Kantian Consequentialism
The central problem for normative ethics is the conflict between a consequentialist view—that morality requires promoting the good of all—and a belief that the rights of the individual place significant constraints on what may be done to help others. Standard interpretations see Kant as rejecting all forms of consequentialism, and defending a theory which is fundamentally duty-based and agent-centered. Certain actions, like sacrificing the innocent, are categorically forbidden. In this original and controversial work, Cummiskey argues that there is no defensible basis for this view, that Kant's own arguments actually entail a consequentialist conclusion. But this new form of consequentialism which follows from Kant's theories has a distinctly Kantian tone. The capacity of rational action is prior to the value of happiness; thus providing justification for the view that rational nature is more important than mere pleasures and pains.
1135376882
Kantian Consequentialism
The central problem for normative ethics is the conflict between a consequentialist view—that morality requires promoting the good of all—and a belief that the rights of the individual place significant constraints on what may be done to help others. Standard interpretations see Kant as rejecting all forms of consequentialism, and defending a theory which is fundamentally duty-based and agent-centered. Certain actions, like sacrificing the innocent, are categorically forbidden. In this original and controversial work, Cummiskey argues that there is no defensible basis for this view, that Kant's own arguments actually entail a consequentialist conclusion. But this new form of consequentialism which follows from Kant's theories has a distinctly Kantian tone. The capacity of rational action is prior to the value of happiness; thus providing justification for the view that rational nature is more important than mere pleasures and pains.
220.0 Out Of Stock
Kantian Consequentialism

Kantian Consequentialism

by David Cummiskey
Kantian Consequentialism

Kantian Consequentialism

by David Cummiskey

Hardcover(New Edition)

$220.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Temporarily Out of Stock Online
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

The central problem for normative ethics is the conflict between a consequentialist view—that morality requires promoting the good of all—and a belief that the rights of the individual place significant constraints on what may be done to help others. Standard interpretations see Kant as rejecting all forms of consequentialism, and defending a theory which is fundamentally duty-based and agent-centered. Certain actions, like sacrificing the innocent, are categorically forbidden. In this original and controversial work, Cummiskey argues that there is no defensible basis for this view, that Kant's own arguments actually entail a consequentialist conclusion. But this new form of consequentialism which follows from Kant's theories has a distinctly Kantian tone. The capacity of rational action is prior to the value of happiness; thus providing justification for the view that rational nature is more important than mere pleasures and pains.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780195094534
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication date: 01/18/1996
Edition description: New Edition
Pages: 208
Product dimensions: 9.36(w) x 6.34(h) x 0.75(d)
Lexile: 1420L (what's this?)

About the Author

Bates College
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews