A formal analysis A Singing Contest comprises close readings of Seamus
Heaney's poetry. Tyler argues that in an era of fractured poetry and politics, Seamus Heaney stands out: his impulse is towards unity and regeneration. Her book considers the interplay between different kinds of literary tradition and community in his poetry. For Heaney, poetry represents a structure allowing imaginative mediation of conflicts that appear irreconcilable in the social, political and historical realms. By detailed structural analysis of diction, meter, imagery and generic form, Tyler illustrates how Heaney's poems create concords from discords, unities from fracture.
From the preface by Rosanna Warren:
"A Singing Contest is written with imaginative and emotional urgency, and in some large sense, as it examines Heaney's spells, it seems itself to want to cast a spell against death. Hence Tyler's return, in various ways, to readings of elegy, whether the fictive elegies of classical pastoral poems, or Heaney's personal elegies. She pores in detail over "Clearances," the sonnet sequence composed in memory of the poet's mother in The Haw Lantern, and she concludes her book with a chapter on literary elegies, Heaney's farewells to his friends and admired contemporaries Ted Hughes, Zbigniew Herbert, and Joseph Brodsky. In these analyses, one sees the wholeness of Tyler's project: her argument that for Heaney, literary tradition itself, rightly received and transformed, reaches into the voids made by death, and establishes connection across rupture. Her thesis is an ancient one, and she gives it particular shape and force in asking us to contemplate it at work in Heaney, whereit binds individual to collective experience, and past to present."
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis|
|Series:||Studies in Major Literary Authors Series|
|Product dimensions:||6.10(w) x 9.10(h) x 0.70(d)|
About the Author
Margaret B. Tyler is Assistant Professor of Rhetoric at the College of General Studies, Boston University. She has published prose (book reviews) and poetry in The Kenyon Review, Agni, The Harvard Review, Del Sol Review, among other journals.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
Writers should get lots of feedback on their stories. Why? What if they want to be a proffessional author? They will never know if they're talented or not unless someone tells them. Using myself as an example, as my title suggests (lluvwriting09) I love to write. I've written numerous stories, but only gotten 3 reveiws. If you would like proof, my newest one, Revival, is located at flame all results. I would like to know if I did a good job, so l think numerous reveiws will help me by telling me how many people liked it, or if most people didn't. Personally, I prefer to have people I don't really know to read my stories, because they, unlike friends or family, will tell the truth about my writing. Family and friends may think I will take offense if they say it's bad, so they lie and say it's good. And if I go proffessional, I could end up very unhappy that no one likes my stories, all because friends or family didn't want to offend me. On a different point of writing and receiving feedback, if you would like to receive good feedback (this goes for everyone), then have good grammer and spelling. I've found that I haven't enjoyed stories as much because of all the bad grammer and spelling. Trust me, it's better to put a little effort into story writting and receive positive feedback than put no effort in and receive negative feedback. I think, you only receive positive feedback through earning it. Working towards an intellagent, intresting story deserves good, positive feedback. And reserched, intelligent stories are more enjoyed than dumb writings with false information. And lastly, intresting topics are highly appreciated throughout all critics. (Also, as a side note, side notes and comments are also enjoyed, with things such as how soon the next chapter will be posted, or how many reveiws wanted to write next chapter)