London: The Novel

London: The Novel

by Edward Rutherfurd

NOOK Book(eBook)

View All Available Formats & Editions

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now


“A TOUR DE FORCE . . . London tracks the history of the English capital from the days of the Celts until the present time. . . . Breathtaking.”—The Orlando Sentinel

A master of epic historical fiction, Edward Rutherford gives us a sweeping novel of London, a glorious pageant spanning two thousand years. He brings this vibrant city's long and noble history alive through his saga of ever-shifting fortunes, fates, and intrigues of a half-dozen families, from the age of Julius Caesar to the twentieth century. Generation after generation, these families embody the passion, struggle, wealth, and verve of the greatest city in the Old World.

Praise for London

“Remarkable . . . The invasion by Julius Caesar’s legions in 54 B.C. . . . The rise of chivalry and the Crusades . . . The building of the Globe theatre . . . and the coming of the Industrial Revolution. . . . What a delightful way to get the feel of London and of English history. . . . We witness first-hand the lust of Henry VIII. We overhear Geoffrey Chaucer deciding to write The Canterbury Tales. . . . Each episode is a punchy tale made up of bite-size chunks ending in tiny cliffhangers.”—The New York Times

“Hold-your-breath suspense, buccaneering adventure, and passionate tales of love and war.”The Times (London)

“Fascinating . . . A sprawling epic.”San Francisco Chronicle

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780307806024
Publisher: Random House Publishing Group
Publication date: 09/07/2011
Sold by: Random House
Format: NOOK Book
Pages: 1152
Sales rank: 341
File size: 9 MB

About the Author

Edward Rutherfurd lives and writes in New York City. He was born in Salisbury, England, and educated in Cambridge.

Read an Excerpt

54 BC

Fifty-four years before the birth of Christ, at the end of a cold, star-filled spring night, a crowd of two hundred people stood in a semicircle by the bank of the river and waited for the dawn.

Ten days had passed since the ominous news had come.

In front of them, at the water's edge, was a smaller group of five figures. Silent and still, in their long grey roves they might have been taken for so many standing stones. These were the druids, and they were about to perform a ceremony which, it was hoped, would save the island and their world.

Amongst those gathered by the riverbank were three people, each of whom, whatever hopes or fears they may have had concerning the threat ahead, guarded a personal and terrible secret.

One was a boy, the second a woman, the third a very old man.

There were many sacred sites along the lengthy course of the river. But nowhere was the spirit of the great river so clearly present than at this quiet place.

Here, sea and river met. Downstream, in a series of huge loops, the ever widening flow passed through open marshland until, about ten miles away, it finally opened out into the long, eastward funnel of the estuary and out to the cold North Sea. Upstream, the river meandered delightfully between pleasant woods and lush, level meadows. But at this point, between two of the river's great bends, lay a most gracious stretch of water, two and a half miles long, where the river flowed eastwards in a single, majestic sweep.

It was tidal. At high tide, when the incoming sea in the estuary reversed the current, this river road was a thousand yards across; at low tide, only three hundred. In the centre, halfway along the southern bank where the marshes formed little islands, a single gravel spit jutted out into the stream forming a promontory at low water, and becoming an island when the tide was high. It was on the top of this spit that the little crowd was standing. Opposite them, on the northern bank, lay the place, now deserted, that bore the name of Londinos.

Londinos. Even now, in the dawning light, the shape of the ancient place could be seen clearly across the water: two low gravel hills with levelled tops rising side by side about eighty feet above the waterfront. Between the two hills ran a little brook. To the left, on the western flank, a larger stream descended to a broad inlet that interrupted the northern bank.

On the eastern side of the two hills, there had once been a small hillfort whose low earthwork wall, now empty, could serve as a lookout post for vessels approaching from the estuary. The western hill was sometimes used by the druids when they sacrificed oxen.

And the was all there was. An abandoned settlement. A sacred spot. The tribal centres were to the north and south. The tribes over whom the great chief Cassivelaunus was master lived in the huge eastern tracts above the estuary. The tribe of Cantii, in the long peninsula south of the estuary, had already given that region the name of Kent. The river was a border between them, Londinos a sort of no-man's-land.

The very name was obscure. Some said that a man called Londinos had lived there; others suggested that it might refer to the little earthwork on the eastern hill. But nobody knew. Somehow, in the last thousand years, the place had got the name.

The cold breeze was coming up the river from the estuary. There was a faint, sharp smell of mud and riverweed. Above, the bright morning star was beginning to fade as the clear sky turned to a paler blue.

The boy shivered. He had been standing an hour and he was cold. Like most of the folk there, he wore a simple woolen tunic that reached to the knees and was fastened at the waist with a leather belt. Beside him stood his mother holding a baby, and his sister little Branwen, whom he held by the hand. For it was his task at such times to keep her in order.

He was a bright, brave little fellow, dark-haired and blue-eyed, like most of his Celtic people. His name was Segovax and he was nine. A closer inspection, however, would have revealed two unusual features in his appearance. On the front of his head on the forelock, grew a patch of white hair, as though someone had dabbed it with a brush of white dye. Such hereditary marks were to be found amongst several families dwelling in the hamlets along that region of the river. "You needn't worry," his mother had told him. "A lot of women think it's a sign that you're lucky."

The second feature was much stranger. When the boy spread his fingers, it could be seen that between them, as far as the first joint, was a thin layer of skin, like the webbing on a duck's foot. This too was an inherited trait, although it did not show itself in every generation. It was as though, in some distant, primordial time some gene in a fish-like prototype of Man had obstinately refused to change its watery character entirely, and so passed on this vestige of its origins. Indeed, with his large-eyed face and his wiry little body, the boy did somehow make one think of a tadpole or some other little creature of the waters, a quick survivor down the endless eons of time.

His grandfather had also exhibited the condition. "But they cut the extra skin away when he was a baby," Segovax's father had told his wife. She could not bear the thought of the knife, though, and so nothing had been done. It did not trouble the boy.

Segovax glanced around at his family: little Branwen, with her affectionate nature and her fits of temper that no one could control; the baby boy in his mother's arms, just starting to walk and babble his first words; his mother pale and strangely distracted of late. How he loved them. But as he stared past the druids, his face broke into a little smile. By the water's edge was a modest raft with two men standing beside it. And one of them was his father.

They shared so much, father and son. The same little tuft of white hair, the same large eyes. His father's face, scoured by crease lines almost resembling scales, made one think of some solemn, fish-like creature. So dedicated was he that the local people referred to him simply as the Fisher. And though other men, Segovax realized, were physically stronger than this quiet fellow with his curved back and long arms, none was kinder or more quietly determined. "He may not be much to look at," the men in the hamlet would say, "but the Fisher never gives up." His mother, Segovax knew, adored his father. So did he.

Which was why, the day before, he had formed the daring plan that, if he managed to carry it out, would probably cost him his life.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

London 4.2 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 85 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This is the best way to learn about British history. Moreover, you'll feel you've spent a few intense days in this historical city. The book traces the progression of six London families through the changing face of London through 2,000 years. Each chapter introduces new characters and events, so the narrative never grows cold. The chapters could nearly stand alone as short stories, but each triumph and adventure leaves you hungry for the next. Be prepared, however, to put 'the present' on hold for several days. You won't want to put this one down.
Guest More than 1 year ago
My adult niece gave me Rutherfurd¿s second book, RUSSKA, as a Christmas gift several years ago. I enjoyed it so much that I went looking for SARUM, and I¿ve since purchased his two more recent books. As I write this review, I have put THE FOREST aside for awhile because Rutherfurd¿s works can be overwhelming to read one after another. LONDON¿s twenty-one self-contained tales begin in 54 B.C., and follow several families through often intertwining generations until 1997. We¿re there when each acquires its surname. We watch as those surnames change; as fortunes are made and lost; as respectability and social status wax and wane, for those who come to call themselves 'Bull' and 'Ducket,' 'Doggett' and 'Silversleeves,' 'Meredith' and 'Barnikel.' Each story carries the unique flavor of the era depicted, and each deals with that time period¿s defining events. I¿ve heard Rutherfurd compared to James A. Michener, and with that I certainly agree. Both writers concentrate on a particular geographic area, and tell the story of that area¿s people over a grand sweep of time. However, I do not see Rutherfurd¿s characters (or Michener¿s, for that matter) as figures sketched in for the storyteller¿s convenience. Each major character in the pages of LONDON is created in enough carefully chosen detail to take on individual life. I particularly enjoyed meeting such colorful figures as 'Dame Barnikel,' who founded a dynastic brewery in a time when most married women controlled no property; the Doggett sisters, twin prostitutes with far more respectable descendants; and Helen Meredith, aristocratic ambulance driver during the Blitz. A great deal of background for each tale is presented to the reader in narrative, 'telling instead of showing' format; but Rutherfurd¿s alternative would have been writing twenty-one novels, because each of his self-contained chapters contains enough material for a complete book. His work feels more condensed than Michener¿s, and that undoubtedly is why. What these two epic writers have in common is their storytelling¿s richness. LONDON supplied me with a good, long, thoroughly engrossing read!
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
This work, while not Rutherfurd's best effort, is none-the-less a solid effort. If you love history, you'll love this book. The main problem I have with the book is that the exposition overwhelms all other aspects of the novel. In historical epics one expects lots of exposition, but when it gets to the point that the characters actions and dialogues are squeezed off the page to make room for the author's observations it gets to be a bit heavy. That is the reason I scored this book as a four-star overall rather than a five. Some of the characters I thought were very well done--when allowed to act out their parts on the page. The plots of each individual story were mostly okay, except for the times that the author chose to tell us, rather than let the characters show us. But all in all, a good book.
Caregiver55 More than 1 year ago
As an English-born American, I thought I knew English history. This book not only provides a fascinating story of several fictional families from the time of the druids through the 20th century, the historically-accurate facts add a richness to the book. Recommended for any lover of historically-accurate fiction.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Well worth the read; an entertaining way to learn bits of history
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
After many trips to England and falling in love with London I find my self leaning toward being an Anglophile! This book gave me insight into so many places I had been in London. knowing how those names and how those places came to be has really made this book special to me. I am definitely a fan of Edward Rutherfurd having read his book, NEW YORK first and found the same wonderful stories and characters that wind through the generations from the beginning to the end. If historical fiction is your read you will enjoy his books. I found myself staying up late many nights as his books fascinating.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
London is now one of the best books I have ever read. The fact that London covers such a long time period was new to me, but now I think I rather like this idea. However, the down side to having such a long time period is the massive amount of characters. With last names like Ducket and Dogget, it was rather easy for me to confuse families, names, and history. The cast list in the beginning was help, but with so many supporting characters, it was not enough. Even with this, the plot that varied by chapters was rather fun. Another thing I liked was the way Rutherfurd incoporated historical events, like Handel and the buring of London. This gave the book accuarcy and gave insight to the time period. I also liked how Rutherfurd varied the social status of his characters. It was fascinating to read how very different living conditions could vary from place to place. I just wish the book had focused just a little more on the 1700s.
Guest More than 1 year ago
The characters through the centuries combined with archeology details of buildings, roads, artifacts used along with civic lessons on early basis of law is fascinating. I love discovering roots of capitalism, and London, with the establishment of contract laws and land ownership, became the basis for America's legal code for property ownership, contracts and owner rights which are foundations of owning, lending, using and creating capital for the betterment of a society. This sweeping view from Roman settlement, Saxon conquest, Tudor, Victorian and correlated influences of Vikings, Celts, Normandy, etc. plus the influences of the Roman Church, Crusades, and on and on is truly a joy for someone wanting a broad sweep of when and why London came to be the center of the British colonial Empire. Also inspires thought of connections of America's colonists and their backgrounds and understanding of tradition, code and conduct which eventually shaped the American nation.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I am a teacher in a Brookyln High School. I have used this text as a basis for an in-depth study of British History and Literature and as an inspiration for a geneological research undertaking I have my students do. The time-sweeping novel is gripping, informative, as well as sophisticated in its story-telling. I recommend it to anyone who has the time.
Rachel Banker More than 1 year ago
I started reading this while in London. It was interesting to be in the places in the book while reading about them.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This novel blew me away. From page one, I was hooked. It took me a mere four days to finish this monster of a book for the simple fact that I couldn't put it down. As an American who is fascinated with everything British, Rutherford made my desire to move there more acute. If you want a detailed historical account of London with an incredible storyline to go with it, this book is for you.
Guest More than 1 year ago
great story and a look into what life might have been like in London through out 2000 years.
Karen Mueller 4 months ago
mahallett on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
each cassette side is a story about a different period of london history always with a character with webbed fingers. each character is in the same area and leaves something there which an archeologist could find, but all in all not that interesting.
lornay on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I liked it and I didn't expect to. I wasn't a fan of Sarum when it first came out. Now I will have to re-read Sarum based on my enjoyment of London. The characters in London are believable and face real conflicts. I also like the etymological angle where place names are explained.
bokai on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I don't usually associate 800+ pages with the term 'beach read', but that is what London turned out to be, a very long beach read. As entertaining as it was, it was shallow, and Rutherfurd did not meet the challenge of writing a single piece of fiction that encompassed all of human history with complete success. It was somewhat entertaining to see the multiple family lines London follows mingle, split, and warp through the ages, and up until the chapter The Tower, the novelty of London's concept was still fresh. There were some moments of real suspense at times, and once or twice a character would stand out from the multitudes of his or her kin, but soon the plot of each chapter was feeling tedious, and the characters were all melding into each other, with only the context of their era giving them strong distinction.For the most part, each chapter in London is a sub story separate from the others by some great rift in time or made distinct by some important event in London's history. While many chapters can stand alone in this way, there are a few that seem to lack any sort of closure, and by the next chapter Rutherfurd has moved on to something else so that I was left asking 'wait, that's it?'. Some chapters, particularly near the end, seems to be short slice of life moments that catch up on a few stray threads and leave it at that. Like any healthy family tree, the population of characters in London balloons out and becomes so unwieldy that there doesn't seem to be any focus by the end. There is some illustration of how people have changed with the times (which I grant was one of the most interesting parts of the book), but the reader is given no time to familiarize himself with the setting before he is whisked away to the next decade. At its worst London feel like an endless parade of introductions for this reason.It is its prose that screams beach read the loudest. It is firmly decent and unobtrusive. It is a rare occasion that a line is worth reading for its own sake, and there were bits I would have edited the heck out of myself, but it was all easily digestible in the end. There is nothing challenging in here, nor is there anything offensive. London is about as OK a novel as I will ever read.
Anntstobbs on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
This was a very good but very long book. I traces the history of the town of London from the early 500 a.d. until 1995. It traces the history of the Doggett, Bull and Silversleeves families. Every different chapter is an entirely new book with new characters and new stories with only the traces of family history and the London tow changes to bundle them together. I loved it.
MissReadsTooMuch on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I did enjoy the beginning of this book but found it became a little repetitive as time went on - same family, same family dynamics, just with different historical events going on outside. I wish he would have followed the history of more than one family through the entire book. I did read the whole thing and always admire Rutherford's writing style but was disappointed with one tiny aspect of the ending that I won't go into right now, but I would like to run into someone else who has finished the book so I can ask why they think the author chose to close one plot lone the way he did.
MikeD on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Like Michner, Rutherford knows how to give a history lesson in a novel... and does it very well here! We start in 54 AD on the river Thames following a family whose father has a couple unique physical characteristics and follow this family thru many generations culminating in 1997 AD. During this adventure we learn much about the history of London and meet many historical characters who interact with this family. Richard the Lion Hearted, Becket, Oliver Cromwell, Henry VIII, Will Shakespere, and many more. A long read at almost 1200 pages, but well worth it!
BoomChick on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I read this before going to London and have also recommended it to many people. I love Rutherfurd, he's great. He does use the word "estuary" kind of a lot!
santhony on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Typical Rutherfurd historical fiction, with London as the subject. Very similar in style to much of Michener's work.
SaraPoole on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I¿ve been a fan of Rutherfurd¿s since reading his debut novel, ¿Sarum¿. ¿London¿ remains my favorite, possibly because of my great fondness for that city but also because of the bang-up job Rutherfurd does bringing it to life. He starts at the beginning¿the end of the last Ice Age¿and goes full-tilt from there on. Following the fortunes of six families, the story winds through the Roman occupation to the days of Chaucer, the Globe Theatre, Dickens, and beyond. The pace is fast, characters come and go a little quickly, but overall this is a satisfying read that will sweep you away into the heart and soul of a fascinating city.
LTFL_JMLS on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Quite a long one... but London's been around for a long time! I liked the way the story followed families through the history of the city, all they way from Roman times to the present. I didn't really care for the ending in 1997 - it seemed a bit anticlimactic - but I guess it's hard to end such a monumental work.
gregory_gwen on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Quite a long one... but London's been around for a long time! I liked the way the story followed families through the history of the city, all they way from Roman times to the present. I didn't really care for the ending in 1997 - it seemed a bit anticlimactic - but I guess it's hard to end such a monumental work.
nicky_too on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Years ago I bought 'Sarum' which I enjoyed very much. When I heard that there were quite a few other books by Edward Rutherfurd I wanted to read them as well. It took me a few weeks, but I've just finished 'London'.It's quite a lot of pages - almost 1,300.But it's worth it.The concept is the same as in 'Sarum'. The main character in the book is basically the town/city and the people provide a way to tell the story. There are a few main families and through them you get to know the place where they live.I think it's wonderful to read about people who actually existed. The people Edward Rutherfurd made up fit in perfectly. And of course, if you've ever been to London, there's a lot of recognition. I have to say that in this case I got lost sometimes. Thankfully each chapter can be read on its own. If anything from the families' past is important the author refers to it.I would definitely recommend this book to other readers.