After Appomattox: How the South Won the War

After Appomattox: How the South Won the War

by Stetson Kennedy
1.0 1

Hardcover

$41.83 $55.00 Save 24% Current price is $41.83, Original price is $55. You Save 24%.
View All Available Formats & Editions

Temporarily Out of Stock Online

Eligible for FREE SHIPPING

Overview

After Appomattox: How the South Won the War by Stetson Kennedy

"Along with his wonderful abilities as a writer and scholar, Stetson possesses enormous courage, social involvement, and a big heart. . . .  He's a brave man, of great conscience, and ought to be accorded a seat alongside Patrick Henry and other great freedom fighters."--Alan Lomax, Association for Cultural Equity

"Throws a clear light on events of the post-Civil War era as they relate to current divisions of class and race in contemporary society.  Kennedy's interpretation runs against that of many other scholars, but certainly it is well supported and coherent and has the added force of strong argument."--Patricia Waterman, University of South Florida

Stetson Kennedy's premise--argued and documented here as never before--is that the verdict of Appomattox was largely reversed during Reconstruction.  The determined southern oligarchy, he says, wrenched political and cultural victory out of military defeat.
 In this dramatic contribution to the history of Reconstruction, Kennedy brings to light thirty-three "long-buried" testimonials from victims and perpetrators of Ku Klux Klan terror that were taken by a Joint Congressional Committee in 1871-72.  They form the core of this account of the decade following the Civil War, which Kennedy describes as a period of "Holocaust, demagoguery, chicanery, fraud, and psychological warfare that culminated in the Deal of 1876." 
 That "deal," struck between Democrats and Republicans in a smoke-filled room of the Wormsley Hotel in Washington, D.C., essentially revoked the unconditional surrender of the South at Appomattox.  It gave Republican Rutherford B. Hayes the victory in the disputed presidential election of 1876 in return for the withdrawal of federal troops from the southern states, and Kennedy contends that it diluted the power of the hard-won 14th and 15th Amendments and led to the imposition of the Jim Crow system after Reconstruction.
 Work on After Appomattox began with Kennedy's discovery of thirteen volumes of testimony--given to a Senate committee by former slaves--housed in the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture in the New York Public Library. The interviews--chilling, heartbreaking, and plain-spoken--describe how "the black and white targets of the Klan terror chose not to arm themselves or bond together for protection, counterattack, or counterterrorism.  They simply stood as individuals against their tormentors, and, for refusing to renounce their rights, were often killed."  Citing the testimony of one former slave, undeterred from voting by a near-fatal flogging, he quotes, "I can be strong in a good cause."

Stetson Kennedy is the author of Palmetto Country, Southern Exposure, The Klan Unmasked, and Jim Crow Guide:  The Way It Was, all reissued in paperback by UPF.  He has received numerous honors recognizing his work for peace and racial equality, from the Negro Freedom Rally People's Award in 1947 to the 1991 Cavallo Foundation Award for civic courage.
The grandson of a Confederate officer, he is a native of Florida and lives in Jacksonville.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780813013411
Publisher: University Press of Florida
Publication date: 04/28/1995
Pages: 321
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x (d)
Lexile: 1360L (what's this?)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

After Appomattox: How the South Won the War 1 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 1 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
Mr. Kennedy's conclusion that the South won the war after Appomattox is totally unsupported. Since the South was fighting for indepencence and it is still not independent, the book wastes the reader's time. Most of the research is done in regards to Klan activities. No one could defend those activities. There certainly were attrocities committed by these terrorists but this does not prove his point. (He even uses his own earlier works as references.) Not a good effort.