Canada is the only OECD country that has universal, comprehensive public hospital and medical insurance but lacks equivalent pharmaceutical coverage. In Ideas and the Pace of Change, Katherine Boothe explains the reasons for this unique situation. Using archival, interview, and polling data, Boothe compares the policy histories of Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia in order to understand why Canada followed a different path on pharmaceutical insurance.
Boothe argues that pace matters in policy change. Quick, radical change requires centralized political institutions, an elite consensus, and an engaged, attentive electorate. Without these prerequisites, states are far more likely to take a slower, incremental approach. But while rapid policy change reinforces the new consensus, incremental progress strengthens the status quo, letting development stall and raising the bar for achieving change.
An important contribution to the study of comparative political economy, Ideas and the Pace of Change should be required reading for anyone seeking to understand why health care reforms succeed or fail.
|Publisher:||University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division|
|Series:||Studies in Comparative Political Economy and Public Policy|
|Sold by:||Barnes & Noble|
|File size:||2 MB|
About the Author
Table of Contents
1: Reexamining Health System Variation
2: Explaining Stability and Change
3: Radical Reform or Incrementalism
4: Entrenched Ideas and Barriers to Major Change
5: Opportunities for Minor Change
6: Explaining Major Change: Rare Conditions For Program Expansion
What People are Saying About This
“In explaining why Canada lacks national, universal pharmaceutical insurance coverage, Ideas and the Pace of Change formulates an original framework for the analysis of policy change. Katherine Boothe’s empirical analysis is impeccably grounded in systematic archival research, as well as abundant interview and polling data.”
“Ideas and the Pace of Change is a real pleasure to read. Boothe’s attention to measuring and documenting how ideas affect policy development is impressive, and her work will be of interest to both academics and policy practitioners.”