Foundations of Biopolitics
The term "biopolitics" had long been in use when it was brought into vogue in Academia by Michel Foucault to designate the liberal administration of health, hygiene, food, sexuality, the birth rate, etc., through various flexible and continuous measures such as nsurance pressures, proposed hygiene rules, incentive policies, with a view to controlling individuals and populations. The French sociologist Jacques de Mahieu (1915-1990), who used it as early as in the 1950s, gives it a quite different meaning: "In the course of our research, we shall see that the ethnic problem, when it has we shall see that the ethnic problem, when it has such, there is a question of the same order, which is already hinted at in everyday language. We say of a human being, as we do of a horse, that it "has breeding". This does not mean that he belongs to a particular ethnic group, but rather that he is distinguished by certain characters within his ethnic group. Once we have established that these characters are hereditary, we will have to admit, willingly or not, that within racial groups, there are categories of the same biopsychic nature as ethnic communities, in the true sense of the word. And once we have seen that these categories are of social importance, we will have to supplement ethnopolitics with genopolitics, and consider all hereditary processes, insofar as they play a part in the life of human communities. This is what biopolitics is all about."
1145220330
Foundations of Biopolitics
The term "biopolitics" had long been in use when it was brought into vogue in Academia by Michel Foucault to designate the liberal administration of health, hygiene, food, sexuality, the birth rate, etc., through various flexible and continuous measures such as nsurance pressures, proposed hygiene rules, incentive policies, with a view to controlling individuals and populations. The French sociologist Jacques de Mahieu (1915-1990), who used it as early as in the 1950s, gives it a quite different meaning: "In the course of our research, we shall see that the ethnic problem, when it has we shall see that the ethnic problem, when it has such, there is a question of the same order, which is already hinted at in everyday language. We say of a human being, as we do of a horse, that it "has breeding". This does not mean that he belongs to a particular ethnic group, but rather that he is distinguished by certain characters within his ethnic group. Once we have established that these characters are hereditary, we will have to admit, willingly or not, that within racial groups, there are categories of the same biopsychic nature as ethnic communities, in the true sense of the word. And once we have seen that these categories are of social importance, we will have to supplement ethnopolitics with genopolitics, and consider all hereditary processes, insofar as they play a part in the life of human communities. This is what biopolitics is all about."
19.62 In Stock
Foundations of Biopolitics

Foundations of Biopolitics

by Jacques de Mahieu
Foundations of Biopolitics

Foundations of Biopolitics

by Jacques de Mahieu

Paperback

$19.62 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Ships in 1-2 days
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

The term "biopolitics" had long been in use when it was brought into vogue in Academia by Michel Foucault to designate the liberal administration of health, hygiene, food, sexuality, the birth rate, etc., through various flexible and continuous measures such as nsurance pressures, proposed hygiene rules, incentive policies, with a view to controlling individuals and populations. The French sociologist Jacques de Mahieu (1915-1990), who used it as early as in the 1950s, gives it a quite different meaning: "In the course of our research, we shall see that the ethnic problem, when it has we shall see that the ethnic problem, when it has such, there is a question of the same order, which is already hinted at in everyday language. We say of a human being, as we do of a horse, that it "has breeding". This does not mean that he belongs to a particular ethnic group, but rather that he is distinguished by certain characters within his ethnic group. Once we have established that these characters are hereditary, we will have to admit, willingly or not, that within racial groups, there are categories of the same biopsychic nature as ethnic communities, in the true sense of the word. And once we have seen that these categories are of social importance, we will have to supplement ethnopolitics with genopolitics, and consider all hereditary processes, insofar as they play a part in the life of human communities. This is what biopolitics is all about."

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9782493842145
Publisher: Cariou
Publication date: 03/31/2024
Pages: 136
Sales rank: 1,143,472
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.29(d)

About the Author

Jacques de Mahieu joined Action Française at a very young age. The arrest of his mentor Charles Maurras in September 1944 led him to leave Europe for Argentina, which was more welcoming. Juan Perón took up his theses on social corporatism. His activities gradually turned towards sociology, anthropology and ethnology. He defined the place of the individual within society as dependent on heredity and the influence of the environment. He devoted a Précis de biopolitique (1969) to the study and evolution of man, criticising multi-ethnic societies and the pressure of demographic migration.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews