Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Good Doctors: The Medical Committee for Human Rights and the Struggle for Social Justice in Health Care

Good Doctors: The Medical Committee for Human Rights and the Struggle for Social Justice in Health Care

4.3 3
by John Dittmer

See All Formats & Editions

In the summer of 1964 medical professionals, mostly white and northern, organized the Medical Committee for Human Rights (MCHR) to provide care and support for civil rights activists organizing black voters in Mississippi. They left their lives and lucrative private practices to march beside and tend the wounds of demonstrators from Freedom Summer, the March on


In the summer of 1964 medical professionals, mostly white and northern, organized the Medical Committee for Human Rights (MCHR) to provide care and support for civil rights activists organizing black voters in Mississippi. They left their lives and lucrative private practices to march beside and tend the wounds of demonstrators from Freedom Summer, the March on Selma, and the Chicago Democratic Convention of 1968. Galvanized and sometimes radicalized by their firsthand view of disenfranchised communities, the MCHR soon expanded its mission to encompass a range of causes from poverty to the war in Vietnam. They later took on the whole of the United States healthcare system. MCHR doctors soon realized fighting segregation would mean not just caring for white volunteers, but also exposing and correcting shocking inequalities in segregated health care. They pioneered community health plans and brought medical care to underserved or unserved areas.

Though education was the most famous battleground for integration, the appalling injustice of segregated health care levelled equally devastating consequences. Award-winning historian John Dittmer, author of the classic civil rights history Local People: The Struggle for Civil Rights in Mississippi, has written an insightful and moving account of a group of idealists who put their careers in the service of the motto “Health Care Is a Human Right.”

Editorial Reviews

Library Journal

Emerging during the civil rights struggle in the South in the early 1960s, the Medical Committee for Human Rights (MCHR) suffered from a chronic identity crisis and continuous internal turmoil but still left a significant legacy. First providing support for civil rights workers, the many doctors, nurses, and others who were part of MCHR also challenged the American Medical Association's tolerance of racism in its affiliates, worked to desegregate and bring more equity to health care, and helped give rise to the widespread creation of community health centers. Disagreements over organizational structure and where MCHR's political focus should be led to its gradual dissolution in the 1980s. Dittmer (history, DePauw Univ.; Local People: The Struggle for Civil Rights in Mississippi) uses interviews plus other primary and secondary sources to shed light on an organization that has remained largely unchronicled. Clearly presented and absorbing, this is recommended for public libraries as well as academic and medical libraries with medical history collections.
—Dick Maxwell

Kirkus Reviews
Civil-rights historian Dittmer (History/DePauw Univ.; Local People: The Struggle for Civil Rights in Mississippi, 1994) focuses on one of the lesser-known groups involved in the struggle. The author acknowledges that his coverage of the Medical Committee for Human Rights in the Bancroft Prize-winning Local People was inadequate. Here he tells the full story of this activist health-care organization, linking its aims and accomplishments with larger struggles. The MCHR, founded by left-wing, white, mostly Jewish doctors and joined by African-Americans, had a dual mission-to provide medical care for civil-rights workers in Mississippi during Freedom Summer (1964) and to reform the South's Jim Crow health-care system. Dittmer reveals the motivations of many of the organization's leaders, and he paints a disturbing picture of the shameful treatment of both black doctors and patients in the South. In the early chapters he writes vividly of the challenges facing civil-rights workers and of the brutality-beatings, jailings, killings-inflicted on them. The narrative pace slows when the author shifts attention to the political controversies and internal ideological disputes that led to the group's decline. Dittmer documents the disintegration of the MCHR following the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the rise of the black-militant movement. Northern white liberals began to question their role in the organization, and a rift was growing between those who saw it as the medical arm of the civil-rights movement and those who believed its mission should be to address the health-care needs of all poor people, regardless of race. By the late '60s the MCHR had become a cash-strapped loose federation oflargely independent local chapters. The author argues that it should be remembered for its role in desegregating Southern hospitals and medical societies, creating comprehensive community-health centers, shaping health-care legislation and providing a model for subsequent activist health organizations, such as Partners in Health. A stark reminder not just of the actions of a group of idealistic activists but of the violence and turmoil of the nation's not-so-distant past. Author tour to Chicago, Cincinnati, Oxford and Jackson, Miss. Agent: Carol Mann/Carol Mann Agency
From the Publisher

“Civil rights historian Dittmer focuses on one of the lesser-known groups involved in the struggle. . . . Dittmer reveals the motivations of many of the organization’s leaders, and he paints a disturbing picture of the shameful treatment of both black doctors and patients in the South. In the early chapters, he writes vividly of the challenges facing civil rights workers and of the brutality—beatings, jailings, killings—inflicted on them. . . . A stark reminder not just of the actions of a group of idealistic activists but of the violence and turmoil of the nation’s not-so-distant past.”


The Good Doctors provides an engaging and well-written account of how the medical community became involved in the civil rights movement, not as spectators but on the front lines—in some cases risking their lives to fight against social and political injustice.”

Journal of the American Medical Association

“A significant contribution to historical analysis of the 1960s . . . [that’s] particularly timely today. Dittmer’s satisfying work delivers both historical detail and contextual nuance in an illuminating discussion that fills in a previous gap in the scholarly literature.”

American Historical Review

The Good Doctors describes a unique historical event in our ongoing struggles for civil rights and social justice: how hundreds of doctors, nurses, medical students, psychologists and other health professionals came to join Mississippi’s ‘Freedom Summer’ in 1964 and served as a volunteer medical corps for the civil rights movement. They went on to help launch a nationwide community health center network for the poor and underserved.”

—H. Jack Geiger, MD, professor emeritus, CUNY Medical School

“This book is an historical landmark. Dittmer’s chronicle of civil rights health care workers is captivating. All of us need to appreciate these brave pioneers.”

—Alvin F. Poussaint, MD, Harvard Medical School

“The good doctors of John Dittmer’s history of the Medical Committee for Human Rights labored at the crossroads of American medicine and American racism. Forty years later the nation chose for its President a Black man committed to universal health care, an incredible valedictory to the risky and humanistic work of the MCHR. The Good Doctors relates the beginning of that American journey, the story of health workers confronting a system hardwired to deliver second-class medicine to people of color. The Good Doctors is an important, dramatic, and timely contribution to our understanding of racism in medicine and health equity in America.”

—Fitzhugh Mullan, MD, George Washington University

“Those who think themselves familiar with the civil rights movement in the United States are in for a welcome surprise. The Good Doctors by prize-winning historian John Dittmer tells the heroic, and previously overlooked, story of an organization that stood at the barricades in every civil rights struggle from Selma to Chicago to Wounded Knee, battling inequality and racism in the medical profession while setting up clinics that today reach hundreds of thousands of underserved patients. The Good Doctors should be required reading for every American who views quality health care as a basic human right.”

—David Oshinsky, author of Polio: An American Story, winner of the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for History

“Deeply researched, brilliantly conceived, beautifully written and unsparing in its analysis of every character who walks across its pages, The Good Doctors is a triumph of passionate scholarship and balanced judgment.”

—James H. Jones, author of Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

“In this era of racial healing, The Good Doctors is a shocking reminder of how recently Jim Crow reigned over medical care in America. Well into the 1960s, many hospitals and doctors’ offices remained segregated, with blacks given separate and grossly unequal access to beds, waiting rooms, and other basic services. Dittmer tells the tale of the courageous few in the medical profession who fought racial injustice and went on to many other battles in the 1960s and early 1970s. Freedom Summer, Selma, the anti-war movement, Alcatraz, Wounded Knee—they’re all here, in this tour of a turbulent and inspiring time that speaks forcefully to our own.”

—Tony Horwitz, author of A Voyage Long and Strange: Rediscovering the New World and Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War

Product Details

Bloomsbury USA
Publication date:
Product dimensions:
9.52(w) x 6.42(h) x 1.18(d)

Read an Excerpt

The Good Doctors

The Medical Committee for Human Rights and the Struggle for Social Justice in Health Care

Copyright © 2009

John Dittmer
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-1-59691-567-1

Chapter One The Good Doctors

During the summer of 1963 civil rights activity intensified throughout the South. Direct action protests rocked Birmingham, Greensboro, Atlanta, and more than a hundred other cities in eleven southern states. The unleashing of police dogs on demonstrators in Birmingham helped persuade President Kennedy to submit a civil rights bill to Congress, which debated its controversial provisions throughout the summer and into the fall. Although the section desegregating public accommodations such as restaurants and hotels was the most prominent feature of the bill, the provision calling for an end to discrimination in federally assisted programs was of special interest to advocates of equal treatment in medical facilities.

In 1946 Congress had passed the Hospital Survey and Construction Act, more commonly called the Hill-Burton Act, after its principal sponsors. The law, providing millions of dollars of federal funds annually for hospital construction and expansion, stated that the facilities be available to "all persons ... without discrimination on account of race, creed, or color." Senator Lister Hill of Alabama then added the following wording: "But an exception shall be made in cases where separate hospital facilities are provided for separate population groups, if the plan makes equitable provision on the basis of need for facilities and services of like quality for each such group." This separate-but-equal clause was, in the words of political scientist David Barton Smith, "the only one in federal legislation of this century that explicitly permitted the use of federal funds to provide racially exclusionary services."

The Hill-Burton Act in practice did not provide equal hospital facilities for blacks. Ninety hospitals that had received federal construction grants from Hill-Burton refused to accept black patients, and as we have seen, throughout the South hospitals that did admit blacks subjected them to inferior and unhealthy accommodations. The National Medical Association had long opposed Hill-Burton, and in 1963 congressmen Adam Clayton Powell and John Dingell vowed to fight the discriminatory clause when the act came up for renewal. At the same time, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund had filed suit in federal court, maintaining that Hill-Burton as written and interpreted was unconstitutional.

On July 17 Walter Lear, representing the Medical Committee for Civil Rights, testified before the House Judiciary Committee, then holding hearings on the Kennedy civil rights bill. Lear supported the measure, noting that it would "clearly invalidate the 'separate but equal' clause of the Hill-Burton Act." But the point of his testimony was to expand the public accommodations section of the measure to include "non-profit, non-governmental hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, and other health facilities which provide an essential public service that would otherwise be provided by government agencies." "It seems anomalous," he told Congressman Powell, "that commercial enterprises serving the general public should be covered by this legislation but that non-profit hospitals serving the general public are not." This provision for expanded coverage was added to the final bill.

Lear's congressional testimony is evidence of the credibility, the Medical Committee had acquired in a short time. That summer its first newsletter went out to ten thousand health care personnel, including the entire membership of the NMA. Fund-raising letters resulted in enough money to pay Lear's business expenses, and the American Friends Service Committee provided space in its New York office. A national advisory board included such luminaries as Paul Dudley White, who had been President Eisenhower's personal physician. MCCR meetings attracted nurses, dentists, and other health care workers in addition to physicians. The group stepped up its attack on the AMA, which had refused to "use its well-known and greatly respected strength to help desegregate hospitals, medical societies, and all other aspects of medicine and health services." Unwilling to come out against the Jim Crow provisions of Hill-Burton, the AMA stood by its pallid 1950 resolution that "constituent and component societies having restrictive membership provisions based on race, study this question, with a view to taking such steps as they may elect to eliminate such restrictive provisions." As earlier, AMA leaders consistently maintained that they could not force state and local societies to admit black members.

On July 31, 1963, Lear and Mike Holloman submitted a list of questions to AMA president Edward R. Annis. They asked if Dr. Annis opposed racial segregation in general, and in particular the racially exclusive policies of medical societies and the segregation of patients in hospitals. Annis did not respond, but the issue would not go away. The AMA adopted a strategy to ignore MCCR and start talking to the less confrontational National Medical Association.

The MCCR Atlantic City protest had an impact on the NMA, for here a predominantly white group of physicians had taken the lead in attacking racial segregation in medicine while the major black medical society sat on the sidelines. "We're friendly with the AMA," explained John T. Givens, the NMA's executive secretary. "I wouldn't do anything to embarrass them." But shortly after the MCCR demonstration, NMA president John A. Kenney Jr., asked AMA officials for a meeting "to discuss racial problems in organized medicine," and the AMA agreed, suggesting its headquarters in Chicago as the site. That session, and its immediate aftermath, symbolized the changes taking place in the NMA leadership. On Tuesday, July 2, President Kenney and a delegation of black physicians met with AMA officials and agreed to hold further discussions, in which NMA representatives would lay out "specific charges of injustices against Negro physicians." The next day NMA president-elect, Kenneth Clement, was part of an NAACP-sponsored demonstration outside the AMA headquarters. Marching with Clement were Montague Cobb and two other members of the NMA board. When asked about the apparent rift in the NMA, Kenney replied that Clement had been invited to the meeting with the AMA, but he had refused to attend. "He'd rather picket," observed Kenney, concluding that "there is a new militancy in our organization."

The AMA reached out, briefly, to members of the black medical association. In August its president-elect, Norman A. Welch, addressed a plenary session of the NMA convention. Assuring delegates that the AMA opposed racial discrimination, he conceded that some county medical societies still refused to admit black physicians. "You are impatient and I don't blame you," he said, but he could only point to the earlier meeting between representatives of the two groups as a sign of progress. And Welch reaffirmed his earlier statement that he would not interfere with those southern medical societies that barred black doctors from membership.

By the end of the summer of 1963, the Medical Committee for Civil Rights had more than two hundred active members, most but not all from the New York City area. To demonstrate their visibility, and to show support for the civil rights movement, MCCR made plans for medical people to participate as a group in the March on Washington. More than two hundred health care workers assembled in Washington on the morning of August 28. The MCCR contingent lobbied members of Congress and had lunch at a local restaurant before assembling for the march itself. Lear recalls that day as "a very moving experience. What was very special was the range of support we had for the medical contingent, much broader than for the picketing of the AMA. The NMA turned out, marching under the MCCR banner, as did the American Nurses Association."

MCCR assisted civil rights workers in an unheralded program that began during the summer of 1963. While attending the IMHOTEP conference in Atlanta that spring, Lear stopped by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee office to talk with executive secretary James Forman, who agreed to lend SNCC support to the MCCR program. During the course of their conversation, Forman mentioned that a number of SNCC veterans were "getting very burned out, and they really needed to get away and rest up." Lear immediately thought of "the lovely summer homes in Westchester County and on Long Island of a number of the physicians I knew," and when he got back to New York he asked Trudy Orris to take on this project.

Born Gertrude Weissman, Trudy came from a poor family in New York. A full-time factory worker at age fourteen, she was active in the labor movement and at an early age became involved in the Communist Party. During World War II she was elected union steward at the clothing store where she worked. By that time she had met and married a young physician named Leo Orris. Brought up in a conservative, orthodox Jewish home, Leo became interested in socialism while in college. "In the thirties and forties if you were not a young leftist who were you? If you had any progressive ideas you were a leftist." Orris served as a military doctor during World War II. During the 1950s the Orrises supported accused atomic spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and became involved in the civil rights movement. Leo belonged to the Physicians Forum, and he was in that small group of physicians who picketed the AMA in Atlantic City. Trudy was the more politically involved of the two. An official in the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, she also became committed to the black protest movement. In early 1963 she took their sixteen-year-old son Peter with her on a freedom ride to Maryland, and responded enthusiastically when Lear told her of his plans for a rest-and-recreation retreat for civil rights workers.

During the summer of 1963, Trudy Orris made weekly trips to New York bus and train stations to meet arriving black SNCC activists. She showed them the city, gave them some orientation about the upper-middle-class families they would be staying with, and then sent them off to Westchester, Fire Island, and Martha's Vineyard vacation homes to enjoy a week of beach time, movies, good food, and conversation. At the end of the week, each host family held a fund-raising party, which raised twenty-five thousand dollars for SNCC that summer. SNCC made all the decisions about who would participate in the program, with Forman taking an active role and spending some time in New York himself. He and other SNCC leaders selected people suffering from burnout (or "battle fatigue," as it would later be called). Most never suspected they had been singled out for any reason except to raise money for SNCC. The summer R & R program was a great success, and it was repeated the following year. Trudy Orris and the white women who supported her worked hard so that the young black activists they admired so much could enjoy a carefree week before returning to the dangerous life of a SNCC field secretary in the Deep South.

After his eventful trip to Atlantic City, Dr. Robert Smith returned to Jackson and his job at the state mental hospital. He had met a number of progressive northern physicians at the AMA protest, who told him to call on them if he ever needed assistance, a promise he would remember. Smith did not return home a conquering hero, however, at least not in the eyes of the local medical establishment. To have one's picture prominently displayed in the New York Times-the symbol of the left-wing, integrationist press-was not the kind of visibility a young black physician desired if he wanted to continue to ply his trade in Mississippi. Smith resumed his work as the Tougaloo physician, attended movement meetings in the evenings, and recruited people for the March on Washington, although he did not go himself. He soon gained a reputation as the "doctor to the movement," as civil rights activists came to him with a variety of minor complaints as well as more serious physical and emotional problems. Often he would be called out of the city to treat victims of police abuse. (With only a handful of black physicians in Jackson, most of whom were nearing retirement age, Smith saw most of the COFO workers himself.

Although Smith had managed to stay out of trouble, his visibility as a civil rights activist and physician proved to be too much for his boss at the state mental hospital, who fired him in October of 1963. By then he knew he was not going to be drafted and was free to return to Chicago, where a residency in OB-GYN had been held open for him. Such a move would have benefited him professionally. But by now he was firmly committed to the black freedom struggle in his native state, and with the support of people like Dr. Britton, Bob Smith opened his own practice in the heart of the black community, near Jackson State College.

In the spring and summer of 1963, the movement was at high tide, with massive demonstrations in cities like Birmingham and Greensboro, the March on Washington Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I have a dream" speech, and President Kennedy's civil rights bill, which promised to end the jim crow system in the South. But then came the September church bombing in Birmingham with the death of four young black girls, followed by the assassination of John Kennedy on November 22. While movement activists did not regard Kennedy as a civil rights champion, his death came as a blow, especially since his successor, Lyndon Johnson, was a southerner with few civil rights credentials. And as the congressional debate over the civil rights bill dragged on month after month, supporters in the North became discouraged as well.

Walter Lear did not need to read the newspapers to know that the civil rights movement had lost some of its momentum. In the late spring he had put together the Medical Committee for Civil Rights. Within a short time nearly everyone in the medical profession knew of its existence, and it had gained credibility with the major civil rights organizations and their leaders. By late summer MCCR made plans to conduct health surveys in hospitals in ten southern cities, to increase its pressure on the AMA, and to expand its base by recruiting nurses, dentists, and other health workers. As with the movement as a whole, however, MCCR experienced a decline during the fall of 1963. It did not survive into the new year.

One major problem was lack of funding. According to Lear, he was "putting full time into MCCR work," and "could not afford to do that without being paid." At a steering committee meeting in late June, the question of putting him on salary was "deferred until the future activity and strength and finances [were] clarified." Attempts to raise money through mass mailings to physicians were unsuccessful, and by the fall the organization had contracted debts it could not pay. According to Lear, "We did not have the skill or energy to raise a lot of money." But to say that MCCR folded because it went broke is to beg the question. Civil rights for African Americans was not fashionable that fall. Without dramatic headlines of racial confrontations in the South, many white liberals, including physicians, turned their attention elsewhere.

As for Walter Lear, he accepted a position as deputy commissioner for the Department of Health in the city of Philadelphia and "after a month or so I closed the Medical Committee for Civil Rights." The unpaid MCCR bills followed him to Philadelphia, where he was hounded by creditors representing the Occidental Restaurant, where the medical group had dined before the March on Washington. It seems that some of the doctors had not paid for their meals, and as the coordinator he was held responsible. After sympathizing with the restaurant management about "the organization [MCCR] that took advantage of you and me [and is] now defunct," Lear paid the bill out of his own pocket. He would not be among the founding members of the Medical Committee for Human Rights.

Mississippians, both black and white, faced the new year with foreboding. In early 1964 Jim Crow still held sway in the Magnolia State, with black Mississippians relegated to inferior jobs, schools, and health care. Many black physicians had either retired or left the state. Almost no younger doctors were choosing to follow Dr. Smith's example and live and work in "The Closed Society." Two who did, Aaron Shirley and James Anderson, would have a major impact on both health care and on race relations in the months and years to come.


Excerpted from The Good Doctors by JOHN DITTMER Copyright © 2009 by John Dittmer. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Meet the Author

John Dittmer, Fillmore, Indiana, is the author of Black Georgia in the Progressive Era, 1900–1920 and Local People: The Struggle for Civil Rights in Mississippi, which was awarded the Bancroft Prize. He has taught in the history departments at Tougaloo College, Brown University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and DePauw University, where he is professor emeritus.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews

The Good Doctors: The Medical Committee for Human Rights and the Struggle for Social Justice in Health Care 4.3 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 3 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
lg4154 More than 1 year ago
This was an interesting read that took a little bit of time to read. You really have to be in a certain mindset to read it. I liked it and it amazed me on what the Doctors went thru during the Civil Rights Era. Not just the black Doctors, the white ones as well. Plus there is added insight in what the black patients and lower income persons as well. I really stopped and made me think the entire time period and what many people endured during this time. I think all people should read this book and it would help to have a better understanding on what both races went through. Not only the problems the Doctors faced, but the nurses as well. I really liked the afterward that gave updates on what each Doctor went on to do after the Civil Rights movement.
authorsamoliver More than 1 year ago
This book outlines a process whereby health care is a human right and not a priviledge. The medical committee for human rights in their committment for social justice in health care creates a path into healing that is attainable. It has long been noted that money buys you better care. This book is an attempt to share ideas on how this is not necessary and what can be done to elicit care as a fundamental obligation to all.