10/03/2016
At a moment when race has resurfaced as an urgent part of the American discourse, Gilman (Seeing the Insane) and Thomas (Affective Labor) critically examine shifting views on race in the social sciences during the 20th century. The authors’ central project is mapping the change from pathologizing race (characterizing Jewish and black people as more susceptible to mental illnesses) to pathologizing racism. They describe how some Jewish psychiatrists at the start of the 20th century accepted the argument that those of their faith were more prone to hysteria, and how asylums in the post-emancipation South tried to treat black patients by recreating the conditions of slavery. The writers locate the central switch in attitudes in the aftermath of WWII, when the world was looking to the nascent fields of social and behavioral science to explain how the people of Germany came to commit such atrocities. This coincided with the birth of the civil rights movement, and led to examinations of the mental toll racism exacts on its victims and eventually, controversially, the costs to its perpetrators. Gilman and Thomas make their case methodically, with rigorous, far-reaching scholarship. They provide no easy answers but plenty of food for thought amid America’s current crisis in race relations. (Dec.)
"Sander Gilman and James Thomas have undertaken a weighty task; they have provided a framework that helps us to decipher the science behind race and racism. As provocative as the books title is, you will find ample evidence and persuasive arguments for why a reliance on medicalizing racism is not enough in our quest to not only understand it but also to eradicate racism."
"Are Racists Crazy?makes a strong, richly documented historical case for medicalization."
"Truly multidisciplinary, thisbook will be of interest to scholars and educators from a variety of social science disciplines."
"Are Racists Crazy?Is a highly informative book that significantly contributes to a historical understanding of the connection between race and madness."
"A tour d'horizon of the historical relationship among race, racism, and mental illness...A sharp contribution to a significant topic that continues to generate heated discussion and debate."- Kirkus
"Sander
Gilman and James Thomas have undertaken a weighty task; they have provided a framework that helps us to decipher the science behind race and racism. As provocative as the book’s title is, you will find ample evidence and persuasive arguments for why a reliance on medicalizing racism is not enough in our quest to not only understand it but also to eradicate racism."
-Deirdre Cooper Owens,author of Medical Superbodies: Slavery, Immigration, and the Birth of American Gynecology
"Gilman and Thomas make their case methodically, with rigorous, far-reaching scholarship. They provide no easy answers but plenty of food for thought amid America’s current crisis in race relations."- Publishers Weekly
“Sander Gilman and James Thomas have provided a unique intellectual and political history of racial theorizing – and have generated a virtual ‘cognitive road map’ of how anti-Semitism as leitmotif has played such a powerful, even dominant role in the way scholars and researchers have approached the subject matter, whether in Europe, the United States, or South Africa. Few works even attempt to piece together so much material, while pulling a convincing thread through a sustained argument.”-Troy Duster,author of Backdoor to Eugenics
"Gilman and Thomas make a major contribution to racial theory. They study the deep structures of racism, not only in plunder, privilege, and antipathy for the 'other,' but also in the scientific frameworks that seek to explain 'otherness,' sometimes affirming it, sometimes denying it. Locating racism within biopolitics, Are Racists Crazy? sheds new light on such varied matters as implicit bias and authoritarian populism. Most important, this book unveils the inescapable political connections between race and science."-Howard Winant,author of The New Politics Of Race: Globalism, Difference, Justice
2016-10-18
A tour d'horizon of the historical relationship among race, racism, and mental illness.Although Gilman (Liberal Arts and Sciences and Psychiatry/Emory Univ.; Seeing the Insane, 2013, etc.) and Thomas (Sociology/Univ. of Mississippi; Working to Laugh: Assembling Difference in American Stand-Up Comedy Venues, 2015, etc.) journey as far back as the Enlightenment, the meat of their investigation covers the period from the 19th century to the present—and the meat is occasionally chewy, with demands placed on readers to be conversant with, say, "the crowd as a forensic concept has its origins in the Lombrosian criminal psychiatry." Nonetheless, in the authors' tracking of the great shift from pathologizing race to pathologizing racism, they cut through a broad swath of theorists, many of whom will be known to general readers. Furthermore, the clear, spot-on summations of the familiar theorists allow readers a measure of comfort in the treatment of less-known theorists (until the necessary supplementary reading can be done). Throughout, it's clear that what galls Gilman and Thomas is the expropriation of the subject by one branch of learning or another, juggling among medicine, sociology, biology, and psychiatry. Jews and blacks, understandably, are the subjects of much study, with the notion of race defined first in physiology, then the susceptibility of disease, and then the inability to find social adaptation. Ultimately, scientific racism moves "from overwhelmingly a biological condition to a socially constructed category." Although the historical transit over the subject alone makes the book valuable, equally useful are the authors' explorations of interiority, hatred, and crowd thinking. They examine Gabriel Tarde's laws of imitation; how Wilhelm Reich bridged the gap between Karl Marx and Freud; and, most illuminatingly, "conjunction," a "crisis between politics, science, and ideology...a period during which the different social, political, economic, and ideological contradictions that are at work in a society come together to give [racism] a specific shape." A sharp contribution to a significant topic that continues to generate heated discussion and debate.
"Gilman and Thomas make a major contribution to racial theory. They study the deep structures of racism, not only in plunder, privilege, and antipathy for the 'other,' but also in the scientific frameworks that seek to explain 'otherness,' sometimes affirming it, sometimes denying it. Locating racism within biopolitics, Are Racists Crazy? sheds new light on such varied matters as implicit bias and authoritarian populism. Most important, this book unveils the inescapable political connections between race and science."
"Sander Gilman and James Thomas have provided a unique intellectual and political history of racial theorizing and have generated a virtual & cognitive road map of how anti-Semitism as leitmotif has played such a powerful, even dominant role in the way scholars and researchers have approached the subject matter, whether in Europe, the United States, or South Africa. Few works even attempt to piece together so much material, while pulling a convincing thread through a sustained argument."
