Free Shipping on Orders of $40 or More
Civil War Washington: History, Place, and Digital Scholarship

Civil War Washington: History, Place, and Digital Scholarship

by Susan C. Lawrence
Civil War Washington: History, Place, and Digital Scholarship

Civil War Washington: History, Place, and Digital Scholarship

by Susan C. Lawrence

NOOK Book(eBook)

$41.49 $55.00 Save 25% Current price is $41.49, Original price is $55. You Save 25%.

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now
LEND ME® See Details

Overview

While it is impossible to re-create the tumultuous Washington DC of the Civil War, Civil War Washington sets out to examine the nation’s capital during the Civil War along with the digital platform (civilwardc.org) that reimagines it during those turbulent years.

Among the many topics covered in the volume is the federal government’s experiment in compensated emancipation, which went into effect when all of the capital’s slaves were freed in April 1862. Another essay explores the city’s place as a major center of military hospitals, patients, and medical administration. Other contributors reflect on literature and the war, particularly on the poetry published in hospital newspapers and Walt Whitman’s formative experiences with the city and its wounded.

The digital project associated with this book offers a virtual examination of the nation’s capital from multiple perspectives. Through a collection of datasets, visual works, texts, and maps, the digital project offers a case study of the social, political, cultural, and scientific transitions provoked or accelerated by the Civil War. The book also provides insights into the complex and ever-shifting nature of ongoing digital projects while encouraging others to develop their own interpretations and participate in the larger endeavor of digital history.



Related collections and offers

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780803269910
Publisher: Nebraska
Publication date: 04/01/2015
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: NOOK Book
Pages: 240
File size: 2 MB

About the Author

Susan C. Lawrence is an associate professor of history at Ohio State University. She is the author of Charitable Knowledge: Hospital Pupils and Practitioners in Eighteenth-Century London.

Read an Excerpt

Civil War Washington

History, Place, and Digital Scholarship


By Susan C. Lawrence

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA PRESS

Copyright © 2015 Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-8032-6991-0



CHAPTER 1

Civil War Washington

The City and the Site

Susan C. Lawrence, Elizabeth Lorang, Brett Barney, and Kenneth M. Price


During the course of the Civil War, Washington DC required new infrastructure, layered on top of Pierre Charles L'Enfant's initial plans for the city streets, public spaces, and buildings. The city went from being barely defended to being the most fortified city in the world. It attracted a new and flourishing theatrical life and an equally flourishing trade in prostitution. Washington also became a city of hospitals—it went from having one to more than a hundred as all manner of places, including a blacksmith shop, were converted into institutions for the sick and wounded. In addition, the city's population more than tripled in four years, as forty thousand fugitive slaves and thousands of others—bureaucrats, actors, authors, nurses, and laborers, among them—were drawn to Washington. This huge influx of people requiring residences, transportation, and waste disposal necessitated the reimagining and reconfiguring of the nation's capital.

The Civil War Washington project has faced pressures that are at least metaphorically similar as we have strived to build a system adequate to house, move, sustain, and clean up after data rather than people. We would like to think that our methods are not as primitive as Washington's, which relied chiefly on pigs for garbage removal and a putrid canal for a sewer system. But we also recognize that we are in an experimental time for digital scholarship, and we cannot foresee how a later era will assess our own. On some level, constructing roads, buildings, and legal codes is akin to designing data structures, enabling data integration, and writing documentation. And on a more fundamental level, the infrastructural changes in Washington DC 155 years ago constitute part of the very data that we are now, in the twenty-first century, building frameworks to accommodate. Washington DC was a work in progress during the Civil War just as our Civil War Washington digital project is a work in progress, open-ended and lacking guarantees of success or even long-term survival because the preservation questions surrounding digital scholarship are not yet answered.

This collection presents a moment in the process of doing digital scholarship. Our choices about what to include in this volume provide some of the many possible answers to the questions "What do digital scholars do? What does digital scholarship actually look like?" The short answer, for this project at least, is that digital scholars collaborate, construct, and work with digital tools, enhance scholarship with digital resources, and share not only the results of our research but also the details of how data are compiled, structured, accessed, and displayed. We transcribe documents, plan searchable databases, create complexly layered maps based on archival resources, and make as much of this freely available on our site as we can so that other scholars will benefit from our labors and develop their own interpretations, including interpretations possibly in conflict with our own.

Digital scholars are actively engaged with interpretation and analysis throughout the process of building a project such as Civil War Washington. We make interpretive decisions about what materials to include, well aware that such decisions reflect the values and biases that scholars bring to their work. Our interpretations, moreover, are encoded throughout the electronic files that comprise the web site's content, from the analysis of the material and intellectual organization of the emancipation petitions embedded in the mark-up language of the Text Encoding Initiative, to the data models developed for the relational database. Data models are a growing genre of interpretive work in the humanities and require new forms of literacy in order to read and to appreciate their analytic structures. To that end, each section and subsection of the Civil War Washington site includes short essays that introduce both the materials presented and how they have been digitized, modeled, and encoded. The essays in this volume demonstrate yet another approach to communicating the interpretations we have made while working on this project: via long-form prose, a standard genre for humanities scholarship. From the time that we launched a live site to the moment we submitted this book for print publication, we have been making interpretive commitments and putting them into the world for others to assess.

We have chosen to simultaneously publish our essays in print and through open access on Civil War Washington (http://civilwardc.org/interpretations/). Even as the Center for Digital Research in the Humanities at UNL, together with a global library community, is actively working on best practices for data curation and the long-term accessibility of digital content, we have turned to print because it has a centuries-long record as a reliable, stable preservation medium. Simultaneous print publication and online access, furthermore, allows us to take advantage of what each form of publication handles best. For many, print remains the preferred format for reading long-form scholarship. Holding a book, feeling the paper when turning a page, perhaps engaging the author with a handwritten note in a margin, offer tactile experiences unmatched by interacting with digital media. Some, too, value the book's apparent physical stability: we trust that it will be the same object next week, or next year, as it is today. There are limits to print that do not exist with electronic texts, however. The online versions of the essays in this collection link directly to primary materials on the Civil War Washington website. The reader can examine some of the source documents, perform searches in the database, or manipulate the map side by side with each author's work. Adept digital users welcome site updates, moreover, including revisions to long-form essays, confident that today's digital scholars keep meticulous records of changes and that they archive versions of a website to preserve its intellectual integrity.

Another difference between publishing in print and publishing online speaks directly to the current state of the academy. Scholarship ought to be judged on the quality of the contribution rather than the mode of communication. Yet, despite the development of statements by professional associations recognizing the importance of fair evaluation of digital scholarship, digital humanities work may at times outpace the evolving institutional structures set up to vet it. The acceptance of new forms of scholarship remains uneven among academics, with some disciplines more open than others. While the imprimatur of a university press or scholarly journal are generally trusted means of establishing academic credibility, they are by no means infallible, and the most important proof of excellence or rigor has always rested on the accuracy and reliability of the research, the persuasiveness of the analysis, and the overall quality and significance of the work. The publication of these essays in both print and electronic formats is an effort to move the discussion away from the mode of communication to the significance of the work itself.

While we have first cast this collection as an engagement with issues in the digital humanities, it is also—and inextricably—an exploration of aspects of Washington DC during the Civil War. It is, in other words, a hybrid that illustrates what can be accomplished with an interdisciplinary team of scholars collaborating on a project organized around a web site that, from the start, aimed to open high-quality academic work to any online user. Gathering data, creating a complex mapping application, transcribing thousands of pages of documents, and putting them all onto an accessible, robust site with advanced search capabilities shaped our research interests not only as a group but also as individual scholars. We engaged with the site both as developers and as users, debating its content and structure together even as we followed our own areas of expertise to write these essays. We hope that the site and the essays inspire others to find new and interesting ways to think about and to understand the nation's capital during the bloodiest episode in American history. The rest of this introduction briefly outlines the development of the Civil War Washington digital project and the essays that appear in this collection.


Civil War Washington: The Site and the Essays

Our digital project developed organically out of the central research interests of scholars at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln (UNL) and the active support of the Center for Digital Research in the Humanities (CDRH). In 2005 Kenneth Price, a co-editor of The Walt Whitman Archive, concluded that the emerging interest in place-based digital research could suggest productive angles for work on Whitman. Literary scholars had focused little attention on Whitman's years in Washington, preferring instead to devote more place-based analysis to the poet's early residence in New York. Whitman left behind a voluminous amount of material rooted in the capital, from published work to notebooks to personal correspondence to the thousands of recently identified documents he produced as a clerk in the Attorney General's Office. Whitman's time in Washington overlapped with that of Abraham Lincoln, and their paths sometimes crossed as they navigated the city streets. At UNL, Price's path crossed with that of Kenneth Winkle, an accomplished Abraham Lincoln scholar with an interest in community-based studies and the use of statistical data in historical analysis. In conversations with CRDH experts, Price and Winkle decided that concentrating on the physical spaces Lincoln and Whitman inhabited and traversed had the makings of a collaborative digital project, one that stood a good chance of generating useful scholarship.

In October 2006 the project was "Lincoln and Whitman in Washington DC." By February 2007 we had decided to limit our scope to the years of the war, so the project was renamed "Abraham Lincoln, Walt Whitman, and Washington DC during the Civil War." Susan Lawrence, an expert in the history of medicine, became one of the co-directors of the project in August 2007, and that increased our attention to the care of the sick and wounded and the extraordinary proliferation of hospitals in Washington. In August 2007, therefore, we devised a new title that emphasized the radical changes taking place in Washington on the medical front as well as in other dimensions of life: "Civil War Washington: Studies in Transformation." Our current title is the most ambitious of them all: simply Civil War Washington. We ultimately abandoned the phrase "studies in transformation" because we wanted to attend to important continuities in the city even as we tracked dramatic changes. Among the various implications of these several revisions of the project's title, the simultaneous temporal narrowing and thematic expansion of its scope seem especially important. From all of the years that Lincoln and Whitman spent in the city we decided to treat just the four years of the war. And rather than spotlight just two individuals, we have widened our view to encompass the entire District of Columbia.

Changing the focus of the project from Whitman and Lincoln in Washington to the whole District during the Civil War years meant that the amount of information that we might consider relevant exploded. Among other things, this has meant that we have spent as much time, if not more, working with data about ordinary citizens and soldiers, drawn from such sources as census records, newspapers, and lists of bawdy houses, as we have with data related to famous politicians, doctors, or writers. At the same time, the process of applying for grants to support our work meant that we had to articulate a set of research questions within a project that we would be able to complete in a multi-year grant period. We proposed to further our understanding of slavery and race in Washington DC and received a National Endowment for the Humanities Collaborative Research grant for this purpose in 2010. This grant enabled us to focus on the District's Compensated Emancipation Act of April 1862 and to make available and fully searchable the 1,127 petitions filed by DC slaveholders for remuneration for the slaves who were thereby freed. We chose to concentrate on the petitions (the originals are located in the U.S. National Archives) because they include the names, ages, and descriptions of every slave freed, along with additional, sometimes lengthy, documentation of both their personal and family histories. Even just browsing through the files online offers a remarkably vivid portrait of an entire community of people at the moment of transition from slavery to freedom.

Two essays in this volume, the multi-authored "Developing Civil War Washington" (chapter 2), and Rob Shepard's "Historical Geography, GIS, and Civil War Washington" (chapter 3), present the challenges of creating and maintaining the Civil War Washington web site and its visual centerpiece, a digitized version of Albert Boschke's Topographical Map of the District of Columbia (1861). Readers lacking interest in the technical aspects of digital scholarship may wish to skip chapter 2 and most of chapter 3. We have placed them at the front of this collection, however, because their arguments are central to the practice of digital scholarship as it currently stands. Decisions made about platforms, database design, and map transformations quite literally shape how information can be collected, categorized, and displayed. None of those steps are mere neutral transformations of passive data. We had to define "place," for example. When a church was appropriated for use as a hospital, did it become a different place? The structure could be both places in the database but not exactly on the map (churches and hospitals have different icons; we did not create a church-hospital icon). How could we date an event, such as the opening of a hospital, when we had month and a year, but no day, when "date" meant a specific day in a specific month in a specific year? (See chapter 2 for the answer.) Because we want the site to be used for an array of research purposes, we cannot foresee all the ways researchers might wish to use the data. By making as many of our decisions as transparent as possible, and by providing much of the underlying data in downloadable formats, we hope to give researchers the ability to apply their own theoretical and methodological perspectives to the materials.

Rob Shepard's essay does more than describe the steps taken to construct a georeferenced version of an iconic historical map. In the last part of his essay, he illustrates the potential of digital tools to illuminate patterns that are otherwise very hard to observe without a great deal of repetitive, painstaking mapping by hand. We have linked the 1860 census data for Ward One (the area close to the president's executive mansion) to the map and, as Shepard shows, can begin to understand the geospatial configuration of Washington by race and by class. Shepard's work also illustrates the difference between what can be done with desktop software applications and what may be done using a web interface. Some digital tools are as yet too complex for full web deployment but are available to experts offline. For such researchers, we have made the map files downloadable. This is an important reminder that "digital scholarship" is not synonymous with "web-based scholarship." The web-based map application nevertheless offers a vital heuristic tool, a way to visualize spatial relationships and connections that may inspire other scholars to seek out more advanced technologies to address their research questions.

Shepard's essay is one example of the way that digital tools can enhance scholarship. The rest of the essays in our volume demonstrate more subtle intersections between the construction of Civil War Washington as a digital project and the specific research interests of the project's participants. As noted above, the project developed organically from Price's and Winkle's own areas of expertise, Whitman and Lincoln, respectively. Lawrence added the history of medicine. Lorang added her proficiency with literary studies of newspapers and war poetry. It is thus hardly surprising that we paid attention to emancipation (one of Lincoln's great goals), to hospitals and medical cases, to poetry in hospital newspapers, and to Whitman's experience of Washington DC during the war as the foci of our work, rather than bawdy houses, theater performances, or the politics of the District's religious congregations. Each of our essays depended upon, grew out of, is integrated with the digital project. The end results—the essays—nevertheless appear in a familiar prose genre. Digital scholarship does not mean that the final research medium must only be digital, with interactive maps or online real-time data visualization. For us, at least, it means that digital tools and access to digitized materials were vital for our research processes, in ways that are more or less explicit in the final written results.


(Continues...)

Excerpted from Civil War Washington by Susan C. Lawrence. Copyright © 2015 Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. Excerpted by permission of UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA PRESS.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Table of Contents

Contents

List of Illustrations,
Acknowledgments,
1. Civil War Washington: The City and the Site Susan C. Lawrence, Elizabeth Lorang, Brett Barney, and Kenneth M. Price,
2. Developing Civil War Washington Katherine L. Walter, Elizabeth Lorang, Stacy Rickel, and Karin Dalziel,
3. Historical Geography, GIS, and Civil War Washington Rob Shepard,
4. Emancipation in the District of Columbia Kenneth J. Winkle,
5. Mining the Compensated Emancipation Petitions Kenneth J. Winkle,
6. Military Hospitals in the Department of Washington Susan C. Lawrence,
7. Reading Civil War Medical Cases Susan C. Lawrence,
8. Poetry, Washington DC's Hospital Newspapers, and the Civil War Elizabeth Lorang,
9. Walt Whitman and Civil War Washington Kenneth M. Price,
Contributors,
Index,

Customer Reviews