- Pub. Date:
- Columbia University Press
In Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief, Dan Arnold examines how the Brahmanical tradition of Purva Mimamsa and the writings of the seventh-century Buddhist Madhyamika philosopher Candrakirti challenged dominant Indian Buddhist views of epistemology. Arnold retrieves these two very different but equally important voices of philosophical dissent, showing them to have developed highly sophisticated and cogent critiques of influential Buddhist epistemologists such as Dignaga and Dharmakirti. His analysisdeveloped in conversation with modern Western philosophers like William Alston and J. L. Austinoffers an innovative reinterpretation of the Indian philosophical tradition, while suggesting that pre-modern Indian thinkers have much to contribute to contemporary philosophical debates.
In logically distinct ways, Purva Mimamsa and Candrakirti's Madhyamaka opposed the influential Buddhist school of thought that emphasized the foundational character of perception. Arnold argues that Mimamsaka arguments concerning the "intrinsic validity" of the earliest Vedic scriptures are best understood as a critique of the tradition of Buddhist philosophy stemming from Dignaga. Though often dismissed as antithetical to "real philosophy," Mimamsaka thought has affinities with the reformed epistemology that has recently influenced contemporary philosophy of religion.
Candrakirti's arguments, in contrast, amount to a principled refusal of epistemology. Arnold contends that Candrakirti marshals against Buddhist foundationalism an approach that resembles twentieth-century ordinary language philosophyand does so by employing what are finally best understood as transcendental arguments. The conclusion that Candrakirti's arguments thus support a metaphysical claim represents a bold new understanding of Madhyamaka.
|Publisher:||Columbia University Press|
|Product dimensions:||0.88(w) x 9.00(h) x 6.00(d)|
|Age Range:||18 Years|
Table of Contents
Introduction: On the Rational Reconstruction of South Asian Philosophy
Part I: Buddhist Foundationalism
1. Dignaga's Transformation of Buddhist Abhidharma
2. The Problems with Buddhist Foundationalism
Part II: The Reformed Epistemology of Purva Mimamsa
3. Nobody Is Seen Going to Heaven: Toward an Epistemology That Supports the Authority of the Vedas
4. Are the Vedas Are Intrinsically True? Prima Facie Justification and the Mimasaka Critique of Buddhist Foundationalism
Part III: The Metaphysical Arguments of Madhyamaka
5. A Philosophical Grammar for the Study of Madhyamaka
6. Candrakirti Against Bare Particulars: An Expression of Madhyamika Metaphysics
7. Is It Really True That Everything Is Empty? Candrakirti on Essencelessness as the Essence of Things
Conclusion: Justification and Truth, Relativism and Pragmatism: Some Lessons for Religious Studies