Collective Bargaining and Increased Competition for Resources in Local Government

Collective Bargaining and Increased Competition for Resources in Local Government

by Arthur W. Spengler


Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for delivery by Thursday, January 27


Local government employees have a higher propensity to engage in collective bargaining than do private sector employees. This springs from the tight competition in the local budgeting process among those requesting, paying for, and providing services. Spengler looks at this trend using a fiscal discontent hypothesis. This approach suggests that the taxpayer revolts during the 1970s and 1980s limited the budget discretion of elected officials and forced public sector employees to turn to collective voice and action to better compete for scarce public resources.

Two levels of employee collective voice are examined: the weaker form of organizing and the stronger collective bargaining model. Substantial differences in the use of each are analyzed based on employee occupation, state, and type of local government. Scholars, business practitioners, policy makers, and researchers in public administration, labor relations, public policy, and local government will find this study an important contribution to understanding the phenomenon of organized collective voice.

Related collections and offers

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781567202908
Publisher: ABC-CLIO, Incorporated
Publication date: 08/30/1999
Pages: 256
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.75(d)

About the Author

ARTHUR W. SPENGLER spent 19 years on the staff of the county council for Montgomery County, Maryland, serving as its staff director and principal policy advisor for eight years./e He has worked as a policy and fiscal analyst for the county and federal governments. Recently, he has been a full-time member of the faculty at George Mason University.

Table of Contents


The Framework

The Voice of the Taxpayers

The Voice of the Employees

Employee Whispers and Shouts

When Voices Meet

A Case Study: Montgomery County, Maryland

Conclusions and Future Research


Customer Reviews