EU Criminal Law after Lisbon: Rights, Trust and the Transformation of Justice in Europe
336EU Criminal Law after Lisbon: Rights, Trust and the Transformation of Justice in Europe
336Hardcover
-
PICK UP IN STORECheck Availability at Nearby Stores
Available within 2 business hours
Related collections and offers
Overview
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9781849466486 |
---|---|
Publisher: | Bloomsbury Academic |
Publication date: | 06/30/2016 |
Series: | Hart Studies in European Criminal Law , #1 |
Pages: | 336 |
Product dimensions: | 6.14(w) x 9.21(h) x 0.75(d) |
About the Author
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements v
Table of Cases xiii
Table of Legislation xix
1 Introduction 1
2 The Constitutionalisation of EU Criminal Law After Lisbon 4
I Introduction 4
II The Constitutionalisation of EU Criminal Law 5
A Constitutionalisation at EU level: Institutions, Principles, Rights 5
B Constitutionalisation and the Member States: Focusing on Transposition and Implementation 11
C Constitutionalisation as Interdependence. Towards a More Coherent EU Criminal Policy 13
III The Persistence of National Diversity 14
IV The Competence Debate-Contested Competence 19
A Contested Competence: Member States v The EU-The Lissabon-Urteil 19
B Contested Competence and Inter-institutional Balance: The Road Traffic Offences Directive Case 21
C Contested Competence and Inter-institutional Balance: The Internal/External Dimension-The Case of Terrorist Sanctions 25
V The Limits of Subsidiarity 40
VI The Limits of Justice À-la-Carte: Variable Geometry and the Case of the United Kingdom 44
VII Conclusion 50
3 Defining EU Competence in Substantive Criminal Law: From Securitised to Functional Criminalisation 53
I Introduction 53
II The Constitutional Politics of Criminalisation Before Lisbon: The Interplay Between Securitised and Functional Criminalisation 54
III EU Competence to Criminalise After Lisbon: Securitised and Functional Criminalisation Revisited 57
A Securitised Criminalisation-Article 83(1) TFEU 58
B Functional Criminalisation-Article 83(2) TFEU 60
C The Extent of EU Competence to Criminalise: Minimum Rules 62
IV The Relationship Between Criminal and Adminstrative Law 63
V Extending EU Competence to Criminalise Elsewhere in the Treaty 65
VI Policy Responses to the EU Competence to Criminalise After Lisbon 68
VII The Lisbon Treaty and the Impact on National Criminal Law 72
A Effectiveness and National Criminal Law: Decriminalisation 73
B Effectiveness as Assimilation: Over-criminalisation 74
VIII Conclusion 80
4 The Rocky Road to European Prosecution: Caught Between Co-ordination and Centralisation 83
I Introduction 83
II Horizontal Co-ordination via the Protection of Fundamental Rights: The Emergence of a Transnational Ne Bis In Idem Principle 84
III Horizontal Co-ordination via the Establishment of Common Standards-The Case of Decisions on Choice of Forum and Conflicts of Jurisdiction 91
IV Towards Vertical Co-ordination: The Evolution and Powers of Eurojust 94
A The Commission's Proposal for a Eurojust Regulation 96
B The Council General Approach 101
V Towards the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office-Ambitions and Limits to Centralisation 103
A Structure and Powers of the European Public Prosecutor's Office 104
B Competence, Scope, Territoriality 109
C Judicial Review of the European Public Prosecutor's Office at EU Level 113
i Constitutional Challenges from Limiting EU Judicial Review for Acts of the EPPO 113
ii Judicial Review of Investigation Decisions and Acts: Lessons from OLAF 117
VI The Quest for Coherence in Prosecution in a Fragmented Area of Criminal Justice 119
VII Conclusion 121
5 Mutual Recognition and Mutual Trust in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice: The Centrality of Fundamental Rights 124
I Introduction 124
II Mutual Recognition as Legal Pluralism 125
III Establishing Limits to Automatic Recognition: The Role of Fundamental Rights 129
A Fundamental Rights as Grounds for Refusal in the European Arrest Warrant Case-Law 131
B Fundamental Rights as Limits to Automatic Recognition: Lessons from European Asylum Law 136
C Mutual Trust and Fundamental Rights: The Impact of Opinion 2/13 140
IV Proportionality as a Limit to Mutual Recognition 142
V Mutual Recognition, Mutual Trust and the Rule of Law 147
VI Conclusion: From Presumed to Earned Trust in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice 151
6 Legislating for Human Rights: The EU Legal Framework on the Rights of Individuals in Criminal Proceedings 153
I Introduction 153
II The Rocky Road Towards EU Law on the Rights of the Defendant Before Lisbon 154
III The Lisbon Breakthrough-The Attribution of An Express (Albeit Functional) Competence to the European Union to Legislate on the Rights of the Individual in Criminal Procedure 156
IV The Renewed Momentum Towards EU Procedural Rights in the Light of Lisbon 158
V The Content of EU Procedural Rights 160
A The Directive on the Right to Interpretation and Translation 161
B The Directive on the Right to Information 162
C The Directive on the Right of Access to a Lawyer 165
VI Horizontal Issues: The Scope and Level of Protection of Procedural Rights After Lisbon 171
VII The Impact of EU Procedural Rights on National Legal Systems: Enforcement and Implementation of Rights 175
VIII The Impact of EU Procedural Rights on National Legal Diversity-The Role of Autonomous Concepts 176
IX Variable Geometry and EU Procedural Rights-The Quest for Coherence 180
X Conclusion: Towards a Paradigm Change in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice 183
7 The Place of the Victim in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice 185
I Introduction 185
II Victims' Rights in EU Criminal Law-A Typology 186
A Victims' Rights as Free Movement Rights 187
B Mutual Recognition 188
C Harmonisation 190
III The Place of the Victim in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice: Constitutional Implications 195
IV The Impact of EU Law on Victims' Rights on National Criminal Justice Systems 199
A Mutual Recognition 199
B Harmonisation 202
V The Impact of Victims' Rights on Justice in Europe 206
VI Conclusion 210
8 The Uneasy Relationship Between EU Criminal Law and Citizenship of the Union 212
I Introduction 212
II Citizenship in EU Criminal Law 212
A EU Citizenship in the European Arrest Warrant 213
B EU Citizenship in the EU System on Transfer of Prisoners 220
III EU Criminal Law in EU Citizenship 223
A The Impact of Secondary EU Criminal Law on EU Citizenship-Tsakouridis 223
B The Impact of Primary EU Criminal Law on EU Citizenship: Article 83(1) TFEU and P.I. 227
IV Conclusion: Towards a Paradigm Change in Citizenship and EU Criminal Law 234
9 The European Union and Preventive Justice. The Case of Terrorist Sanctions 236
I Introduction 236
II Preventive Justice via 'Global Administrative Law': The Role of the UN Security Council 237
III Implementation of the UN Security Council Resolutions by the European Union 241
IV Judicial Review of the EU Implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions: Kadi I 245
V Judicial Review of the EU Implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions: Kadi II 249
VI Extending the Preventive Justice Framework in the Field of Counter-Terrorism: The Case of Measures on 'Foreign Fighters' 257
VII Conclusion: Preventive Justice and the Limits of Procedural Justice 260
10 Conclusion. Placing the Individual at the Heart of European Criminal Justice 263
A The Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on National Legal Diversity-From Cooperation and Mutual Recognition to Interdependence and Harmonisation 264
B The Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the Relationship Between the Individual and the State-The Growing Importance of Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law 266
C The Promise of Rights-The Individual at the Heart of European Criminal Justice 270
Bibliography 272
Index 287