The Oxford Classical Dictionary

5.0 3 5 1
by Simon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth, Esther Eidinow



Condition: New

Sold by PbshopUK

Seller since 2016

Seller Rating

Seller Comments:

New Book. Shipped from UK within 10 to 14 business days. Established seller since 2000.

Ships from: Fairford, UNITED KINGDOM

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Back to Product Details

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780199545568
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Publication date: 05/04/2012
Pages: 1792
Sales rank: 896,464
Product dimensions: 8.30(w) x 10.90(h) x 2.80(d)

About the Author

Simon Hornblower is a Senior Research Fellow in Classical Studies at All Souls College, Oxford. Antony Spawforth is Professor of Ancient History at the University of Newcastle. Esther Eidinow is Reader in Ancient Greek History at Newman University College in Birmingham.

Table of Contents

List of New Entries
Area Advisors
Note to the Reader
A-Z Dictionary Entries

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Oxford Classical Dictionary 5 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 3 reviews.
flmcgough on LibraryThing 8 months ago
This book should be on every classicist's book shelf. It contains clear, concise entries on nearly every subject and figure of antiquity, going all the way up to the 4th-5th centuries. It's the ultimate reference book to the Classical World.
JaneAnneShaw on LibraryThing 8 months ago
The title of the OCD says it all. Indispensable, even if it does require a whole table of its own to sit on!
pomonomo2003 on LibraryThing 10 months ago
All things considered, a superb reference work, January 26, 2007This edition (the third edition, 1996) has over 6200 entries on 1640 pages! And no, I haven't read them all... This is really wonderful for those times when you come across a new term (whether a person, place or thing) and need some idea as to who (what or where) is being discussed, indicated or alluded to. This Edition, published in 1996, was put together between 1991-1994 and contains matters (such as the Near East) that were barely touched on in earlier editions. But never fear! - The centrality of Greece and Rome has been quite correctly retained. There is, however, a much broader (and self-consciouss) inter-disciplinary focus to this edition. Older readers will likely be annoyed by long bows to feminism, Marxism and postmodernism in some of the essays. Occasionally, the tone and 'politically correct' point of view of some entries can be a bit over the top. If you are either old-fashioned or easily annoyed (and you know who you are) it might be wise NOT to toss out the second edition... But even they might find some of the new 'thematic' entries - on disease, ecology, economy, imperialism, literacy, motherhood, and technology, e.g. - more than occasionally useful. There is even good news for the under-educated - most Greek and Latin terms are translated! But I would prefer that the Greek or Latin and its translation both appear; this compromise would likely satisfy both novices and experts. Unfortunately, the cost of including the original term and the translation would likely cause the publisher to balk. Now, Roman names will probably continue to annoy everyone. If, for example, one looks up Caesar one finds 'See Iulius Caesar'. Now, as I hope we all know, the Romans had three names (using Caesar as an example): Gaius (praenomen), Iulius (nomen), Caesar (cogomen). Pretty much no one, besides Emperors and writers, is listed under the cogomen in this edition - they are almost all listed by nomen. (No, Caesar is not the exception, he was never officially Emperor.) The change of 'Julius' into 'Iulius' is also annoying - especially after being assured (Preface, viii) that "the more familiar form [...] should be preferred." But with a work of this scope and length there will always be a multitude of quibbles and annoyances. One of mine is that I wish the tiny bibliographies that follow some entries were less brief. But all things considered this is a first-rate OCD that will inevitably, after a generation and a half has passed, need to be revised. But such is the fate of all academic reference works. - They are all such slaves to fashion! That said, the general editors, Hornblower and Spawforth, and the area advisers have much to be proud of; 4.5 stars, 5 if the 'politically correct' gestures are toned down and the bibliographical data following some of the separate entries increased.