Celts: A History / Edition 1

Celts: A History / Edition 1

by Peter Berresford Ellis
3.0 3
ISBN-10:
0786712112
ISBN-13:
2900786712112
Pub. Date:
11/25/2003
Publisher:
Running Press Book Publishers
Select a Purchase Option (Revised)
  • purchase options
    $7.66 $13.95 Save 45% Current price is $7.66, Original price is $13.95. You Save 45%.
    icon-error
    Note: Access code and/or supplemental material are not guaranteed to be included with textbook rental or used textbook.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Celts: A History 3 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 3 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
Peter Berresford Ellis. The Celts: A History, New York: Carrol & Graf Publishers, New York, 1998, 235 pgs. In his work, The Celts: A History, Peter Berresford Ellis conflates copious amounts of information in order to present Celtic history at an introductory level. Ellis educates his audience on multiple topics such as Celtic architecture and the roles of Celtic women, but at the same time stimulates a great amount of skepticism within the reader. Thus, while Mr. Ellis¿ book has many admirable aspects, it also contains some poor features as well. Ellis was born in Warwickshire, England on March 10, 1943. While in college, he acquired his honours BA and master¿s degree in Celtic studies, but decided to pursue a career in journalism instead of becoming a professional historian. He now contributes articles to the Irish Post and the Irish Democrat and has written over 30 books pertaining to Celtic history '2'. When one begins to read The Celts: A History, one immediately recognizes Mr. Ellis¿ extensive knowledge in etymology. Throughout his book, he repeatedly argues that the ancient Celtic languages correlate to Sanskrit. He uses plenty of examples of Celtic words and associates them with ancient Sanskrit through their close relation in spelling, with English script, and in their meanings. For example, in Sanskrit, the word raja translates to ¿king,¿ which corresponds to the same meaning the word rí has in Old Irish. Another great aspect of Mr. Ellis¿ book is his use of many ancient resources. As he provides a plethora of information on the Celts, he supports this data with sources such as Strabo, Pliny the Elder, Julius Caesar, and Cornelius Tacitus. He further engages the reader by providing a short biography on each of the resources he uses, noting how each of these ancient sources wrote history. In his section on Queen Boudeca, a former queen of the Iceni tribe in southeastern Britain, he cleverly quotes Cassius Dio and Cornelius Tacitus to support his arguments. Also, the author presents a broad history of the Celts and covers the multiple facets of this culture throughout his work. Mr. Ellis not only provides his audience with the glorious accounts of the Celtic kings and queens, but also includes the history of the lower class. During the book, one will find chapters on Celtic religion, cosmology, farming, mythology, and even medicine. Thus, the author accommodates the reader with an extensive amount of Celtic history. While The Celts: A History has numerous strengths as an introductory history, it falls short in some critical areas. In the first chapter, the author asserts the biased nature of Julius Caesar by stating ¿Julius Caesar, whose work is often quoted as a great authority to be accepted without argument, was, after all, a Roman soldier with political ambition a general who had set out to bring the entire Celtic world crushed under the heel of the Roman empire for his own political aggrandizement, '14'¿ but then quotes Caesar many times during his work. In particular, Mr. Ellis references Caesar when discussing the druids, a historical topic that has conjured up an extreme level of controversy amongst historians during the past. Since the druids advocated an oral society where history was handed down by word of mouth, the Celts committed little to writing, which explains why many historians cite Greek and Roman sources. Still, Mr. Ellis had the option to cite from many other sources other than the dogmatic Julius Caesar, but chose not to. Thus, the author seems to contradict himself by making Caesar a principal source in his book. Another flaw located throughout this book is the author¿s inability to properly cite sources. As one reads this book, one will notice the lack of footnotes. Every time Mr. Ellis quotes an ancient or modern source, he neither provides the page number nor the title of the book or document in which he selected the quote. In fact, during the chapter ti
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago