Do we consciously cause our actions, or do they happen to us? Philosophers, psychologists, neuroscientists, theologians, and lawyers have long debated the existence of free will versus determinism. In this book Daniel Wegner offers a novel understanding of the issue. Like actions, he argues, the feeling of conscious will is created by the mind and brain. Yet if psychological and neural mechanisms are responsible for all human behavior, how could we have conscious will? The feeling of conscious will, Wegner shows, helps us to appreciate and remember our authorship of the things our minds and bodies do. Yes, we feel that we consciously will our actions, Wegner says, but at the same time, our actions happen to us. Although conscious will is an illusion, it serves as a guide to understanding ourselves and to developing a sense of responsibility and morality.Approaching conscious will as a topic of psychological study, Wegner examines the issue from a variety of angles. He looks at illusions of the will -- those cases where people feel that they are willing an act that they are not doing or, conversely, are not willing an act that they in fact are doing. He explores conscious will in hypnosis, Ouija board spelling, automatic writing, and facilitated communication, as well as in such phenomena as spirit possession, dissociative identity disorder, and trance channeling. The result is a book that sidesteps endless debates to focus, more fruitfully, on the impact on our lives of the illusion of conscious will.
|Sold by:||Barnes & Noble|
|File size:||4 MB|
About the Author
The late Daniel M. Wegner was Professor of Psychology at Harvard University.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
Daniel M. Wegner¿s book is a lucid, entertaining exploration of one of the most important issues in philosophy and psychology: the existence of will. Extreme determinists contend that people are mechanisms programmed to do what they do and that any notion of freedom or choice is merely illusory. Their antagonists, the proponents of free will, say that people consciously freely choose to act (at least some of the time). Wegner falls into the former camp. Conscious will, he says, is an illusion. But in a wide-ranging ramble that touches on law and the courts, spirit possession, hypnotism, neuroscience, phantom limbs and Ouija boards among other things, he builds a strong anecdotal case that this illusion is essential to being human. The book is curiously desultory, now citing some experiment on the brain in deadly earnest academic language, and then tossing off a flip remark about a popular stage magician or an apparently very clever horse. We find it both entertaining and elucidating, although it may not always rise to the most demanding standards of philosophical evidence and argument.
Wegner fails to address the fact that effective influence from environment does not negate conscious will. The sense of free will is not an illusion. The fact some peoples' choices can be manipulated just shows that there are many levels to decision making and that if a manipulator knows how to contrive information or situations, sometimes a particular different outcome can be produced. But even then, the person who is manipulated is still innocently using their free will within the operative decision making criteria that their personality has developed during their life. Every part of a person's criteria of personality forms from their personal evaluations of their experiences. Every formative evaluation is an act of free will.
Free will is more a factor of personal development of personality responses than it is any particular performance. Personality forms in an individual so that they may act automatically to familiar situations. Personality predictability is not non-free will, but is instead the manifstation of trained character traits that serve the person as a convenience in their life's situations.
The problem with all refutations of conscious will is that they demand total non influence from experience and environment. Non adaptibility and non influence describes insanity and autism, not free will. Free will provides a person with adaptible active input in life's varying situations. It is a survival mechanism
THINK LIKE A SALAMANDER! or don't. What did you do in response to that sentence? Whatever you did, the part of you that decides, that seems to decide, is you, is your free will. Wegner would convince you that you are not real. This may seem trivial, but it strikes at the very dignity of life and self esteem.
Free will is real. If Wegner doesn¿t think so, then I guess that is what he chooses. If a person does accept free will's validity, they are likely be a more responsible person who expects the same from those they trust. Dignity and responsibility are the stakes in the discussion of free will and its validity.