese. Foreign companies in China nearly always employed their own imported managers and salesmen. Starr hired locals. As his company expanded into other Asian nations and into other types of coverage, he continued the practice of relying on native-born employees. In the late 1920s, Starr, by then married to the daughter of a Canadian missionary, returned to the United States to build up the center of his empire. He purchased several of the insurance companies that his agency represented and started new firms, too, most of them with an overseas connection. During World War II, he was especially aggressive in South American markets previously dominated by German and Italian firms. Privately held, the burgeoning insurance conglomerate made a millionaire of Neil Starr, but he began to neglect it somewhat in the late 1950s, when he had a personal crisis. (He was devastated when his wife left him for a Russian painter.)

Neil Starr’s companies, which would assume the name American International Group in 1967, were global long before most other American financial firms started to look overseas. The difference was patience, as Starr and his colleagues learned the intricate art of insurance on a mosaic of more than a hundred countries. They took the time to understand local customs and to navigate regulations that baffled many U.S. firms. One of the toughest challenges was retaining sharp employees in developing economies, where AIG training often made a worker worth more than even AIG could afford to pay.

The Next Generation

Even though AIG had thousands of policies, offered by hundreds of subsidiaries, the man Neil Starr tapped to replace him believed that the behemoth was basically quite simple. Maurice Greenberg, nicknamed “Hank” after the Detroit Tigers ballplayer of that name, grew up on a farm in upstate New York. He earned a law degree between stints in the army during World War II (in which he landed with the Rangers during the D-Day invasion) and the Korean Conflict. After distinguishing himself in a domestic insurance subsidiary, he was picked as president of AIG. “Sometimes I find a man who has an inner fire, a man who is perfectly in his métier, his orbit,” Starr once said of his ability to choose executives, “and when I do, I back him.”

Hank Greenberg’s zeal for new businesses led AIG to pioneer coverage in many new areas. It insured satellites, offshore oil rigs, and computer networks; it protected companies against the cost of environmental cleanup and corporate directors from shareholder lawsuits. A subsidiary called AIG Political Risk wrote insurance against kidnapping and extortion. With the help of consultants such as Henry Kissinger, AIG continued another tradition, pushing across forbidding political boundaries.

AIG sought permission in 1992 to stage a homecoming and reestablish operations in mainland China, from which foreign businesses had been barred when the Communists took power in 1949. Hank Greenberg stepped up as the lead salesman and worked the prospect tirelessly. Meanwhile, his company quietly cultivated favor by investing heavily in a Shanghai office complex. AIG also took the initiative to locate a set of windows stolen long before from the Summer Palace in Beijing, buying them for $500,000 from a European collector and restoring them to the palace as a gift to the Chinese people.

“It took almost a decade and a half to open China for AIG,” Greenberg wrote. “It took dozens of trips. Most CEOs I know who want to open a foreign company want to meet with the leader of that country once. After that, they believe they’ve done all that’s required. It doesn’t work that way.”

Net income, which was $17.2 million when Greenberg took over in 1968, grew to $50 million in 1975. By 2000, it was $5.64 billion.

INVEST IN SKIING?

Anyone looking over the long list of assets of American International Group (AIG) might wonder why one of the world’s most potent insurance companies owned a ski resort in Vermont. However, this was no investment fad: AIG had owned Mount Mansfield in Stowe for more than forty years. The reason was twofold: first, Cornelius Starr liked to ski. Second, Maurice Greenberg liked to ski.

The AIG Decision

The value in AIG stock was its record of growth. In financial terms, the company was the eternal youth of the industry, chalking up each new record as though it was only just starting. The decision points for buying the stock in 1988 related to the future and just how long the company could continue its insistent rate of expansion.

Overall, the property/casualty industry stagnated in 1986–1987, but not AIG. Some investors noted that it was writing fewer policies and worried about its growth slowing in the future. That idea was blown away in 1988 when AIG continued to record increased earnings on its crafty strategy.


“We look for markets without a lot of competition,” said AIG’s longtime vice chairman, Thomas Tizzio. The company’s philosophy was to actively seek areas in which it could offer coverage that was otherwise unavailable. Furthermore, it simply left fields that were overcrowded. Investors could see the effect of the company’s choosy standards in the margins it was able to maintain. Investors who picked AIG out of the pack were rewarded with a stock that increased by more than twenty times from 1988 to 2000.

Acquisitions extended the types of businesses in which AIG was engaged, but insurance remained the most important revenue stream. The deterioration of Communism in the Soviet bloc enhanced prospects for the expansion into Eastern Europe and Central Asia. At the same time, the Asian market was more enticing than ever, especially with a return to China in the offing. In the two fastest-growing Asian nations, the Philippines and Japan, AIG subsidiaries either led the market or came up second.

“Entrepreneurial” is an expression often used to imply a certain autonomy of the divisions; at AIG, it has gone much further ever since the reorganization of 1967–1968 when Greenberg took over. At any given time upper management in effect owns at least 30 percent of the company. It is a unique arrangement, giving AIG some of the best characteristics of a professional partnership. AIG’s top 300 employees receive the right to buy dividend-rich shares in a related company that holds, among other things, a substantial stake in AIG. Meanwhile, the top 40 employees are offered similar shares, but of a much higher grade—each block yields dividends of over a half-million dollars annually. The bonus shares, which have to be surrendered when the employee leaves, represent holdings of almost one-third of AIG’s stock. Significantly, the company is always in the hands of people with a real stake in its performance.

At Home Abroad

The factors ruling against the purchase of AIG in 1988 were led by a general uncertainty about the insurance sector. However, as is often the case, the dullness of a sector isn’t necessarily a bad thing and does not affect every stock within it. AIG was different from most other insurance companies: at once more daring in its pursuit of uncrowded businesses and more conservative in its own money management. In addition, AIG was assiduously steering clear of insurance that it considered overregulated, notably health insurance.

Smart investors judge stocks in a sector as much by what makes them different as by what makes them similar. AIG was a case that rewarded people who took the trouble to learn why it was not like other insurance companies.

The AIG formula made a clear profit on underwriting. That is, it managed to earn money on that basic insurance business of selling policies and paying claims. Surprisingly, AIG is one of the few companies that does so consistently. In the 1980s, U.S. property-and-casualty insurers as a group paid out much more money in claims than they took in through premiums. Their idea, which worked most of the time, was that investment profits on accumulated premiums would more than make up for underwriting losses.

AIG, on the contrary, considered that its revenue would expand in a more stable way if it made a profit at each end of the insurance business: underwriting and investment. Rough stretches are inevitable in the investment climate (making for setbacks in a company’s portfolio), as well as the earthly climate, causing natural disasters such as hurricanes that result in losses in the underwriting business. Because the company scrutinized claims closely, sometimes withholding payment, it has occasionally been charged with skirting obligations on technicalities. However, financial conservatism on all fronts consistently earned AIG the highest possible ratings from agencies that grade insurance companies.

One cloud that hovered over the decision to buy AIG stock in 1988 remained for the entire span through 2000. As of this writing, it is talked about still. Hank Greenberg has never indicated any plans to retire or name a successor. “There is only one Royal Highness around here,” said vice chairman Tizzio, referring to Greenberg. Like monarchs who live long lives, condemning the eldest heir to a life of harrowing boredom, Greenberg has watched a whole generation of likely successors move on to leadership at other companies. Greenberg’s vim is as legendary as his highly effective management. However, investors worried about the overall leadership of a company as powerful as AIG resting so precariously on the shoulders of one man.

Epilogue

The rise in AIG’s stock price that started in 1988, or indeed with the IPO nineteen years before that, stalled for the first time in 2000. The price-to-earnings ratio, which was running about double the industry average as it grew to 16 in 1996, soared to more than 20 in 1998 and past 36 in 2000. It was a heady ratio for a financial company, where a number under 10 would be more typical. Over a long span, AIG justified investors’ faith, but a change in conditions was inevitable.

A high price-to-earnings ratio is a hungry number that must be fed with great news every year, if not every single quarter. In the bearish market of late 2000, AIG’s stock couldn’t push higher, even while the company posted another year of double-digit growth at 11.5 percent: great for any other big insurer, only good for AIG. Investors were also cautious because of AIG’s exposure to the slumping Asian market. Ironic, since Asia was once what made investors run to the stock.

Another factor in AIG’s pause was an acquisition spree in 1999–2001. Investors tend to be petulant and expect companies to keep making money without ever spending any of it. AIG’s purchases were widely praised for their strategic value, especially in bolstering the company’s presence in the lucrative business of financial planning. In the long range, AIG was undoubtedly better off. However, the market moves on short headlines, not long reports. So in 2000, though AIG was still a healthy company, inviting to long-term investors, it was not perceived as a growth stock.

Lessons

Ensuring future profits . . . Even a competitive, price-oriented business such as insurance can have pockets of profitability. Make sure to hook up with managements intent on finding those niches.

Variety is the spice . . . AIG is constantly coming up with new product offerings. You can’t get 20 percent growth by standing still.

When in Rome . . . Both CEOs believed in the importance of understanding local economies.

Management . . . Only two CEOs, both great. The big question mark: Who will take over next?

TIMELINE
1919 Neil Starr founds American Asiatic Underwriters in Shanghai.
1926 Starr establishes a base in the United States.
1950 China operations cease.
1967 Company renamed AIG.
1968 Hank Greenberg succeeds Starr as CEO.
1969 Initial public offering.
1975 Net income $75 million.
1987 Net income $1 billion.
1993 Returns to business in China.
1994 Net income $2.17 billion.
2000 Net income $5.64 billion.


From the Hardcover edition.
Read More Show Less

First Chapter

Chapter 1

The Link Between Great Management and Bottom-line Profits

Louis Rukeyser has said that evaluating a corporate management in isolation of the company it leads is every bit as difficult as evaluating the director of a Broadway play. He's right. We tend to evaluate managements and directors backward; if they produced a hit, they must have been pretty good, and if they didn't, well, you can draw your own conclusions. But a backward conclusion isn't worth much in the stock market, because you can't invest inthe past.

Yes, investors should demand strong management from companies whose stock they own. But how can you tell? Wasn't Enron once the most admired company in America? Certainly an investor's job is made easier when a company has a visible leader at the helm whom investors can get to know and trust. If Warren Buffett weren't leading Berkshire Hathaway, you can bet that the annual meeting would be considerably less crowded-and that his company's approach to business would be less widely understood.

In the absence of a charismatic personality to deliver the corporate message, you as an investor must do some legwork. You can begin by reading the annual report to see the human faces behind corporate performance. When you read on, you hope to find more than glossy pictures. You're looking for a clear link between the actions and philosophy of management and the bottom-line profitability of the company. Above all, the question you should be

asking is "Has this company distinguished itself from its competitors?" If the answer is no, then management hasn't made its case.

In this chapter we see that three outstandingcompanies-AIG, GE, and IBM-were more than just a sea of initials; they were great long-term stock selections. Investing for the long haul requires unusual confidence, and those investors who truly understood the management teams behind the scenes were the most confident of all.

ETERNALLY YOUNG

American International Group

1988-2000

AIG was that actuarial's complaint-the statistical anomaly. It was a big insurance company that was still growing at a gallop, making money in good times and bad. Not many insurance companies could say the same over the last quarter of the twentieth century, which is what made AIG so cool and consistent. In other words, it was an investor's dream.

When analyzing the quality of a company's management, it's natural to start at the top. Not every CEO gets to be a national media star, so it can take a bit of legwork to learn how a company is run. The process is certainly easier when there's continuity in the executive suite.

Investors who prize continuity hit the jackpot with American International Group. What has set it apart over the years has been management's insistence that growth take place away from the commodity segment of the business. Every single CEO of AIG felt the same way: both of them, that is.

Two Strong Leaders = One Great Company

From 1919 to the present day American International Group (AIG) has had only two CEOs, Cornelius Starr and Maurice Greenberg, and it's been the better company for it. The latter is bombastic and the former was reticent, but outward personalities aside, their philosophies have reflected the same values, and given AIG a distinct corporate culture. Most of all, the romance of the insurance giant, incongruous as that phrase may be, is a deep involvement in business all over the world. Since the day AIG opened its first two-room office in Shanghai in 1919, overseas revenues have been central to the business, and accounted for about 50 percent of operating income from 1988 to 2000. The company stock was not only an insurance play, but for an individual portfolio, it also offered one-step global diversification.

Both Starr and Greenberg were alike in believing that every center in the business is a profit center, or should be. One arm could not be expected to make up for another. Greenberg in particular has long believed that innovation is essential to AIG's growth. The company, therefore, cast a wide net, including the more mundane property-and-casualty, marine, life, and auto insurance, of course, but it also would offer the more exotic, such as insuring children in day care against kidnapping and Internet websites from hackers. With so many types of policies and different entities to sell them, "innovation" has translated into a corporate structure so complicated that AIG could be called a corporate spiderweb, woven of as many as 300 subsidiaries.

To say that Greenberg wanted AIG to grow would be an understatement; by his own confession, he has thought nothing else ever since he took over in 1968. One year into his tenure, he oversaw AIG's first public offering of shares. The stock thrived on Greenberg's dictum for the company-earnings growth of nearly 20 percent per year. It was easier to say than to do, but from 1968 to 1998 AIG found ways, ridding the books of lagging businesses and starting or acquiring ones with glowing potential. By the mid-1980s, the company easily hit Greenberg's target, as assets grew by an average of 34 percent from 1984 to 1988, while in each of the four preceding years growth in earnings followed at an average clip of 27 percent. During that time, the stock price languished, due to the pessimistic perception of the whole property/casualty sector. Smart investors may have been accumulating AIG stock, but the price didn't really start to move until 1988. That year, with Asian markets booming, Wall Street looked for companies poised to benefit. AIG was belle of the ball.

Americans were hearing a great deal about the accelerating overseas economies of the Pacific Rim and AIG offered a ride along with those "tiger" economies. The stock, which had made precious little progress between 1985 and 1988, burst out, showing that insurance could still be a high-growth industry when it encompassed practically the whole world.

From 1988 to 2000, AIG stock increased from a price (adjusted for splits) of $4.85 to $110. A $10,000 investment would have been worth $226,804 after a dozen years. Even more intriguing for investors, AIG was surefooted. The stock moved upward without a noticeable downturn or even a plateau. In that sense, it only reflected the company, which turned a profit even in years when the earnings reports of other property-and-casualty companies were laid waste by hurricanes or other natural disasters. While AIG stock easily outstripped the S&P 500 (average of large companies), as well as its own brethren in the insurance sector, it also stayed ahead of the NASDAQ average. AIG was one of the anomalies of the 1990s bull market, which was largely propelled by nascent high-tech companies: it was old company, old economy, but decidedly high-growth nonetheless.

Blatant Opportunist

One of the things that helps distinguish AIG is its origins. In 1919, fresh from service in World War I, twenty-seven-year-old Berkeley grad and lawyer Neil Starr went to Shanghai looking for opportunity. He found it, all right, in a nation of millions unable to buy their own life insurance.

The Chinese people were going uninsured because the British companies that dominated the business in China wouldn't consider selling life insurance policies to native Chinese. The only logical reason for the English position was that actuarial tables (which predict average life spans) did not yet exist for the Chinese population. These tables are key, because normally the people who issue policies depend on tables in order to set rates. So, Starr saw quite a business. He founded American Asiatic Underwriters (AIG's predecessor) and established a pattern when he extended his company to include life insurance for Chinese nationals, estimating longevity and setting rates that ensured a profit.

Another hallmark of Starr's young company was that its staff was exclusively Chinese. Foreign companies in China nearly always employed their own imported managers and salesmen. Starr hired locals. As his company expanded into other Asian nations and into other types of coverage, he continued the practice of relying on native-born employees. In the late 1920s, Starr, by then married to the daughter of a Canadian missionary, returned to the United States to build up the center of his empire. He purchased several of the insurance companies that his agency represented and started new firms, too, most of them with an overseas connection. During World War II, he was especially aggressive in South American markets previously dominated by German and Italian firms. Privately held, the burgeoning insurance conglomerate made a millionaire of Neil Starr, but he began to neglect it somewhat in the late 1950s, when he had a personal crisis. (He was devastated when his wife left him for a Russian painter.)

Neil Starr's companies, which would assume the name American International Group in 1967, were global long before most other American financial firms started to look overseas. The difference was patience, as Starr and his colleagues learned the intricate art of insurance on a mosaic of more than a hundred countries. They took the time to understand local customs and to navigate regulations that baffled many U.S. firms. One of the toughest challenges was retaining sharp employees in developing economies, where AIG training often made a worker worth more than even AIG could afford to pay.

The Next Generation

Even though AIG had thousands of policies, offered by hundreds of subsidiaries, the man Neil Starr tapped to replace him believed that the behemoth was basically quite simple. Maurice Greenberg, nicknamed "Hank" after the Detroit Tigers ballplayer of that name, grew up on a farm in upstate New York. He earned a law degree between stints in the army during World War II (in which he landed with the Rangers during the D-Day invasion) and the Korean Conflict. After distinguishing himself in a domestic insurance subsidiary, he was picked as president of AIG. "Sometimes I find a man who has an inner fire, a man who is perfectly in his métier, his orbit," Starr once said of his ability to choose executives, "and when I do, I back him."

Hank Greenberg's zeal for new businesses led AIG to pioneer coverage in many new areas. It insured satellites, offshore oil rigs, and computer networks; it protected companies against the cost of environmental cleanup and corporate directors from shareholder lawsuits. A subsidiary called AIG Political Risk wrote insurance against kidnapping and extortion. With the help of consultants such as Henry Kissinger, AIG continued another tradition, pushing across forbidding political boundaries.

AIG sought permission in 1992 to stage a homecoming and reestablish operations in mainland China, from which foreign businesses had been barred when the Communists took power in 1949. Hank Greenberg stepped up as the lead salesman and worked the prospect tirelessly. Meanwhile, his company quietly cultivated favor by investing heavily in a Shanghai office complex. AIG also took the initiative to locate a set of windows stolen long before from the Summer Palace in Beijing, buying them for $500,000 from a European collector and restoring them to the palace as a gift to the Chinese people.

"It took almost a decade and a half to open China for AIG," Greenberg wrote. "It took dozens of trips. Most CEOs I know who want to open a foreign company want to meet with the leader of that country once. After that, they believe they've done all that's required. It doesn't work that way."

Net income, which was $17.2 million when Greenberg took over in 1968, grew to $50 million in 1975. By 2000, it was $5.64 billion.

INVEST IN SKIING?

Anyone looking over the long list of assets of American International Group (AIG) might wonder why one of the world's most potent insurance companies owned a ski resort in Vermont. However, this was no investment fad: AIG had owned Mount Mansfield in Stowe for more than forty years. The reason was twofold: first, Cornelius Starr liked to ski. Second, Maurice Greenberg liked to ski.

Copyright© 2002 by W. Randall Jones with Julie Fenster
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)