The Birth of a Nation

The Birth of a Nation

Director: D.W. Griffith Cast: Henry B. Walthall, Miriam Cooper, Mae Marsh
3.8 12

Item is available through our marketplace sellers.


Overview

The Birth of a Nation

The most successful and artistically advanced film of its time, The Birth of a Nation has also sparked protests, riots, and divisiveness since its first release. The film tells the story of the Civil War and its aftermath, as seen through the eyes of two families. The Stonemans hail from the North, the Camerons from the South. When war breaks out, the Stonemans cast their lot with the Union, while the Camerons are loyal to Dixie. After the war, Ben Cameron (Henry B. Walthall), distressed that his beloved south is now under the rule of blacks and carpetbaggers, organizes several like-minded Southerners into a secret vigilante group called the Ku Klux Klan. When Cameron's beloved younger sister Flora (Mae Marsh) leaps to her death rather than surrender to the lustful advances of renegade slave Gus (Walter Long), the Klan wages war on the new Northern-inspired government and ultimately restores "order" to the South. In the original prints, Griffith suggested that the black population be shipped to Liberia, citing Abraham Lincoln as the inspiration for this ethnic cleansing. Showings of Birth of a Nation were picketed and boycotted from the start, and as recently as 1995, Turner Classic Movies cancelled a showing of a restored print in the wake of the racial tensions around the O.J. Simpson trial verdict.

Product Details

Release Date: 11/21/2000
UPC: 0017078913828
Original Release: 1915
Rating: NR
Source: Sling Shot
Region Code: 0
Sound: [Dolby Digital]

Cast & Crew

Performance Credits
Henry B. Walthall Ben Cameron, the Little Colonel
Miriam Cooper Margaret Cameron
Mae Marsh Flora Cameron, the Little Sister
Lillian Gish Elsie Stoneman
Robert Harron Ted Stoneman
Ralph Lewis The Honorable Austin Stoneman, Leader of the House
Wallace Reid Jeff, the blacksmith
George Siegmann Silas Lynch
George Andre Beranger Wade Cameron
Monte Blue Actor
William de Vaull Jake
Joseph Henaberry Abraham Lincoln
Jennifer Lee Cindy, The Faithful Mummy
Eugene Pallette Wounded Enemy to Whom Ben Gives Succor
Sul Te Wan Actor
Alberta Lee Mrs. Lincoln
Elmo Lincoln White Arm Joe
Walter Long Gus, a Renegade Negro
Bessie Love Piedmont girl
Maxfield Stanley Duke Cameron
Charles Stevens Volunteer
Erich Von Stroheim Man who falls from Roof
Raoul Walsh John Wilkes Booth
Violet Wilkey Flora as a child
Tom Wilson Stoneman's Negro Servant
Gibson Gowland Actor
Spottiswood Aitken Dr. Cameron
Mary Alden Lydia Brown, Stoneman's Mulatto Housekeeper
Donald Crisp Gen. Ulysses S. Grant
Josephine Crowell Mrs. Cameron
Sam de Grasse Sen. Charles Sumner
William Freeman Sentry
Howard Gaye Gen. Robert E. Lee
Olga Grey Laura Keene
Elmer Clifton Phil Stoneman
John Ford Klansman

Technical Credits
D.W. Griffith Director,Score Composer,Producer,Screenwriter
Billy Bitzer Cinematographer
Thomas F. Dixen Screenwriter
Robert Goldstein Costumes/Costume Designer
Mont Alto Motion Picture Orchestra Score Composer
James Smith Editor
Frank E. Woods Screenwriter

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Birth of a Nation 3.8 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 12 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
The Birth Of A Nation tells history as it was, not as the drippy pc revisionists would have it. White masters treating slaves humanely valor on both sides of the Civil War war crimes carried out against Southerners during the war cruel & unjust despotic rule of the occupied South and the Klan riding heroicly to the rescue of the oppressed White Southerners, restoring majority rule in the South. Something definately needed these days!!!
Guest More than 1 year ago
This movie was, and remains, one of the greatest films ever produced. Yes, in the year 2007 it is obviosuly biased, yes, it is offensive, and yes, you should be angry that people in the United States once actually held the views espoused in this film as a majority opinion. But, to use this as an excuse to say it is anything less than one of two or three of the most groundbreaking films of all time shows another form of bias. People who encourage censorship or avoidance of this film, also might like to pretend that history never happened, or that Griffith was not singlehandedly writing the language of cinema. I am always saddened that people like some of the other reviewers here would pan the entire concept of the filmmakers art because they disagree with the objectives of the content. They would take this otherwise excellent film and lock it up so that nobody could ever view it. I think it is far better that a film like this be seen in context, with a rational explanation of the history behind it. It is far more educational, far more entertaining, and far more honest. The story is a relic of a bygone and less informed era, a reflection of the times in which it was written. It is easy to hate for its terrible stereotypes and attitudes. However, putting aside one's own modern sensibilities, and appreciating the film and story for what it is, it is readly seen as a very well constructed film, with a complex and flowing story and tremendous innovation that has, along with Intolerance and a few other films of that early era, set a standard of filmic prose for almost 100 years. Apart from the terrible stereotypes and extreme poetic license in presenting history, it is still a compelling story, with a real knack for presenting the viewpoints and emotions of the individual characters. It is involving and believable, and transcends the passage of time "as do most of the best silent films". This a great film. It is perhaps not the first silent film one should see, but at some point, every film enthusiast, and every person interested in the history of race relations in the United States, owes it to him or herself to see this movie.
Guest More than 1 year ago
One must keep in mind that this movie is known for its new techniques and methods for filmography, not for the story line. The year which it was released should say a lot both in the quality of acting, filmography, and the cultural mindset of the United States at the time.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This is a movie that everyone should check out. Even as a family. This is the most accurate portrayal of what it was like during the Civil War era. It made me feel like it was the good old days again...Grab this one. It will make you feel good. BY: TJ
Guest More than 1 year ago
This film stars beautiful Lillian Gish, Mae Marsh, Miriam Cooper, Wallace Reid and Eugene Pallette. It¿s the story two families during Southern reconstruction and the Civil War. This film will be a memorable and gripping viewing experience. Subsequent viewings only make this film better and better. With superb performances from all of its actors and D.W. Griffith's direction, this is a must see!
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
D.W. Griffith, when he wrote and directed this, overstepped a line. There were no Negro actors or actresses in "Birth.....", just a bunch of White people doing White vs. Black. How could a white man possibly have any idea of what a Negroe felt as a slave? Dissapointing. D.W. Griffith did a little better 1 years later with the original "Ben-Hur". But this is very disappointing.
Guest More than 1 year ago
As I am a proud member of the "drippy politically correct community", I should say I am also a proud white Southerner, but of the Liberal genre! Enough about me, great film that really is comparable to the propaganda films in authoritarian states. I am a knack for silent films and this one is a jewel.
Guest More than 1 year ago
The movie was not that signifigant, if we must look at a mere film to gain our understanding of history we are lost. To say that this is the greatest film ever is an injustice to the film industry. The ignorance of the film maker out weighs any potential value that this film may bring to anyone, regardless of it's teaching of history. As an Afrikan-American the treatment recieved by the whites in this movie is like apples and oranges compared to the racism that was going on then and is still going on now. Also, comments like those made by the Lone Wolf are indicative to not only our NATIONAL problems but also our WORLD problems, so , if we have an accurate account of history and not just Rome and beyond, then the reviewer would probably hate himself instead of the Fathers of Civilization"Beggining-modern times" and their heroic children. The greatest thing I took from the movie is that white supremacy was and still is the American way no matter how you dilute it it is still the straw that stirrs the cup. While I don't say rack it, I don't think it should be shown to any one other than those that are intertested in it as it is no different than watching porn, with it's tasteless use of black face and degrading language. This was the past and could be seen as that, if I was not told what context to take this and many other race related things.
Guest More than 1 year ago
If I could, I would give this movie a zero. I'm sorry, but I was disgusted with this film. I had to watch this in US History while my teacher was out for like a week. Everyone was very offended by the whole "blackface" thing. And for the worksheet we had to complete, I wrote all the answers sarcastically, so did the rest of the class. At the end of the class period my class wrote a note to my teacher to never show this movie EVER again.