Imagine a country where the right to vote is not guaranteed by the Constitution, where the candidate with the most votes loses, and where paperwork requirements and bureaucratic bungling disenfranchise millions. You're living in it. If the consequences weren't so serious, it would be funny.
A concise handbook designed as a fact-filled companion to the forthcoming PBS documentary starring political satirist and commentator Mo Rocca, Electoral Dysfunction illuminates a broad array of issues, including: the Founding Fathers' decision to omit the right to vote from the Constitution—and the legal system's patchwork response to this omission; the battle over voter ID, voter impersonation, and voter fraud; the foul-ups that plague Election Day, from ballot design to contested recounts; the role of partisan officials in running elections; and the antidemocratic origins and impact of the Electoral College. The book concludes with a prescription for a healthy voting system crafted by leading voting-reform experts, whose agenda for change includes a call for universal voter registration and unform national standards.
Published in the run-up to the 2012 election, Electoral Dysfunction is for readers across the political spectrum who want their vote to count.
|Publisher:||New Press, The|
|Sold by:||Barnes & Noble|
|File size:||4 MB|
About the Author
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
I read some of it and came to conclusion that when someone says bipartisan or nonpartisan, they mean to the left. Victoria writes well, but if you pay attention to a more detailed explanation on the voter id, she takes sides and phrases an opinion it would be discouraging the voters more aka voter suppression, basically saying proving that you are eligible to vote is discouraging to the voters according to her. She says that having to use Voter ID, which by the way is a regular ID that you need in many aspects of most people's lives, is a voter suppression. She claims that Republicans want voter ID and Democrats call it voter suppression and fight it, but yet she takes the side of discouraged voters when it comes to proving you are eligible and not fraudulent. She also takes it upon herself to explain some articles of our constitution, which she does well, but yet presenting the side of voting being phrased to suppress those who were slaves in some states, rather than the fact the the voting was phrased indirectly for south to not get the votes needed and therefore try to abolish the slavery from the north. If she was in fact bipartisan or nonpartisan, she would have known to properly explain those several items that I mentioned here. This book fails to be bipartisan, but yet claims to be. Hypocritical is more like it, but well written as far as pretending to be bipartisan or nonpartisan. If you are looking for explanation on the voting process, she does relatively good job, but if you think that this is an open minded opinion without taking sides, you would be mistaken and therefore somewhat swayed to one sided direction of the political spectrum.