Libertarianism valorizes individual freedom, and on the traditional libertarian view, that freedom is demanded and secured by individual rights. Consequentialism is often thought to be antithetical to libertarianism precisely because it cannot accommodate such rights, instead requiring significant personal sacrifice for the greater good. In A Consequentialist Defense of Libertarianism, Richard Fumerton turns this debate on its head, advancing a consequentialist libertarianism that is more subtle than most extant rights-based versions of libertarianism and anything but doctrinaire.
In this wide-ranging study of political theory, ethics, and public policy, Fumerton attempts to incorporate consequentialism and libertarianism. The definition of libertarianism in this volume is indeed "flexible" (p. 197), especially when compared to the traditional view of libertarianism as advocating for constraining and diffusing power. The problem with libertarianism, and the need for interweaving libertarianism with consequentialism, results from the prevailing "'rights-based' conception of rationality and morality" (p. x) found in contemporary libertarian theory. If libertarianism can incorporate some critical elements of consequentialism, namely, certain "constraints" (p. xi) on what can be achieved in the social and political realms, the faulty and impractical limitations of libertarianism can be overcome. Guided by an imaginative reassessment of John Stuart Mill and consequentialism, the author suggests that new policy approaches to the issues of free expression, social life, and economics can replace the "confusing distraction" of debates over rights (p. 15)… [T]he "appeal for more humility when it comes to the political positions one takes on controversial issues concerning freedom" (p. 13) constitutes an enduring scholarly achievement. Recommended. Advanced undergraduates through faculty.
"Richard Fumerton’s A Consequentialist Defense of Libertarianism is a tour de force working through many major issues in ethics, political and legal philosophy, epistemology, and philosophy generally, done by one of the most distinguished philosophers of our times. Fumerton’s judgments on these issues are well-organized and clearly expressed in a manner accessible to lay readers, and yet despite such widespread accessibility, there is no sacrifice of the kind of philosophical sophistication achievable only by one who has spent a lifetime maturing his judgments about such issues."
"A masterful, rich, and lucid overview of what consequentialism is and how consequentialism approaches policy questions. Taking on abortion, the legalization of recreational drugs, and taxes, Fumerton explains in compelling terms why policies that preserve and protect social and economic freedom are likely to have the best consequences for communities."
In this wide-ranging study of political theory, ethics, and public policy, Fumerton attempts to incorporate consequentialism and libertarianism. The definition of libertarianism in this volume is indeed "flexible" (p. 197), especially when compared to the traditional view of libertarianism as advocating for constraining and diffusing power. The problem with libertarianism, and the need for interweaving libertarianism with consequentialism, results from the prevailing "'rights-based' conception of rationality and morality" (p. x) found in contemporary libertarian theory. If libertarianism can incorporate some critical elements of consequentialism, namely, certain "constraints" (p. xi) on what can be achieved in the social and political realms, the faulty and impractical limitations of libertarianism can be overcome. Guided by an imaginative reassessment of John Stuart Mill and consequentialism, the author suggests that new policy approaches to the issues of free expression, social life, and economics can replace the "confusing distraction" of debates over rights (p. 15)… [T]he "appeal for more humility when it comes to the political positions one takes on controversial issues concerning freedom" (p. 13) constitutes an enduring scholarly achievement. Recommended. Advanced undergraduates through faculty.
